logo
Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capeheart quits editorial board over dispute with white colleague: ‘Robbing me of my humanity'

Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capeheart quits editorial board over dispute with white colleague: ‘Robbing me of my humanity'

New York Post27-05-2025
A black Washington Post opinion writer said he quit the newspaper's editorial board over a dispute with a white colleague about a piece concerning Georgia's voting laws that he didn't agree with — accusing her of 'robbing me of my humanity,' according to a report.
Jonathan Capehart, who was the only African American member of the editorial board when he quit in 2023, writes in a new book titled 'Yet Here I Am: Lessons from a Black Man's Search for Home,' that he stepped down over a dispute with another opinion editor, Karen Tumulty, the news site Semafor reported.
In his book, Capehart, who remains a columnist at the paper, writes that he clashed with Tumulty over an editorial which took issue with then-President Joe Biden's criticism of a 2021 Georgia voting law.
5 Jonathan Capehart is a Washington Post opinion columnist.
Getty Images
Biden described the law as 'Jim Crow 2.0' — a characterization that the Washington Post editorial board deemed to be 'hyperbolic.'
That didn't sit well with Capehart, who agreed with Biden's view of the law and was upset that the editorial may make it appear as if he supported the board's position that it was 'hyperbolic,' according to Semafor.
According to the book, Capehart was incensed when Tumulty later did not apologize to him for publishing it. He wrote that he felt additionally put off when Tumulty said Biden's choice of words was insulting to people who had lived through racial segregation in the South.
'Tumulty took an incident where I felt she ignored and compounded the insult by robbing me of my humanity,' he wrote in the book, which was published last week.
'She either couldn't or wouldn't see that I was black, that I came to the conversation with knowledge and history she could never have, that my worldview, albeit different from hers, was equally valid.'
Capehart left the editorial board after complaining about the incident to human resources and other senior figures at the paper, Semafor reported.
5 Capehart reportedly clashed with fellow editorial board member Karen Tumulty.
Lisa Lake
Capehart's frustrations were notable enough that after the piece was published, opinion editor David Shipley was asked to meet privately with the Rev. Al Sharpton to discuss the incident and alleged shortcomings in the paper's opinion coverage, Semafor reported.
The claims made by Capehart in his new book have also reportedly rankled Washington Post staffers, according to Semafor.
Capehart's description of the incident in his book as well as a recent discussion that he held with former Biden administration official Susan Rice at a local Washington, DC, bookstore last week has been the subject of internal recriminations at the newspaper in recent days, Semafor reported.
5 According to his new book, Capehart took issue with an editorial criticizing remarks by then-President Joe Biden.
Getty Images for Family Equality
According to two Washington Post staffers, staff have complained privately that the book publicly pitted current colleagues against each other and appeared to run afoul of the Post's editorial guidelines around collegiality, as well as rules that restrict staff from publicly disclosing internal editorial conversations.
The Post has sought comment from the Washington Post, Tumulty and Capehart.
In a statement to Semafor, Tumulty noted that the paper had repeatedly published opinion pieces criticizing Georgia's 2021 voting laws limiting ballot access, but said she would not comment further on the book or the Post's editorial processes.
5 Then-President Joe Biden described the 2021 Georgia voting law as 'Jim Crow 2.0' — which Tumulty thought was 'hyperbolic.'
Reuters
'I have a very different recognition of the events and conversations that are described in this book, but out of respect for the longstanding principle that Washington Post editorial board deliberations are confidential I am not going to say anything further,' Tumulty told Semafor.
Some current and former staff told Semafor that they felt Capehart's decision to go after Tumulty in a book and on his book tour over an editorial disagreement, as well as the actual description of the incident, was unfair to her.
'Ed board members, current and former, are honor bound not to discuss specific deliberations publicly,' former deputy opinion editor Chuck Lane said in a text to Semafor.
5 Capehart's book has reportedly rankled staffers at the Washington Post.
Christopher Sadowski
'I can only say that Karen took an unsought leadership role when the paper needed her, and performed it superbly and 100 percent honorably, despite extraordinary health challenges — for which I admire her greatly.'
The Washington Post editorial board has undergone considerable upheaval in the last nine months.
Just before the Nov. 5 presidential election, billionaire owner Jeff Bezos blocked the editorial board from endorsing the Democratic nominee, then-Vice President Kamala Harris.
Earlier this year, Bezos overhauled the opinion section so that it would promote 'personal liberties' and 'free markets' — a move that prompted the resignation of Shipley.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Netanyahu believes occupying Gaza is the only way to save the hostages – but it will also start bloodiest phase of the war yet, experts warn
Netanyahu believes occupying Gaza is the only way to save the hostages – but it will also start bloodiest phase of the war yet, experts warn

New York Post

time2 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Netanyahu believes occupying Gaza is the only way to save the hostages – but it will also start bloodiest phase of the war yet, experts warn

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is preparing to call for the full military occupation of the Gaza Strip to fight Hamas and free the hostages, according to multiple reports – but it could kick off the bloodiest phase of the war yet for the Jewish state. Netanyahu has long maintained that military might is the best way to finish off Hamas and rescue the remaining 50 hostages in Gaza, and the proposal calls for deploying Israel Defense Forces troops on the ground across the entire Palestinian territory, according to Israeli media. 'This puts the IDF under new risks, with the soldiers having to deal with regular ambushes, improvised explosions and sniper fire from an insurgency,' Colin Clarke, a counter-terrorism expert at the New York-based Soufan Group, told The Post. 'This operation could also lay the groundwork for the next version of Hamas.' 8 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly pushing for a full military occupation of the Gaza Strip. AFP via Getty Images The Israeli government has confirmed about 450 deaths of IDF soldiers in 18 months of the Gaza ground war. Israel already occupies about 75% of the Strip, with Gaza's nearly two million people huddled in the crowded pockets along the western shore. Any full-scale occupation of Gaza, would likely see troops go into Deir al-Balah, which currently stands as the only major city that has yet to see major ground operations. The families of the 20 living hostages have said it's likely their loved ones are being held there — and they worry any military action would put them in grave danger. 8 Netanyahu maintains that military force stands as the best way to save the hostages and accomplish his goal of fully eliminating Hamas. AFP via Getty Images Hamas has reportedly ordered its terrorists to execute their captives if Israeli soldiers are spotted nearby. Reports began emerging on Monday evening that Netanyahu was ready to greenlight the full occupation of Gaza, with one senior official telling Israeli outlets that 'the die has been cast.' The move to occupy Gaza came after Hamas published a pair of videos last week showing off the emaciated bodies of two Israeli hostages, with one digging his own grave and the other weeping as he begged for food and water. 8 The fighting would likely be the bloodiest of the war so far inside the already war-torn enclave, experts warned. AFP via Getty Images 8 Israeli soldiers would face regular attacks from insurgent groups inside Gaza if they were to be stationed there as an occupying force. AFP via Getty Images Christopher O'Leary, a former senior FBI official who led many hostage recovery teams, said that while Hamas likely published the propaganda videos in hopes of pressuring Netanyahu to re-engage in the cease-fire talks, they likely had the opposite effect. 'It showed off the brutality of Hamas to the world and gave Netanyahu the justification he needed to launch a full occupation of Gaza,' O'Leary said. The logistics of occupying Gaza, however, are being questioned by at least 19 former Israeli military, intelligence and security chiefs, who publicly warned of unnecessary bloodshed earlier this week. 8 The call to occupy Gaza came after Hamas published video of emaciated hostages, including 24-year-old Evyatar David. Al-Qassam Brigade Footage 8 The terror groups in Gaza also published video of Rom Braslavski begging for food and water. Mona Yacoubian, the director and senior adviser of the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), said the plan would put too much strain on the IDF, which likely doesn't 'have the bandwidth or ability to maintain the occupation.' 'We've already seen soldiers suffer from fatigue, death, PTSD, and suicide through the course of the war,' she said. 'Israel also has to contend with its other conflicts in Syria, Lebanon, against the Houthis in Yemen and, of course, Iran.' Yacoubian, Clarke, and O'Leary also warned that an occupation would see insurgency rise in Gaza and more guerilla attacks on the soldiers stationed in the enclave. 8 About 70% of all buildings in Gaza have been destroyed by the war, with the fighting threatening the few areas that have been spared. AFP via Getty Images 'If occupation becomes the norm, in a place with widespread destruction and hunger, we'll see insurgents rise up and strike back,' said O'Leary, who has also served on the Counterterrorism Division of the FBI. 'It also risks Hamas regaining popular support and legitimacy from the people to defend them from the occupation force,' he added. Yacoubian warned that the IDF won't just have Hamas to contend with, as armed gangs from other factions would likely also rise to power to fight Israel. 'This could birth groups more radical than Hamas,' she said. 'This is a recipe for Israel to become embroiled in a forever war in Gaza.' 8 Experts fear occupation may lead Hamas to regain popularity among the masses as the opposition to Israel. AFP via Getty Images Critics have claimed that Netanyahu is pushing for a full occupation out of necessity to appease members of his right-wing coalition to keep his government from dissolving. Members of Netanyahu's cabinet, like National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, have demanded Israel take Gaza and prioritize the destruction of Hamas over diplomatic means to rescue the hostages. Yoram Cohen, a former director of Israel's Shin Bet intelligence agency, ultimately accused the prime minister on Sunday of echoing his cabinet member's 'fantasy' of eradicating Hamas. Clarke said that there is no clear path to fully eliminate Hamas, as evident by Israel's claim earlier this year that it killed 70% of the terror group's armed forces, only for the militants to repeatedly rebuild their numbers. Clarke warned that without stated logistical goals that go beyond 'the elimination of Hamas,' Israel could find itself marred in a years-long occupation effort that fails to complete its mission, like what happened in southern Lebanon for 18 years back in 1982. 'I'm not saying Israel will be stuck in Gaza for the next 18 years, but they might be,' he said.

Biden ‘Politburo' aide Bruce Reed blames ex-prez's debate fiasco on his stutter
Biden ‘Politburo' aide Bruce Reed blames ex-prez's debate fiasco on his stutter

New York Post

time2 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Biden ‘Politburo' aide Bruce Reed blames ex-prez's debate fiasco on his stutter

WASHINGTON — A member of former President Joe Biden's so-called 'Politburo' testified that his ex-boss's infamously bad debate performance was the result of his stutter during a closed-door transcribed interview with House Oversight Committee lawyers this week. Bruce Reed, 65, Biden's former deputy chief of staff for policy, delivered a spirited defense of the 46th president's cognitive abilities during his roughly six-hour-long transcribed interview Tuesday, The Post has learned. 'Mr. Reed claimed in his transcribed interview that Joe Biden's debate performance was the result of his stutter,' a source familiar with Reed's testimony told The Post. Advertisement 'When asked whether Americans' concerns about Joe Biden's mental acuity were legitimate, Mr. Reed responded that he believes Americans should not have had any concerns about the President's mental faculties.' 3 Bruce Reed has been described as a policy wonk and was seen as a driving force behind much of former President Joe Biden's domestic agenda. Bloomberg via Getty Images Reed, who is now the ninth ex-Biden aide to appear before the panel, did not take questions from the press before his closed-door testimony. Biden struggled with a stutter during his youth, but he participated in numerous public debates over the past five decades where he seemed much more coherent. Advertisement Biden, 82, agreed to debate President Trump in late June of last year, far earlier than presidential verbal bouts have typically taken place during recent decades, usually in the fall. Reed, who has been described by Democratic operatives as a policy wonk, was among the advisers who helped prepare Biden for the notorious fumbling debate. Biden appeared on the debate stage borderline stonefaced at times and struggled to complete some of his thoughts, with his mouth agape during portions. The stunning display sparked a Democratic mutiny against Biden that led to him dropping out of the 2024 race. Advertisement 3 Former President Joe Biden has ripped into Republicans for questioning whether he actually made the decisions on how autopen was used. POOL/AFP via Getty Images 'During his interview, Mr. Reed stated that the decision to hold the debate early was a deliberate strategy to get ahead of early voting and the Olympics,' the source recounted. 'He emphasized that the campaign's push for the early debate was unrelated to concerns about President Biden's age.' The bombshell book 'Original Sin' described Reed as one of what the authors called Biden's 'Politburo,' the core inner circle of 'ultimate decision-makers' around the 46th president. He is now the last of the non-family 'Politburo' members described in the book to testify before the panel. Advertisement The 65-year-old has been a key figure in the Biden team and Democratic politics for years. In addition to his time as deputy chief of staff for policy during the Biden administration, Reed also served as Biden's chief of staff during the first half of his vice presidency and held key roles in the 2020 and 2024 campaigns. He also worked in the Clinton administration as the director of the Domestic Policy Council, a deputy campaign manager for policy during the 1992 Clinton campaign for the presidency, and a speechwriter for former Vice President Al Gore during his Senate days. Back in May, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) revived his probe into whether there was a 'cover-up' of Biden's mental cognition that he had opened last Congress. 3 Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer revived the probe into Joe Biden's acuity back in May. Getty Images The Kentucky Republican also expanded the probe to look at Biden's use of autopen to sign official documents after revelations emerged that the 46th president used the device very frequently. No lawmakers were present for Reed's transcribed interview. Biden has publicly ripped into aspersions from Republicans over his use of the autopen and insisted that he made every decision. Advertisement Other ex-Biden aides who sat before the Oversight panel, include former White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain; former senior adviser Mike Donilon; former counselor Steve Ricchetti; Jill Biden's powerful former chief of staff Anthony Bernal; former presidential physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor; Ashley Williams, former special assistant to the president and deputy director of Oval Office Operations; and Neera Tanden, the former White House director of the Domestic Policy Council. Some of those ex-Biden aides who came before the powerful investigatory committee had been subpoenaed and opted to plead their Fifth Amendment, refraining from answering questions. Reed had agreed to a transcribed interview before the Oversight Committee and, therefore, wasn't able to plead the Fifth. The powerful investigatory panel is slated to hear from former senior adviser Anita Dunn on Thursday. There are at least four more ex-Biden aides scheduled to appear before the panel after Dunn.

Trump wants US to take over Gaza aid delivery: ‘He does not want babies to starve'
Trump wants US to take over Gaza aid delivery: ‘He does not want babies to starve'

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Trump wants US to take over Gaza aid delivery: ‘He does not want babies to starve'

President Trump is making plans for the US to take over the humanitarian aid distribution in Gaza as famine looms over the Palestinian enclave, American and Israeli officials said. Trump, who has criticized the ongoing mass hunger in the Gaza Strip, is 'not thrilled' at the prospect of having to take over aid distribution from Israel, but he believes that there's no other way to address concerns of famine, officials familiar with the talks told Axios. 'The starvation problem in Gaza is getting worse. Donald Trump does not like that,' a US official said. 'He does not want babies to starve. President Trump is making plans for the US to take over the humanitarian aid distribution in Gaza. Getty Images 'The starvation problem in Gaza is getting worse. Donald Trump does not like that,' a US official said. Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto/Shutterstock 'He wants mothers to be able to nurse their children. He's becoming fixated on that,' the official added. Trump has split from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the Israeli leader's claims that widespread starvation isn't happening in Gaza. The president asserted last week that the images of emaciated children can't be faked.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store