logo
Inside Central Ohio's data center boom

Inside Central Ohio's data center boom

Axios30-04-2025
The Midwest is emerging as one of the nation's fastest-growing data center hubs, a complex trend the Columbus area helped kick off about a decade ago.
Why it matters: Data centers power the AI boom — but their soaring energy and water demands often go unreported, with unclear benefits for local communities and few permanent jobs created.
Data centers used 4.4% of U.S. electricity in 2023 and could consume up to 12% by 2028, per the Department of Energy.
Data center construction is at an all-time high, increasing 69% year-over-year from 2023-2024, per CBRE, a commercial real estate firm.
State of play: With Chicago and Columbus' energy capacities tapping out, companies are increasingly eyeing secondary markets such as Minnesota, Iowa and Indiana, where land is cheaper and energy is more available, Andy Cvengros of real estate firm JLL tells Axios.
The Midwest's abundant tax incentives are particularly appealing for companies, says Jon Davis, a policy strategist for The Council of State Governments. Ohio is one of several states with a sales tax exemption on data center equipment.
And cooler temperatures and proximity to the Great Lakes reduce the need for energy-intensive cooling — an advantage over warmer southern states.
Yes, but: The expansion often happens behind closed doors.
Local governments frequently sign nondisclosure agreements with tech firms, limiting public knowledge of energy and water usage, says Helena Volzer of the nonprofit Alliance for the Great Lakes.
Fewer than one-third of data centers track water consumption, according to a 2021 study.
"That is kind of startling," Volzer says.
The other side: Our world is growing increasingly digital, and the data needs to go somewhere. U.S. households had an average of 21 digital devices in 2023, per a Deloitte survey.
"It's businesses of all shapes and sizes as well. They're increasingly relying on digital infrastructure," Dan Diorio, senior director of state policy for the Data Center Coalition, tells Axios.
As companies build to meet that surging demand, energy is a "significant cost driver," and it's in their best interests to be efficient, he says.
How data centers took root in Central Ohio
Columbus' data center boom is largely thanks to infrastructure investments from Amazon, which opened its first local center in Hilliard in 2016.
The big picture: New Albany was ahead of the curve even before that, adding centers for businesses such as Nationwide, Discover and TJX.
The city wanted to diversify its business portfolio and increase the value of its rural land, Jennifer Chrysler, the suburb's community development director, tells Axios.
Even with local abatements, adding the centers increased tax revenue for schools without adding students.
The latest: Today, the suburb's burgeoning Business Park is what Chrysler calls an "ecosystem" of tech investments that made Intel's Ohio One project possible.
What they're saying:"When you have names like Google and Meta and AWS and Microsoft and QTS in your community, people start to scratch their heads and say, 'What's going on in Central Ohio?'" Chrysler says.
"There is 100% value in those kinds of big tech names being here."
The hidden environmental costs of data centers
Data centers house server farms that store our information, along with electrical equipment that gets hot, requiring 24/7 air cooling that annually uses millions of gallons of water as a refrigerant.
They also use a large amount of electricity, which requires generating water.
Between the lines: Their exact consumption levels are often unknown, since most of them rely on municipal utilities, Volzer says.
Threat level: A recent Environment America report cautioned that this demand may delay the retirement of some fossil fuel power plants or require new fossil fuel generation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: Embedded tax startup April raises $38M
Exclusive: Embedded tax startup April raises $38M

Axios

time12 hours ago

  • Axios

Exclusive: Embedded tax startup April raises $38M

April, an embedded tax platform, has raised $38 million in a Series B round led by QED Investors, founder Ben Borodach tells Axios exclusively. Why it matters: Embedding tax tools directly into financial apps can improve financial decision-making and boost customer retention. Zoom in: Nyca Partners and Team8 also participated in the Series B round, bringing the total funding April has raised to date to $78 million. How it works: Fintech apps and financial institutions use April's APIs to integrate tax filing and planning directly into their platforms, enabling year-round, real-time tax management. April operates on a SaaS-based model, offering flat-rate pricing to fintech partners, who can choose to mark up services for their end customers. "Our vision is to embed tax in every financial decision," Borodach says. "Taxes should be happening where you're managing your money. They should be happening in real time, and they should be personalized to you." Context: New York-based April operates in a market dominated by legacy tax-preparation giants like Intuit, H&R Block, Thomson Reuters, and Wolters Kluwer. But it recently became the first new company in 15 years to achieve national e-file coverage in all 50 states, Borodach says. The company has also launched a series of new products over the past year, including pro-assisted and pro-led tax filing, quarterly estimate tools for small business owners, and paycheck withholding optimizers. As a result, it is seeing increased demand from wealth management platforms, including integrations with digital advisers catering to mass-affluent clients and an upcoming partnership with a trillion-dollar asset manager. By the numbers: April claims it can reduce the time it takes to prepare and file taxes from the IRS' reported 13‑hour average down to just 22 minutes. The company processed hundreds of thousands of returns through partnerships with over 50 fintech apps and financial institutions this past tax season. It has seen its business grow three times year-to-date and more than seven times over the past 12 months, Borodach says. What's next: The company is preparing to launch advanced tax planning tools around capital gains, retirement planning, and stock transactions.

AI's global race in the dark
AI's global race in the dark

Axios

time15 hours ago

  • Axios

AI's global race in the dark

The U.S.'s great AI race with China, now freshly embraced by President Trump, is a competition in the dark with no clear prize or finish line. Why it matters: Similar "races" of the past — like the nuclear arms race and the space race — have sparked innovation, but victories haven't lasted long or meant much. The big picture: Both Silicon Valley and the U.S. government now agree that we must invest untold billions to build supporting infrastructure for an error-prone, energy-hungry technology with an unproven business model and an unpredictable impact on the economy and jobs. What they're saying:"America is the country that started the AI race. And as president of the United States, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it," Trump said at a Wednesday event titled "Winning the AI Race." Policy experts and industry leaders who promote the "race" idea argue that the U.S. and China are in a head-to-head competition to win the future of AI by achieving research breakthroughs, establishing the technology's standards and breaking the AGI or "superintelligence" barrier. They suggest that the world faces a binary choice between free, U.S.-developed AI imbued with democratic values or a Chinese alternative that's under the thumb of the Communist Party. Flashback: The last time a scientific race had truly world-shaping consequences was during the Second World War, as the Manhattan Project beat the Nazis to the atomic bomb. But Germany surrendered well before the U.S. had revealed or made use of its discovery. The nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union that followed was a decades-long stalemate that cost fortunes and more than once left the planet teetering on an apocalyptic brink. The 1960s space race was similarly inconclusive. Russia got humanity into space ahead of the U.S., but the U.S. made it to the moon first. Once that leg of the race was over, both countries retreated from further human exploration of space for decades. State of play: With AI, U.S. leaders are once again saying the race is on — but this time the scorecard is even murkier. "Build a bomb before Hitler" or "Put a man on the moon" are comprehensible objectives, but no one is providing similar clarity for the AI competition. The best the industry can say is that we are racing toward AI that's smarter than people. But no two companies or experts have the same definition of "smart" — for humans or AI models. We can't even say with confidence which of any two AI models is "smarter" right now, because we lack good measures and we don't always know or agree on what we want the technology to do. Between the lines: The "beat China" drumbeat is coming largely from inside the industry, which now has a direct line to the White House via Trump's AI adviser, David Sacks. "Whoever ends up winning ends up building the AI rails for the world," OpenAI chief global affairs officer Chris Lehane said at an Axios event in March. Arguing for controls on U.S. chip exports to China earlier this year, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei described competitor DeepSeek as "beholden to an authoritarian government that has committed human rights violations, has behaved aggressively on the world stage, and will be far more unfettered in these actions if they're able to match the U.S. in AI." Yes, but: In the era of the second Trump administration, many Americans view their own government as increasingly authoritarian. With Trump himself getting into the business of dictating the political slant of AI products, it's harder for America's champions to sell U.S. alternatives as more "free." China has been catching up to the U.S. in AI research and development, most tech experts agree. They see the U.S. maintaining a shrinking lead of at most a couple of years and perhaps as little as months. But this edge is largely meaningless, since innovations propagate broadly and quickly in the AI industry. And cultural and language differences mean that the U.S. and its allies will never just switch over to Chinese suppliers even if their AI outruns the U.S. competition. In this, AI is more like social media than like steel, solar panels or other fungible goods. The bottom line: The U.S. and China are both going to have increasingly advanced AI in coming years. The race between them is more a convenient fiction that marshals money and minds than a real conflict with an outcome that matters.

These 11 companies have left California over the years
These 11 companies have left California over the years

Business Insider

time18 hours ago

  • Business Insider

These 11 companies have left California over the years

McKesson Corp. Pharmaceutical giant McKesson left California in 2019. In terms of public companies, only Apple loomed larger in the Bay Area. Then-CEO John H. Hammergren said that McKesson was moving its headquarters to Las Colinas, Texas (near Dallas) to "improve efficiency, collaboration and cost-competitiveness, while providing an exceptional work environment for our employees." Chevron Oil giant Chevron had deep roots in California, going back to the 1870s when an early predecessor discovered oil north of Los Angeles. That didn't stop the company from moving to Houston in 2024. Looking back on its move, the energy giant says that California's leaders have taken steps that made it "unappealing." "While our relocation has very real benefits to our business, we also believe California policymakers have pursued policies that raise costs and consumer prices, creating a hardship for all Californians, especially those who can least afford it," Ross Allen, a spokesperson for Chevron, said in a statement to Business Insider. "These policies have also made California investment unappealing compared with opportunities elsewhere in the US and globally." Tesla Like some of his fellow tech CEOs, Elon Musk grew frustrated with the limitations of the Bay area before Tesla left for Austin in 2021. "There's a limit to how big you can scale in the Bay Area," Musk said at the time. Before the move, Musk had also clashed with officials over keeping Tesla's Fremont, California, factory open despite COVID-19 orders. Oracle In 2020, Oracle left its longtime home in California. The computer technology giant isn't done moving yet. Last year, CEO Larry Ellison said the computer technology giant would move its headquarters from Austin, where it had been for less than half a decade, to Tennessee. "Nashville is a fabulous place to live," Ellison said, according to an Associated Press report. "It's a great place to raise a family. It's got a unique and vibrant culture .... It's the center of the industry we're most concerned about, which is the health care industry." CBRE Global real estate company CBRE monitors the number of companies leaving California. The firm itself left Los Angeles in 2020. "Designating Dallas as CBRE's global corporate headquarters formalizes how our company has been operating for the past eight years," Lew Horne, head of operations in the Southwest, said in a statement to the Los Angeles Times in 2020. Charles Schwab Charles Schwab left for Westlake, Texas, in 2019 after it agreed to buy Omaha-based TD Ameritrade. Schwab chairman and founder Charles Schwab singled out the business climate in California as motivation for the move: "The costs of doing business here are so much higher than some other place" he told Forbes. The companies said in a joint statement that their new home would "allow the combined firm to take advantage of the central location of the new Schwab campus." In 2023, SFGate reported that Schwab further reduced its presence in San Francisco, its former home. "We've had an extremely positive experience in Texas," a spokesperson from Schwab said in a statement to BI. "From day one, the energy, innovation, and welcoming spirit of North Texas has far exceeded our expectations." Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) In 2020, Hewlett Packard Enterprise announced it was leaving California, another COVID-19 era departure. "Houston is also an attractive market for us to recruit and retain talent, and a great place to do business," CEO Antonio Neri said in a statement announcing the move. Neri praised HPE's new home in Spring, Texas (a Houston suburb), but stressed that the company was not leaving Silicon Valley entirely. "Our San Jose campus will remain a hub for technological talent and innovation," he said. Palantir Software giant Palantir left Silicon Valley in 2020. Before the tech company moved, CEO Alex Karp said he had concerns about California. "I'm pretty happy outside the monoculture in New Hampshire," Karp told Axios in May 2020 when asked if he would move back to California as the COVID-19 pandemic was receding. Karp said at the time that Palantir was narrowing down its list of future homes, which potentially included Colorado. Palantir has been in Denver since August 2020. SpaceX Elon Musk promised to move SpaceX to Texas in 2024, part of a series of announcements that positioned his companies away from California. In announcing SpaceX's relocation, Musk singled out a California law that forbids schools from requiring staff to inform parents of a student's gender identity. "This is the final straw," Musk wrote on X in July 2024. "Because of this law and the many others that preceded it, attacking both families and companies, SpaceX will now move its HQ from Hawthorne, California, to Starbase, Texas." AECOM Global consultancy firm AECOM left Los Angeles in 2021, saying that Texas offered more benefits. "Dallas has emerged as a US hub for corporate headquarters and a compelling corporate talent magnet, particularly among our peers and public companies in the engineering and consulting sectors," a company spokesperson told The LA Times. FICO Financial data analytics firm FICO, officially known as the Fair Isaac Corporation, quietly moved to Bozeman, Montana, sometime in 2021. The company, best known for its FICO score, previously moved its corporate headquarters from Minneapolis to San Jose in 2013.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store