Taxes, energy, and healthcare: 3 ways that Trump's megabill impacts the business world
In the end, the megabill moved through the Senate on a 50-50 tally that required Vice President JD Vance to break the tie before the 870-page bill passed the House a few days later in a vote of 218-214.
The process proved exceptionally contentious largely over healthcare provisions that are set to extract hundreds of billions in government savings but could cause millions to lose coverage.
Medicaid and the inclusion of a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase were just two of the most controversial pieces of a complex bill that is set to reshape whole swathes of the US economy, especially around taxes, energy, and healthcare.
It's a bill also set to be felt keenly in American pocketbooks with provisions like no taxes on tips, cuts to student loans and the Pell Grant program, changes to 529 plans for education expenses, an increase in state tax deductions, and a range of other provisions that both business and consumer groups will be digesting for months.
Clean energy companies are already paying perhaps the keenest attention, with government support for EVs and solar projects set to be eliminated in the years ahead due to changes in the bill.
Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk emerged during final negotiations as the top business-world critic attacking the bill's price and how it treats clean energy. He said in recent days that the $3.3 trillion increase in debt expected from the bill makes a "mockery" of his work at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Economists have likewise noted the final price tag, which could top $4 trillion. Also critiqued was an accounting gimmick Republicans employed to hide much of that red ink that Maya MacGuineas of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget called "a massive cover-up" in a withering statement that added that the bill was "the single most expensive, dishonest, and reckless budget reconciliation bill ever."
Silicon Valley also has questions after a last-minute change stripped a closely-watched artificial intelligence provision.
But a range of GOP priorities that were included — from increased funding for border enforcement to money for America's 250th anniversary celebration next year — pushed the bill over the line with many in corporate America also in favor and focused on the tax piece.
Business Roundtable Chair Chuck Robbins, the CEO of Cisco (CSCO), offered following the final vote that the bill would allow "American businesses to better plan, invest and build for the future."
Trump for his part worked relentless to flip votes and get the bill passed calling it at one point the "greatest bill ever passed."
Here is a closer look at three ways the current version the bill would impact the business world.
A centerpiece of the bill — and far and away the source of the most expensive provisions — surrounded taxes.
The bill's main impetus has long been to permanently extend tax cuts for individuals contained in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which Trump signed into law on a temporary basis during his first term.
The bill would represent a continuation of the status quo for taxpayers. As one example, the bill is set to mean America's highest earners will carry on with a top rate of 37%.
The bill also provides new tax credits for individuals by fulfilling signature Trump campaign promises — albeit slightly less fulsomely than in the House version — via the elimination of taxes on tips, overtime, and car loan interest. It also offers an expanded standard deduction for seniors after Trump promised to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits.
Employees will be able to deduct up to $25,000 annually for tips and overtime.
Business owners, meanwhile, are keenly focused on a series of tax deductions that will reinstate credits for corporations for things like property depreciation, capital investments, new factory construction, interest expenses, and research and development costs.
Many of these provisions were present in the House version, but only temporarily. Permanency was a key Senate priority and is now included in the bill, even as it increased the price tag by hundreds of billions of dollars.
Senate Finance Committee chair Mike Crapo shepherded the tax changes and celebrated passage with a statement that said corporate provisions give "businesses the certainty they need to make the long-term investments that power economic growth."
The bill also makes permanent the pass-through deduction at a rate of 20%. That deduction — formally known as the 199A deduction — is focused on often smaller businesses organized as S corporations or partnerships.
The Senate version also includes an array of other tax changes, including a $40,000 annual deduction for state and local taxes (SALT) for the coming years, an expanded child tax credit, enhanced credits for "opportunity zones," and so-called MAGA accounts.
The effect on the energy sector could also be profound, especially after a last-minute series of changes turned the bill even further against the clean energy industry while offering new support for fossil fuels.
The bill has long been expected to phase out Biden-era clean energy tax credits, but the final bill will shut them down faster than many had expected.
The proposal to eliminate EV credits would even take effect on Sept. 30 of this year.
A late addition to the bill also raised worries that a new tax on wind and solar projects completed after 2027 was in the offing. But a flurry of objections led to a moderation, with the final draft quietly removing that excise tax.
"The bill's targeted tweaks to solar and wind tax credits, especially the phaseout language, are a relative market positive given the onerous nature of the previously proposed excise tax," is how Ed Mills of Raymond James summed up the net effects there.
At the same time, new last-minute inducements were unveiled for fossil fuels, including one classifying coal as a critical mineral for a government manufacturing credit.
"We're doing coal," Trump said in a recent interview on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures," where he also called solar energy projects "ugly as hell."
It was a mix that led Musk and others to predict that the larger effect of the bill would be to cut off clean energy, hurt the overall energy grid, and perhaps lead to higher utility bills.
At one point, Musk called the bill "utterly insane" and vowed that members of Congress who voted yes "will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.'
The bill is also set to implement major changes to the healthcare system.
Healthcare negotiations continued until nearly the literal last minute, and the overall package is set to trim the government's Medicaid spending by around $900 billion in the years ahead.
Corners of the sector, like rural hospitals, are set to be most directly impacted.
Republican Sen. Collins of Maine flipped against the bill late in the process and explained her no vote afterwards as driven "primarily from the harmful impact [the bill] will have on Medicaid, affecting low-income families and rural health care providers like our hospitals and nursing homes."
And the bottom line for patients — according to an accounting from the Congressional Budget Office that came in over the weekend — is that 11.8 million additional Americans would become uninsured by 2034 because of the healthcare provisions.
Some that lose coverage would be illegal immigrants, as Republicans often point out, but millions of US citizens are expected to lose coverage if the bill is enacted because of additional requirements to qualify for coverage.
This story has been updated with additional developments.
Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance.
Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Are Lakers buying out LeBron James? Explaining latest viral update on superstar's contract amid trade rumors
LeBron James seems like he'll stay front and center of the NBA's headlines this offseason. His agent Rich Paul's comments after LeBron opted-in to his Los Angeles Lakers contract for 2025-26 made many wonder whether James is seeking a trade. Advertisement There's also been a suggestion of a buyout, but that hasn't gained the same traction. Well, at least until a viral parody account posted on X on July 4 that James and the Lakers are working on a buyout. MORE: A major update in LeBron James' trade talks from Lakers Are Lakers buying out LeBron James? No, the Los Angeles Lakers are not buying out LeBron James. They also aren't working toward a buyout with LeBron. It would be entirely illogical for the Lakers to buy out James. He was a second-team All-NBA choice in 2024-25. Why would they get rid of him for nothing in return? While trades don't appear to be forthcoming, LeBron's name value plus talent give him legitimate trade value if he ends up requesting a deal. Advertisement But for now, it's full speed ahead for LeBron with the Lakers. MORE NBA NEWS:
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's $71 Billion Wealth Wipeout Dwarfs Next 7 Billionaire Decliners Combined
The world's richest person is worth less in 2025 than at the end of 2024, with Tesla Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk seeing his wealth take a hit as he battles with President Donald Trump. What Happened: The share price of Tesla has been highly volatile since Trump won the 2024 presidential election. Tesla shares hit new all-time highs in December 2024, driven by optimism for the electric vehicle leader and the strong relationship between Musk and Trump, which could help address regulatory issues and attract new fans. Tesla stock also traded over $400 at the start of 2025. Trending: GoSun's Breakthrough Rooftop EV Charger Already Has 2,000+ Units Reserved — Musk's work done with the government through the Department of Government Efficiency led to a call for boycotts against Tesla, and may be a reason for the weakened demand globally in 2025. Several recent falling outs between Musk and Trump have caused Tesla shareholders to worry about the future and have led to a significant decline in Musk's wealth in 2025. Musk is worth an estimated $361 billion according to Bloomberg. While that figure is significant and higher than second-place Mark Zuckerberg ($252 billion), it is down $71.2 billion year-to-date in 2025. For context, Musk has lost more in his net worth in 2025 than the next seven highest 2025 decliners combined, who are listed below with their rank on the list, net worth and YTD decline. 273. Dustin Moskovitz, Facebook co-founder, Asana Inc (NYSE:ASAN) founder: $11.4 billion, -$16.9 billion YTD 7. Bernard Arnault, LVMH (OTC:LVMUY) CEO: $162 billion, -$14.4 billion YTD 168. Mike Sabel, Venture Global (NYSE:VG) co-founder: $15.3 billion, -9.4 billion YTD 169. Bob Pender, Venture Global co-founder: $15.3 billion, -$9.4 billion YTD 9. Sergey Brin, Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ:GOOGL) co-founder: $152 billion, -$6.6 billion 8. Larry Page, Alphabet Inc co-founder: $162 billion, -$6.5 billion 189. Sukanto Tanoto, Royal Golden Eagle founder: $14.1 billion, -$6.3 billion Musk has lost more wealth than these seven individuals combined. In fact, the $71.2 billion drop in his net worth is so steep, it would rank as the 23rd largest fortune in the world on its own. That means in 2025 alone, Musk has lost more money than the total net worth of all but about 20 It's Important: Tesla stock is down 16.7% year-to-date in 2025, which has significantly impacted Musk's wealth, as he owns approximately 12% of the company. Other stakes in SpaceX and xAI have held up better but are less volatile, as they are privately held and don't experience the same valuation spikes as Tesla stock does on a day-to-day basis. Regardless of how much Musk and Trump are worth, the Tesla CEO's net worth is significantly higher, but investors may soon learn which figure truly matters when it comes to valuing Tesla. Trump has threatened to investigate the subsidies that Tesla receives and is again speaking critically of electric vehicles. Tesla investors should also keep in mind that Trump was once strongly opposed to autonomous vehicles and stated that he would ban them from the road. The president appears to have had a change of heart or been influenced by Musk to make it easier to get autonomous vehicles on the road today. Musk previously set a Guinness World Record in 2022 with the largest single-year wealth drop, with his net worth declining between $180 billion and $200 billion. It is unlikely that Musk could see such a significant drop again in 2025, but continued battles between Musk and Trump could be a storyline to watch. Read Next: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: Schedule your free call with a financial advisor to start your financial journey – no cost, no obligation. These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – they all believe in one platform that offers a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends Image created using photos from Shutterstock. Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Elon Musk's $71 Billion Wealth Wipeout Dwarfs Next 7 Billionaire Decliners Combined originally appeared on
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
1 Warren Buffett stock I'm staying well away from
Investors always pay close attention to which stocks Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway is buying – whether or not it's the CEO himself making the decisions. And one stands out to me. Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ) looks like a classic example of being greedy when others are fearful. But despite the stock being down 31% in the last year, I'm staying away from this one. it's one of the largest US alcohol producers and marketers. And the industry as a whole looks as though it's in a transition phase at the moment. One of the biggest developments is the well-documented shift towards more premium products. This has been happening across beer, wine, and spirits. Constellation Brands isn't oblivious to the ongoing changes. The company has been looking to position its portfolio to align with this trend by divesting some of its lower-priced lines. This looks like a good strategy to me. But there's another ongoing trend that looks more problematic, which involves beer and wine losing market share to spirits. That's a problem for a firm where beer accounts for 85% of overall revenues. Despite growth in some of its premium divisions, the category as a whole being in decline is a big concern. The Berkshire Hathaway investment managers might be seeing something, but I don't know what that is. In the UK, Diageo (LSE:DGE) is also going to contend with challenges to the alcohol industry in general. These include the rise of GLP-1 drugs, which could well weigh on overall demand. I think, however, the FTSE 100 firm has a more attractive portfolio for dealing with these risks. Its sales predominantly come from spirits, with smaller contributions from beer and wine. The strength of Diageo's spirits portfolio is well-documented. But even in its relatively minor wine division, the company is firmly positioned towards the luxury end of the market. Through a joint venture with Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Diageo has access to some of the top champagne names. These include Dom Pérignon, Moët & Chandon, and Veuve Clicquot. Its beer division primarily consists of Guinness, which some analysts have speculated the firm might be looking to sell. But I don't think this would be a particularly welcome development. Guinness sales have been strong recently, underscoring the shift towards premium lines across categories. So I see the division as another reason to be optimistic about Diageo's portfolio. A lot of recent attention has been focused on UK shares trading at lower multiples than their US counterparts. But that's not so obviously the case with Constellation Brands and Diageo. Despite a lower dividend yield and a higher price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, Constellation Brands trades at a lower free cash flow multiple than its FTSE 100 counterpart. This means that — in one important respect — the stock is cheaper. On balance, however, I think Diageo is in a stronger position to deal with the challenges the alcohol industry is facing. That's why it's the stock I've been buying for my portfolio. The post 1 Warren Buffett stock I'm staying well away from appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Stephen Wright has positions in Berkshire Hathaway and Diageo Plc. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Constellation Brands and Diageo Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio