Tories demand Reeves ‘urgently rule out' investment tax hikes
The Tories claim scrapping the £500 dividend allowance will drag an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying investment levies.
The party is seeking to pile pressure on ministers after a memo sent by Angela Rayner to Ms Reeves, in which the Deputy Prime Minister suggested a series of tax hikes, was leaked to the press.
In the document, Ms Rayner proposed removing the dividend allowance to raise around £325 million a year in revenue, as well as axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares and increasing dividend tax rates, the Telegraph reported.
Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'The Government need to urgently rule out these tax hikes on savers and investors before speculation causes further economic harm.
'Labour don't understand how business works and how to create growth. More taxes on investment, entrepreneurship and saving are the last thing our economy needs right now.'
The Government's U-turns over welfare reform and winter fuel payments have left the Chancellor with a multibillion-pound black hole to fill, fuelling speculation that she will seek to raise revenue through tax hikes.
The Tories claimed axing the dividend allowance would drag 'an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying dividend tax'.
This figure appears to be based on an assumption that at least 8.82 million people in the UK hold shares that pay dividends.
Some 3.6 million are already subject to dividend tax, according to data obtained by investment platform AJ Bell through a Freedom of Information request.
The Chancellor last year said she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes' after her first budget but has since refused to rule out raising specific levies, saying it would be 'irresponsible' to do so.
A Labour Party spokesperson said: 'The Conservatives have some brass neck. They've still not apologised for the damage caused by the Liz Truss mini-Budget, nor the £22 billion black hole they left – which hammered firms and families across the country.
'Labour is doing more to support business than the Tories ever could.
'We've already delivered three historic trade deals and four interest rate cuts – to reduce costs and put money back in people's pockets.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Emissions from gas-fired power plant to be stored underground in UK first
A gas-fired power plant will have its carbon emissions captured and piped underground in a first for Britain, as part of Ed Miliband's net zero plans. The Government announced on Tuesday that a new power station at Connah's Quay in North Wales will be fitted with carbon capture technology. Emissions from the plant, which will generate enough electricity for 900,000 homes, will be transported by pipeline to a storage facility underneath Liverpool Bay. The power station is one of two projects now confirmed to be in talks about joining the HyNet pipeline network, which will transport emissions from heavy industry for storage under the Irish Sea. The other business looking at joining the network is a biomass plant in Ellesmere Port that will also use carbon capture. Both schemes are expected to contribute towards Mr Miliband's plan for a clean electricity system by 2030. They will deliver what is known as 'low-carbon dispatchable power' – steady, reliable energy, unlike intermittent wind and sun generation, with minimal emissions. Mr Miliband's clean power action plan states that these plants will be vital to managing 'dunkelflaute' weather periods in the winter, when gloomy and low-wind conditions depress the output of wind and solar farms. The Government has set a target of having up to 7 gigawatts (GW) of low-carbon dispatchable power available by 2030. The energy secretary's plan also relies on keeping around 35GWs of 'unabated' gas-fired plants in reserve, meaning generators where the carbon is simply emitted into the atmosphere. The 1.4GW Connah's Quay project, which will be delivered in two phases by German power company Uniper, would be the first gas plant fitted with carbon capture to come online in the country. It would replace the existing 1.4GW gas plant currently at the site, which is reaching the end of its lifespan. Together with Evero Energy's biomass plant in Ellesmere Port, the Government said the scheme would help to create 800 local jobs. They are part of the broader HyNet network in the North West, which was one of three carbon capture schemes to secure funding from a £22bn pot announced by Mr Miliband and Sir Keir Starmer in October. HyNet is expected to enter service in 2028. Net Zero Teesside, a similar project in the North East, has also been promised funding. Mr Miliband has said these networks are 'essential if we are to decarbonise without de-industrialising'. On Tuesday, Sarah Jones, the Industry Minister, said: 'We are securing the jobs of the future, the power for our homes and the protection of our planet by becoming world leaders on carbon capture and storage. 'These new projects will bring industrial renewal, unlock growth and secure an additional 800 good, skilled jobs for local people across North Wales and the North West – taking the total supported by HyNet to 2,800 – all part of our Plan for Change.' Mike Lockett, boss of Uniper UK, said: 'Government's support for the development of carbon capture and storage infrastructure is vital for moving towards clean power 2030 and at the same time maintaining a secure electricity supply.' Under Labour's green energy plans, carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies will be relied on to strip up to 30m tonnes of CO2 from UK emissions each year by 2030 and more than 100m tonnes by 2050. Carbon capture systems take emissions from factories or other sites that burn fossil fuels or wood and pass them through a process that strips out waste CO2. This is then compressed into a liquid and pumped deep underground for permanent storage, eventually reacting with and becoming part of the surrounding rocks. Scientists have warned the technology still needs a great deal of research and engineering to succeed. A report on carbon capture produced by The Royal Society, Britain's leading scientific institution, said: 'An enormous and continued investment is needed each year to 2050 to build the injection wells, transport networks, monitoring technologies, and a skilled workforce, and to install hundreds of new wells each year.' Earlier this year MPs also raised concerns that the Government was committing billions of pounds to what was essentially 'unproven' technology.
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pushing airport expansion while rail travel languishes – so much for Labour's green agenda
August is peak flying time, and airports are on many minds. The government has signalled its support for colossal expansions, whose extra flights would bust its carbon pledges. The excuse is that supertechnology will magic away the extra CO2 pumped into the atmosphere, though it must know that clean, green flying is still futurology. Here's the pity of it: until now this government has rightly boasted of its green credentials, making massive investments in sustainable energy and retro-insulating cold homes. Expanding air travel is not on any green agenda. Heathrow has just submitted proposals for a £50bn third runway, as approved by Labour in 2009 and the Tories who voted it through parliament in 2018. Covid applied the brakes but now Heathrow is back with gold-plated, 'shovel-ready' plans. Its owners, including Qatar, Singapore and Saudi Arabia, expect the planning bill to prevent newts or judicial reviews blocking the runway. Their pitch to an investment-hungry government is that expanding Europe's busiest airport would create 100,000 new jobs, propelling growth with 750 extra daily flights. Flying gets a green light from the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander: she agreed to double the size of Luton airport, favours Gatwick's second runway for 100,000 more flights and gives Stansted's expansion a fair wind. These allow a 70% increase in flights above 2018 levels, and cancel out all the carbon savings from the government's clean power plan. Rachel Reeves promised to be 'Britain's first green chancellor', but her plans live or die on growth, so billions in private investment is hard to resist. But beyond construction, the growth-potential claims for extra flights look highly dubious. The promised global 'connectivity' imagines business people zipping into Britain with briefcases full of contracts. But that's not who these extra flyers will be. Most will be frequent flyers flying more frequently, not for business but for leisure, according to the New Economics Foundation and Possible, the climate campaign. National Travel and Civil Aviation Authority passenger surveys show only one in 14 UK passengers are business travellers. The pandemic showed that meeting online saves money and time; business travel has already peaked. Would extra flights bring in tourist income? No, 70% of flights are British tourists off abroad to spend vastly more than foreigners spend here. Of extra flights in 20 years, 83% were taken by already frequent flyers, mostly for leisure. Growth will not be from more families taking an annual holiday: half the population doesn't fly in any year, while just 15% consume 70% of flights. Nearly a third are 'ultra-frequent flyers' taking six or more journeys a year. Instead of these heaviest users paying more for their pollution, airlines reward frequent flyers. The Flying Fair report from the New Economics Foundation suggests imposing a high levy on those flying six or more times a year, not added to ticket prices but raised in tax returns. That makes the cost of their excessive air travel highly visible, and could raise £6bn a year, while cutting aviation CO2 by 28%. Newly nationalised trains would gain from disincentivising flight. But UK prices are a bizarre deterrent. I'm planning to go to Edinburgh next week – a train journey I love. Checking prices, I found a £29.99 flight each way, while LNER costs £181.69 return. France has banned domestic flights where trains can do the journey in less than two and a half hours and so should we: start by banning airlines charging less than rail. Switch the 39m domestic journeys being made annually by plane to train. The good news is the extra potential capacity in the Channel tunnel, which could be realised with a little investment. Twelve trains an hour run each way, but the tunnel could run 2.5 times more, and prices would fall. That's where investment should go, instead of to airports, as new European routes open up. Yes, it takes longer. It means adding train time to the concept of a holiday. But if it were cheaper, what luxury it would be compared with the hell of holiday airports and flights that don't land you in city centres. Climate damage is the real cost of avoidable flying. The chancellor says: 'Expansion must be delivered in line with UK's legal, environmental and climate obligations.' But the Climate Change Committee (CCC), the government's statutory adviser, warns that airport expansion would breach UK carbon budgets for net zero emissions by 2050. The aviation industry and government claim that wonder technology will deliver carbon-free flying with electric planes, sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) and carbon capture. None is anywhere near available, says the CCC, which expects 17% SAFs by 2040. It advises no extra flying before 2030, and only 2% more by 2035, to allow time for new technology to be developed. Let's hope clean flight arrives soon, but it's not here yet: currently, suppliers must only guarantee that SAFs comprises 2% of the total. Here's the honesty test for those claiming carbon-neutral flight is imminent: agree to no extra flying until it arrives. The government's mood music is all pro-flying, not urging climate-conscious travel. To change habits and attitudes, it should start by banning frequent flyer bonuses. Why allow private jets? Seat for seat they are 30 times more polluting, paying less tax as a proportion of ticket price, as was exposed by Possible's Jetting away with it report. The government's airport policy will reveal its seriousness on the climate crisis. Politically, it shows whether Labour is sufficiently alarmed by serious threats from the left, from Greens, Liberal Democrats and Jeremy Corbyn revivalists pledged to invest in trains, not airports. But refusing airport expansion allows Tories and Faragistes to add those lost foreign billions to their dishonest tally of net zero costs. A YouGov poll found that 61% of people regard airport expansion as the wrong priority, alongside mayors Andy Burnham and Sadiq Khan. But the Treasury's dilemma is obvious: climate or cash? Its answer should also be clear: just call a moratorium until green flying arrives. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist
South Wales Argus
8 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Registrations of new cars down by 5% in July, figures suggest
Approximately 140,000 new cars were registered in July, compared with 147,517 during the same month in 2024. Battery electric vehicles (Bevs) held a 21% share of the new car market last month. The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), which released the preliminary figures, slightly upgraded its forecast for full-year new car registrations, to 1.9 million. Registrations in 2024 reached 1.95 million. Bevs are forecast to hold a full-year market share of 23.8%. At least 28% of new cars sold by each manufacturer in the UK this year are required to be zero emission – which generally means pure electric – under the Government's zero emission vehicle mandate. The first electric car models eligible for new Government grants were announced on Tuesday. Drivers will be able to save £1,500 with the purchase of new Citroen e-C3, e-C4, e-C5 and e-Berlingo cars. These are the first models approved under the new £650 million electric car grant. The scheme will enable motorists purchasing a new electric car to save either £1,500 or £3,750, depending on the vehicle's sustainability. Ian Plummer, commercial director at online vehicle marketplace Auto Trader, said the grant has provided a 'much-needed boost' for consumer interest in new electric cars, with EV consideration up 10 percentage points on Auto Trader. But the unveiling of the initiative on July 14 explains why it was a 'slow' month for sales as buyers 'wait to see just which models will get what level of grant'. He added that discounts – either through the grant or by brands cutting prices themselves – will 'trickle through to EV sales in the coming months'. Final figures for July's new car registrations will be published at 9am.
