Can cancer drugs treat Alzheimer's? New study thinks so
As per Alzheimer's Association, in 2025, global Alzheimer's statistics indicate a significant prevalence of the disease, with projections estimating that over 7 million Americans will be living with Alzheimer's dementia. Globally, it is estimated that someone develops dementia every three seconds, and the number of people living with dementia is expected to reach 78 million by 2030.
The progressive neurodegenerative disorder, long considered a therapeutic dead end, may soon find some hope of cure in an unlikely ally: cancer drugs.
Recent research reveals that several oncology medications, originally designed to fight tumors, have shown promise in targeting key pathways of Alzheimer's disease (AD), from protein aggregation to neuroinflammation and metabolic dysfunction.
Let's delve deeper into the newest discovery of the silver lining.
The medical breakthrough:
Scientists are exploring cancer drugs as a potential way to tackle Alzheimer's disease, given that the options for treatment are quite limited.
As cases of Alzheimer's continue to rise in the U.S. and around the world due to an aging population, there still isn't a cure. Efforts to create new treatments that actually slow the disease's progression have mostly fallen short.
Currently, only two drugs, Leqembi and Kisunla, are approved by the FDA to slow down early Alzheimer's, but their effectiveness is very limited. Many pharmaceutical companies have even stopped developing Alzheimer's drugs after unsuccessful trials, while others are experimenting with existing medications, including popular weight loss drugs.
Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, have taken a different approach. They searched through a database of over 1,300 various drugs, like antipsychotics and chemotherapy drugs, to find ones that could be repurposed for Alzheimer's treatment. Their study, published in the journal
Cell
, highlighted two cancer drugs that showed promise in reducing Alzheimer's risk. When tested together on mice, these drugs appeared to slow or even reverse Alzheimer's symptoms.
One drug is typically used for breast cancer, and the other works against colon and lung cancer. Alzheimer's is known to cause significant changes in gene expression in the brain, which can disrupt brain function and lead to memory loss.
From their database, fewer than 90 drugs successfully reversed markers related to Alzheimer's in human brain cells. Of these, five drugs seemed particularly effective in lowering Alzheimer's risk for actual patients, and the researchers focused on two FDA-approved cancer drugs to test in mice.
According to the findings, letrozole, a breast cancer drug, appeared to influence gene expression in nerve cells, while irinotecan, used for colon and lung cancer, affected glial cells, which support the nervous system. Alzheimer's can damage nerve cells and trigger an overgrowth of glial cells, leading to brain inflammation.
Interestingly, past studies have shown that breast cancer patients on letrozole had a lower chance of developing Alzheimer's, and colorectal cancer survivors treated with irinotecan also showed decreased risk, adding to the excitement around these findings.
The groundbreaking findings:
Researchers have been testing a combination of two cancer drugs in mice and found some promising results: the combo reversed brain degeneration and improved memory in mice showing signs of Alzheimer's. However, because what works in mice doesn't always work in humans, they plan to test these drugs in a clinical trial with Alzheimer's patients.
Dr. Yadong Huang, a co-author of the study and a neurology professor at UCSF, noted the advantages of repurposing existing drugs: 'Developing a new drug can take hundreds of millions, or even billions, of dollars, and on average takes more than 10 years.
For this repurposed drug, usually, it just takes two or three years, and then you can go to the clinical trial, and the cost is much, much lower.' Despite this progress, he acknowledged, as reported by NBC News, 'We still haven't generated or produced any very effective drugs that can really slow down dramatically the cognitive decline.
'
Alzheimer's remains a complex disease, and its exact cause is still a mystery. Currently, it isn't clear why these cancer drugs might help with Alzheimer's.
One idea is that the breast cancer drug reduces estrogen production, which controls many genes. Another theory is that the colon and lung cancer drug might reduce inflammation in the brain by stopping glial cells from multiplying.
Dr. Melanie McReynolds, a biochemistry assistant professor at Pennsylvania State University, who wasn't involved in this study, added another angle. Her research suggests that another cancer drug can help Alzheimer's by regulating glucose metabolism, which is how cells generate energy.
'With aging, with stress, with diseases, that line of communication is disrupted,' she explained. She believes the drug combo could reverse metabolic decline, calling it 'the secret for contributing to better outcomes with Alzheimer's.
'
What's ahead:
Cancer drug repurposing opens a transformative chapter in Alzheimer's treatment, where repurposing anticancer agents allows researchers to exploit existing toxicity and pharmacokinetic data, potentially accelerating human testing and reducing development costs.
While these findings are exciting, the potential side effects need to be carefully considered. Letrozole can cause hot flashes, and irinotecan may lead to severe diarrhea. 'These drugs have huge side effects, so you need to always balance and figure out whether those types of side effects would be amenable to somebody with Alzheimer's,' Sirota cautioned. 'It's not that it's a slam dunk.'
Reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease linked to target protein for diabetes, as per a study
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
US Scientists discover new early warning sign for deadly pancreatic cancer
With 508,533 new cases and 505,752 deaths worldwide in 2021, pancreatic cancer remains a significant global health challenge with increasing incidence and mortality rates. Pancreatic cancer is often considered deadly due to its tendency to be diagnosed at a late stage, its aggressive nature, and the lack of effective treatments for advanced cases. However, may soon gain a powerful new ally in the battle against this cancer: a biological 'early warning' system that can signal the presence of precancerous pancreatic cells. Researchers at the University of California, San Diego, have uncovered a crucial link between inflammation, cellular stress, and the development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the most common and aggressive type of pancreatic cancer. What is pancreatic cancer? Pancreatic cancer is a disease in which malignant (cancerous) cells form in the tissues of the pancreas. The pancreas is a gland located behind the stomach that plays a crucial role in digestion and blood sugar regulation by producing enzymes and hormones. While the exact causes are not always clear, risk factors include smoking, family history of pancreatic cancer, long-standing type 2 diabetes, and chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatic cancer is often difficult to diagnose early because symptoms may be subtle or absent in the early stages. The deadliness of PDAC Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) originates in the small ducts of the pancreas and carries an incredibly grim prognosis. The average five-year survival rate is less than 10%. According to 2023 estimates, over 62,000 new cases of pancreatic cancer were diagnosed in the US alone. Because it usually shows no symptoms in early stages, PDAC is typically detected only after it has spread, making it hard to treat and nearly impossible to cure. Scientists have long known that inflammation and cellular stress are involved in the growth and spread of pancreatic cancer. But the exact mechanism remained unclear until now. The silver lining In a new study, the UC San Diego team focused on a protein called STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), which is activated under stressful or inflammatory conditions in the body. Once turned on, STAT3 triggers a chain of biological reactions that help tumors grow, adapt, resist treatment, and spread. David Cheresh, a pathologist and co-author of the study, told Newsweek, 'Given the fact that STAT3 plays such an important role in many cancers and the fact that it controls so many genes prompted us to drill down on which genes in particular are associated with cancer development, progression, and drug resistance.' The team also discovered that under low oxygen conditions and inflammation, both common in cancer, STAT3 activates a gene called Integrin β3 (ITGB3) in pancreas cells. This gene speeds up tumor growth and helps cancer spread faster. Even more concerning, they found that common treatments like chemotherapy can also trigger STAT3, which may explain why some tumors become resistant over time. However, the good news is, when researchers blocked STAT3's pathway, they were able to delay the development of tumors, offering a potential new direction for future therapies. The STRESS UP gene signature Through this work, the scientists identified 10 genes, including ITGB3, that STAT3 turns on during stress. Together, they form what the team calls the "STRESS UP" signature, a genetic fingerprint of precancerous activity. As per Cheresh, 'A significant number of patients are what we refer to as 'inducible' for these STRESS UP genes, including ITGB3.' But why is that important? Because it could help doctors predict which patients are likely to develop pancreatic cancer and how aggressive that cancer might become. It could also help determine who is more likely to respond to current treatments. Cheresh added, 'Having knowledge of this gene signature in patients could be valuable since there are known drugs on the market for other diseases that block STAT3 activation and thereby inhibit the expression of the STRESS UP genes in cancer cells.' The importance of early detection (and personalized treatment) The research suggests that STRESS UP could play a role at every stage of pancreatic cancer, from the earliest precancerous lesions to fully drug-resistant tumors and even those that have spread to other organs. According to Cheresh, 'We observed that the STRESS UP gene signature is linked to various critical stages of cancer development including: tumor initiation as precancerous lesions develop into actual tumors, as tumors develop drug resistance, and as tumors develop an invasive or metastatic behavior [when cancer spreads].' The researchers are now examining each of the 10 genes in the STRESS UP signature more closely to develop targeted therapies. One such therapy is already in early clinical trials for patients with drug-resistant cancers. Cheresh explained, 'We are now examining each of these STRESS UP genes for their specific role in the development and progression of cancer with the hope that new specific therapies can be developed. We already have one such therapeutic just now entering clinical trials for patients with drug-resistant cancers.' World Lung Cancer Day 2024: Combating The Deadly Disease With Advanced Treatments
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Most common vitamin, mineral supplements Americans take: Myths, risks, and side effects to know
Apart from indulging in those savory hot dogs, crispy burgers, and candy-sprinkled donuts, Americans thrive on another set of edibles – it's supplements! From multivitamins to mega-doses of vitamin C, Americans love their supplements. While supplements do help us with several health benefits, consuming them in moderation is the key to good health. In fact, a growing body of research suggests that many common supplements are misunderstood, often unnecessary, and in some cases, potentially risky. Let's unpack the perks, perils, and risk factors of America's own superfood – the supplements. America and its obsession with supplements According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), over 75% of US adults report taking some form of dietary supplement. As per ResearchGate, the vitamin and supplement industry is now worth over $40 billion annually, fueled by promises of better health, longer life, and disease prevention. What are multivitamins? Multivitamins are dietary supplements containing multiple vitamins and minerals, designed to fill nutritional gaps in a person's diet. They are available in various forms like tablets, capsules, and gummies, and are intended to supplement, not replace, a healthy diet. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo Many people take them as a safety net to 'fill nutritional gaps', but the real question is – are they necessary for the average healthy adult? Multivitamins Despite being a daily ritual for millions, multivitamins have a mixed track record. Large-scale studies, including those published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) , have found no significant benefits of daily multivitamin use in preventing chronic diseases like heart disease or cancer in healthy individuals. The key issue? Most people who eat a balanced diet already get the nutrients they need from food. Experts warn that relying on supplements instead of real food can create a false sense of nutritional security. The bottom line? Multivitamins aren't dangerous. However, they're not a substitute for fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. Vitamin D Vitamin D, often dubbed the 'sunshine vitamin', is vital for bone health and immune function. It helps regulate the amount of calcium and phosphate in the body. These nutrients are needed to keep bones, teeth, and muscles healthy. A lack of vitamin D can lead to bone deformities such as rickets in children and bone pain caused by a condition called osteomalacia in adults. Vitamin D supplements are one of the few supplements that health professionals widely recommend, especially for people who live in northern climates, have darker skin, or spend little time in sunlight. However, that said, more is not always better. According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) , too much vitamin D from supplements can be harmful due to the risk of hypercalcemia, which is an excess of calcium in the blood. This can lead to various health problems, including kidney damage, heart issues, and bone problems. The safe upper intake level is 4,000 IU per day for adults unless directed otherwise by a healthcare provider. Calcium Calcium is essential for strong bones, especially in older adults and postmenopausal women. It also plays a vital role in numerous other bodily functions. It helps muscles contract, including the heart, and enables nerves to transmit messages. Additionally, calcium is essential for blood clotting and the release of hormones that regulate various bodily processes. However, popping high-dose calcium pills has raised red flags in recent years. Studies, including Harvard Health , suggest that high calcium intake from supplements, particularly in older adults, might increase the risk of cardiovascular issues like heart attacks and stroke, as well as kidney stones and potentially prostate cancer. Additionally, high calcium levels in the blood (hypercalcemia) can lead to symptoms like constipation, nausea, and fatigue. The best approach? Aim to get calcium from your diet first, and use supplements only when medically advised. Vitamin C Vitamin C is crucial for various bodily functions, primarily because it acts as a powerful antioxidant and is essential for tissue growth, repair, and maintenance. It supports the immune system, aids in iron absorption, and is vital for the production of collagen, which is important for skin, blood vessels, bones, and other connective tissues. Vitamin C is one of the most beloved supplements, thanks to its supposed ability to prevent colds and boost immunity. While vitamin C is undeniably important, most Americans already get enough from their diet. While vitamin C is generally safe, taking too much, especially in supplement form, can lead to side effects. High doses (particularly above 2,000 mg daily) can cause gastrointestinal issues like diarrhea, nausea, and stomach cramps. In some individuals with pre-existing conditions like hemochromatosis or kidney problems, it can exacerbate those conditions. Iron Iron is a vital mineral that plays a crucial role in various bodily functions. Its primary importance lies in its involvement in the production of hemoglobin, a protein in red blood cells responsible for carrying oxygen throughout the body. This oxygen transport is essential for energy production, muscle function, and overall vitality. Iron supplements are commonly prescribed for people with iron-deficiency anemia, particularly women of childbearing age. But taking iron without a deficiency can backfire. Too much iron supplementation can be harmful due to potential organ damage, gastrointestinal issues, and interactions with other medications. Excess iron can accumulate in vital organs like the liver and heart, leading to diseases such as cirrhosis and cardiomyopathy. Gastrointestinal problems, including nausea, vomiting, and constipation, are common side effects. Additionally, iron can interfere with the absorption of other medications. That's why it's crucial to have a blood test before supplementing; more isn't always better when it comes to iron. Magnesium and Zinc Magnesium is a mineral that is essential for healthy muscles, nerves, bones, and blood sugar levels. If you don't get enough magnesium in your diet over a long time, you may be at a higher risk of health problems such as heart attack, stroke, diabetes, or osteoporosis. Magnesium supplements are frequently taken for sleep, muscle cramps, and stress. On the other hand, zinc is a vital mineral that plays a crucial role in numerous bodily functions. It is essential for a healthy immune system, wound healing, DNA and protein synthesis, and proper growth and development. It also impacts taste and smell, and is involved in over 300 enzyme reactions. Usage of zinc supplements shoots up more in the cold and flu season. Too much magnesium from food does not pose a health risk in healthy individuals because the kidneys eliminate excess amounts in the urine. However, high doses of magnesium from dietary supplements or medications often result in diarrhea that can be accompanied by nausea and abdominal cramping. Meanwhile, high doses of zinc can potentially cause nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, especially when taken long-term. High doses can also interfere with the absorption of other essential minerals like copper and iron, leading to deficiencies. Furthermore, excessive zinc intake may suppress the immune system and lower levels of 'good' cholesterol. The looming risk First off the bat: when it comes to supplements, it's crucial to understand that 'more isn't always better'. But the biggest risk with supplements, perhaps, isn't overdose, it's distraction from malnutrition while overlooking the real sources of those nutrients and, in extension, underestimating the importance of consuming good food. Many people turn to pills instead of making the harder changes that matter more: eating better, exercising, and quitting smoking. Additionally, supplements are not tightly regulated by the FDA, which keeps a galring loophole in the aspect of health concerns. Labels can be misleading, dosages might be inconsistent, and some products may even contain unlisted substances or contaminants that in the long run, may end up causing more harm than good. The solution? Get your supplements only from trusted brands that undergo third-party testing, and consult a professional healthcare provider before signing up for popping those pills. Remember, supplements can be useful in certain cases, like vitamin D in winter, iron for diagnosed anemia, or folic acid during pregnancy. But for the average healthy adult, a colorful, balanced diet still beats a capsule. Study: Mushroom extract supports clearing human papillomavirus (HPV) infections
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Coconut oil vs olive oil: Which is better for heart health?
Walk down any health food aisle in the grocery store and you'll find bottles of different varieties of oil side by side, each flaunting health claims that promise a longer, better life. But when it comes to heart health, which of these trendy oils truly delivers? With so many cooking oils lining supermarket shelves, it's easy to get confused, especially when popular picks like coconut oil and olive oil claim several health benefits. T he answer lies not in marketing slogans, but in what science says, comparing their fat content, antioxidants, and long-term effects on your cardiovascular system. So, based on science-backed information, which one is better for your health? Olive oil Olive oil, particularly extra virgin olive oil (EVOO), has long been hailed as a cardiovascular champion due to its high levels of monounsaturated fats, antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory compounds. According to researchers from UC Davis and the American Heart Association, its rich content of oleic acid and polyphenols supports cardiovascular health, regulates blood pressure, reduces inflammation, and lowers the risk of diseases like type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo Let's delve a little deeper. Rooted in the Mediterranean diet, which is consistently linked with lower rates of heart disease, one of EVOO's key ingredients is oleic acid, a monounsaturated fat that has been shown to reduce LDL (bad) cholesterol without affecting HDL (good) cholesterol. According to the American Heart Association , researchers found that those who ate more than half a tablespoon of olive oil each day had a 15% lower risk of having any kind of cardiovascular disease and a 21% lower risk of coronary heart disease. Replacing one teaspoon of butter, margarine, mayonnaise, or dairy fat with the same amount of olive oil lowered the risk of cardiovascular disease by 5% and coronary heart disease by 7%. Moreover, EVOO is rich in polyphenols, natural antioxidants that help reduce inflammation, improve blood vessel function, and protect LDL cholesterol from oxidative damage (a major trigger for atherosclerosis). Compounds like oleocanthal (acts like a natural ibuprofen, blocking enzymes that fuel inflammation), found only in extra virgin varieties, have even been compared to ibuprofen in their ability to reduce inflammation. A landmark 2013 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that people who consumed a Mediterranean diet rich in olive oil had a significantly lower risk of heart attack, stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes. Another study reveals that higher olive oil consumption correlates with lower risks of heart disease, stroke, and overall mortality, which are the key benefits of Mediterranean-style diets. Coconut oil Coconut oil, on the other hand, has gained popularity thanks to its high content of medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs), which, as per studies , are believed to be more easily metabolized by the liver and used as a quick energy source. While that may sound promising, the issue lies in the type of fat that coconut oil is mostly made of: saturated fat. Now, the saturated fat in coconut oil is typically 80–90%, with much of it being lauric and myristic acid. These fats increase both HDL ('good') and LDL ('bad') cholesterol. However, rising LDL remains a key risk factor for heart disease. A 2020 meta-analysis found that coconut oil raised LDL cholesterol levels more than unsaturated fats and vegetable oils, without clear evidence of long-term cardiovascular benefit, with no evidence of anti-inflammatory or blood sugar benefits. On the other hand, randomized trials provide mixed results. One BMJ Open study showed coconut oil didn't significantly raise LDL compared to olive oil, and even boosted HDL. However, the long-term benefits of coconut oil remain unclear. The American Heart Association has strongly advised against the use of coconut oil as a heart-healthy alternative. So while coconut oil may be better than trans fats or butter in limited quantities, it doesn't hold up against oils like EVOO when it comes to protecting your heart. Why olive oil is a clear winner Cholesterol control: A key advantage of olive oil lies in its fatty acid profile. EVOO is rich in monounsaturated fats, which lower LDL cholesterol and raise HDL cholesterol, striking a protective balance for the heart. EVOO also contains plant sterols and phenols that may interfere with cholesterol absorption and protect against oxidative damage. On the contrary, as per research , coconut oil elevates LDL significantly, by about 10 mg/dL or more, when compared to non-tropical oils. Stability under heat: When it comes to cooking, EVOO isn't just heart-healthy, it's heat-stable. Its phenolic compounds prevent degradation at high temperatures, making it a safer choice for sautéing and roasting than commonly believed. Meanwhile, coconut oil scores well in stability tests, but lacks the antioxidant protection EVOO offers, making it a poor choice in comparison to olive oil. Inflammation and beyond: Chronic inflammation is one of the silent drivers of heart disease. Olive oil's antioxidants and oleocanthal reduce inflammatory markers, supporting cardiovascular and mental health over the long term. Coconut oil, on the other hand, does not provide these anti-inflammatory compounds and may worsen inflammation by raising LDL. Which one to use in the kitchen? In terms of smoke point and cooking stability, both oils have their place: EVOO has a moderate smoke point (~375°F) and is excellent for sautéing, roasting, and salad dressings. Its antioxidants actually make it quite stable for most home cooking methods. It is ideal for dressing, drizzling, or low-to-medium heat cooking. Additionally, as EVOO is rich in heart-supportive fats and antioxidants, it makes it one of the healthiest pantry staples. However, consuming too much olive oil, despite its health benefits, can lead to weight gain, digestive issues, and potentially exacerbate inflammation. Additionally, the high fat content can upset the digestive system, causing discomfort like diarrhea, bloating, and flatulence. Coconut Oil, with a higher smoke point (~450°F for refined versions), is better suited for high-heat cooking and baking. It also has a strong flavor, which can be a plus or a minus depending on your dish. However, consuming too much coconut oil, which is high in saturated fat, can lead to increased levels of LDL (bad) cholesterol, potentially raising the risk of heart disease and stroke. It's also high in calories, and excessive intake without dietary adjustments could contribute to weight gain. Coconut oil is great for adding flavor to tropical, Asian, or baking recipes. Choose virgin or unrefined versions for better benefits, and limit intake to occasional use to avoid excess saturated fat. The final verdict? To sum it up in one line: use coconut oil sparingly, olive oil liberally. If heart health is your priority (as it should be), extra virgin olive oil should be your #1 choice. With decades of evidence supporting its ability to lower cholesterol, reduce inflammation, and decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease, EVOO is not just a kitchen staple; it's a medical recommendation. Coconut oil, on the other hand, while flavorful and trendy, should be seen more as an occasional indulgence than a daily go-to. If you enjoy the taste, use it on special occasions or maybe on weekend cooking. However, turning it into your daily cooking oil might not be in the best interest of your health. This article is for informational purposes only and is not intended to replace professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making changes to your diet or using any product for health purposes.
