ECU Worldwide Unveils XLERATE 2.0: Faster Global LCL Service with Expanded US Coverage
MIAMI, May 12, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ECU Worldwide, Allcargo Logistics' wholly owned global subsidiary, has launched XLERATE 2.0, setting new industry benchmarks for speed and reliability in global logistics. The service operates via sea routes from major Chinese ports and Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam to Los Angeles, followed by inland distribution to 10 newly added, strategic locations across the United States. This expansion enhances ECU Worldwide's ability to provide expedited delivery times and reliable cargo movement for time-sensitive shipments from Asia to the USA.
With this growth, ECU Worldwide has strengthened its network across major U.S. cities, including Seattle, San Francisco, Las Vegas, Denver, Detroit, San Antonio, Charleston, Kansas City, Laredo and San Juan. These expansion increases our network from 20 to 30 locations, further reinforcing ECU Worldwide's delivery services and expanding its reach for customers across the US.
ECU Worldwide simplifies pricing with transparent, all-inclusive rates, ensuring no hidden charges or pre-carriage fees for key Asian ports. Offering all-inclusive rate from both China main ports and Ho Chi Minh City customers benefit from clear, predictable costs.
Additionally, the Exclusive Priority Service enhances XLERATE shipments with priority handling at these ports including Ho Chi Minh City. This eliminates traditional 2–3 hour waiting periods, ensuring faster, more reliable cargo movement.
Commenting on XLERATE 2.0's launch, Niels Nielsen, Regional Head USA & Canada - "XLERATE 2.0 marks a significant leap forward in global logistics. With industry-leading transit times, cargo is available in just 12 days from vessel sailing from Shanghai / Shenzhen & 19 days from Ho Chi Minh City to Los Angeles and final delivery to our expanded network of 30 locations will be completed within 15–25 days. This enhanced geographic coverage, combined with streamlined processes and priority handling, empowers our customers to maintain a competitive edge in their markets while building more resilient supply chains."
ECU Worldwide's extensive network spans over 300 offices across 180 countries, operating more than 2400 direct trade lanes. This comprehensive global presence ensures seamless multimodal transport connectivity between manufacturing hubs and fulfilment centres worldwide.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250423085060/en/
Contacts
For further details contact pr@allcargologistics.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Tech companies building massive AI data centers should pay to power them
The projected growth in artificial intelligence and its unprecedented demand for electricity to power enormous data centers present a serious challenge to the financial and technical capacity of the U.S. utility system. Appreciation for the sheer magnitude of that challenge has gotten lost as forecast after forecast projects massive growth in electric demand over the coming decade. The idea of building a data center that will draw 1 gigawatt of power or more, an amount sufficient to serve over 875,000 homes, is in the plans of so many data center developers and so routinely discussed that it no longer seems extraordinary. The challenge, when viewed in the aggregate, may be overwhelming. A recent Wood Mackenzie report identified 64 gigawatts of confirmed data center related power projects currently on the books with another 132 gigawatts potentially to be developed. 64 gigawatts are enough to power 56 million homes — more than twice the population of the 15 largest cities in America. The U.S. electric utility system is struggling to meet the projected energy needs of the AI industry. The problem is that many utilities do not have the financial and organizational resources to build new generating and transmission facilities at the scale and on the data center developers' desired timeline. The public policy question now on the table is who should pay for and bear the risk for these massive mega-energy projects. Will it be the AI developers such as Amazon, Microsoft, Meta and Alphabet — whose combined market value is seven times that of the entire S&P 500 Utility Sector — or the residential and other customers of local electric utilities? The process to answer this and related questions is underway in the hallways of the U.S. Congress, at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and other federal agencies, in tariff proceedings before state regulatory authorities and in public debate at the national, state and local levels. Whether they are developed at the federal, state or local level, the following values and objectives should form the core of public policy in this area: Data centers developers that require massive amounts of electric power (e.g. above 500MW or another specified level) should be required to pay for building new generating and transmission facilities. The State of Texas recently enacted legislation that requires data centers and other new large users to fund the infrastructure necessary to serve their needs. Although it is customary to spread the cost of new facilities across the user base of a utility, the demands that data center developers are placing on utility systems across the country are sufficiently extraordinary to justify allocating the costs of new facilities to those developers. Moreover, data center developers have the financial resources to cover those costs and incorporate them into the rates charged to users of their AI services. The developers of large data centers should bear the risk associated with new utility-built generating and transmission facilities, not the utility. As an example of such a policy, the Public Utility Commission of Ohio just approved a compromise proposed by American Electric Power of Ohio that would require data centers with loads greater than 1 gigawatt and mobile data centers over 25 megawatts to commit to 10-year electric service contracts and pay minimum demand charges based on 85 percent of their contract capacity, up from 60 percent under the utility's current general service tariff. Another option included in the Texas legislation requires significant up-front payments early in the planning process and mandates that data center developers disclose where they may have simultaneously placed demands for power. It is not unusual for data center requests for service to be withdrawn once they decide on the best location and package of incentives. Data center developers have the financial capacity and ability to manage this risk, utilities do not. Generating facilities that are co-located at large data centers should be integrated with the local utility electric grid, with appropriate cost allocation. Although a few projects have examined the option of a co-located power generation 'island' fully independent of the grid, most projects intend to interconnect with the grid system for back-up power and related purposes. Properly managed, this interconnection could be advantageous for both the data center and the utility system, provided that costs are appropriately allocated across the system. The U.S. government should continue to support the development of nuclear technology, including small modular reactors. U.S. utilities do not have the financial resources to assume the risk of building new nuclear-powered generating facilities. The emergence of a new set of customers, data center developers with enormous needs for electric power and deep pockets, changes the equation. The U.S. government has provided billions of dollars of support for new nuclear technologies and should continue to do so for the purpose of bringing their costs down. The U.S. government should continue to support energy efficiency improvements at data centers. Data centers use massive amounts of power for running servers, cooling systems, storage systems, networking equipment, backup systems, security systems and lighting. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory has developed a 'handbook' of measures that data centers can implement to reduce energy usage and achieve savings. In addition, there now are strong market forces to develop new super-efficient chips that will lower the unit costs of training and using AI models. The U.S. government should help accelerate the development of these chips given their leverage on U.S. electricity demand. The stakes in this public policy debate over our energy future could not be higher. If we get these policies right, AI has the potential to remake the U.S. economy and the energy infrastructure of this country. If we get it wrong, the push to build new generating and transmission facilities to provide gigawatts of power has the potential to overwhelm the financial and operational capacity our electric utility system, impose burdensome rate increases on homeowners and businesses, undercut efforts to reduce the use of fossil fuels to meet climate-related goals and compromise the reliability of our electricity grid for years to come. David M. Klaus is a consultant on energy issues who served as deputy undersecretary of the U.S. Department of Energy during the Obama administration and as a political appointee to two other Democratic presidents. Mark MacCarthy is the author of 'Regulating Digital Industries' (Brookings, 2023), an adjunct professor at Georgetown University's Communication, Culture & Technology Program, a nonresident senior fellow at the Institute for Technology Law and Policy at Georgetown Law and a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
Engadget
2 hours ago
- Engadget
China calls for the creation of a global AI organization
China wants to work with other countries and has laid out its plans for the global governance of artificial intelligence at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai. Li Qiang, the country's premier, warned about "technological monopolies" and said that AI could become "an exclusive game for a few countries and companies." As such, he proposed the creation of a "world AI cooperation organization" during the event. Li didn't specifically mention the United States when he talked about monopolies, but the US restricts AI chip exports to his country. NVIDIA had to develop chips that are only meant for China and conform to export rules so it wouldn't lose the Chinese market completely. Meanwhile, Chinese companies like Huawei are developing their own AI systems to make up for China's lack of access to more advanced AI chips from American firms. Li also made the statement a few days after the Trump administration revealed its AI Action Plan, which seeks to limit state regulation of AI companies and which aims to ensure that the US can beat China in the AI race. The Chinese premier said his country would "actively promote" the development of open source artificial intelligence and that China is "willing to provide more Chinese solutions to the international community" when it comes to AI. He also said that his country was eager to share AI technologies with developing countries in the global south. "Currently, overall global AI governance is still fragmented. Countries have great differences, particularly in terms of areas such as regulatory concepts [and] institutional rules," Li said. "We should strengthen coordination to form a global AI governance framework that has broad consensus as soon as possible."
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Pakistan says it's ‘very close' to a trade deal with President Trump
Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar claimed his country is 'very close' to locking down a tariff deal with the US ahead of President Trump's fast-approaching Aug. 1 deadline for the 'Liberation Day' levies to take effect. Dar met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and predicted a deal is just days away as the Trump administration scrambles to finalize agreements with countries before the deadline. 'I think we are very close to finalizing a deal with the U.S.,' Dar said during an appearance at the Atlantic Council think tank Friday. 'Our teams have been here in Washington, discussing, having virtual meetings and a committee has been tasked by the prime minister to fine-tune now.' 'It's not going to be months, not even weeks, I would say days.' Since Trump unveiled his 'Liberation Day' tariffs, a deluge of countries have been negotiating with his team to cut lightning deals. 3 Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio this week to discuss trade and other issues. Getty Images 3 President Trump has been trying to overhaul US trade policy during his second term. Ron Sachs/CNP / Trump repeatedly agreed to postpone the implementation rate for most of those tariffs, with the most recent deadline being Aug. 1 to give more time for negotiations to play out. So far, he has locked down tariff deals with the United Kingdom, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines. The Trump administration also has a tariff truce with China, where there is an Aug. 12 deadline to ink a broader deal. At the moment, Trump has imposed a 10% baseline tariff rate on almost all imports, tariffs on Chinese imports, 25% tariffs on automobiles, aluminum, and steel, as well as 25% on imports from Canada and Mexico that don't comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Total US trade with Pakistan clocked in at about $7.3 billion last year, according to the Office of the US Trade Representative. The State Department and Pakistan also confirmed the two sides held talks on trade issues, but didn't reveal a timeline for a deal getting finalized. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Earlier this year, fighting erupted between India and Pakistan after the Pahalgam terrorist attack near India's administered Jammu and Kashmir. The incident sparked a chain of events that led to India firing missiles into Pakistan. Pakistan responded in kind. The two countries, which have been mired in decades-long tensions over Kashmir, are both nuclear-armed, which has led to elevated concerns about the conflict spiraling out of control. 3 Pakistan revealed plans to nominate President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize last month. REUTERS A ceasefire was announced between the two in May. Trump has since publicly taken credit for helping to mediate the differences between the two sides. Last month, Pakistan announced plans to nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize over his 'decisive diplomatic intervention' during the conflict with India.
