Supermarket pricing errors costing millions of dollars a year
The consumer organisation said shoppers were too often being stung at the checkout and paying more than the advertised shelf price for items.
New World and Pak'n Save owner, Foodstuffs said it took pricing accuracy seriously and had invested in systems and staff training to reduce errors. RNZ has approached Woolworths for comment.
Consumer NZ chief Jon Duffy said pricing errors might seem small for individuals but the practice was costing New Zealanders tens of millions of dollars a year.
He said the government needed to step in and a petition had been launched calling for tougher penalties for breaches of the Fair Trading Act.
Consumer also wanted to see the introduction of a mandatory pricing accuracy code to hold supermarkets to account for errors and automatic compensation for shoppers who were overcharged.
Duffy said a recent Consumer survey found 62 percent of shoppers noticed pricing errors over the past year.
"This isn't okay, particularly at a time when people are struggling to pay their bills," he said.
"It's already illegal for businesses to mislead consumers about prices, but the current law is not forcing supermarkets to up their game."
A Foodstuffs spokesperson said the company had invested heavily in better systems, daily checks, and electronic shelf labels to reduce errors.
"Our policy is that if a customer is overcharged, they get a refund of that product and get to keep the product. We've also strengthened staff training and store processes to ensure pricing is clear, accurate, and fair."
Duffy told RNZ the Fair Trading Act was letting consumers down, citing two cases where Pak'n Save supermarkets had pleaded guilty to breaches, with charges including inaccurate pricing and misleading specials.
Duffy said the maximum penalty of $600,000 was not enough of a deterrent. He said while New Zealand didn't need to follow in the footsteps of Australia's $50 million penalty, a fine closer to $10m would be more appropriate.
He told RNZ there also needed to be more specific rules in the Act around advertising specials so as not to mislead customers, such as specials on multi-buy products.
"There's a double pack of biscuits ... but it's cheaper to buy each pack individually than the special that's advertised as a twin pack.
"Those are really common examples that we see."
He said if buyers got home and realised they were overcharged after checking their receipt, they should get both a refund and keep the product for free.
"Because no doubt you've probably had to get back in the car and drive back to the supermarket to do the supermarket's job for them. You're helping them correct a process they should be getting right in the first place."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Secondary teachers union rejects pay offer
The secondary teachers union has rejected a pay offer of one percent a year for three years. RNZ understands it is one of the lowest offers ever made to secondary teachers. The offer to members of the Post Primary Teachers Association amounts to a three percent pay rise over three years. That is well below the 14.5 percent over three years won through arbitration in 2023 and the average 10 percent over three years the union's members grudgingly accepted in 2019. Both of those settlements also included lump sum payments. The government's offer this year also sought to increase the number of days outside term time that schools can require teachers to come to work from 10 to 20 each year. The Public Service Commissioner, Sir Brian Roche, was overseeing this year's negotiations. In May he announced he would retain the responsibility usually delegated to the Education Ministry. "My rationale for this decision is influenced by the wider objective of overseeing collective bargaining and managing fiscal pressures across the public sector," he said at the time. Sir Brian was disappointed the PPTA had rejected the pay offer and urged the union to reconsider. He said the offer was carefully crafted to recognise the contribution teachers make while ensuring it was affordable for taxpayers in a difficult economic times. "The offer on the table represented a 3 percent increase over three years, on top of annual pay progression of between 4.5 percent and 7.5 percent," he said. "For many secondary teachers, this equates to pay increases between $3100 and $8000 a year, with regular annual progression included. Over three years the offer provides increases of between $1850 to $3123, or between $7275 and $15250 with annual pay progression. "The economic environment and the government's fiscal position are very difficult. Every additional dollar spent must be weighed against what is sustainable and fair to all New Zealanders. "I am open to continued dialogue and am committed to reaching a settlement that supports teachers, students, and our public school system." Post Primary Teachers Association President Chris Abercrombie, told Morning Report, he believed teachers deserved an agreement that reflected their skills. "We've got immense change in our sector right now and we need a qualified suitable workforce to implement that change." Abercrombie said it had been 30 years since they had seen this happen. The Educational Institute Te Riu Roa (NZEI) started negotiation of the primary teachers collective agreement last month.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
People Need Opportunities Not Punishment To Find Jobs
The Green Party is calling on the Government to put its money where its mouth is when it comes to helping people into jobs following a new report, 'The Pipeline of Potential', that highlights how people out of work need opportunities, not punishment, to find employment. 'Instead of punishing people for being unemployed when there is no work, we can build a workforce with good jobs that support the common good,' says the Green Party's spokesperson for Workforce Planning, Ricardo Menéndez March. 'New Zealanders should be in control of our economy, our jobs and our future. We can create the jobs we need and do the kind of work that helps us build an Aotearoa we can be proud of. 'Today's report makes clear that the punitive approach that this Government is taking to get people into work is not effective. We cannot punish people into work when there are no jobs. 'We need to take a more hands-on approach when it comes to our economy and the organisation of our workforce. We can give people meaningful jobs that help us confront some of our biggest challenges instead of punishing people without work and any real opportunities. 'We have a plan to provide people with meaningful work. Our Green Jobs Guarantee will deliver an initial 40,000 jobs to rebuild our infrastructure, restore nature and build homes for people to live in. 'Our Future Workforce Agency, Mahi Anamata, will actively plan for the skills we need. We'll revitalise and supercharge the roaring success of Jobs for Nature, and we'll ensure everyone in this country who wants a good, decent, living-wage paying job will get one,' says Ricardo Menéndez March.
The Spinoff
2 hours ago
- The Spinoff
What did Nicola Willis's cost-of-butter meeting with Fonterra actually achieve?
The butter price crisis prompted a high-profile meeting at the Beehive – but global markets, not politicians, are still calling the shots, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Was the butter meeting a damp squib? Finance minister Nicola Willis says she was surprised by 'the almost breathless excitement' around her Tuesday evening meeting with Fonterra chief executive Miles Hurrell, reflecting a week of coverage perhaps more suited to a major sporting event than a wonky meeting about dairy economics. The Post dubbed it 'the butter meeting heard round the country' while news sites ran red breaking news banners as Hurrell and Willis sat down to talk. With 500g blocks of butter topping $11 in some supermarkets, the stakes, at least symbolically, were high. Willis said the conversation covered many topics, but she did ask Hurrell to clarify how butter is priced and why New Zealanders often pay more than overseas consumers. The main outcome, according to the Herald's Thomas Coughlan? A suggestion that Hurrell will publicly explain the breakdown of butter pricing later this week. 'He was so good at communicating about [butter prices], I have encouraged him to provide that information to New Zealanders,' Willis said. Labour smells spin The political optics of the meeting have raised eyebrows, particularly given Willis's own six-year stint in senior roles at Fonterra, reports Bridie Witton in Stuff. Labour's finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds questioned whether the meeting was more about performance than policy, arguing Willis should already understand how butter is priced. Willis pushed back, saying she worked in government relations and environmental strategy – not pricing – and refused to 'pre-judge' Fonterra's explanations. Her office also noted she meets with the dairy giant regularly, and the discussion this week wasn't solely about butter. Still, the intense buildup and media framing gave the impression of a high-level intervention, when in fact the levers to influence pricing remain limited. 'The lesson here is that performance politics doesn't work,' Newstalk ZB's Heather du Plessis-Allan said. 'In fact … it runs the risk of backfiring, which is exactly what's happening here.' So why is butter so expensive? As Blayne Slabbert explains in The Press (paywalled), 95% of our dairy products are exported and domestic prices reflect what those products earn overseas – a model known as export parity pricing. Recent Stats NZ data shows butter prices, driven by the global market, have surged 46.5% in a year, reaching an average of $8.60 per 500g. While world dairy prices dipped slightly in July, they remain far above historical levels. Global supply is tight, and demand – especially in China and Southeast Asia – continues to climb. 'You get to the situation we're in now where butter is at extraordinary heights and everyone wants their butter on toast,' High Ground Dairy consultant Stu Davison tells Newstalk ZB's Michael Sergel. 'We don't see it running right back to where we were five years ago.' That international appetite for grass-fed butter benefits our farmers and boosts export revenues, but leaves local consumers squeezed at the checkout. A changing role for Fonterra As butter becomes a lightning rod for public frustration at the cost of groceries, Fonterra may soon exit the retail fray altogether. The co-operative plans to sell off consumer-facing brands like Anchor and Mainland, focusing instead on its business-to-business operations. Writing in The Conversation, agribusiness professors Alan Renwick and David Dean say the move makes commercial sense. While some fear an overseas owner could lead to higher prices for consumers, they think it could help disrupt the current 'cosy' relationship between Fonterra and the supermarkets – potentially even bringing prices down. In the Herald, Clive Elliott, a barrister specialising in intellectual property, argues that the sell-off is a strategic error. 'Our prosperity and ability to remain a first-world economy depends on our ability to add value,' Elliott warns, arguing Fonterra is abandoning decades of brand equity. Regardless of who ends up owning the dairy brands, the butter pricing system is unlikely to shift dramatically. For now, New Zealanders will have to settle for an unsatisfying explanation rather than meaningfully lower costs.
