After Conor McGregor withdraws ‘new evidence' in rape case, we examine neighbour's claims
This is the almost 24-metre distance over which Conor McGregor's 'witnesses' claimed they saw Nikita Hand being attacked through their upstairs window.
Our pictures show the two houses facing each other on the opposite sides of a quiet cul-de-sac in Drimnagh in south Dublin.
Samantha O'Reilly came forward to claim that she clearly viewed a 'heated row' between Ms Hand and her then partner when she looked out her bedroom window late on 'Sunday night/early on the Monday morning' in December 2018.
According to Google Earth, the distance between the two upstairs windows of the homes is 23.5 metres (77 ft) – with the windows also providing a barrier to vision.
Samantha O'Reilly
Neither Ms Hand, her former partner or McGregor's witnesses, Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins, still live on the road in Drimnagh and none of the current residents have any ties to the case.
O'Reilly made the 'bombshell' statement to McGregor's legal team, claiming she witnessed an assault through two windows across the road at a time when the natural light was likely to be severely diminished.
The claim was slammed as 'lies' by Ms Hand.
However, when it came to test the evidence during Conor McGregor's appeal against his civil rape trial verdict this week, O'Reilly and her partner Steven Cummins' statements were formally withdrawn.
The statements have now been referred to the DPP by the judges for perjury.
In a sworn affidavit, O'Reilly claimed she was in the back bedroom of this home when she was woken by a fight between Nikita Hand and her then-partner in their home all the way across the street in the hours after she was allegedly sexually assaulted by Conor McGregor in a Dublin hotel in December 2018.
Ms Hand (35) successfully sued McGregor in a civil court over an incident in which he was alleged to have 'brutally raped and battered' her in a penthouse at the Beacon Hotel in south Dublin in December 2018.
McGregor launched an appeal against the civil court verdict and in May his legal team said they wanted to introduce new evidence from Ms Hand's former neighbours Samantha O'Reilly and her partner Steven Cummins.
The couple said they only came forward six years later after seeing television reports about the trial.
Ms Hand described the claims as 'lies' and McGregor's legal team dramatically withdrew those claims from the appeal this week with Ms Hand's legal team suggesting it was now being 'conceded' the claims were lies.
Despite their bedroom being in the rear of their own home, O'Reilly claimed she awoke after hearing the row.
Ms Hand said it was not conceivable that Ms O'Reilly would have been awoken after hearing the row from the back bedroom.
Ms O'Reilly claimed after waking up she witnessed a physical row between Ms Hand and her then partner Stephen Redmond at their south Dublin home.
O'Reilly's affidavit inferred Mr Redmond assaulted Ms Hand in an upstairs bedroom by punching her and kicking her after pushing her to the floor.
In her affidavit, despite her own bedroom being located at the back of her home, O'Reilly claimed she was woken by sounds of 'screaming and shouting' from Ms Hand's house.
Nikita Hand
'They were both shouting at each other,' she said. 'Nikita was saying words to Ste [Stephen] to the effect that 'it was always about you'. They were running in and out of the bedrooms. Nikita was pushing Ste.'
She said the couple eventually returned to the 'first bedroom' and then claims she saw Mr Redmond push Ms Hand so that she fell down.
'I could see Ste's arms moving up and down as if he was hitting Nikita. I also saw him moving his hips in a way that indicated to me that he was kicking her.
'As Nikita was on the ground I did not see any blows land on her. She got up and started pushing her hair out of her face... She then ran out of the room... I was extremely upset at this.'
Conor McGregor
Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 6th
Ms O'Reilly said by this point both her daughter and her partner Steven Cummins were awake. Her daughter was 'screaming at me' to help Ms Hand.
She said her partner insisted they should not get involved in another person's domestic row. Ms O'Reilly said she then heard Mr Redmond's car taking off fast out of the cul-de-sac.
Ms O'Reilly said she subsequently went across the road and saw Ms Hand at her front door where she was screaming.
She said Ms Hand later said she was 'grand' and went inside.
In a responding affidavit, Ms Hand said she had 'a verbal argument' but said Mr Redmond did not assault her that night or ever during their relationship.
Conor McGregor
She also said that she never went upstairs during the row as her daughter was sleeping upstairs and only went upstairs to check on her daughter after Mr Redmond left the house.
Ms Hand also said it was inconceivable that the argument could have been heard from a house across the road, that she didn't come out of her home screaming and did not speak to Ms O'Reilly.
One of the key points of her affidavit was that Ms O'Reilly and Cummins' bedroom was at the back of their house looking into the back garden while the front windows upstairs were their children's bedrooms.
Ms Hand said she and Mr Redmond never went upstairs during the row as her daughter was sleeping upstairs.
She said she only went upstairs to check on her daughter after Mr Redmond left the house.
Ms Hand insisted it was not conceivable the argument could have been heard from a house across the road, that she did not come out of her home screaming, and had no conversation with Ms O'Reilly.
A key point in her affidavit related to the layout of Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins' house.
Ms Hand said their bedroom was upstairs at the back of the house looking onto the back yard, while the windows upstairs at the front were children's bedrooms.
Cummins claimed he was woken that night by screams from his daughter and it was obvious from 'screams and shouts' that there was a 'row' in Ms Hand's house. He did not claim to see any physical violence.
On Wednesday, Ms Hand's lawyer John Gordon SC said she had been disadvantaged by 'highly disparaging and unfair criticisms' in 'widely published' claims from the affidavit.
Mr Gordon said the application to introduce the witnesses was not just to produce further evidence, but also to 'undermine my client's reputation', including by stating she had lied.
Mark Mulholland, counsel for McGregor, had raised concerns that the request was an attempt to get the matter on the record for the media, adding that this would be 'wholly inappropriate'.
Mr Gordon said Ms Hand was 'put through the wringer yet again' and expressed a desire to cross-examine Mr Cummins and Ms O'Reilly.
He asked the Court of Appeal to use its powers to refer matters to the DPP, citing concerns around perjury.
The three judges of the court, Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy, Mr Justice Brian O'Moore and Mr Justice Patrick MacGrath, said they would do so.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sunday World
4 hours ago
- Sunday World
Man who beat victim to death with shovel told gardai ‘I hope the c**t is dead'
GUILTY PLEA | Joseph Cahill (46) pleaded guilty to the unlawful killing of 43-year-old Gerard 'Ger' Curtin Joseph Cahill A sentencing hearing for Joseph Cahill (46), who pleaded guilty to the unlawful killing of 43-year-old Gerard 'Ger' Curtin, heard that Cahill had previously threatened to kill the deceased after Mr Curtin came to his house, threw stones at his windows, threatened to burn the house down and demanded money. Mr Curtin left after Cahill's partner gave him €300. Inspector James Ruddle of Roxboro Road Garda Station in Limerick told the court that Curtin returned to Cahill's house in the early hours about two weeks later, again demanding money. CCTV footage showed the deceased smashing a window of the Cahill home with a rock. The lock on Cahill's front door was broken so he had propped a shovel against it to keep out intruders. Cahill took the shovel, opened the door and struck the victim on the head, causing him to immediately fall to the ground, the inspector said. Cahill then struck Mr Curtin three more times as he lay "defenceless and immobile" on the ground. Gerard Curtin Before delivering the blows, Cahill called emergency services and asked for the police. After delivering the fatal blows, with Mr Curtin lying motionless on the ground, Cahill told the call-taker that a man was trying to get into his house. He waited a further eight minutes and 30 seconds before telling the call taker to send an ambulance. When asked why he needed an ambulance, Cahill said: "I think he's dead... I had to protect my kids. I don't give a fuck about going to jail. I beat a shovel off his head and I kept beating, to tell you the truth." The first garda at the scene made a note of Cahill saying: "I hit him with a shovel, I hope the c**t is dead." Garret Baker SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions, told Ms Justice Eileen Creedon that Cahill was originally charged with murder. He said the DPP accepted the manslaughter plea on the basis that Cahill honestly believed that he was protecting himself, his property and his children but that the force he used in striking Mr Curtin four times with the shovel was excessive. On May 30 this year, Cahill, of Sarsfield Avenue, Garryowen, Limerick pleaded guilty to the unlawful killing of Gerard Curtin on November 4, 2023 outside his home. Mr Baker said the offence warrants a headline sentence of ten to 15 years. In an impact statement, Bianca Hickey told the court that the deceased was a brother, father, partner and friend. She said the family has always been "close-knit" but the killing tore them apart. Joseph Cahill News in 90 Seconds - Thursday, July 31 She said they have watched their parents become "completely different people". Their mother "traded nights at bingo for sleepless nights and endless nightmares" while their father lost interest in his hobbies and no longer loves chatting and laughing with his family. They never got to say goodbye or kiss him one last time because his injuries were so catastrophic that his coffin had to be closed. Inspector Ruddle agreed with Michael O'Higgins SC, for Cahill, that gardai were aware of allegations over many years that Mr Curtin had smashed windows of houses and threatened the occupants. The court heard that eight days after the killing, Cahill's home was petrol bombed and the family was forced to move out of the area. Cahill's sister's home was also petrol bombed at 5am while all people living there were in bed, the court was told. When Mr O'Higgins began to read a letter of apology from his client, the deceased's family stood up and walked out of court. In the letter, Cahill said he wanted to "express how deeply sorry I am" to the victim's partner and children. He said he carries the "massive burden" of what he did every day and has turned the lives of his own family upside down. "I never set out or imagined that night going to bed that anything like this would happen," he said. Mr O'Higgins said his client has a long history of mental illness, polysubstance abuse and a gambling addiction. He pointed to a psychiatric report which states that due to childhood trauma, Cahill is predisposed to act irrationally and to overreact to threats against himself and his family. He has no relevant previous convictions and, Mr O'Higgins said, is not likely to come before the courts again. Counsel asked the court to take into account that Cahill was woken on the night by a volatile man smashing his windows and trying to cross the threshold into his home. The four blows took just four seconds, he said, and although the force used was excessive, counsel asked the court to consider how quickly his brain could process what was happening. While Mr O'Higgins said the court would have to impose a custodial sentence, he asked Ms Justice Creedon to offer the "maximum leniency" possible. Ms Justice Creedon adjourned sentencing to November 24.
Sunday World
4 hours ago
- Sunday World
Pervert's suspended sentence for bombarding boy with explicit chat is overturned
James Varian (32) was found to have 7,781 child pornography images on his mobile phone James Varian (32), with an address at Lois na Greine, South Douglas Road, Cork was found to have 7,781 child pornography images on his mobile phone, with the majority of the files related to prepubescent children under the age of 12. Varian pleaded guilty to using information and communication technology to facilitate the sexual exploitation of a child contrary to section 8 (1) of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017. He also pleaded guilty to the possession of child pornography contrary to section 6 (1) of the Child Trafficking and Pornography Act 1998, as amended by section 14 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017. The judge also took into consideration an offence of attempting to pervert the course of justice contrary to common law. James Varian talks to our reporter at his Cork home On November 19, 2024, Varian was sentenced by Judge Dermot Sheehan in Cork Circuit Criminal Court. He received four years fully suspended for the charge of facilitating the sexual exploitation of a child, and two years fully suspended for the possession of child pornography. The Director of Public Prosecutions had appealed the sentence on the grounds that it was too lenient. At the original sentencing hearing, Detective Sergeant Brendan Corry said that on January 4, 2022, gardai were called to an address and spoke to a father who said that images and other media files of a sexual nature were found on a home computer a 15-year-old boy had been using. Det Sgt Corry said that gardai found messages of a sexually explicit nature were being sent to the boy, mostly through the messaging site Telegram. He said that on January 5, the respondent phoned gardai to say that he was the subject of a garda enquiry and on January 6 a warrant was obtained to search his home. He said that the communication discovered by gardai was 'alarmingly excessive, with in excess of two thousand five hundred messages exchanged over a period of nine days spanning between December 26, 2021 and January 4, 2022." At the time of offending, Varian was 28 years old, while the boy was 15. Det Sgt Corry said that on January 4, upon discovering that gardai were investigating, Varian also directed the boy to 'purge chats, delete everything'. James Varian talks to our reporter at his Cork home He said that Varian was arrested on May 30, 2022, was detained and interviewed on two occasions, where he made no admissions at interview. He said that the seized phone was found to contain 7,781 images classed as child pornography, with 6,431 of these images deemed as 'child animation'. Counsel for the DPP, Emmet Boyle BL, told the Court of Appeal that the sentencing judge erred in failing to attach appropriate weight to aggravating factors in the case. He said these factors included the amount of messages sent to the child, the disparity of age between the defendant and the victim, his urging the boy to delete the messages and his risk of reoffending which was outlined by the probation services. Mr Boyle also said that the sentencing judge put undue weight on the mitigating factors in the case, like Varian's lack of previous convictions and his early guilty plea. Defence counsel for Varian, Jane Hyland SC, said that the decision to fully suspend his sentence was justified and the judge was exercising within his discretion in the sentencing. She said that her client lost his job as a result of the incident, that he suffers from mental health problems and that he also suffered reputationally from the incident. Returning judgement, Mr Justice John Edwards said that the sentencing judge's reasons for fully suspending the sentences were 'relatively sparse', giving only Varian's age and the fact that he was a first time offender. He said that the judge acted in error to fully suspend the sentences and that the decision was not proportionate to the gravity of the offending. He said that the sentencing was 'outside the norm and unduly lenient'. James Varian He also said that although the court noted Varian's assertions of his remorse, his letter of apology presented to the judge failed to mention his young victim at all. Mr Justice Edwards said that the court decided to quash the original sentences and proceeded to resentencing. He said that there was no issue with the original headline sentences imposed at six years for sending explicit messages and four years for the possession of child pornography. He said that the court also accepted the discount of two years for both counts given in mitigation by the sentencing judge. The Court of Appeal sentenced Varian to four years in custody with the final 12 months suspended for a period of 12 months for the count of sending explicit messages. They also sentenced him to two years in custody for the count of possession of child pornography, to run concurrently with the first.
Irish Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Conor McGregor breaks silence after losing appeal over 'rape' case
Conor McGregor has broken his silence just hours after he lost an appeal in a civil case in which Nikita Hand accused him of rape. McGregor, who was not in attendance at the High Court, lost his appeal on all five grounds that it was taken. A jury ruled in favour of Ms Hand last November, who said she was raped by the former MMA fighter and awarded her almost €250,000 in damages. And McGregor, who has an estimated net worth in excess of €200m, must also pay Nikita Hand €2m in legal costs. But in his first social media post since the appeal verdict, McGregor did not mention the court hearing. Instead, he promoted his own-brand stout and an upcoming Bare Knuckle fight card, a company in which he has a minority ownership stake. McGregor would then go on to post multiple photos in his Instagram story promoting the stout. The Dubliner found himself in hot water with High Court Judge Alexander Owens after last year's outcome when he took to social media, saying it was a "kangaroo court". "The social media post was constructed to be an attack on the jury and cannot be tolerated," said Mr Justice Owens at the time. "If he did post the text, it was highly irresponsible," the judge said. "It is most unsatisfactory that a litigant would go on to attack the jury." In today's hearing Mr Justice Brian O'Moore was also critical of McGregor's conduct and attempt to reintroduce new evidence in the case in the form of couple Samantha O'Reilly and Stephen Cummins - who claimed to have witnessed Ms Hand possibly being assaulted by her ex partner - only to sensationally withdraw the sworn affidavits on the opening of the appeal. The judges have referred the issue to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to decide whether any perjury was committed. 'The conduct of Mr. McGregor, in publicly introducing evidence which fundamentally called into question the correctness of the jury's verdict and the testimony of Ms. Hand which had led to it, only to abandon that evidence when it was about to be tested is behaviour which deserves to be marked by a palpable sign of the court's displeasure and disapproval,' Judge O'Moore added.
