logo
An engineer, a call centre operative and more… The 12 men now acquitted in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts

An engineer, a call centre operative and more… The 12 men now acquitted in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts

First Post21-07-2025
Nineteen years ago, on July 11, seven pressure cooker bombs exploded inside the coaches of Mumbai's suburban trains within 11 minutes, killing 188 people and injuring another 700. Now, the Bombay High Court has acquitted the 12 men, who were initially found guilty of conspiracy and terror charges. But why? read more
A forensic officer at the site of a damaged railway train compartment hit by the serial bomb blast in Mumbai in July 12, 2006. Seven bombs went off in the country's financial hub vital commuter rail network killing hundreds. Now, 19 years later, the 12 accused have been acquitted. File image/Reuters
Eleven minutes — that's all it took to shake India's financial capital. On July 11, 2006, seven bombs packed in pressure cookers tore through first-class coaches on the city's suburban train line, turning evening commutes into carnage.
The explosions at Mumbai's Mahim, Bandra, Khar, Jogeshwari, Borivali, Matunga Road and Mira Road resulted in the deaths of 188 people, and injuring another 700.
Nineteen years later, the Bombay High Court has made an unprecedented move; Justices Anil S Kilor and Shyam C Chandak have acquitted all 12 accused in the case — five of them were on death row — noting the evidence provided by the prosecution wasn't sufficient to convict them.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What exactly happened in the 2006 train blasts? Who are the 12 accused who have been let off and more importantly, why?
11 minutes of terror unfold in Mumbai
July 11, 2006 was like any other day in Mumbai. Working men and women had finished a long day's work and making their way home using the lifeline — the suburban trains. However, at 6.24 pm, serial explosions occurred along the railway line, continuing until 6.35 pm.
Following the explosions, investigators found that the bombs were concealed inside pressure cookers filled with high-grade RDX and ammonium nitrate. Forensics revealed that the explosives were designed to rupture metal and flesh. These bombs were detonated using sophisticated timers, ensuring coordinated chaos.
Security officials gather near a damaged local train compartment hit by the serial blasts in Mumbai in July 2006. File image/Reuters
In the days following the blast, Maharashtra's ATS began a long-winding investigation, which included the examination of 250 witnesses, studying hundreds of documents, maps and phone records. At the end of it all, in 2015, a trial court convicted 12 people in the blasts — the special court of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act sentenced Kamal Ansari, Faisal Sheikh, Asif Khan, Ehtesham Sidduqui and Naveed Khan to death. Seven other convicts Mohammed Sajid Ansari, Mohammed Ali, Dr Tanveer Ansari, Majid Shafi, Muzzammil Shaikh, Sohail Shaikh and Zamir Shaikh were sentenced to life imprisonment for being part of the conspiracy.
From sentenced to acquitted — the 12 men involved
Following the sentencing, the 12 convicts filed appeals against their convictions and sentences. And in July 2024, a special bench was constituted to hear the matter on a day-to-day basis.
This resulted in today's (July 21) development; the court acquitting all 12 of the accused after the 'the prosecution utterly failed in establishing the case beyond reasonable doubts'.
But who are these 12 men?
1) Kamal Ansari: Hailing from Bihar, the 50-year-old was found guilty and sentenced to death in the Mumbai 7/11 blasts. He was also of planting the bomb that exploded at Mumbai's Matunga. Awaiting his death sentence at Nagpur prison, Ansari died in 2021 as a result of contracting Covid-19.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
2) Faisal Sheikh: According to the ATS investigation, Sheikh was responsible for the explosion at Jogeshwari station. Authorities revealed that he was a wanted man even before the blasts — he was on the radar since 2004, at a time which he was deported by Saudi Arabia for illegally staying there. After Saudi, he went to Pakistan and reportedly received training at the Bahawalpur terror camp, which is known to be the Jaish-e-Mohammed's terror hub. 'I didn't want to come to India and wanted to stay in Pakistan and prove my loyalty with Muslims. But my trainers told me that if I wanted to prove my loyalty with Muslims then I should go back to India and avenge the killing of Muslims in hundreds of riots across India,' Faisal has believed to have confessed to the police soon after getting arrested in 2006 in the blast case.
Besides laying the bomb, Sheikh also sent youths to that country for training purpose. He had also attended conspiracy meetings besides giving shelter to Pakistani nationals. He was also sentenced to death in this matter.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
3) Asif Khan: Hailing from Maharashtra's Jalgaon, procured explosive material and planted a bomb, which exploded at Borivali station. Authorities noted that he was an active member of SIMI — the Students Islamic Movement of India, a banned Islamist organisation. After the blasts, Khan fled Mumbai and shifted to Belgaum. He was the last accused to be arrested in the case and later given the death sentence.
One of the 12 men who were convicted of involvement in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts. File image/AFP
4) Ehtesham Sidduqui: At the time of the bombings, Sidduqui, then 30-years-old, was the joint secretary of SIMI, the banned group in India. Hailing from Uttar Pradesh's Jaunpur, he came to Maharashtra to pursue his education in engineering. However, he dropped out and soon enrolled in SIMI.
As for his involvement in the blasts, Siddiqui conducted reconnaissance of local trains. He was also present when bombs were made. He planted an explosive in a local train, which exploded at Mira Road station. For this, he was on death row.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
5) Naveed Khan: Born in Kuwait, Khan reportedly developed a strong friendship with Faisal Shaikh, who was believed to be responsible for funding the entire blasts. Working as a call centre employee at the time of the blasts, the police stated that he was in contact with all the accused and was the one responsible for placing the bomb that exploded at Khar. He too, was on death row.
6) Mohammed Sajid Ansari: A resident of Mumbai, he was awarded the life sentence in the Mumbai 7/11 blasts for allegedly procuring timers for the bombs and helping to assemble them. He also reportedly harboured two Pakistani nationals at his residence.
7) Mohammed Ali: A resident of Mumbai's Shivaji Nagar, he was charged with assembling bombs at his house with the help of Pakistanis who had sneaked into India. For this, he was given life imprisonment. According to investigators, he was part of the SIMI group.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
8) Dr Tanveer Ansari: A resident of Mumbai, the doctor became a SIMI member and was sentenced to life for his involvement in the Mumbai 7/11 blasts. Authorities note that he received arms training in Pakistan and also surveyed local trains in Mumbai to plan the blasts.
In 2015, the trial court had found 12 men guilty of the 2006 Mumbai train bombings. However, now the Mumbai High Court has acquitted them. File image/AFP
9) Majid Shafi: He arranged for transportation of Pakistani nationals to Mumbai via Bangladesh border and back after the blasts.
10) Muzzammil Shaikh: A software engineer, he received arms training in Pakistan. He surveyed the local trains that were to be bombed. He is the youngest accused in the case. According to an Indian Express report, two of his brothers — Faisal and Raahil — are believed to be the main planners of the conspiracy. Raahil was never caught.
11) Sohail Shaikh: Sentenced to life, a resident of Pune, he reportedly received arms training in Pakistan and surveyed the trains to be targeted. He also received hawala money from absconding accused, Rizwan Dhaware for the execution of the blasts.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
12) Zamir Shaikh: A Mumbai resident, he surveyed local trains and helped assemble the bombs. He received life imprisonment for his involvement in the blasts.
Reasons for court to acquit them
But why exactly did the court acquit these 12 in the Mumbai blasts case? There are a number of reasons why high court bench of Justice Anil Kilor and Justice Shyam Chandak overturned the trial court's judgment.
The high court pointed out serious flaws in the prosecution's case; they noted that key witnesses in the blasts were unreliable, identification parades that were held with authority and confessional statements were tortured out of the accused.
In its judgment, the high court noted, 'The defence had raised serious questions about the test identification parade. Many witnesses remained silent for unusually long periods, some over four years, and then suddenly identified the accused. This is abnormal. Hence, their conviction is quashed and set aside.
The 2006 Mumbai serial bomb blasts survivor Mahindra Pitale pays tribute to the victims on its 17th anniversary at Mahim railway Station, in Mumbai back in 2023. File image/PTI
'The confessional statements are found to be incomplete and not truthful as some parts are a copy-paste of each other. The accused persons have proved their case that torture was inflicted at the time,' it added.
The high court also slammed the prosecution for failing to examine crucial witnesses. For instance, the court found that the testimony provided by the taxi drivers who drove the accused to Churchgate were 'not trustworthy' and 'cannot be made basis for the conviction'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It also questioned the handling of the evidence; in the matter of 'recoveries like RDX and other explosive material, the prosecution could not establish that the evidence was sacrosanct until it reached the Forensic Science Laboratory,' the bench said.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Malegaon Blast: Maharashtra Must Challenge Acquittal Verdict, Says Congress MLA Arif Masood
Malegaon Blast: Maharashtra Must Challenge Acquittal Verdict, Says Congress MLA Arif Masood

India.com

time23 minutes ago

  • India.com

Malegaon Blast: Maharashtra Must Challenge Acquittal Verdict, Says Congress MLA Arif Masood

New Delhi: Congress MLA from Madhya Pradesh, Arif Masood, urged the Maharashtra government to file an appeal against the acquittal of all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit. Masood emphasized that terrorism has no religion and should not be associated with any faith. He cited the state government's recent decision to challenge the Bombay High Court's acquittal of 12 accused in the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts case, stating that similar action should be taken in the Malegaon case. "Terrorism has no religion, nor is it related to any Maharashtra government, which has announced that it would file an appeal against the acquittal of the 12 accused in the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts case by the Bombay High Court, should do the same thing in the Malegaon case too," said Arif Masood. Meanwhile, families of the Malegaon blast victims have expressed their intent to challenge the verdict of the special NIA court, which acquitted all the accused on July 31. Their lawyer, Shahid Nadeem, confirmed that some of the families will independently file appeals. He also criticized the National Investigation Agency (NIA) for not taking action against witnesses who turned hostile during the trial. The Maharashtra government had earlier approached the Supreme Court to challenge the Bombay High Court's acquittal in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case. In the Malegaon investigation, after the NIA took over from the ATS, it dropped charges under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), citing issues with how the provisions were applied. The 2008 Malegaon blast occurred on September 29 in the Nashik district, killing six people and injuring over 100. In its judgment, the special court not only acquitted all seven accused but also directed the government to pay compensation, Rs 2 lakh to the families of those killed and Rs 50,000 to the injured. The court found insufficient evidence to prove that Pragya Thakur owned the motorcycle allegedly used in the blast, noting that its chassis number had been erased. It also observed that Thakur had renounced worldly possessions two years before the incident.

'Digging my own grave': Hamas tunnel horror exposed; Freed hostage recalls 'cruel' conditions
'Digging my own grave': Hamas tunnel horror exposed; Freed hostage recalls 'cruel' conditions

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'Digging my own grave': Hamas tunnel horror exposed; Freed hostage recalls 'cruel' conditions

A newly released video from Hamas showed Israeli hostage Evyatar David emaciated and visibly distressed in a tunnel in Gaza, which freed hostage Tal Shoham knows so well. Shoham, 40, was held in Hamas captivity in Gaza for 505, where he spent most of the time underground, with fellow hostages Evyatar David and Guy Gilboa Dalal. He was released in February under a temporary ceasefire deal, but his friends stayed behind. In an interview with Reuters on Sunday (August 3), Shoham said he recognised the tunnel shown in the video and described the extreme deprivation he and others experienced while their captors lived comfortably nearby. Show more Show less

UP ATS arrests two, including ‘doc'from Thane, for Ghazwa-e-Hind plot
UP ATS arrests two, including ‘doc'from Thane, for Ghazwa-e-Hind plot

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

UP ATS arrests two, including ‘doc'from Thane, for Ghazwa-e-Hind plot

Lucknow: The Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) of Uttar Pradesh arrested a doctor identified as Usama Maj Sheikh (24) from Badlapur in Maharashtra. Sheikh, who claims to be a homeopathy practitioner, was taken into custody from his residence in Badlapur East on Monday morning with the assistance of the local police. Earlier on August 2, ATS had arrested Ajmal Ali (19) from UP's Amroha. The ATS said that both accused were in contact with several Pakistani individuals through social media and were part of a larger online network aimed at indoctrinating Indian Muslim youth. Their objective, according to the preliminary findings of ATS, was to incite communal hatred, provoke religious animosity, and prepare ground for a violent movement to establish Ghazwa-e-Hind—an Islamist concept of religious conquest—by spreading Sharia law through jihad. The duo allegedly influenced and provoked young Muslim men to harbour resentment against non-Muslims, encouraging them to join anti-national and criminal activities aimed at destabilising the country, the ATS added. Ajmal was first summoned to the ATS headquarters in Lucknow for questioning where he revealed to have been in touch with his mentor Sheikh and several others in Pakistan. Based on the findings, UP ATS registered an FIR at ATS police station in Lucknow. Ajmal was arrested and produced before a court, which sent him to judicial custody. Following further leads, the ATS also tracked down Usama Maj Sheikh and placed him under arrest on August 4 from his residence in Badlapur, Maharashtra. Under tight security, Sheikh was produced before the Ulhasnagar court, which granted a transit remand. He was brought into custody and is being interrogated further regarding his role in the ideological indoctrination and recruitment of radical youth for extremist objectives, the ATS said. The ATS sources said they are trying to identify other members of the network, including possible foreign handlers and local collaborators. Digital evidence retrieved from seized mobile phones and social media accounts is being forensically analysed. More arrests are likely in the coming days.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store