EAM Jaishankar meets China's Vice President Han Zheng, points to improvement in bilateral ties
During his meeting with Han Zheng, Jaishankar expressed India's support for China's Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Presidency.
In a post on X, Jaishankar stated, 'Pleased to meet Vice President Han Zheng soon after my arrival in Beijing today. Conveyed India's support for China's SCO Presidency. Noted the improvement in our bilateral ties. And expressed confidence that discussions during my visit will maintain that positive trajectory.'
https://x.com/DrSJaishankar/status/1944589556491440326
In his opening remarks at the meeting with Han, Jaishankar expressed confidence that discussions during his visit will maintain that positive trajectory. He noted that the ties between two nations have been improving since the meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Kazan.
He said, 'India supports a successful Chinese presidency at the SCO. Excellency, our bilateral relationship, as you have pointed, has been steadily improving since the meeting between Prime Minister Modi and President Xi Jinping in Kazan last October. I am confident that my discussions in this visit will maintain that positive trajectory.'
Jaishankar stated that India and China have marked the 75th anniversary of diplomatic ties. He mentioned that the resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra is widely appreciated in India.
He said, 'We have marked, Excellency, the 75th anniversary of the establishment of our diplomatic relations. The resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra is also widely appreciated in India. Continued normalization of our ties can produce mutually beneficial outcomes.'
He also talked about the prevailing international situation. He said, 'The international situation, as we meet today, Excellency, is very complex. As neighboring nations and major economies, an open exchange of views and perspectives between India and China is very important. I look forward to such discussions during this visit.'
Jaishankar arrived in China after concluding his visit to Singapore, his first trip to China in five years. He is expected to meet his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, for a bilateral meeting on Monday.
Jaishankar and Wang Yi last met in February on the sidelines of a G20 meeting in Johannesburg, where both sides echoed calls for mutual trust and support.
Jaishankar will also attend Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Tianjin on July 15. The Ministry of External Affairs confirmed that 'EAM will visit the People's Republic of China to participate in the SCO Council of Foreign Ministers' Meeting (CFM) being held in Tianjin. EAM will also hold bilateral meetings on the sidelines of the CFM.'
This is External Affairs Minister's first visit to China since relations soured following the deadly military clash in Galwan in 2020. Jaishankar's visit follows visits by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, who had travelled to China in June for the SCO meetings.
Wang Yi is also expected to visit India next month to meet NSA Ajit Doval -- part of a planned round of dialogue under the Special Representatives (SR) mechanism aimed at resolving the decades-old boundary dispute.
The 2020 Galwan Valley standoff between India and China was the worst border clash in over 40 years, resulting in the death of soldiers on both sides. The incident sharply escalated tensions and brought bilateral ties to a historic low.
The decision to revive the SR dialogue and other dormant channels was reportedly taken during a brief exchange between PM Modi and President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of a summit in Kazan, Russia, in October last year. There have been a few glimmers of positive movement, most notably the resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra after nearly five years. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
Kerala woman's UAE horror: Kills child, self after dowry torture, molestation
5:04 External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar met with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the SCO Summit, his first visit to China in five years. During the meeting, Jaishankar raised concerns about trade restrictions imposed by China, including controls on rare earth material exports that affect India's EV sector and the blocking of tunnel boring machines for the bullet train project. He stressed the need to normalize relations and people-to-people exchanges, stating, 'It is also essential in this context that restrictive trade measures and roadblocks are avoided.' The discussions also covered the need to complete the border disengagement and de-escalation process and the sharing of hydrological data for the Brahmaputra River. This meeting occurs as efforts are underway to repair relations following the October 2024 meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi in Kazan.
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's copper tariff: Twisted logic won't help re-industrialize America
US President Donald Trump's proposed 50% tariff on copper imports is emblematic of his administration's incoherent approach to economic policy: Soaked in nostalgia for America's industrial past, it pursues strategies that will make it harder for US manufacturers to succeed now and in the future. Trump noted that copper 'is necessary for Semiconductors, Aircraft, Ships, Ammunition, Data Centers, Lithium-ion Batteries, Radar Systems, Missile Defense Systems, and even, Hypersonic Weapons, of which we are building many." So why would you then want to raise taxes on copper? Increasing the price Americans pay for copper makes the US a less desirable location for building aircraft, ceding advantage to competing producers in Europe, Brazil and Canada. It makes it harder to establish a domestic semiconductor manufacturing industry. It exacerbates the already dire state of the US shipbuilding industry, which is wholly reliant on protectionist policies. Also Read: Copper offers India a glowing hot opportunity: Now for a strategy The strategic value of copper might be a basis for protectionism if the US were getting its copper from hostile or unstable countries. But copper is not a rare earth mineral for which the US must rely on Chinese suppliers, nor is it like oil in the pre-fracking era, when the US had to import it from questionable regimes in the Middle East. The majority of US copper imports come from Chile, and the next two major suppliers are Canada and Peru. Meanwhile, America also has a robust domestic copper industry, which accounts for about half the copper used in the US. The majority of this copper comes from the swing state of Arizona, which may offer a narrow partisan rationale for copper protectionism. But there is no strategic problem with importing copper from friendly countries in the Western Hemisphere— and every reason to worry that deliberately raising the price of a widely used production input will hamper US competitiveness in crucial industries. This is, unfortunately, not an unusual consequence of Trump's trade policy: By applying taxes on intermediate goods, he is encouraging the US to specialize in resource extraction and primary commodities at the expense of complicated manufactured goods. Also Read: American puzzle: Trump's tariffs have resulted in an inflation paradox 'Industrial policy' functions by moving a nation's economy up the value chain. In the early days of the American Republic, for example, Alexander Hamilton worried that the US would continue to be a de facto economic colony of Europe. As a sparsely populated nation with abundant natural resources, a totally unregulated market might have caused America to specialize in exporting raw materials to Europe, which would in turn export manufactured goods back to America. As an alternative, he proposed protective tariffs to promote the growth of US industry. Trump borrows his own tariffs from the Hamiltonian tradition, but completely misses the larger logic of the programme and the altered nature of the modern economy. Over time, as the world has become richer and shipping has become cheaper, the cutting edge of manufacturing has become increasingly complicated. These days it's common to assemble a finished product from parts made in countries all around the world, with each part itself containing a staggering array of raw materials. Countries get richer by specializing at the more complex end of the spectrum. To the extent that you can boost US natural-resource production by eliminating low-benefit regulatory barriers, that's a win. But boosting the US copper-extraction industry at the expense of US copper-using industries is a recipe for de-industrialization. And much the same applies to Trump's obsession with protectionism for industries like steel and aluminium. For the US to be a manufacturing powerhouse, its industries need access to the cheapest possible inputs. Also Read: Chinese history shows how a closed economy could squander a nation's greatness It's also worth considering that even though 19th-century pro-industrialization politicians favoured tariffs, Trump is likely overrating their importance in promoting the growth of factories. One important manufacturing input, after all, is workers. The kind of quasi-open borders of the Gilded Age would probably not be a major boost to US manufacturing today. But a serious industrial policy would consider the case for a visa programme for skilled workers with experience in fields such as semiconductors, batteries and shipbuilding. At a minimum, the goal should be to avoid actions that make things worse. Copper is important because it's used to make other stuff. The goal of US trade policy, not to say industrial policy, should be to help America become a better place to make stuff that the world wants. Trump's nostalgia economics is pushing the US further from that goal. ©Bloomberg The author is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Running full-blown circus aimed at destroying India's foreign policy': Congress hits out at S Jaishankar
The Congress on Tuesday hit out at External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar for saying that India and China have made good progress in the past nine months towards the normalisation of bilateral relations, with Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, saying that he 'is now running a full-blown circus aimed at destroying India's foreign policy'. Taking a swipe at Jaishankar in a post on X, Gandhi said, 'I guess the Chinese foreign minister will come and apprise [Prime Minister Narendra] Modi about recent developments in China-India ties. The EAM is now running a full blown circus aimed at destroying India's foreign policy.' Jaishankar made the remarks on Monday on his first visit to China since the military standoff along the Line of Actual Control in eastern Ladakh began in May 2020. He told Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi that while India and China have made good progress in the past nine months towards the normalisation of bilateral relations, they should work to address de-escalation on the border. The Congress also released a statement on Tuesday, saying that it would like to 'remind the EAM of recent developments in bilateral ties since the PM's last tête-à-tête with President Xi'. 'China gave total support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, turning it into a testing ground for network-centric warfare and weapon systems such as the J-10C fighter and PL-15E air-to-air missile and assorted drones. Deputy Chief of Army Staff Lt Gen Rahul R Singh has stated that India fought three adversaries in Sindoor, including China that gave Pakistan 'live inputs' i.e. real time intelligence on Indian military operations. Pakistan is likely to acquire Chinese J-35 stealth fighters in the near future,' said the statement, released by Congress MP and communication in charge Jairam Ramesh. The statement further said that China 'has restricted exports to India of critical materials like rare-earth magnets, speciality fertilisers, and tunnel-boring machines for infrastructure projects'. 'Important sectors like telecoms, pharmaceuticals, and electronics remain critically dependent on Chinese imports, even as the trade deficit with China reaches a record $99.2 billion,' it said. The party also said that 'Indian patrols continue to require Chinese concurrence to reach their patrolling points in Depsang, Demchok, and Chumar'. ''Buffer zones' in Galwan, Hot Spring, and Pangong Tso lie predominantly within the Indian claim line, preventing our troops from accessing points to which they had unrestricted access before April 2020,' said the statement. The Congress said that 'this kowtowing to China is unsurprising given the EAM's beliefs'. Quoting an interview from two years ago, the statement said: 'Look, they are the bigger economy. What am I going to do? As a smaller economy, am I going to pick up a fight with the bigger economy?' Targeting PM Modi, the Congress said, 'His boss, the Prime Minister of the laal ankh, had similarly given a public clean chit to the Chinese with his statement of June 19, 2020, when he said, 'Na koi hamari seema mein ghus aaya hai, na hi koi ghusa hua hai'.' The party asked 'when the EAM and his boss the PM are going to take the people of India into confidence and hold a detailed debate on China in Parliament as the Indian National Congress has been calling for since 2020'. The Congress said that it hoped that PM Modi would agree to such a discussion and 'break the five-year drought' in the forthcoming Monsoon session of Parliament. 'If Parliament could debate the border situation in November 1962 when the Chinese invasion was at its peak, why cannot we discuss now – especially given that both sides appear to want renormalisation (albeit without necessarily restoring the May 2020 status, quo on the Line of Actual Control in Eastern Ladakh)?' the statement said. It added, 'It is essential to build a national consensus on the critical security and economic challenges arising from China's rise as the world's leading manufacturing power and its position as the second-largest economy, one that may well surpass the United States within a decade.'
