₹1L-crore R&D push for private sector unveiled
The Research Development and Innovation (RDI) scheme, shaped through wide consultations with industry experts, will provide long-term financing or refinancing at low or interest-free rates . It will back projects that have moved beyond early-stage research and reached the prototype stage,said union minister Ashwini Vaishnaw at a press briefing on the cabinet's decisions.
'When a company moves beyond the prototype stage, it often faces the 'valley of death,' a critical phase where many innovations fail due to lack of support,' said Vaishnaw. 'This is exactly when timely assistance is needed to turn a promising prototype into a viable product.'
The scheme will target sunrise sectors such as clean energy, climate tech, deep tech (quantum applications, robotics, space teach), AI in key areas, biotech, digital agriculture, and also interestingly technologies required for strategic reasons, economic security, self-reliance or public interest.
'Countries that invest heavily in R&D see long-term gains in productivity and technological advancement across industries,' said Vaishnaw.
The Economic Survey 2024-25 noted that even though India has increased the gross expenditure on research & development (GERD) from approximately ₹ 60,196 crore in 2011 to about ₹ 127,381 crore in 2021, it still is a mere 0.64% of its GDP. The survey noted that this remains 'insufficient and remains low compared to many countries that have forged ahead in R&D.'
A Press Information Bureau release said the government will give ₹ 1 lakh crore to the Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF) as a 50-year interest-free loan. ANRF, a government body set up to boost research and innovation, will create a special fund that offers concessional finance to second-level fund managers, who will then evaluate and select individual projects for funding. In some cases equity investments in startups may also be considered, the PIB release said.
Contributions to the Deep-Tech Fund of Funds, announced in Budget 2025, or any other fund of funds meant for RDI may also be considered, the release added.
The RDI scheme will be guided by the ANRF governing board, chaired by the prime minister. Its executive council will set guidelines and recommend fund managers and project types. A group of secretaries, led by the cabinet secretary, will approve changes and review progress. The secretary of the relevant sector will be included in the group. For instance, if a project involves AI, the secretary of the IT ministry will be part of the decision-making body. The department of science and technology will be the nodal agency for implementation.
Industry insiders described the scheme as transformative.
'DeepTech is the final frontier in the Indian Startup ecosystem. This ( ₹ 1 Lakh crore over 5 years) is a massive commitment from the Government of India to catalyze private sector R&D and deep tech innovation,' said Rajan Anandan, Managing Director at Peak XV Partners and former head of Google in India and Southeast Asia on X.
Nikhil Agarwal, managing director, foundation for innovation and technology transfer (FITT), IIT Delhi, said, 'For the first time, our private sector has a real runway to dream bigger, build deeper, and compete globally. This move can transform India from a service-driven economy into a true innovation powerhouse. It's a defining moment for our nation's future.'
He pointed out that for young founders building in AI, space, biotech or semiconductors, access to R&D capital has always been the missing link. This scheme fills that gap, he said, calling it a structural reform that re-imagines how India competes globally.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Message in smooth train fare hike: A mature Indian who knows a good ride comes at a price
Nothing good comes for free. That's the message loud and clear in the various moves the Narendra Modi government is making in infrastructure. Be it rising highway tolls, heavy-duty bridges and tunnels, or now the latest addition—a hike in train July 1, Indian Railways has increased passenger fares across most long-distance trains: the first such move in five years. But while the hike may pinch slightly on paper, its implications are broader, reflecting a subtle but decisive shift in both public expectations and political fare increase is marginal but with a purpose: 2 paise more per km in AC classes and 1 paisa more in the sleeper and second-class Mail and Express trains. For slow passenger trains, the hike is 0.5 paisa per km and applies only on trips exceeding 500 services and monthly season tickets remain unaffected. The fare for a 1,000 km distance in multi-class passenger trains will be hiked on an average at Rs 10 for economy class and Rs 15 for second class. Still, it adds up. With over 4.8 trillion passenger km of movement expected in FY2025-26, the fare adjustment is projected to net the railways an additional Rs 1,100 crore over the remaining nine months of the financial year. Had it been implemented from April 1, the amount would have crossed Rs 1,450 boost is no small deal in a system where passenger operations are heavily subsidised. Suburban travel recovers barely 30 per cent of its cost; non-AC long-distance journeys about 39 cent. Only AC segments, thanks to their premium pricing, manage a slender surplus of around 3.5 per just as telling as the numbers is the silence. There's been precious little political outrage. No protests. No widespread condemnation. That silence suggests two things: one, that the BJP now believes it can insulate itself from backlash in the wake of such policy decisions, a courage lacking in many predecessors who either delayed fare increases or cloaked them in opaque the Indian passenger appears to have grown up—prepared, albeit grudgingly, to shell out a little more in return for real enhancements of service. Most importantly, there has been radio silence even from railway minister Ashwini Vaishnaw on this on social of this is a far cry from 2014 when the new Modi government had to roll back a proposed hike in suburban fares following a blowback. In comparison, the latest fare hike comes just months before the crucial Bihar could mean that increases in railway fares may finally no longer be the political silver bullet they once were. Some of this change in perception is a consequence of how far Indian Railways has come in recent years. The widening of Vande Bharat routes, the visible station modernisation projects and the cleaner coaches—all of that adds to the fact that the railways is trying to deliver what is more than just status fare hike becomes a piece of a larger narrative then: of passengers paying for, and demanding, better value. To be sure, for a few years now, the railways has been printing the not-so-subtle message on all its tickets that it recovers only half of its cost from ticket last fare hike was in January 2020. It amounted to an increase of 4 paise per km for AC classes and 2 paise for non-AC and suburban services. The shift was made with relatively little political current fare increase is less steep, but it is tied to a several more important process tweaks: Aadhaar-based OTP verification for Tatkal tickets, advance reservation charts eight hours before departure and revised waiting list caps—up to 60 per cent in AC, 30 per cent in sleeper, thanks to more data it does not outright invalidate the Opposition's query: why are you raising fares now, after a record Rs 2.5 lakh crore allocation has been made for railways in Budget 2025-26? Doesn't the government have more money than before?The answer lies in the calculus of operational cost. Salaries, fuel, maintenance, security and the introduction of new services all carry enormous costs. But the expense that pinches the most is the ballooning pension bill, which is within touching distance of Rs 70,000 crore and rising every revenues can bail the railways out only so much. And with passenger earnings projected to climb from Rs 75,215 crore in FY25 to Rs 92,800 crore in FY26, some of it will also be down to making up the shortfall, filling the gap with yet more class-based also the more profound optics of fairness. This still leaves half of all rail passengers—suburban and short-distance in particular—paying highly-subsidised rates, whereas the higher expectations of better-off passengers for clean, punctual and modern trains cannot be carried through cross-subsidisation this hike is just as much about messaging as money. It's the railways asserting itself as a modern, service-driven utility, not a big old legacy network of some other era dragging along the baggage of populism. That said, for the wheels to turn faster, cleaner and more reliably in the future, passengers will have to chip in, perhaps only a little bit. Most of all, it is a shift in the public transport conversation in India: from entitlement to to India Today Magazine- Ends
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Pentagon Flexes "Bunker Buster" Used in US Strikes on Iran Nuclear Sites Firstpost America
Pentagon Flexes "Bunker Buster" Used in US Strikes on Iran Nuclear Sites | Firstpost America | N18G Pentagon Flexes "Bunker Buster" Used in US Strikes on Iran Nuclear Sites | Firstpost America | N18G The Pentagon has released footage of a GBU-57 bunker-buster bomb test, confirming the same munitions were used in US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Fourteen bombs were dropped by B-2 bombers, alongside a Navy missile strike. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and General Dan Caine defended the operation while rejecting leaked intelligence reports that suggested limited damage. The White House backed their position, and the FBI launched an investigation into the leak. All 100 US senators received a classified briefing, with Republicans praising the strikes and Democrats raising concerns about effectiveness. Meanwhile, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei claimed the US failed to achieve its goals and warned of retaliation if further attacks occur. See More
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Siddaramaiah-Shivakumar baton change buzzing, how Congress is handling its restive Karnataka MLAs
As the Siddaramaiah-led Congress government approaches the halfway mark of its tenure in Karnataka, the ruling party is seeking a report card on the performance of its legislators while also conducting a review of the organisational exercise comes amidst a bout of dissent from Congress MLAs, many of whom have been clamouring for more funds for their constituencies, giving Opposition parties ample ammunition to target the government over state the familiar refrain of a leadership change at the government's helm has about a mid-term handover of the baton from chief minister Siddaramaiah to his deputy D.K. Shivakumar has been a constant undercurrent of the Congress tenure in Karnataka since it came to power in May 2023. The current spell of speculation began with a cryptic comment by cooperation minister K.N. Rajanna that big changes were due in September. Coming from a Siddaramaiah loyalist, speculation was rife that Rajanna was hinting at a cabinet reshuffle or a new Pradesh Congress Committee (PCC) is serving an extended tenure as PCC president, and Siddaramaiah loyalists like Rajanna have been pressing for a Rajanna didn't elaborate on what the changes would be, other voices soon joined the chorus. Ramanagara MLA H.A. Iqbal Hussain, a Shivakumar loyalist, said the latter deserved a chance to become chief minister, having led the party to power as state the Congress top brass sought to dismiss talk about a change of guard, on another front, it had to contend with other MLAs airing their complaints aloud. Particularly damaging for the government were the allegations by B.R. Patil, a senior Congress legislator from Aland, about corruption in a housing scheme for the poor. MLA Raju Kage threatened to resign, complaining about delayed work orders for projects sanctioned in his fund allocations for infrastructure work in their constituencies has been an ongoing grouse of Congress MLAs, given the government's significant expenditure on the five key welfare schemes, or election guarantees, that were implemented immediately after the Congress came to power. To address such complaints, Siddaramaiah had announced the Rs 8,000 crore Chief Minister's Infrastructure Development Programme, focused on road construction and other infrastructure, in Budget 2025 presented in March.'There are more than sufficient funds available for development. This is a bogey being raised by the BJP as they want the government guarantees to be shut down,' said Randeep Singh Surjewala, AICC (All India Congress Committee) general secretary in charge of Karnataka, on July is holding meetings with Congress legislators as part of the performance review. He is slated to meet all MLAs over the next eight days. The Congress has 136 MLAs in the state, including Siddaramaiah and is a continuous process. We are trying to understand from our MLAs what work they have done in the past two years in their constituencies. It is important to review their performance,' he said, adding that the performance of ministers will also be looked into. 'We are also asking them (MLAs) about any difficulties or aspirations they will convey it to the government.'The review will also cover the efficacy of the election guarantees in each constituency as well as the performance of district-level Congress functionaries and frontal organisations. 'So, this is a review of the main body organisation too. It will give an idea of how we should make our policies more responsive to the people,' Surjewala to him, no opinions are being sought on a leadership change. 'The answer is clearly a no,' he said. In a bid to quell the open speculation, notices are being issued to legislators such as Hussain for making public statements about a possible change of outlined the purpose of Surjewala's visit. 'Randeep Surjewala is here to receive pleas from MLAs and give guidance on the [running of the] party organisation. He is trying to bring in discipline in the party amidst public statements by some MLAs,' said the deputy chief minister. 'Neither a cabinet expansion nor a leadership change was discussed. We are not in a hurry for that; our sole focus is 2028 [state elections].'advertisementSubscribe to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
