A Texas church school ranked last in state measles vaccination rates. Its pastor rejoiced
'We don't necessarily just do (vaccines) for ourselves,' says sociologist Jennifer Reich of the University of Colorado Denver and author of "Calling the Shots: Why Parents Reject Vaccines."
'We do them for the people around us. We do them for our grandparents; we do them for pregnant women at the grocery store for whom rubella can be devastating. It's not necessarily my personal benefit from the vaccine, but the way that I'm part of a community.'
That feeling isn't shared by everyone. Researchers including Reich say recent viral headlines, such as a North Texas pastor publicly boasting on Instagram that his church school ranked lowest in Texas for measles vaccination rates, are disheartening and show the nation heading down a dangerous path.
'Part of Christian values involves caring for those in need, caring for those who are vulnerable,' Reich said. 'To see that lost in favor of this underscoring of individual choice over caregiving and an ethos of collective care is disappointing.'
In his March 5 post on Instagram, pastor Landon Schott of Mercy Culture, a megachurch in Fort Worth, Texas, was ebullient.
'I just found out that @mercyculturepreparatory is the number one school in Texas for the LEAST amount of 'vaccinations!'' he said. 'We value our HEALTH & FREEDOM!'
Just 14.2% of Mercy Culture Prep's kindergarteners were vaccinated, according to Texas health department figures for 2023-24, the lowest rate by a solid margin among the state's 1,681 schools or districts submitting data. The second least vaccinated school was Dallas Christian Academy, with a 25% vaccination rate, followed by the Turkey-Quitaque Independent School District in the southeast Texas panhandle, with a 35.7% vaccination rate.
'I just want to congratulate all the family members of MC Prep that embrace freedom of health,' Schott said in a video accompanying the post, which had received nearly 1,800 'likes' as of Tuesday afternoon and comments consisting of clapping-hand emojis. 'They're not allowing government or science projects to affect how you live and lead your life.'
The next day, Texas State Rep. Nate Schatzline posted his own video, adding that his children attend Mercy Culture.
"I've gotten word that my children's school has been ranked the #1 most unvaccinated school in Texas & I'm upset…that we haven't celebrated sooner!" Schatzline wrote in the accompanying text.
The U.S. is experiencing its largest measles outbreak in years. Two people – a school-age child in Texas and a man in New Mexico, both unvaccinated – have died. Texas state health department officials reported 223 cases statewide as of Tuesday, with 156 of those alone in Gaines County, southwest of Lubbock. Twenty-nine people have been hospitalized.
Health experts have stressed the importance of vaccines to stop the spread of measles, an extremely contagious viral infection that can lead to serious, life-threatening health complications like pneumonia or encephalitis – particularly among children younger than 5. It spreads through the air through coughs and sneezes and can linger for as long as two hours after an infected person has left the area.
'Measles is so contagious that 90 percent of unvaccinated people who are exposed to measles will get sick,' said Lara Anton, a state Department of State Health Services spokesperson. Nearly one in five people who contract the virus, she said, require hospitalization.
The Texas outbreak has spread in under-vaccinated communities where people have been fed misinformation that measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccines are dangerous. The MMR vaccine, with two complete doses, provides 97% protection against measles and is even 93% effective with just one dose.
Before the introduction of measles vaccine in 1963 and widespread vaccination, major epidemics occurred worldwide approximately every two to three years and caused an estimated 2.6 million deaths each year, according to the World Health Organization.
Measles was declared eradicated in the U.S. in 2000 but has resurfaced as vaccination rates have fallen.
Given the seriousness of the outbreak, many responded to the posts with scorn.
'You are putting the safety of children at risk by advocating for this,' one commenter told Schott. 'Shame on you.'
'This is a horrible thing to be celebrating,' wrote another. 'This is a disgrace to the name of Christ. Jesus loves the children, and advocating for them to be exposed to preventable sickness and death defies every tenet of Jesus loving the little children. Please, please, reconsider this.'
'You are truly a nut job,' said another.
Meanwhile, in response to Schatzline, one woman wrote: "Celebrating turning your back on science while people die isn't the flex you think it is."
Reached last week, Schott told USA TODAY that Mercy Culture believes "in freedom of health, and that parents should have their rights."
"We believe in freedom of health and that parents should have their rights," Schott said.
He conspiratorially characterized the health officials' urgings of vaccines as part of 'this constant push and narrative to control people,' one he said similarly played out during COVID-19 when he said vaccines and masks "were shoved down our throats."
Schott said he doesn't tell his congregation what to do.
'I've never encouraged anyone to get or not get a vaccination," he said. "We have tons of people who have gotten the vaccine and there's no pressure, no hatred, no shade thrown on any of those people. We celebrate each parent stewarding their children and their family's freedom and health.'
As a sociologist, Reich finds the growing rejection of vaccines foreseeable given cultural shifts toward individualism and parental empowerment.
'Parents have embraced an ethos that says they are personally responsible for their children's health and therefore best able to decide what their children need,' she said. 'It's unsurprising that vaccines have become part of that.'
Reich said examples such as Mercy Culture Church show the spread of infectious disease doesn't necessarily lead people to question such assumptions. Instead, she said, many consider illness a moral judgment – a reflection of one's baseline health, personal behavior, decision making or nutrition and exercise regimen.
'With this situation, parents really imagine their children will not be susceptible to the worst outcomes of infectious disease,' she said. 'Vaccines aren't going to keep their children safe; they are.'
The COVID-19 pandemic, she said, not only accelerated the move away from vaccines but made it largely a partisan one, with growing conservative cynicism regarding scientific and pharmaceutical research.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Trump administration's health secretary and noted vaccine skeptic, has minimized the national outbreak, suggesting remedies such as Vitamin A despite experts' advice otherwise. In an editorial published March 2 on Fox News Digital, he asked parents to consider measles vaccinations for their children but added that "the decision to vaccinate is a personal one."
Despite the blowback to his social media posts, Schott remained steadfast in his position.
According to his Instagram video, Schott learned about Mercy Culture's vaccination ranking when he walked into the boardroom this week and was greeted by balloons and a surprise gift – a T-shirt reading 'MC Prep: #1 School in Texas (for least amount of vaccinations).'
'Freedom is something we take seriously – religious freedom, freedom of our health,' he said in his Instagram video. 'So, shout-out to MC Prep for being the least vaccinated school in Texas! We'll take it.'
Reich considers such thinking worrisome.
'If we continue to think about everything as a process of personal choice, some people are going to be really vulnerable,' Reich said. 'Rubella isn't a particularly serious disease for the person infected, but prior to vaccination it was the leading cause for birth defects. If we continue to think about our decisions as only affecting us personally, even as we live in communities, we're going to encounter a lot more challenges going forward.'
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Measles vaccinations: Texas pastor revels in school's state-low rates
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
8 hours ago
- Newsweek
How Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill Impacts Medicaid Users: Experts Weigh In
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Billions in Medicaid cuts passed by Republicans as part of President Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" will have widespread negative implications on people across the United States, multiple experts told Newsweek. Why It Matters Trump's touted tax overhaul and spending cuts package, which passed Thursday on a 218-214 vote in the House after months of haggling in both chambers of Congress, has provoked broader concerns about health care access and funding—notably to vulnerable populations who rely on Medicaid and the social safety net. The CBO estimates the roughly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade will result in 12 million people losing coverage by 2034. Trump had repeatedly promised not to cut Medicaid benefits, including by the White House's own admission as recently as March. The cuts are deeply unpopular, according to polls, and present a political challenge for Republicans ahead of next year's midterm elections. What Is the Big, Beautiful Bill? The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is a sweeping reconciliation package that advances Trump's domestic policy agenda. It includes major tax reforms, spending cuts, and regulatory changes across multiple sectors. The bill passed the House and Senate along party lines and is positioned as a cornerstone of Trump's second-term legislative goals. Numerous experts predict that Medicaid cuts and new requirements in President Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" will have widespread implications on Americans and state, federal funding mechanisms. Numerous experts predict that Medicaid cuts and new requirements in President Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" will have widespread implications on Americans and state, federal funding mechanisms. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva The 1,200‑page package will: Permanently extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts, while exempting overtime pay, tips and some Social Security income from taxation. Impose 80‑hour‑per‑month work requirements on many adults receiving Medicaid and apply existing SNAP work rules to additional beneficiaries. Repeal most clean‑energy tax credits created under President Biden. Authorize a $40 billion border security surge and fund a nationwide deportation initiative. Raise the federal debt ceiling by $5 trillion, with the Congressional Budget Office estimating that it could add $3.4 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. When Did the Big, Beautiful Bill Pass the Senate? The bill narrowly passed the Senate on Tuesday after an overnight session. The 50-50 vote generally along partisan lines was tipped in Republicans' favor by Vice President JD Vance, who cast the decisive tiebreaker vote. Has the Big, Beautiful Bill Been Signed? President Trump signed his package of tax breaks and spending cuts into law Friday during a White House ceremony. How the Big, Beautiful Bill Will Impact Medicaid Beneficiaries The bill includes changes to eligibility for Medicaid, including mandating that Medicaid recipients must carry out some kind of work for at least 80 hours a month, which has prompted many health care experts and lawmakers to warn that it will only push millions off the program. Other concerns include diminished care in rural communities and increased out-of-pocket costs for doctors' visits. To accommodate the bill's signature tax cuts, which mostly benefit the wealthy, the cuts have to come from somewhere, according to Miranda Yaver, assistant professor of health policy and management at the University of Pittsburgh. Consistent with prior Republican approaches, the cuts are coming from America's safety net programs, she said. "One in five Americans relies on Medicaid for their health coverage, and one in seven Americans relies on SNAP for their food security, so cutting these critical programs will be devastating," Yaver said. Roughly 92 percent of Medicaid beneficiaries are already working or would be exempt, according to KFF. But what threatens their coverage is not noncompliance with work hours; rather, the administrative burdens of documenting their work or exemption, according to Yaver. "For that reason, the requirement can be better characterized not as a work requirement, but rather as a paperwork requirement. ... Some have characterized Medicaid paperwork requirements as a solution in search of a problem, because contrary to some characterizations of people playing video games in basements, most people on Medicaid are working or would be exempt," she said. A Medicaid accepted here sign in Kokomo, Indiana, in September 2019. A Medicaid accepted here sign in Kokomo, Indiana, in September 2019. GETTY "I don't think it's a solution in search of a problem so much as it is a solution to a different problem: low-income Americans being provided health insurance." Jake Haselswerdt, associate professor at the Truman School of Government & Public Affairs at the University of Missouri, agreed that the paperwork aspect is likely going to be an issue. "We're going to have to see, what are the regulations look like? How do states implement this?" Haselswerdt told Newsweek. "But I'm not optimistic, especially coming from a Missouri standpoint. "We have maybe the worst Medicaid agency in the country. The call center wait times at times have been the worst in the country." Chris Howard, professor of government and public policy at William & Mary, told Newsweek that cuts to Medicaid and to the Affordable Care Act [ACA] will have "profound effects" at the state level. Millions of people across the country will lose health insurance, he said, including an estimated 300,000 in his state of Virginia. "Basically, Republicans are trying to undermine big parts of the [Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare] without having to replace them," Howard said. "They learned that 'repeal and replace' did not work in Trump's first term, so now they just want to repeal." Large rural populations in some of the hardest hit states, like Virginia and Kentucky which have expanded Medicaid under the ACA, will receive reduced federal funding for individuals who rely on Medicaid. "States can't run budget deficits, and they are highly unlikely to replace all the lost funds," Howard said. "More people will lose coverage. In the health care system, every dollar of benefit to someone is also a dollar of income to someone else. "Hospitals and nursing homes, especially in rural areas, depend heavily on Medicaid dollars. Many of them will have to lay off workers or close down. If hospitals have to provide more uncompensated care to the uninsured, there will be pressure on private insurance to raise rates." Rural hospital closures not only increase driving distances for medical care, Yaver said, but they can also deter businesses from operating in communities with economic downturn. She called the rural hospital fund in the bill "a drop in the bucket relative to the devastation headed their way." Haselswerdt said the ramifications on Americans' health and well-being will also take a hit. The rural hospital fund, around $25 billion, won't be enough across all 50 states, he said. "Nothing's permanent because policy can change, but we think of them as permanent cuts—this kind of short-term, financial Band-Aid," Haselswerdt said. "I don't really think makes that much of a difference. [When] people lose coverage that means these hospitals are delivering more freer charity care that never gets paid for. "That was something that was demonstrated with the ACA. When coverage expanded under the ACA, it helped hospitals; they had less uncompensated care to deal with. So, if you change policy in such a way that more people are showing up at hospitals without health coverage, it's not going to be good for those hospitals." President Donald Trump, from left, speaks as Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, listen during an event in the... President Donald Trump, from left, speaks as Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, listen during an event in the Roosevelt Room at the White House, Monday, May 12, 2025, in Washington. More Associated Press What the White House Has Said About Impact on Medicaid A "Myth vs. Fact" sheet released by the White House on June 29 responds to numerous critiques of the One Big Beautiful Bill, including on Medicaid. The White House called it a "myth" that the legislation "kicks American families off Medicaid." "As the President has said numerous times, there will be no cuts to Medicaid," the statement reads. "The One Big Beautiful Bill protects and strengthens Medicaid for those who rely on it—pregnant women, children, seniors, people with disabilities, and low-income families—while eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse. "The One Big Beautiful Bill removes illegal aliens, enforces work requirements, and protects Medicaid for the truly vulnerable."
Miami Herald
16 hours ago
- Miami Herald
More ICE Deaths ‘Inevitable' as Detention Numbers Soar
Deaths in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention centers look set to surpass the previous year's total, with three months still to go. With 12 people confirmed to have died while in ICE custody since October 2024, when the current Fiscal Year began, the number has already matched the previous year's total. Human rights groups are warning more are certain. "These deaths are clearly attributable to the Trump administration's increased and aggressive detention policies, and I have no doubt that when more complete investigations take place, it will likely provide information that these deaths were likely preventable," Eunice Cho, senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) National Prison Project, told Newsweek. The latest death came on June 26, when 75-year-old Cuban national Isidro Perez, in the country for decades, passed away in a hospital after suffering a heart issue while in a Miami ICE facility. In response to that news, President Donald Trump's border czar Tom Homan told reporters outside the White House: "People die in ICE custody." To be sure, ICE detention centers are not alone in experiencing deaths of detainees, with the the U.S. prison system — at both federal and state levels — frequently reporting deaths among inmates. In 2019, the mortality rate across the prison system was 259 per 100,000 inmates, based on Department of Justice figures showing 4,234 deaths in prisons at state and federal level nationwide. By comparison, the mortality rate of ICE detainees at the current numbers would work out to about 21.3 deaths per 100,000 people. The ICE population also has a far quicker turnaround than the prison system. In fiscal year 2022, running from the previous October through September 2022, three people died in ICE detention – the lowest number since reporting was mandated by Congress in 2018. The highest recent yearly death total came in 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic hit, with 21 deaths across the agency's various facilities. Those facilities are often run by private companies contracted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). ICE repeatedly says that individuals in its charge receive high-quality medical assessments and care, including 24-hour emergency medicine. But several independent reports over recent years, including from the ACLU and Robert F. Kennedy Center for Human Rights, have given a very different picture of the conditions facing detainees who are awaiting immigration hearings or deportation. In 2024, the ACLU outlined a lack of oversight when it came to ICE detention deaths, suggesting evidence may have destroyed and highlighting efforts to blame low-level employees for the incidents. The organization, working alongside others, found that many deaths were likely preventable, should medical care have been more readily accessible. "People are dying preventable deaths in [Homan's] direct custody," Cho said. "People are dying because of the lack of constitutionally required medical care that should be provided to anybody in government custody." A year later, far more people are being placed in ICE detention. Since January, the Trump administration has been increasing its efforts to arrest and detain illegal immigrants. While Congress has allocated funding for around tens of thousands of more beds in the current tax bill, the number of detainees stood at roughly 56,300 as of mid-June. "There's never been a time where immigration detention hasn't been deadly, so it's just inevitable that the more people we detain, the more people who are going to die," Anthony Enriquez, the vice president of U.S. advocacy and litigation at RFK Human Rights, told Newsweek. ICE is struggling with limited capacity and resources to fulfill its mission of millions of deportations. In addition to the new funds being allocated to the agency by Congress, the White House is trying other novel ways to expand capacity, from repurposing Guantanamo Bay to new detention center contracts issued for private companies GEO Group and CoreCivic, to the new so-called "Alligator Alcatraz" in southern Florida. Following a tour of the new detention facility on Tuesday, which includes bunkbeds stacked together in wire-fenced cages, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem praised the standards on offer. "Alligator Alcatraz can be a blueprint for detention facilities across the country. It will provide DHS with the beds and space needed to safely detain the worst of the worst," she posted on social media. All of this is to deliver on the president's promise of mass deportations. Trump returned to the White House promising upwards of 11 million immigrants without legal status would be deported, targeting the "worst of the worst" first. Records have shown that a large share of those currently in detention do not have a criminal record, but civil immigration offenses instead. "A lot of people misunderstand the purpose and the nature of immigration detention, and they think that if it's a detention center, then it's a jail, and if it's a jail, then that means this is someone who has already been found guilty of some type of bad act and should be serving a punishment," Enriquez said. "But in fact, many of the people in immigration detention do have lawful status to be here in the United States." Cho, of the ACLU, told Newsweek that ICE was not exercising discretion with respect to those it was now detaining. Because more people are remaining in detention when they previously would have been released, the situation is leading to a "deterioration of conditions in custody," he said. "My fear is this trajectory is only going to increase," Cho said. "That is because Congress is on the cusp of passing a new reconciliation bill that is providing $45 billion to the expansion of immigration detention in the country, and I want to compare that to the current $4 billion that ICE already receives every year for its already massive immigration detention system. "This amount of money is going to provide ICE with the ability to not only double, triple, quadruple the capacity of people who are being held in immigration detention, it is going to allow a system that is larger than the entire federal Bureau of Prisons population put together, under the care of someone like Tom Homan who has expressed total disregard for the fact that people are dying in custody." Newsweek reached out to ICE via email Tuesday for comment on the increase in deaths and measures being taken to prevent any more. The agency did not reply before publication. Related Articles California Man in US for Over 35 Years Detained at Car WashDonald Trump Could Let Millions of Illegal Immigrants Stay in USAOC Warns of ICE 'Explosion' After Trump Bill PassesTrump Administration Sending Hundreds of Marines to Florida to Help ICE 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hamilton Spectator
20 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
UN records 613 killings in Gaza near humanitarian convoys or aid distribution points run by US group
DEIR al-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — Israeli airstrikes killed 15 Palestinians in Gaza early on Friday, while another 20 people died in shootings while waiting for aid, the hospital morgue that received their bodies told The Associated Press. Meanwhile, the U.N. human rights office said on Friday it has recorded 613 killings in Gaza near humanitarian convoys and at aid distribution points run by an Israeli-backed American organization since it first began operations in late May. Spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani said the rights office was not able to attribute responsibility for the killings. But she said 'it is clear that the Israeli military has shelled and shot at Palestinians trying to reach the distribution points' operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Those killed in Friday's strikes included eight women and one child. Nasser Hospital said of those who were killed in shootings, two died near aid distribution sites in Rafah and 18 were waiting for trucks to deliver supplies elsewhere in southern Gaza. Israel's military did not immediately provide comment on the strikes. Israel's military said a soldier was killed in combat in the north of Gaza and it was investigating. Over 860 Israeli soldiers have been killed since the war began, including more than 400 during the fighting in Gaza. The recent killings took place as efforts to halt the 21-month war appeared to be moving forward. Hamas said Friday that it was holding discussions with leaders of other Palestinian factions to discuss a ceasefire proposal presented to it by Egyptian and Qatari mediators. Trump said Tuesday that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen. Hamas will give its final response to mediators after the discussions have concluded, the statement said. The Health Ministry in Gaza said the number of Palestinians killed in the territory has passed 57,000. The ministry does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count, but says more than half of the dead are women and children. The war began when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages. According to Palestinian witnesses and Gaza's Health Ministry, several hundred people have been killed or wounded by Israeli troops when trying to reach the aid sites since they opened in May. The military has repeatedly said it's fired only warning shots, denies deliberately firing towards civilians, and says it's looking into reports of civilian harm. ___ Kullab reported from Jerusalem. Julia Frankel contributed. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
