
TikTok brings ‘raw milk' craze to Britain – despite it being 45 times more likely to put you in hospital
'I drink a glass of raw milk with a couple of egg yolks and some raw honey mixed in every day, it's better for you because it hasn't been processed,' says Mostafa, a 17-year-old schoolboy who began drinking raw dairy about a year ago after discovering it on TikTok.
'Raw milk is so good for us, and when you think about it, big companies might not want us to be our healthiest because they profit from our poor health,' adds Lola, 21, a recent UCL graduate and weekly regular at the shop. 'That said, the main reason I continued to drink raw milk after trying it is because how it makes me feel, it makes me feel alive!'
Hook & Son is just one of several British businesses riding the raw dairy wave – sales of which have soared in recent years to the point where three million litres of raw milk are now sold in the UK annually, an almost five-fold jump from 600,000 litres in 2014.
Unlike dairy sold in the supermarket, the products – not only milk but raw ice cream, butter, yoghurt, and crème fraîche – are all unpasteurised.
Pasteurisation, invented by French chemist Louis Pasteur in the 19th century, is a heating process that kills off any harmful bacteria and viruses contained in dairy products. One of the most important scientific breakthroughs in history, it is credited with saving millions of lives from diseases like bovine tuberculosis, diphtheria, E.coli, listeria, and salmonella.
All the more curious, then, that the TikTok generation is abandoning it – especially given the threat posed by H5N1 bird flu which has been found in raw milk supplies across America.
While advocates claim – without robust evidence – that raw dairy can treat chronic illnesses, rebalance hormones, and strengthen the gut microbiome, UK health watchdogs have repeatedly warned that such products pose serious risks and strongly advise against consuming it.
Unpasteurised dairy products are 840 times more likely to cause illness than pasteurised dairy, and 45 times more likely to put you in hospital, according to a study published in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases.
'We advise that raw or unpasteurised drinking milk and cream may contain harmful bacteria that can cause food poisoning. People with a weaker immune system are particularly vulnerable to food poisoning and should not consume it,' says the Food Standards Agency, the government body responsible for food safety and hygiene.
The risks are higher for pregnant women, young children, and the elderly, adds the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
Why then, are people suddenly going mad for unpasteurised dairy products in Britain?
Much of the craze can be traced back to the US, where the raw dairy movement has exploded on the back of social media.
Once the preserve of the health-conscious fringe, raw milk is now championed by figures across the cultural spectrum — from Goop founder Gwyneth Paltrow to anti-vaxxers and MAGA-esque preppers.
US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his nominee for Surgeon General, Dr. Casey Means, have both described US regulations on raw dairy as a 'war on public health,' arguing that unpasteurised products are 'superfoods' that should be made more widely accessible.
An estimated 10 million people are now thought to regularly consume raw dairy in America – at least 2,000 of which have fallen ill as a direct result of raw dairy consumption in the last 20 years, resulting in hundreds of hospitalisations and at least three deaths, according to the US Centre for Disease Control (CDC).
Concern among US health watchdogs has soared as H5N1 has spread throughout the nation's dairy farms, contaminating its vast milk supply chains.
Live traces of H5N1 have been found in raw milk sold in supermarkets in California, the epicentre of the outbreak.
The US CDC has reacted by issuing strongly worded warnings against consuming any raw dairy. 'The CDC strongly advises against consuming raw (unpasteurised) milk, even if it may not be contaminated with the H5N1 virus, due to the potential for various foodborne illnesses. While the risk of H5N1 transmission from raw milk is still being investigated, the CDC recommends avoiding raw milk products to minimise the risk of infection, including H5N1.'
The US CDC has also detailed the deaths of a dozen cats who died horribly after catching H5N1 from consuming untreated farmyard milk in Texas last year.
'Clinical signs in affected cats were depressed mental state, stiff body movements, ataxia, blindness, circling, and copious oculonasal discharge,' the CDC reported.
@coachcarnivorecam Always Go For Raw Milk 🥛 #carnivore #carnivorediet #milk #rawmilk #healthy #health ♬ original sound - Coach Carnivore Cam
In Britain, H5N1 has infected many poultry farms, causing millions of birds to be slaughtered, but it has not so far been found in dairy farms or raw milk supplies.
Nevertheless, experts are worried that the trend in unpasteurised dairy is now taking off here.
'Raw milk doesn't offer any proven health benefits,' says Dr Tim Spector, British epidemiologist and founder of Zoe, a company specialising in gut health. 'What it does come with is a significantly high risk of infection.'
'Why is it so popular? Well, I think it taps into the idea that 'natural' is always better – but this naturalistic fallacy can be dangerous, just because something is natural, doesn't make it safe. Skip raw milk, and stick to the science.'
That certainly seems to chime with the vibe at Borough Market.
'We've really seen a rise in young customers over the past few years – teenagers, students, loads of them,' said a member of staff at the Hook & Son Raw Dairy Shop.
She added that she drinks a litre of raw milk a day herself, and says she has never felt better.
Scrolling through social media, it's easy to get swept up in the trend.
There are hundreds of thousands of videos promoting the supposed health benefits of unpasteurised dairy – claims often made with confidence, but little scientific backing.
'The truth is, when you boil milk it denatures the proteins [...] you lose the enzymes, the digestive enzymes,' says Niall Kiddle, an internet personality who advocates for a return to 'ancestral eating' as a path to better health.
In another clip, Coach Carnivore Cam – a manosphere influencer whose daily meals include two rare rib eye steaks, two lamb mince burgers, and ten fried eggs – says: 'It's funny to me how people think they are being healthier by drinking skimmed or semi-skimmed milk, but that couldn't be further from the truth'.
The trend seems to be popular with Notting Hill-type mums too.
'Let's talk about raw milk. I drink it and I give it to my daughter. I'm not a scientist or a nutritionist, but it aids digestion and boosts the immune system,' says Clara on TikTok, her infant child strapped to her chest in a £370 terry towelling baby carrier.
The online dialogue taps into a new-age obsession with 'natural' eating, driven in part by a growing anxiety around ultra-processed foods.
The same impulse may explain the rise of the so-called 'carnivore diet', which encourages people to consume a diet made up entirely of raw meat.
Rigorous studies, including systematic reviews published in Clinical Infectious Diseases and Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, show no health benefits for raw milk over pasteurised milk.
The same studies confirm that all key nutrients survive pasteurisation in pasteurised milk.
That science has been unable to penetrate the online movement, however.
'I'm into organic, healthy living,' says Monica, who comes to the Hook & Sons stand every week with her three year old daughter, Mia. 'In the beginning I was a bit scared, but it's absolutely lovely. My kids love it and I think it's very nutritious and very healthy.'
Since January, the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) ordered the temporary closure of 43 more poultry farms after they became infected with H5N1.
Over the last year, more than two million farmed birds have been culled in Britain to try and stamp out H5N1 infection.
A recent survey of dairy farms in England, Scotland, and Wales tested 508 bulk milk samples and found no evidence of H5N1.
But the same study confirmed that H5N1 could survive in raw milk. Only with pasteurisation could it reliably be killed off.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
36 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
NHS on the hunt for ‘precision-matched' blood donors
Scientists have tested tens of thousands of blood donors to see if they have rare blood types in a UK-first. The blood from donors with rare blood types will be collected and frozen so it can be used to help other people with the same type of blood. It will also be available should the donor be in a situation where they themselves need a blood transfusion. The new drive to find precision-matched blood donors comes to help people who are at risk of blood transfusion side effects. NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) said that blood matching is 'vital' due to the complexity of blood groups – there are 362 known blood types. So far its scientists have DNA-tested the blood types of 77,000 donors as part of a research project. This is the first time that blood types have been DNA tested in the UK at-scale, NHSBT said. Dozens of rare blood donors have been identified during the process and it is hoped the number will rise to hundreds. This means that blood from these donors can be used as 'personalised, precision-matched transfusion' for those in need. This can help avoid severe transfusion reactions – where the body sees the transfused blood as 'foreign' and rejects it. People who are particularly at risk of these reactions are those who regularly receive blood donations including those with sickle cell disorder and thalassaemia. Experts hailed the project as the 'first major step' towards rolling out precision-matched blood more widely. Dr Gail Miflin, chief medical officer at NHSBT, said: 'Taking these 77,000 donors and testing their blood to such a precise level has been an incredible undertaking and will work to significantly change the way we issue blood – especially to those patients at higher risk of transfusion related reactions. 'We will be able to match to an increasing number of blood groups, ensuring that patients have blood that is most similar to their own and reducing the risk of any reactions. It is an example of just how we are driving innovation which can radically improve patient outcomes.' NHSBT's genomics programme director, Kate Downes, added: 'This inventory of blood will enhance our capacity to find units with rare blood groups for difficult to match patients as well as provide better matched units for patients who have an increased risk of transfusion reactions, aiding us in our mission to save and improve even more lives. 'This genotyping is a first major step towards rolling out precision matched blood more widely, which would be a landmark change in how blood is matched.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
NHS on the hunt for ‘precision-matched' blood donors
The NHS is searching for blood donors with rare blood types so it can ensure patients in need can receive 'precision-matched' blood. Scientists have tested tens of thousands of blood donors to see if they have rare blood types in a UK-first. The blood from donors with rare blood types will be collected and frozen so it can be used to help other people with the same type of blood. It will also be available should the donor be in a situation where they themselves need a blood transfusion. The new drive to find precision-matched blood donors comes to help people who are at risk of blood transfusion side effects. NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) said that blood matching is 'vital' due to the complexity of blood groups – there are 362 known blood types. So far its scientists have DNA-tested the blood types of 77,000 donors as part of a research project. This is the first time that blood types have been DNA tested in the UK at-scale, NHSBT said. Dozens of rare blood donors have been identified during the process and it is hoped the number will rise to hundreds. This means that blood from these donors can be used as 'personalised, precision-matched transfusion' for those in need. This can help avoid severe transfusion reactions – where the body sees the transfused blood as 'foreign' and rejects it. People who are particularly at risk of these reactions are those who regularly receive blood donations including those with sickle cell disorder and thalassaemia. Experts hailed the project as the 'first major step' towards rolling out precision-matched blood more widely. Dr Gail Miflin, chief medical officer at NHSBT, said: 'Taking these 77,000 donors and testing their blood to such a precise level has been an incredible undertaking and will work to significantly change the way we issue blood – especially to those patients at higher risk of transfusion related reactions. 'We will be able to match to an increasing number of blood groups, ensuring that patients have blood that is most similar to their own and reducing the risk of any reactions. It is an example of just how we are driving innovation which can radically improve patient outcomes.' NHSBT's genomics programme director, Kate Downes, added: 'This inventory of blood will enhance our capacity to find units with rare blood groups for difficult to match patients as well as provide better matched units for patients who have an increased risk of transfusion reactions, aiding us in our mission to save and improve even more lives. 'This genotyping is a first major step towards rolling out precision matched blood more widely, which would be a landmark change in how blood is matched.'


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Striking doctors claiming to care about patients? It's a sick joke
The British Medical Association confirmed that a five-day NHS strike would go ahead from Friday VUK VALCIC/SOPA IMAGES/LIGHTROCKET VIA GETTY IMAGES W hen hospital doctors strike they routinely trot out the claim that they are doing it for the patients. Their desire for generous pay awards (to add to pensions that are the envy of the private sector) is billed as almost incidental to their mission to save the National Health Service. Failure to award them a double-digit pay rise, they explain, will result in catastrophe for the health service. And why? Because, says the British Medical Association, the professional body for doctors turned militant trade union, young medics would be 'forced' to hightail it to sunny Australia to line their pockets. They wouldn't be able to help themselves. The activists in the BMA fomenting a new and scarcely believable round of strikes, beginning on Friday with a five-day stoppage, should stop insulting the public's intelligence with this offensive cant, wipe away their crocodile tears and admit that it's all about the cash. The price: thousands of patients will end up in more pain and for longer, or die earlier, because of their grotesque selfishness. The NHS, which these wreckers always claim to revere, will be plunged into chaos again, just as it is recovering from 44 days of strikes in 2023-24. And what is the BMA's latest pay claim? Resident doctors — hospital doctors who are not consultants, previously known as junior doctors — want 29 per cent. Yes, really. That is on top of a 22 per cent rise last year. After the Labour government's capitulation to the BMA in 2024, it is trying to return to relative normality this year with an above-inflation offer of 5.4 per cent, in line with the pay review body recommendation and the most generous offer in the public sector. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, is trying to talk sense into the strike leaders, offering the olive branch of reduced student debt. But having shown weakness once Mr Streeting finds himself in the all-too-predictable position of facing an emboldened opponent confident in its power. The good news is that Sir Jim Mackey, chief executive of NHS England, has refused to play the BMA's game and is insisting that routine operations carry on. Tom Dolphin, chair of the BMA council, and Emma Runswick, his deputy, have called for all non-urgent procedures to be cancelled, claiming that doing otherwise would 'put patients at risk'. Their hypocrisy is nauseating: it is the BMA that is placing patients in peril. The BMA's cynicism does not end there. When resident doctors strike it falls to consultants to fill the gaps. These aristocrats of the NHS, enjoying basic salaries up to £140,000, not including private work and overtime, are being advised by the union to charge £313 an hour for strike night cover. This is rampant profiteering. Only 26,800 BMA resident doctors voted to strike out of 53,800. Some 22,000 resident doctors are not in the BMA. So just a third of all resident doctors voted yes to misery. The silent majority should back the NHS. Medical graduates start their professional training on £36,000; by their early thirties they are earning £70,000. From then on it is a staircase to comfort. NHS doctors enjoy a super-perk they prefer not to highlight: generous, index-linked defined benefit pensions resulting in retirement incomes greater than most salaries. The public needs to understand how much it is paying for the retirements of these arrogant, entitled, callous strikers. The BMA is now in danger of overreaching itself, of forfeiting public respect. A 29 per cent pay claim, following a 22 per cent one, is a sick joke.