Samantha Harvey and Téa Obreht shortlisted for inaugural Climate fiction prize
Samantha Harvey and Téa Obreht are among the writers in the running for the inaugural Climate fiction prize.
Harvey's Orbital, her Booker-winning novel set on the International Space Station, and Obreht's novel The Morningside, about refugees from an unnamed country, have both been shortlisted for the new prize, which aims to 'celebrate the most inspiring novels tackling the climate crisis'.
The Ministry of Time by Kaliane Bradley (Sceptre)
And So I Roar by Abi Daré (Sceptre)
Briefly Very Beautiful by Roz Dineen (Bloomsbury)
Orbital by Samantha Harvey (Cape)
The Morningside by Téa Obreht (Weidenfeld)
Also in contention for the £10,000 award are And So I Roar by Abi Daré and Briefly Very Beautiful by Roz Dineen. In Daré's novel, a sequel to her internationally bestselling debut The Girl with the Louding Voice, 14-year-old Adunni is living in Lagos, having escaped the rural village in which she was a victim of abuse and enslavement. The novel exposes 'the harsh realities faced by women and girls worldwide, underscored by intersectional environmental issues', according to judge Tori Tsui. 'It's a tough but essential read.'
Meanwhile former Times Literary Supplement journalist Dineen's debut, about a mother looking after her three small children in a city rocked by global catastrophe, was described by judge Nicola Chester as 'a haunting, fierce narrative of love, beauty and the desire to live through an accelerating crisis and a world on fire'.
Kaliane Bradley's novel The Ministry of Time, which has also been longlisted for this year's Women's prize for fiction, completes the shortlist, and was praised by the Climate fiction prize's chair of judges Madeleine Bunting as 'climate fiction which manages to be both surprising and still make its point powerfully'.
Described by Guardian reviewer Ella Risbridger as '50% sci-fi thriller and 50% romcom', The Ministry of Time is a love story about a disaffected civil servant working in a near-future London and Commander Graham Gore, first lieutenant of Sir John Franklin's ill-fated expedition to the Arctic. Though it contains 'vast themes' – the British empire, the refugee crisis and the Cambodian genocide among others – they are 'handled deftly and in deference to character and plot', Risbridger wrote.
Journalist Bunting, climate justice activist Tsui and author Chester were joined on the judging panel by birdwatcher and writer David Lindo and the Hay festival's sustainability director Andy Fryers.
The shortlist was whittled down from a longlist of nine that also included Praiseworthy by Alexis Wright, The Mars House by Natasha Pulley, Water Baby by Chioma Okereke and Private Rites by Julia Armfield.
The five chosen books 'promote and celebrate the power and joy of storytelling, to show us how we might see ourselves anew in the light of the climate crisis, and how we might respond to and rise to its challenges with hope and inventiveness', said Chester.
Sign up to Bookmarks
Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you
after newsletter promotion
Launched in June 2024 at the Hay literary festival, the Climate fiction prize will be awarded annually to 'the best novel-length work of fiction published in the UK engaging with the climate crisis'. It is supported by Climate Spring, a global organisation dedicated to transforming how the climate crisis is represented in film, TV, mainstream entertainment and popular culture.
The winner will be announced on 14 May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
4 days ago
- Spectator
No, I'm not going to bloody Glasto
'Are you going to Glasto?' Just the name – in that smug, shortened form – is enough to set my left eyelid twitching, the way it does when I read emails from people who still include pronouns in their signature. 'Glasto', trailing the self-satisfied whiff of BBC executives high-tailing it from Hampstead on a taxpayer-funded jolly, of hedgies glamping in a five-grand-a-night yurt and the sort of inherited wealth that means you crash in a mate's eight-bedroom Old Rectory within the free ticket zone, rather than camping cheek-by-unwashed-jowl with the masses. No, I am not going to Glastonbury. The last time I went – and I can tell you the exact year, because I found the programme while going through some boxes in the attic – was 2004. I think it was the first year the Great Wall went up to stop people scaling the fence and, getting there late on the Wednesday, we had to pitch our tents hard against it – which was like camping in the shadow of the Berlin Wall, though less convivial. That was the year I swore I'd never go again: the crowds were insane (150,000) and just moving between stages took at least two hours. The five days were an exhausting feat of endurance with the odd highlight (James Brown on the Pyramid stage, Orbital headlining the Other Stage on the Sunday night) but it was such a crush to move around the site, you were doing well if you managed to see even a couple of bands a day. Glastonbury also has the worst sanitation of any festival I've ever been to, either as a punter or when I was working for the news teams of Radio 1 and, later, 6 Music. (See Julian Temple-Morris's 2006 documentary for a taster.) It was only bearable back in 2004 because my cousin's band were playing the New Bands stage and I had a backstage pass so could use their loos. (Shamefully, I didn't even watch their set as they clashed with P.J. Harvey.) Apparently there are showers at Glastonbury, but I've never had one – or met anyone who has. This year a whopping 210,000 tickets have been sold. A built-up area of over 200,000 is classed as a city by the Office for National Statistics. From today, Worthy Farm in Somerset will have a temporary population somewhere between that of Reading and Wolverhampton. Even before you look at the line-up, which is lacklustre (my only must-see would be Neil Young, but I have tickets for his Hyde Park concert next month; these days I only go to gigs where I can sleep in my own bed), just the logistics of getting around the site are about as appealing as the SAS selection march over the Brecon Beacons. You can, of course, smoke weed and take shrooms to mitigate the privation – only one of your mates will invariably do a Syd Barrett and require looking after for the rest of the weekend. And depending on the weather, there will be sunburn or trench-foot – or both – to contend with. You should also forget any Alexa Chung-style outfits you had planned; England in June can be extraordinarily cold and unsettled (remember, D-Day had to be postponed). I vaguely recall watching Paul McCartney while I was wrapped in a damp blanket from the Oxfam stall that smelt of the old person who'd died in it. Of course, moaning that Glastonbury isn't what it used to be is all part of the ageing process – I get that. 'What do you mean, you need money, darling?' asked my mother when I wanted her to sub me for my ticket sometime in the late 1990s. 'I didn't pay anything when I went.' She went to the first Glastonbury (then the Pilton Pop Festival, but that moniker was swiftly dropped, presumably being less marketable to Trustafarian twats). They watched Marc Bolan and drank free milk from the dairy. This year a pint of festival cider will cost you around £7, which isn't outrageous – but remember to make it last because the queues for both bars and bogs will be apocalyptic. And good luck finding your friends ever again if you need to head off on your own during the 1975's set for a pee. Apparently there are showers at Glastonbury, but I've never had one – or met anyone who has Even if you can get close enough to the stage – rather than watching on the giant screens – your vision will be obscured by the serried ranks of Palestine flags. One of the most wilful misconceptions about Glastonbury is that it's a lovely crowd of chilled old hippies. Try sticking your head under a standpipe meant for drinking water because you just can't go another day without washing your hair and hear the queue of knit-your-own-Guardian readers erupt with language that would make a paratrooper blush. There's vast cognitive dissonance between the festival giving millions to charities like Greenpeace and the grotesque amounts of rubbish and single-use plastic (mostly in the form of abandoned tents, wellies and ponchos) left behind. This year there's added spice – in addition to the usual 'festival flu' and STDs – with warning of a measles outbreak from the UK Health Security Agency, due to all the unvaccinated Gen Z-ers, born in the wake of the MMR scare. There have also been thousands of cases of Covid reported by people who went to Download earlier this month. But there's no need to spank nearly £400 on a Glastonbury ticket (you can't, in any case – they sold out in 35 minutes). To recreate the experience at home, just do the following: stop washing and use baby wipes instead. Retch every time you open the bathroom door and give yourself a UTI by going for as long as you can without peeing. Throw your phone in a bush. Eat a burrata and butternut squash flatbread wrap and then bin £20. Fail to find your bed and have a couple of hours of fitful sleep outside while playing industrial techno through a tinny speaker. Oh – and, crucially, watch it all on TV. That's really what all those Glasto-goers will be doing anyway.
Time Out
5 days ago
- Time Out
Mother Sippy: Pienaar & Son
Welcome to Mother Sippy, where we shine a light on the talented winemakers, brewers, distillers and mixologists that make sure the Mother City never goes thirsty! From new wine releases to taprooms pouring perfect pints, Mother Sippy is your guide to all that's good and great in Cape Town's world of drinks. There is no shortage of craft breweries and taprooms in Cape Town, and from Woodstock to Noordhoek, you are never far from a pint of Pale Ale. Wine? Urban cellars are dotted about, with Duncan Savage perhaps being the most notable, and there are even a handful of gin distilleries to visit if you look closely enough. But whisky? Nope, there's only one place in the city distilling and ageing uisge beatha in the heart of Cape Town. You'll find Pienaar & Son in Maker's Landing, the incubator hub in the V&A Waterfront, close to Time Out Market Cape Town. And it's not hard to miss, with its gleaming column still and racks of oak barrels hinting at the creativity within. Pienaar & Son first made a name for itself when the craft gin revolution was kicking off, and their duo of signature gins – Empire, all lemon and cucumber, and Orient, a nod to the spice trade around the Cape of Good Hope – remain hugely popular with gin aficionados and mixologists alike. But it's whiskey where Pienaar & Son truly stands out, as the Mother City's sole whisky distillery. Their Tiny Batch whiskies blend hand-crafted creativity with a touch of cheeky street sass. Time Out Cape Town sat down with Andre Pienaar to discover more about this hand-crafted collection of Cape-inspired spirits. Pour us a tale. How did Pienaar & Son get started? The journey began around 2013 or 2014. I was composing music for film and advertising, but I began to feel burnt out. At the time, everyone was brewing beer in their garages, and I had studied chemistry and biochemistry. My dad is a chemical engineer who specialises in potable alcohol stills. I bought a small 20-litre stove with the idea of making gin and moonshine on the weekends. It kind of scratched every part of my brain: technical, flavour, branding. It was such a creative endeavour. The timing was good and we'd just started to see the start of craft gin. So in 2015, he designed and built our stills. He built the still; I'm the chef. We got our licenses in 2016 and have been in business ever since. In 2020, we moved to Makers Landing, and we grew from doing gin to vodka, and later whiskey – though, of course, whiskey needs to age. Talk us through the distillery at Maker's Landing... We use a continuous column still, the same one we use for making vodka. Both are 100% corn fermentations, but of course vodka is distilled to a high percentage to strip out flavour; the whiskey is distilled to a sweet spot that lets in some propanols and butanols for a peppery, biscuity profile. Because we built the still, we can pick a strength – a flavour profile – and draw that consistently. From the still, it goes into the barrels… anything special? We import new American oak barrels. They're expensive, but worth it. Our whiskey, apart from being made outside the US, would technically qualify as bourbon. We aim to fill 10 to 12 225-litre barrels a year, and we usually release single-barrel batches. How long do you age your whisky for? Regulations say three years, and with our first batch, I was happy with how it tasted then. But by the time I had sourced the bottles and designed labels, it was around three years and nine months. So, I figured we'd just wait four years. Now, we're on a four-year cycle. We do keep some barrels back for longer maturation – partly for curiosity, partly for quality. But there's always a balancing act with cash flow and the evaporation loss. We might release a six-year-old later this year. We use two char levels in our barrels – a medium char and a heavy char – and release both simultaneously, as separate batches. What's the flavour in the glass? The heavy char is your classic profile of maple, vanilla, chocolate – a sweet, rich bourbon vibe. The medium char is more grassy, lighter, with a coconut sweetness. It's more intellectual, I guess – the kind of whiskey you sip and think about. Your packaging is great… why is it so important? Tiny Batch is a bit of a stab at these giant distilleries releasing 'small batch' whiskies, and because we're small, we need to stand out. Our whiskey bottle is actually an olive oil bottle, but I just love the shape of it. I take a lot of branding inspiration from the cosmetics world. I think high-end craft spirits and perfume have a lot in common. Do you have other spirits on the horizon? We've done some one-offs – a bourbon-style blend with rye and malt, and I'm chatting to barrel suppliers about orange liqueur barrels. So yes, we're always playing around with stuff, but whiskey is our core. Can the public stop in for a tasting? We're open seven days a week for collections. Tastings happen from Friday to Sunday, and every Sunday we run a gin school where you can distil your own bottle. Bookings are via the website.
Daily Mail
18-06-2025
- Daily Mail
Time is running out to curb climate change: Window to avoid 1.5°C of warming will close in just 3 YEARS if CO2 emissions continue at current rate, scientists warn
Time is running out to curb climate change, scientists have warned in a major new report. There are now only 130 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide left in the 'carbon budget' - the amount of carbon that can be emitted before the world hits the critical limit of 1.5°C of warming. If the world keeps producing greenhouse gases at the current rate, that will be gone in just three years. What's more, the remaining carbon budget to avoid 1.6°C or 1.7°C of warming will be burnt through in as little as nine years at current rates. The report found that 2024 experienced 'alarmingly unexceptional' high temperatures, reaching 1.52°C (2.74°F) warmer than the pre-industrial benchmark. Overall, 1.36°C (2.45°F) of that warming can be directly traced back to human activity, with the remaining 0.16°C (0.29°F) coming from natural fluctuations. A single year above 1.5°C of warming doesn't mean that the Paris Agreement has been breached, but it does show that the world is getting dangerously close to this threshold. Professor Joeri Rogelj, co-author and climate scientist at Imperial College London, says: 'The window to stay within 1.5°C is rapidly closing. Emissions over the next decade will determine how soon and how fast 1.5°C of warming is reached. ' The annual Indicators of Global Climate Change study combines the work of 60 scientists to measure 10 key indicators of climate change to give a broad picture of the planet's health. The data shows that we are rapidly approaching the warming limits set out by the Paris Climate Agreement and that the remaining 'carbon budget' is dwindling. Professor Rogelj explains that the carbon budget is worked out from the basis that 'the global warming we experience is largely determined by the total amount of carbon dioxide that is ever emitted into the atmosphere by human activities.' He adds: 'That means that if we want to keep warming from exceeding a specific level, there is a limited amount of carbon dioxide that can ever be emitted. 'The remaining carbon budget estimates how much of that amount remains when looking at where we stand today.' By looking at current warming rates and how much the planet warms per tonne of CO2 emitted, the researchers calculated that 130 billion more tonnes of CO2 will bring humanity to the 1.5°C limit set out in the Paris Agreement. At the current rate, the world releases the equivalent of around 53 billion tonnes each year. To put that into perspective, that is the same as 5.2 million Eiffel Towers of CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere every single year. What is the carbon budget? The carbon budget is an estimate of how much more CO2 can be released into the atmosphere before the world reaches a certain heating threshold. This is worked out from the basis that almost all of the world's heating is caused by CO2 added to the atmosphere. By looking at how much CO2 has been emitted and how much the planet has warmed, researchers calculate how much warming a tonne of CO2 creates. Comparing this to our current warming rates, scientists calculate how many more tonnes of CO2 would lead to a set temperature. The carbon budget for 1.5°C of warming currently stands at 130 billion tonnes from the beginning of 2025. If emissions are not rapidly reduced to more sustainable levels, there will be no way to avoid exceeding 1.5°C and triggering more severe and dangerous consequences. Even though 2024 was more than 1.5°C hotter than the pre-industrial average, that does not mean the Paris Agreement has been breached. This international treaty binds its signatories to 'pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5°C' taken as an average over several decades. But, looking at the climate on a wider time scale shows that we are quickly approaching a time when this will be breached. The average surface temperature on Earth for the decade between 2015 and 2024 was 1.24°C (2.23°F) hotter than it was before the industrial revolution. Professor Rogelj told MailOnline that 'all' of this change is due to humans putting more greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The study found that only 0.02°C (0.04°F) of warming over the last decade has any non-human causes, which Professor Rogelj calls a 'negligible' amount. By comparison, during the transition out of the last Ice Age - one of the fastest periods of natural warming in the planet's history - the warming rate was about 1.5°C (2.7°F) per thousand years. That is equivalent to just 0.02°C (0.04°F) of warming per decade, compared to 1.22°C (2.2°F) of human-caused warming per decade today. As greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, the rate of heating is increasing right up to the present day. The rate of global heating seen between 2012 and 2024 was double that seen in the 1970s and 1980s. At these rates, the researchers estimate the world will breach the Paris Agreement's limits on average warming by around 2030. This is already causing measurable changes in Earth's climate, especially in the oceans which absorb 91 per cent of the excess heat trapped by greenhouse gases. Warmer waters lead to rising sea levels, faster ice melt, and more violent storms. Dr Aimée Slangen, research leader at the NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, says: 'Since 1900, the global mean sea level has risen by around 228 mm. 'This seemingly small number is having an outsized impact on low-lying coastal areas, making storm surges more damaging and causing more coastal erosion, posing a threat to humans and coastal ecosystems. Most of the excess heat created by greenhouse gases is absorbed by the oceans which leads to rising sea levels and increased ice melt 'The concerning part is that we know that sea-level rise in response to climate change is relatively slow, which means that we have already locked in further increases in the coming years and decades.' The researchers behind the report say that action needs to be taken to reduce the rate of greenhouse gas emissions to avoid more severe effects of climate change. Professor Rogelj concludes: 'How much carbon budget we have depends on the level of warming that we want to limit global warming to, and how much risk of higher warming we are willing to allow. 'Overall, however, for any temperature limit that aims to avoid dangerous levels of climate change, it essential that we stop emitting climate pollution as soon as we can. 'Every year that reductions are delayed adds to this cumulative problem.' THE PARIS AGREEMENT: A GLOBAL ACCORD TO LIMIT TEMPERATURE RISES THROUGH CARBON EMISSION REDUCTION TARGETS The Paris Agreement, which was first signed in 2015, is an international agreement to control and limit climate change. It hopes to hold the increase in the global average temperature to below 2°C (3.6°F) 'and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C (2.7°F)'. It seems the more ambitious goal of restricting global warming to 1.5°C (2.7°F) may be more important than ever, according to previous research which claims 25 per cent of the world could see a significant increase in drier conditions. The Paris Agreement on Climate Change has four main goals with regards to reducing emissions: 1) A long-term goal of keeping the increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels 2) To aim to limit the increase to 1.5°C, since this would significantly reduce risks and the impacts of climate change 3) Governments agreed on the need for global emissions to peak as soon as possible, recognising that this will take longer for developing countries 4) To undertake rapid reductions thereafter in accordance with the best available science
