
Trump administration told Taiwan president to avoid New York stopover
Advertisement
Confirmation of Lai's travels would have riled China, which held trade negotiations with Trump's team in Stockholm this week. China considers Taiwan to be part of its territory and sees the United States' support for Taiwan as meddling in a domestic issue. Beijing routinely objects to Taiwanese leaders' visits abroad, particularly to the US.
Matthew Pottinger, who was the longest-serving deputy national security adviser in the first Trump administration, criticized the apparent decision by US officials to 'bend over backwards' in the face of Chinese objections to transit stops by the Taiwanese leader. He noted that such visits were common during the first Trump term — he had met with the Taiwanese president on a visit to New York — and during the Biden administration.
Advertisement
'Beijing will pocket this concession and ask for more,' Pottinger said.
According to two officials familiar with the planning, Lai called off the trip after Trump administration officials told him to revise his itinerary for the US, specifically to forgo the visit to New York, which was viewed as more high-profile. The news about the Trump administration's objections to Lai's travel plans was earlier reported by The Financial Times.
On Monday evening, Lai's spokesperson, Karen Kuo, said the president had no plans to travel soon. Lai needed to focus on dealing with damage in southern Taiwan from a typhoon, as well as trade talks with the Trump administration, Kuo said. She said the reports of US obstructions were 'inaccurate' and 'purely speculative.'
While Lai's office had never publicly confirmed the trip, three Taiwanese officials had in recent days and weeks privately described his plans to stop in New York and Dallas as part of his travels to Paraguay, Guatemala, and Belize, three of Taiwan's diplomatic partners in Latin America.
David Sacks, a fellow in Asia studies at the Council on Foreign Relations who specializes in US-Taiwan relations, pointed out that such US stops were coordinated with Washington. 'The idea that Taiwan would plan a trip for its president to visit three of its diplomatic partners while transiting through the United States, all without approval from senior American officials, strains credulity,' he said.
Advertisement
The White House National Security Council did not reply to a request for comment. Tammy Bruce, a State Department spokesperson, told reporters Tuesday that because Taiwan had not announced any travel plans by Lai, any discussion about it was 'a hypothetical.'
Lai's predecessor as president, Tsai Ing-wen, visited New York in 2023, during the Biden administration.
Tsai also met in California with Kevin McCarthy, then the speaker of the House, the third-ranking post in the US government. That was the highest-level in-person meeting for a leader of Taiwan in the United States since Washington switched diplomatic relations from Taiwan to the People's Republic of China in 1979.
The United States maintains political, economic, and security ties with Taiwan, and allows the island's president to make stops on the way to and from other countries — but Washington has sometimes set limits. In 2006, President Chen Shui-bian canceled a plan to travel through the United States after Washington denied him permission to stop in New York.
Taiwanese officials had made arrangements for Lai to give a speech in New York, and he was expected to attend an exhibition of Taiwanese technology and products in Dallas, according to two researchers who had heard about the plans from diplomats.
Asked about the reports that the Trump administration had blocked Lai's plans for visiting the US this time, a spokesperson for the Chinese government's Taiwan affairs office reiterated that Beijing 'adamantly opposes' any such visits at any time.
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada holds out hope of trade deal as US talks tough on tariffs
Canada said it was hopeful it can still strike a deal with the US to bring down its tariff rate even as the Trump administration denied Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DigitalOcean Holdings (DOCN) Stock Falls 11% Over Past Week Amid Tech Sell-Offs
DigitalOcean Holdings announced the launch of its GradientAI Platform, a major leap in simplifying AI integration for enterprises. Despite this launch, the company's stock dropped 11% over the past week. The broader market decline, provoked by weak job data and tariff-related uncertainties, may have influenced this dip. The tech-heavy Nasdaq's struggle, combined with widespread tech sell-offs, likely added weight to DigitalOcean's stock movement, rather than countering it. While the company's innovative platform aims to drive growth, its recent price movement reflects broader market trends more than the company's specific developments. You should learn about the 2 possible red flags we've spotted with DigitalOcean Holdings. We've found 22 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. DigitalOcean Holdings' recent announcement of the GradientAI Platform may significantly impact future revenue and earnings by simplifying AI integration for its enterprise clients. This aligns with their ongoing expansion in AI activities, as highlighted in their 160% year-over-year AI ARR growth, and could enhance their revenue stream. However, despite these developments, the company's shares have not shown immediate positive returns. Over the last year, DigitalOcean's total shareholder return was a 10.28% decline, reflecting broader challenges in the tech sector, particularly within the context of US$806.59 million in revenue and US$108.56 million in earnings. This underperformance is also evident when compared to both the US market and the IT industry, which saw returns of 17.5% and 22.8%, respectively, over the same period. The launch of DigitalOcean's AI initiatives indicates potential upside in revenue and earnings forecasts, partially supported by projections of a 13.2% annual revenue growth. Analyst forecasts suggest earnings could rise, fueled by strategic investments in data center expansion and increased ARPU. These forecasts support a price target of US$38.82, representing a significant potential upside from the current share price of US$25.74. However, the ambitious price target requires future performance alignment with analyst expectations, including substantial revenue and earnings improvements. Thus, while the GradientAI launch is promising, its immediate effect on share prices appears muted by larger market dynamics, leaving analysts' projections to reflect more optimistic longer-term potential. Click here to discover the nuances of DigitalOcean Holdings with our detailed analytical financial health report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include DOCN. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Time Business News
22 minutes ago
- Time Business News
India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination: MEA Bold Response to White House Peace Claims
Source – LegalPress New Delhi – The official India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination response emerged on Friday when the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) diplomatically sidestepped questions regarding the White House's aggressive campaign for President Donald Trump to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. This measured diplomatic response reflects India's careful approach to addressing American claims about conflict resolution. During a press briefing, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal was directly questioned about the India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination issue, specifically regarding White House assertions that Trump had ended several global conflicts, including the dispute between India and Pakistan. The spokesperson's response demonstrated India's preference for avoiding direct engagement with controversial American political narratives. Diplomatic Deflection Strategy The India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination query received a characteristically diplomatic response from Jaiswal, who stated, 'It is better to take this question to the White House.' This carefully crafted deflection avoids both endorsement and criticism of American claims while maintaining India's traditional non-interference stance in foreign political processes. This approach to the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination reflects New Delhi's broader strategy of avoiding entanglement in American domestic political debates, particularly those involving disputed claims about international diplomatic achievements. The MEA's response maintains diplomatic neutrality while neither validating nor challenging White House assertions. White House Claims and International Conflict Resolution The context surrounding the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination stems from White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's comprehensive advocacy for Trump's Nobel Peace Prize candidacy. Leavitt claimed that Trump had 'ended conflicts between Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia.' The India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination campaign specifically highlights alleged American mediation in the India-Pakistan conflict as evidence of Trump's peace-making credentials. According to White House calculations, Trump brokered approximately one peace deal monthly during his six months in office, making him deserving of international recognition. Leavitt's statement that 'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize' directly incorporates the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination narrative as supporting evidence for this assertion. This claim positions the alleged India-Pakistan ceasefire as a significant diplomatic achievement worthy of Nobel recognition. India's Historical Position on Bilateral Negotiations The India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination issue highlights a fundamental disagreement between New Delhi and Washington regarding the nature of India-Pakistan conflict resolution. India has consistently maintained that the cessation of hostilities between the two nations was achieved through bilateral negotiations rather than external mediation. New Delhi's rejection of Trump's mediation claims creates complications for the India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination narrative promoted by the White House. This disagreement represents a significant diplomatic challenge, as India's official position directly contradicts the foundation of American Nobel Prize advocacy. Despite repeated assertions from Trump linking trade deals to conflict resolution, India's stance on the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination remains unchanged. The government continues to emphasize bilateral diplomatic processes rather than acknowledging American intervention in regional peace initiatives. Pakistan's Contrasting Position While India maintains diplomatic distance from the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination campaign, Pakistan has embraced and actively supported Trump's candidacy. Islamabad has publicly thanked Trump for allegedly brokering the India-Pakistan deal, creating a stark contrast with India's position. In June, Pakistan formally nominated Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, specifically citing his 'diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' during the India-Pakistan crisis. This Pakistani endorsement adds complexity to the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination debate by providing official support from one of the alleged beneficiaries. The Pakistani government's statement declared: 'Government of Pakistan Recommends President Donald J. Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. The Government of Pakistan has decided to formally recommend President Donald J. Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis.' International Recognition and Norwegian Nobel Committee The India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination campaign faces the ultimate test of international legitimacy through the Norwegian Nobel Committee's evaluation process. Despite various endorsements and advocacy efforts, the Committee has maintained its traditional silence regarding Trump's candidacy. The Norwegian Nobel Committee's approach to the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination reflects their standard practice of avoiding public commentary on potential candidates. This institutional discretion means that public advocacy campaigns, regardless of their intensity or political backing, do not necessarily influence final selection decisions. Geopolitical Implications and Diplomatic Complexities The India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination issue illustrates broader challenges in contemporary international diplomacy, where domestic political narratives intersect with complex international relationships. India's careful response demonstrates the delicate balance required when addressing claims that involve multiple stakeholders with differing perspectives. The ongoing debate surrounding the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination reflects deeper questions about conflict resolution attribution, the role of external mediation in bilateral disputes, and the intersection of international recognition with domestic political objectives. Future Diplomatic Considerations As the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination campaign continues, India's diplomatic strategy will likely maintain its current trajectory of non-engagement with American political narratives while preserving bilateral relationship stability. This approach allows India to protect its sovereignty over conflict resolution narratives while avoiding unnecessary diplomatic friction with the United States. TIME BUSINESS NEWS