PM Modi meets Shashi Tharoor, other members of all-party delegation on Operation Sindoor
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday met with members of the all-party delegations who took part in the global outreach programme on Operation Sindoor. During the meeting at 7 Lok Kalayan Marg, the prime minister met with Congress leader Shashi Tharoor, JD(U)'s Sanjay Jha and others.
Following Operation Sindoor, the Indian government announced a total of seven all-party delegations, led by members from the ruling NDA alliance and the opposition INDIA bloc.
BJP's Ravi Shankar Prasad and Baijyant Panda, Congress' Shashi Tharoor, JD(U)'s Sanjay Jha, Shiv Sena's Shrikant Shinde, DMK's Kanimozhi, and NCP (SP)'s Supriya Sule led the seven delegations to different parts of the world, to convey India's policy on zero tolerance for terrorism.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
31 minutes ago
- India.com
Rinku Singh BSA Controversy Explained: Why UP Government's Decision Sparked Nationwide Debate
photoDetails english 2924085 Indian cricketer Rinku Singh, known for his IPL performances, has been appointed as a Basic Education Officer (BSA) in Uttar Pradesh under the International Medal Winner Direct Recruitment Rules 2022. Despite having formal education only up to Class 9, his selection has sparked massive controversy on social media. While some support the move as recognition of sporting excellence, others criticize it as an insult to qualified, educated youth. The role typically requires a graduate degree, but Rinku has seven years to complete it. His engagement to SP MP Priya Saroj has further fueled speculation about political influence behind the appointment. Updated:Jun 30, 2025, 07:13 AM IST 1. Rinku Singh Appointed BSA Despite Class 9 Education: How Is This Possible? 1 / 20 Under the International Medal Winner Direct Recruitment Rules 2022, Rinku qualifies due to his Asian Games gold, bypassing the usual graduation requirement for Basic Education Officer roles. 2. Basic Education Officer Role: Why Rinku Singh's Selection Sparked Uproar 2 / 20 The BSA oversees district-level school operations. With education as the department's core, appointing a Class 9-pass cricketer raised concerns over competency and symbolic messaging in public education. 3. Meritocracy vs Recognition: The Core of the Rinku Singh Controversy 3 / 20 Critics argue appointing an under-qualified individual undermines merit-based hiring, while supporters see it as recognition of sporting excellence and a motivational move by the state. 4. Social Media Reactions on Fire: 'Injustice to Educated Youth' Trends 4 / 20 Trending Twitter hashtags like #RinkuSingh #BSAControversy reflect mixed reactions—some praise his journey, others question sidelining lakhs of graduates preparing for education sector jobs. 5. Policy Loophole or Planned Inclusion? Understanding Rule 7 of UP's 2022 Gazette 5 / 20 Rule 7 allows direct BSA appointments for international medal winners. Rinku and six others were chosen, but only he's facing backlash due to the symbolic value attached to the education sector. 6. Will Rinku Singh Need to Graduate to Retain the BSA Post? 6 / 20 Yes. As per policy, Rinku has seven years to complete his graduation to retain the BSA position. Failure to do so can result in reassignment or dismissal, adding a ticking clock to the post. 7. Netizens Suggest Alternate Posts: Why Not Sports or Police Department? 7 / 20 Many online users say Singh would better serve as a sports department official or police officer, roles seen as more aligned with his achievements and less sensitive than education governance. 8. Rinku Singh's Salary as BSA: What He'll Earn in Government Service 8 / 20 As a Group A gazetted officer, Rinku could draw ₹70,000–₹90,000/month, with perks like HRA, DA, medical benefits, and housing — adding to the controversy over rewarding a non-graduate. 9. Political Link Speculation Grows Post Engagement With SP MP Priya Saroj 9 / 20 Netizens have linked his appointment to his recent engagement with Samajwadi Party MP Priya Saroj, sparking debates around nepotism and political influence in high-level appointments. 10. Rinku Singh's Story: From Gas Cylinder Delivery Boy to Government Officer 10 / 20 While the debate rages on, Rinku's journey—from humble Aligarh beginnings to the IPL and now government service—continues to inspire millions, creating a complex narrative of success and scrutiny. 11 / 20 12 / 20 13 / 20 14 / 20 15 / 20 16 / 20 17 / 20 18 / 20 19 / 20 20 / 20
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
Big, beautiful budgets: not just an American problem
LAST YEAR America ran a budget deficit of 7% of GDP. It may soon be even bigger. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, now working its way through Congress, permanently extends tax cuts introduced in 2017, offers more to hospitality workers and old folk, and boosts payments to poor children. The proposed legislation amounts to trillions of dollars of extra borrowing over the next decade. Mr Trump's showmanship attracts attention—but America is not alone. Governments across the rich world are increasingly profligate (see chart 1). This year France will run a deficit worth 6% of GDP; Britain's will be only a little smaller. The German government will borrow the equivalent of 3% of GDP. Canada's budget balance is also moving into the red. Jean-Baptiste Colbert, a bureaucrat under Louis XIV, remarked that the essence of tax policy involved 'plucking as many feathers from the goose with the least hissing". Today's governments do not pluck the goose. Like producers of foie gras, they stuff it. Governments have long run deficits. France, the land of foie gras, has not seen a surplus since 1974. And a government can simultaneously borrow money and become less indebted, if the economy grows faster than debt accumulates. What is happening today, however, is unprecedented. Deficit levels would not be unusual if the economy were in recession. In fact, rich-world GDP is growing decently. The unemployment rate is near an all-time low. Corporations' profit growth is healthy. Meanwhile, borrowing costs have jumped. The average rich-world government, weighted by GDP, now borrows for ten years at a 3.7% annual interest rate, up from 1% during the covid-19 pandemic. In these circumstances, many textbooks would advise, at the very least, cutting your deficit. Today's governments prefer to double down. Many are promising to raise defence spending. Although that may be unavoidable, the same is not true of other decisions. In Japan political parties are offering fiscal sweeteners, ranging from cash handouts to consumption-tax cuts, ahead of an election to the upper house of parliament. The British government recently undid cash-saving measures it had imposed only a few months before, restoring payments to old people to help with energy bills. South Korea is cutting inheritance tax. Australia is cutting income tax. Even once-prudent countries are getting in on the act. The German government is planning to borrow €800bn ($940bn) to invest in defence and infrastructure. 'By German standards, this truly is 'whatever it takes' fiscal policy," say analysts at Deutsche Bank. Switzerland, which before the pandemic ran a large budget surplus, now has a small one. Next year the country will introduce a 13th month of state-pension payments. The silver-haireds enjoying a late lunch on the banks of the Rhine do not appear to be on the breadline. These days, though, everyone gets a handout. Why are governments so spendthrift? During the pandemic politicians developed a habit of bailing out businesses and households. High inflation then spurred demands for payments to alleviate a 'cost-of-living crisis". Today many incumbents hope to ward off populists by throwing around money. When a politician suggests a cut, 24-hour news and social media ensure that everyone hears a sob story. Fiscal responsibility is more toxic than ever before. Until recently, it was painless for governments to run loose fiscal policy. In 2021-23 nominal GDP was growing reasonably fast, inflation was high and interest rates were low. Under these conditions, the average rich-world government could run sizeable primary deficits (ie, before interest payments) and still cut their debt load. Some countries, such as Japan, could reduce their debt-to-GDP ratio even if they ran a primary deficit of 12% of GDP. As such, two-thirds of rich-world governments are less indebted today than five years ago. Japan's debt-to-GDP ratio has fallen by 24 percentage points. Greece's has fallen by 68 points. Today growth and inflation are down, and interest rates are up. We calculate that, for the average rich country to cut its debt, it must now balance its primary budget. For some, the fiscal arithmetic has radically altered. Italy's debt-reducing primary balance has swung from a deficit of 3.1% of GDP in 2023 to a surplus of 1.3% of GDP. The Italians are shrinking their budget deficit, but not by enough. With many other governments making even less progress, and a trade war promising a growth slowdown, rich-world public debt is likely to start rising (see chart 2). This is bad timing. Demographers have known for decades that the mid-2020s would be the point at which baby-boomers would begin to retire in droves, prompting demand for health care and pensions to surge. In 2015 Britain's Office for Budget Responsibility, a watchdog, suggested that even under benign conditions, now was the point at which the government would struggle to avoid accumulating debt. A demographic crunch and free-spending fiscal policies are therefore about to interact in unpleasant ways. No one can predict if or when investors will lose patience, forcing interest rates much higher. Yet there must be a limit to the debt binge. As any lover of foie gras knows, overfeeding even the greediest goose can cause its liver to explode.
India Today
38 minutes ago
- India Today
Desperate stunt: BJP, Congress slam Kejriwal over slum demolition protest
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress launched attacks on former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Sunday, accusing him of hypocrisy and political theatrics over his protest at Jantar Mantar against slum to the Aam Aadmi Party's 'Ghar Rozgar Bachao Andolan', Delhi BJP president Virender Sachdeva called the campaign a 'desperate stunt' aimed at diverting attention from AAP's governance failures. 'Kejriwal owes the people an answer — how many houses has his government actually given to slum dwellers in the last 10 years?' he left the Narela flats in ruins because of his stubbornness. Today's event, held in the name of jhuggi residents, had no clear direction till 11 am It was purely political theatre,' Sachdeva added. Earlier, while addressing the protest at Jantar Mantar, Kejriwal accused Prime Minister Modi of breaking promises made to slum dwellers. "Prime Minister Narendra Modi had said 'Jahan Jhuggi, Wahan Makan', but what he meant was 'Jahan Jhuggi, Wahan Maidan'. His promises are false, and I urge you not to fall for them in future,' the AAP chief also took a sharp personal swipe at the Prime Minister, calling him a 'liar' and urged slum dwellers not to vote for the BJP or Congress. AAP leader Saurabh Bharadwaj echoed the attack, saying, 'If the BJP is hurt by the word 'jhootha', we'll call it 'asatya' instead — but the truth doesn't change.'advertisementHe alleged that the Rekha Gupta-led Delhi government had 'ruined' the city in just five months. 'We had left a perfectly fine Delhi. But these people have ruined it. There are long power cuts, school fees have been hiked, and their ministers and MLAs are busy looting Delhi,' he to Kejriwal' statements, Sachdeva accused him of trying to 'rewrite history' and claimed that it was BJP workers who stepped up during the Covid crisis. 'While BJP workers were arranging food and shelter for slum dwellers, the AAP government was trying to evict them. Now Kejriwal wants to act like their savior, the people of Delhi are not fool,' he BJP chief also condemned the language used by Kejriwal and senior AAP leader Gopal Rai against Prime Minister Narendra Modi. 'The kind of words they are using for the Prime Minister reflects their Naxalite mindset. No civil society can accept this kind of behavior. Delhi has already rejected this 'kattar beimaan' (hardcore dishonest) and chaos-spreading Kejriwal.'Sachdeva rejected the AAP's accusations of slum demolitions under the BJP and said it was, in fact, Kejriwal's government that failed to rehabilitate slum dwellers. 'If courts had not stepped in, the condition of these people would have been even worse today,' he said, asserting BJP's commitment to providing permanent housing under the 'Jahan Jhuggi, Wahan Makan' the Congress also dismissed Kejriwal's protest as a show of 'crocodile tears' and questioned his credibility on the issue of slum dwellers. Delhi Congress president Devender Yadav posed ten pointed questions to Kejriwal via social media, highlighting AAP's own actions against slums during its the key questions, Yadav asked: 'Is it not true that in 2021, Kejriwal approved the 'Jhuggi Hatao' scheme as Chief Minister? Why is he now pretending to stand with slum dwellers?'He further alleged that former minister Satyendar Jain had announced the closure of the 'Jahan Jhuggi, Wahan Makan' scheme in September 202. 'Now Kejriwal is shedding crocodile tears. Why?' Yadav Kejriwal's use of public funds, the Congress asked, 'Did Kejriwal not use the votes of slum dwellers to build his grand 'Sheesh Mahal'? Now that slum residents are becoming homeless, why is he protesting?'Yadav also slammed the AAP for failing to fight for slum dwellers in the Supreme Court and not passing any resolution in the Delhi Assembly to protect them. 'When Congress fought in the Supreme Court, where was the AAP? Under whose pressure was this silence?' he Congress accused Kejriwal of 'hypocrisy' and claimed that his tenure as Chief Minister contradicts his current stance as a supporter of the urban poor.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Delhi#AAM AADMI PARTY#Bharatiya Janta Party#Indian National Congress
