Joe O'Byrne: ‘We're having the reactivation of the type of politics that we saw in the early 1930s'
Once welcomed in elite Nazi circles (aristocrat Libertas was given away by Hermann Göring at their 1936 wedding), this extraordinary pair became part of the secret anti-Nazi resistance network of artists, intellectuals and allies dubbed The Red Orchestra by the German military-intelligence service.
Both Luftwaffe officer Harro and his writer wife Libertas had been involved in the resistance movement before the war, but once war was declared, such activities were reclassified as treason and punishable by death.
O'Byrne first came across their story when studying for an MA in German literature. He initially wrote a screenplay about them, but came to believe Harro and Libertas were better suited to the expanse and interiority of a novel. From the outset he wanted to keep faith with their authentic selves, and 'Be true to how they lived, what they said, what they were, what they might have been'.
READ MORE
The Red Orchestra in Blue, which is also a homage to Berlin (O'Byrne lives in Berlin and Dublin), conjures up two brave, brilliant and charismatic individuals. Set during 1939-1942, it depicts Harro and Libertas as companions, comrades and co-conspirators. Their story is both a very public tale of heroism and tragedy, and the private love story of two complex and ambitious individuals whose legacy has become as deeply interconnected as their lives.
[
German president tackles uncomfortable statistic: every second German favours 'drawing a line' under Nazi past
Opens in new window
]
This is O'Byrne's first novel to be published, although he has written plenty ('probably 12,' he says cheerfully). The novel's original publication date of May 2020 was one of many literary casualties of Covid, and he found its cancellation difficult.
'For a couple years after that, I didn't write any more. I started a number of ideas for books - about four or five - and couldn't finish. And then last year I got one of them to the end of a draft.'
The next novel he hopes to publish is Deposition. Set in the Liberties area of Dublin, its dual timeline incorporates the present day and the mid-18th century. The novel he drafted last year, The White Butterfly, takes place in Havana in 1894 and contemporary New York.
'There are writers who like to keep in the same furrow and I don't,' he says. 'I think it's because I work in theatre a lot, where you tend to chop and change.' In addition to writing and directing for film, television and radio, his many theatre credits include Frank Pig Says Hello and The Dead School by Patrick McCabe. He also directed and co-adapted Roddy Doyle's The Woman Who Walked into Doors and The Five Lamps for the stage, and Gary Brown's Dockers.
'Writing a novel is a long process. If you're writing a play you might have a first draft in four weeks. It might take longer, but four weeks is actually possible, whereas with a book you're in it for the long haul. As a writer you have to be patient.'
What would he choose if he could work in one art form only? 'At this stage I would probably stick with fiction. Theatre and film are collaborative arts, but because you're engaging with so many people it becomes difficult. Not that the people are difficult, but the process can be. Sometimes you get up in the morning and think, I just want to be on my own and write, I don't want to have to go into a rehearsal room and engage with all these issues and problems and deadlines. The thing about theatre is that once you start, the deadlines come at you so fast ... It's a big ticking clock.'
It was a grand historical deed, and it was necessary, and to be commended. However, it led to significant internal resistance
—
O'Byrne on Angela Merkel's decision to admit more than a million asylum seekers into Germany
A third significant character in the novel is Polish-born singer and musician Martin Rosenberg (also known as Rosebery d'Arguto), who was arrested by the Gestapo in 1939 and deported to Sachsenhausen concentration camp, where he secretly set up a choir of Jewish prisoners.
Rosenberg's character is introduced with a vivid and insightful description of him as living through three maps: that of Poland when ruled by the tsar of Russia; independent Poland after the first World War; and finally that of 'the expanding Reich when Hitler struck and overran Poland'. It is a striking image, and one with contemporary parallels, as O'Byrne notes, referencing Trump's fixations with Canada and taking control of Greenland.
Redrawing maps is just one of the similarities O'Byrne touches on between Europe of 80 years ago and today, citing the similarities between the rise of Nazism and the current growth of right-wing parties and attitudes. He finished writing The Red Orchestra in Blue in 2015, a year he describes as,
'the beginning of what you might call the current phase of the reactivation of past history,' because that was the year when German chancellor Angela Merkel allowed more than a million asylum seekers to cross the border into Germany.
'It was a grand historical deed, and it was necessary, and to be commended. However, it led to significant internal resistance,' he says, as it became a major factor in the growth of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party.
(The AfD
came second
in Germany's federal elections in February, winning a record 152 seats in the 630-seat parliament.)
'Trump's attacks on certain institutions are reminiscent of the Nazi attacks on the education system and cultural institutions,' he says. 'When the Berlin Wall and the Iron Curtain came down, people used the phrase 'at the end of history'. Unfortunately history is not over; history has been reactivated. It just went into abeyance, into slumber mode, and now we're having the reactivation of the type of politics that we saw in the early thirties.' In the novel, Harro says, 'It was all an abuse of confidence, the whole Nazi affair.'
As democracy retreats, and culture, science and education are under threat, it's hard not to hear echoes of 1930s Europe all around us today, and O'Byrne's wish for the novel is that it contributes 'to a discussion or argument about the perils of where we're heading at the moment.'
The five-year delay in publishing may yet be to O'Byrne's advantage, as interest in second World War literature continues to grow, particularly since the publication of Anthony Doerr's Pulitzer Prize-winning All the Light We Cannot See, which was adapted by Netflix in 2023. Persephone Books recently reissued Sally Carson's Crooked Cross, which in 1934 depicted the rise of Nazi tyranny with horrifying accuracy.
O'Byrne also explores the value of culture when it is pitted against what Harro describes as 'the march of steel'. Harro and Libertas were so involved in Berlin's cultural life that they would have witnessed the arts being subverted and crushed.
'Most of the artists we might consider the great artists in Germany in the '20s were considered degenerates and so their art was swept aside,' he says. 'They still did have cabarets, but they were very sanitised. The theatres had a limited, more classical repertoire, and classical music was a key part of the cultural offering. Harro and Libertas would have witnessed that, in fact, culture can only do so much.'
From jazz (the 'In Blue' of the novel's title) to cabaret, classical music and the popular hits of the day, music flows like a river through this novel - of all the arts, O'Byrne believes music is the spirit that cannot be crushed.
'Stories like this have to be told and retold,' he says, seeing the role of imagination as to keep hope alive. Ina Lautenschläger, described in the novel as 'fashion model by day, clandestine printer by night', tells Harro, 'At times like these, we must fill our lives with fiction, with fantasy, this is our own little bit of theatre. They cannot take our imagination away from us. That is what makes us human.'
Hope is the key, O'Byrne believes. Of Harro and Libertas Schulze-Boysen he says, 'They were brave, they lived in hope. You don't engage in resistance unless you actually have hope.'
The Red Orchestra in Blue is published by Betimes Books
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Ireland is not anti-Semitic': Taoiseach rejects criticism from veteran US senator
The Taoiseach has rejected criticism of the Occupied Territories Bill from the chairman of the United States Senate foreign relations committee, describing the accusation of anti-Semitism as appalling. Idaho Republican Jim Risch said Ireland was on 'a hateful, anti-Semitic path' and that the US would have to reconsider the bilateral relationship if the legislation proceeded. 'I would reject any assertion that this is anti-Semitic. I'm appalled of that assertion and that's something we're going to correct,' Micheál Martin told The Irish Times. Speaking in Osaka during a four-day visit to Japan, Mr Martin said the war in Gaza was causing pressure on politics throughout Europe. But he insisted the Government did not have to choose between defending Ireland's economic interests and taking a tough position against Israel's actions. 'We've been very responsible in terms of looking at everything through the prism of humanitarian rights. I don't know how anyone can justify the blockade in Gaza. The reports we're repeatedly getting from UN agencies in respect of starving children and the slaughter of children, that is absolutely unacceptable,' he said. READ MORE 'It's not one or the other. We will work on our economic interests. We'll work to explain our position to interlocutors in the US and to the US administration.' The Taoiseach said he was encouraged by Donald Trump's 'absolute opposition to war' to hope that the US president could succeed in bringing an end to the killing in Gaza. Martin said that during his visit to Washington in March, it was clear Israel was galvanising opinion in the US against Ireland. 'We were getting feedback that there was a certain undermining of Ireland unjustifiably and endeavouring to position Ireland's opposition into the conduct of the war and the breaching of international humanitarian law by Israel, and labelling that as anti-Semitic,' he said. 'Ireland is not anti-Semitic. We've been very strongly supportive of international and global efforts to oppose anti-Semitism. We've signed significant declarations in that respect, but also in terms of our own education system, we've been very strong in terms of teachings on the Holocaust and the horrors of all of that. We would reject that very strongly, and that's a bit of a smear on Ireland.' Much of the focus of the Taoiseach's visit to Japan is on the bilateral economic relationship and Japanese investment in Ireland. Japan's population is declining by more than 800,000 every year and Martin said that contrary to anti-immigration rhetoric, Ireland's growing population is one of its attractions for foreign investors. 'I said it this week to a couple of Japanese companies, there is no issue with human capital in Ireland because we have access to the European labour market. It's been a powerful incentive, whereas tax would have been an earlier incentive. In the modern world, it's human capital,' he said. 'I acknowledge that our population has gone up by one-third in two decades. That's what's creating the pressure on services, creating huge demand on housing, but also on health services, education services. But there's something to reflect on that we're now, for the first time since the famine, over seven million people. To me, that's an extraordinary achievement by modern Ireland. It should be seen as an achievement.'


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Keeping student fees down and reducing VAT would cost €3 billion we don't have
Political decision-making and attention-seeking have morphed into one. Getting attention or avoiding it are old habits – the new normal is that analysis underpinning choices with big consequences too frequently amounts to a calculation about how it affects the news cycle. Its all-pervasiveness means there are no longer good litmus tests for policymaking. The debate over student fees is an example of the wrong thing for the wrong reason. Another is the threat to again reduce the VAT rate on hospitality businesses to 9 per cent, down from 13.5 per cent. Minister for Higher Education James Lawless spoke the truth when he said that the €1,000 reduction in student fees was a once-off measure, funded by a cost-of-living package that would not be repeated. The Tánaiste and Fine Gael Simon Harris leader jumped in feet-first, made a big issue of it, and insisted that fees would be reduced. But reduced from what? The €3,000 they were before the series of 'once-off' reductions, or the €2,000 they were last year? The sustainability of third-level funding was not allowed to cloud the issue. A spat was started, and the spotlight was on. Manufacturing difference and reducing students fees would cost €100 million per year. Bringing VAT down again to 9 per cent for the hospitality sector would cost €734 million. Cumulatively that is more than €3 billion cut out of the tax base in the remaining life of the Government. That is big money in a country with only three sources of tax large enough to make any real difference – income tax, corporation tax and VAT. Just days away from learning what the next turn in the Donald Trump tariff saga will be, we are being egged on to slash a dangerously narrow tax base further. It is only weeks since the International Monetary Fund described our fiscal position as 'highly exposed to external policy shifts and shocks' and recommended 'broadening the tax base through VAT, property tax and personal income tax reforms'. READ MORE The Department of Finance 's Tax Strategy Group in its report on VAT last July pointed out that the EU Commission, the OECD and others such as the Commission for Taxation and Welfare recommended broadening the VAT base and narrowing the scope of reduced rates to stabilise VAT revenues. The Commission for Taxation and Welfare proposed widening the VAT base and limiting the use of zero and reduced rates of VAT. There is no requirement, it said, for a business to pass on any VAT reduction to the consumer at reduced prices. When the State spent €1.2 billion on the last VAT reduction for the hospitality sector it went into the pockets of proprietors, not customers. To repeat the dose would, in the opinion of the Tax Strategy Group, constitute 'an enormous fiscal transfer of taxpayers' money to the sector which the evidence available at present does not support'. To add to the dreary nonsense of experts who don't have to get elected, or even get on the news, on Monday the governor of the Central Bank reiterated warnings about the narrowness of the income tax and VAT base. He specifically warned against the widespread application of reduced and zero rates to a variety of goods and services. In a digital era where attention is currency, and clicks shape policy, the frenetic pursuit of the spotlight passes for political expertise. In fact, it's a downward spiral where good money and credibility are thrown away in the false hope of electoral approval for bad policies. The remark of the wily Luxembourg politician Jean-Claude Juncker that 'we all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it' has become a backstop for time servers. Their own supposed expertise in getting elected is the real nonsense. Fine Gael chased the crowd and lost badly in three elections. It is in Government with an apathetic Fianna Fáil because time and again the opposition, principally Sinn Féin, failed to persuade people they are up to the job. They have not only lost their way; they have also lost the compass. The problem is not that the Government parties can't do economics, they can't do politics. They have neither the backbone nor the bandwidth to carry the arguments they once believed in but now hardly remember. It is a measure of how far Ireland has come that the power of the publicans has passed intact to restaurateurs and hairdressers. That is progress indeed. Days before Trump rolls the dice on tariffs again, big chunks of our tax base are blithely gambled on in pursuit of the approbation of a grasping and politically unreliable middle class.


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Middle class parents are the winners in third-level fee cut. That's why Fine Gael don't want to touch it
When the Nobel Prize winning US economist Milton Friedman – who was much admired by Ronald Regan and Margaret Thatcher – remarked that 'nothing is so permanent as a temporary Government programme' he most certainly didn't have the Irish higher education grant system in mind. But the kerfuffle over the suggestion that the €1,000 reduction in the ' student contribution' towards third-level fees may be axed looks set to prove him right once again. Introduced in Budget 2022 as part of a cost-of-living package, the temporary measure reappeared in the following two budgets and the expectation was that it would also feature in next year's budget, the details of which will which be announced in October. That would certainly seem to be the view of Simon Harris , leader of junior Coalition partner Fine Gael, who has thrown shade on the suggestion at the weekend by the Minster for Higher Education, Fianna Fáil's James Lawless, that the measure would not feature next year. Harris – who introduced the cut when he was doing Lawless's job – remarked somewhat elliptically that we will 'see where the Budget brings us'. READ MORE The issue will no doubt provide much political sport over the dog days of summer but what is not up for debate is that the arguments for its retention are electoral rather than economic. [ Third-level fees: No funding earmarked to avoid the €1,000 hike this year, Taoiseach says Opens in new window ] The main beneficiaries of the cut are middle-class, higher-income voters. The €1,000 reduction has little impact on the ability of students from lower-income families to access third level education. There are roughly 250,000 third level students and around a quarter of them get a grant. There are various levels of grant ranging from the full package (covering the costs of accommodation, living and student contribution) to grants covering part of the student contribution. The income thresholds for the various levels go from €27,400 for the full package to €136,000 for the minimum grant. Roughly two-thirds of recipients are on the full grant. The Department of Education says students from families earning less than €55,924 will not have to pay the student contribution this year. Defining what constitutes the middle class in contemporary Ireland is not straightforward. In many ways, it's more a state of mind than an income bracket. However, the think tank Social Justice Ireland (SJI) reckons that a middle-income earner is someone on between €40,000 and €100,000 a year. If you accept the SJI categorisation, then all students from lower-income families should get their student contribution covered. Likewise, a fair chunk of the bottom half of the middle-income bracket get all or some of it covered. The real winners from the across-the-board reduction in student contribution are those at the top end of the middle-income bracket and the lower end of the high-income bracket. They are the Irish middle class. And they were undoubtedly feeling the pressure as inflation and energy prices soared in 2022. The cut in the student contribution would have made a significant difference to many families back then, but inflation has abated, wages have gone up and people have adapted. The reduction costs the exchequer almost €100 million a year, which is roughly a quarter of what the Government spends on third level student supports such as grants. If the policy of this Government is – as stated in its programme for Government – 'fair and equal access to quality further and higher education regardless of socioeconomic status, ability or geographical location' a hallmark of its time in office, then it is a no -brainer that the €100 million should now be used to increase the size of grants and raise the income thresholds. It is not that simple, of course. More than half of Irish income tax is paid by the top 10 per cent of earners, who take home more than €100,000 a year, says the parliamentary budget office, which crunches the numbers for Oireachtas members. It is an unbalanced and unstable system, as we saw in the 2008 crash when income tax revenues evaporated, but it keeps the economy competitive. The impact of the lopsided levying of income tax is felt most by those who earn just over €100,000. They may earn a lot, but they also pay a lot of tax and can struggle to fulfil the conventional aspirations of middle-class life such as higher education for their offspring. There are a couple of carrots thrown our way, including child benefit – which is not means tested – and a heavily subsidised private education system which sees the State pay teachers' salaries at elite private schools. There are also generous allowances to ensure that we can pass on our wealth – mostly in the form of the family home – to our children. All of which are political no-go areas. The real problem for the Government is that the temporary reduction in college fees seems to have become part of this unwritten social contract with the middle class. Changing it will come at a political price.