Canada warns travelers of US border agents' authority to search electronic devices
The Canadian government is warning citizens visiting the United States that US border officials have the authority to search travelers' electronic devices – including phones, laptops, and tablets – without providing a reason.
In a revised travel advisory posted online, it urges Canadians to 'expect scrutiny' when crossing the border and warns that refusing to comply involves risks including device seizure, travel delays, or the denial of entry for non-US citizens.
Under US law, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents may demand passwords to unlock devices during inspections. Travelers who refuse the demand risk having their electronics confiscated and may face long delays.
The advisory recommends placing devices in airplane mode before crossing to prevent unintended downloads of remote files, which could complicate screenings.
The move follows recent incidents involving such searches. Last month, Dr. Rasha Alawieh, a Lebanese assistant professor and physician at Brown University, was deported to Lebanon after US agents at Boston Logan International Airport discovered deleted photos of the late Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on her phone.
The existence of the photos was outlined in a court filing obtained by CNN affiliate WCVB.
'In explaining why these multiple photos were deleted by her one to two days before she arrived at Logan Airport, Dr. Alawieh stated that she did not want to give authorities the perception that she supports Hezbollah and the Ayatollah politically or militarily,' the filing reads, per WCVB.
While US authorities maintain that device searches are critical for national security, civil liberties groups have long criticized the practice as invasive.
The US Supreme Court has upheld the authority of border agents to conduct warrantless device searches, citing the 'border search exception' to the Fourth Amendment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al-Ahram Weekly
15 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Israel's normalization appeal elicits mixed responses in Syria, Lebanon - Region
Israel's attempt to open peace talks with Syria and Lebanon has been met with deep scepticism, as decades of Israeli military aggression, occupation, and violence continue to fuel mistrust in both countries. On Monday, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said Israel had an 'interest in adding countries, Syria and Lebanon, our neighbours, to the circle of peace and normalisation while safeguarding Israel's essential and security interests.' Neither Beirut nor Damascus responded, reflecting deep mistrust after decades of Israeli attacks and occupation. Saar's statement came amid shifting regional dynamics, including the fall of longtime Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in December and the weakening of Lebanese armed group Hezbollah following its latest conflict with Israel. However, Israel's history of military aggression continues to shape attitudes. Syria's new Islamist authorities confirmed indirect talks with Israel aimed at reducing tensions following the Israeli army's occupation of the UN-monitored buffer zone in southern Syria and repeated bombings of Syrian army positions. Damascus condemned the strikes as violations of its sovereignty. Interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa has repeatedly called on the international community to pressure Israel to halt its attacks. While moderating his rhetoric compared with his predecessor, mistrust remains high. 'There is no problem with conducting peace negotiations, but in a way that maintains Syria's dignity,' said housewife Rania al-Fawakhiri in Damascus. 'Of course, we are not talking about complete normalisation, but conditional normalisation that does not undermine our rights.' Syria said the goal of talks is to reimplement the 1974 ceasefire between the two countries — a minimal step amid decades of Israeli hostility. The status of the Golan Heights remains a key sticking point. Israel occupied the area during the 1967 war and annexed it in 1981, a move not recognised internationally. 'We want our land, we have occupied land,' said Damascus lawyer Awad al-Hamad. 'The Golan will only ever be Arab and Syrian.' Saar stated the Golan Heights 'will remain part of the State of Israel' under any future peace agreement, underscoring Tel Aviv's refusal to relinquish occupied territory. Under Assad, Syria's education system labelled Israel 'the usurping entity' and 'the Zionist enemy,' framing the 'liberation of the Golan' as a national duty. Syria and Israel have technically been at war since 1948. No substantive negotiations have taken place since the Syrian civil war began in 2011, which allowed Iran and its regional allies to strengthen their presence amid ongoing Israeli strikes. Israel's push for normalisation follows its military weakening of regional adversaries in Lebanon, Gaza, and Iran, but its continued strikes, ongoing genocide in Gaza, and military occupation continue to fuel tensions. The United States has strongly backed normalisation, with Syria envoy Tom Barrack saying on Sunday that Sharaa 'has indicated that he doesn't hate Israel... and that he wants peace on that border.' Barrack also urged Lebanese officials to commit to fully disarming Hezbollah, a major military and political force resisting Israeli attacks. Despite a ceasefire, Israel has repeatedly bombed Lebanon, targeting Hezbollah positions but also causing civilian casualties and widespread damage. Lebanese officials have demanded full Israeli withdrawal and insisted state forces be the sole bearers of arms. The latest conflict began after Hezbollah attacks in 2023 in support of Palestinians in Gaza escalated into an all-out war with Israel in September. Israeli strikes inflicted heavy damage on Hezbollah-held areas in southern and eastern Lebanon, as well as Beirut's southern suburbs, killing thousands of Lebanese, many of them civilians, and deepening Lebanon's economic crisis. 'Lebanon's wellbeing comes first, and if the only way to get that is through normalisation... we could have a peace treaty to rebuild our country,' said 71-year-old Naim Qassir in Beirut's Hamra district. But not all share that view. 'Even if the whole world normalises with Israel... we the owners of the land in the south, the Beqaa and Dahiyeh will not,' said 46-year-old driver Ahmed Shamas. 'We will fight it until the end of time.' *This story was edited by Ahram Online. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Egypt Independent
17 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Ukraine kills one of the highest-ranking Russian officers of the conflict
CNN — The deputy chief of the Russian Navy has been killed by Ukraine in Russia's Kursk region, Oleg Kozhemyako, the governor of the Primorsky region in Russia's far east, said Thursday. Guards Maj. Gen. Mikhail Gudkov, the Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy who also led a brigade that fought in Ukraine, was killed in the Russian border region that saw a successful Ukrainian incursion last year. He is one of Russia's highest-ranking officers to have been killed since the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago. Kozhemyako previously handed Gudkov awards for bravery and said the two had spoken a lot over the years in a statement announcing the death. He described Gudkov as a 'strong-willed warrior' who had 'died while performing his duty as an officer together with his fellow soldiers.' Kozhemyako did not provide any further details on the circumstances of Gudkov's death. Russia's Ministry of Defense confirmed Gudkov's death on Thursday, saying he was killed in combat in the Kursk region. There has been no immediate comment from Ukraine. Gudkov was appointed as the deputy chief of the Russian Navy for coastal and ground forces by President Vladimir Putin in March. Putin said at the time: 'Since the minister and the Chief of the General Staff believe that your experience needs to be replicated in other units, I have decided to transfer you to a position – to increase your level of responsibility.' The Ukrainian military had previously accused Gudkov and other members of his former 155th brigade of committing war crimes in Ukraine, including the killing of civilians in the towns of Bucha, Irpin and Gostomel in the early months of Russia's war. Separately, the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine has said the 155th brigade was involved in executions of Ukrainian prisoners of war. Russia has consistently denied committing war crimes in Ukraine, despite evidence gathered by the Ukrainians and international investigators.
Egypt Independent
17 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Many Americans want a third party. But where would it fit?
A version of this story appeared in CNN's What Matters newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here. CNN — Americans are entrenched into their partisan corners, but the party lines keep moving in weird new ways. Republicans who grew up in the Grand Old Party might not recognize a party overtaken by the Make America Great Again movement. Democrats who cheered when President Bill Clinton declared the era of big government to be over might wonder how it is that a democratic socialist is their party's candidate for mayor of New York City. Others have followed Democratic expat and scion of Camelot Robert F. Kennedy Jr., with his Make America Healthy Again mantra, to vote for Trump. Two options aren't enough for multitudes For a variety of structural reasons, two options is what most Americans get, even though poll after poll suggests few are happy with either party. Against that backdrop, it's interesting to consider Elon Musk's pledge to form an 'America Party,' an alternative to Republicans and Democrats, if President Donald Trump's megabill becomes law. 'Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE,' he wrote on his social media platform. Musk's primary concern is that the megabill adds to the national debt, he said – and not, as Trump alleges, that he's sore about the end of tax credits to encourage Americans to buy electric vehicles. The third-party pledge follows Musk's musings last month that the US needs a party 'that actually represents the 80% in the middle.' Which middle? It's an interesting thought experiment to consider what the political middle might look like to a space and computer nerd and technocrat like Musk. He cares deeply about climate change and wants desperately for humans to be interplanetary and to live on Mars, but he opposes the megabill for all its government spending. He has strong thoughts about encouraging more American women to have babies, but thinks the addition of people to the country through illegal immigration is an existential threat to the US. The same thought experiment crossed my mind last month when Karine Jean-Pierre, who was White House press secretary under former President Joe Biden, announced in the run-up to the publication of her memoir that she's leaving the Democratic Party. 'We need to be clear-eyed and questioning, rather than blindly loyal and obedient as we may have been in the past,' she said in a statement to CNN. But it doesn't seem like Jean-Pierre's version of independence will be in the same galaxy as Musk's. Three varieties of Democrat One of the more interesting political campaigns of the coming months is likely to be the New York City mayor's race, in which the upstart Democrat (and democratic socialist) Zohran Mamdani will take on Eric Adams, the sitting mayor who is also a Democrat but is running as an independent. Also on the ballot as a 'Fight and Deliver' independent will be former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, another Democrat, although it's not clear if he'll seriously campaign between now and November. That's a lot of different versions of Democrats New Yorkers will be able to sort through. Zohran Mamdani gestures as he speaks during a watch party for his primary election in New York on June 25. David Delgado/Reuters There are already multiple third parties There are, of course, existing third parties in the US. The Green and Libertarian parties appear on most ballots for president, which means they have dedicated followings across the country, but they lack the power to get anyone elected to either the House or Senate. Former Rep. Ron Paul of Texas mounted presidential campaigns as both a Libertarian and a Republican, but he got the most traction as a libertarian-minded Republican. His son, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, is one of the few Republicans now willing to cross Trump and oppose the megabill. Paul, like Musk, is worried about the national debt. 'You're roadkill in the middle' A senator closer to the middle, Alaska's Lisa Murkowski, did vote for the bill, but only after securing carveouts that will help her state – but could aggravate every other American. Murkowski is that rare moderate who can survive without party backing. She won a write-in reelection campaign – the triple lindy of politics – after losing the Republican primary in 2010. That was before her party veered even more toward Trump, but Murkowski recently told CNN's Audie Cornish there are more quiet centrist Americans than people realize. She's representing them, she said, even if Washington is a dangerous place to be a moderate. 'You're roadkill in the middle,' Murkowski told Cornish for her 'The Assignment' podcast. 'Endangered species' Another Republican who opposed the megabill is Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina. He said cuts to Medicaid would cost too many North Carolinians their health insurance. But prioritizing the people you represent rather than the national party is anathema in today's political environment. 'In Washington over the last few years, it's become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species,' Tillis said in a statement Sunday. Fearing a primary and Trump's wrath, or maybe just tired of defending the shrinking middle ground in the Senate, Tillis also announced he would not seek reelection next year, which immediately made his North Carolina seat Democrats' top pickup priority. Democrats must hope that a moderate like former Gov. Roy Cooper will jump in the race and defy Democrats' national branding. Majority makers Perhaps Cooper would play the same kind of role as former Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia. Manchin voted with Democrats most of the time, but his tendency to buck the party leadership made him a thorn in the side of progressives. Coincidentally, when Manchin left office, Democrats lost their majority in the Senate. On his way out the door, Manchin said it was time for a third-party alternative, but he opted not to run for president. Middle fringes Kennedy did run for president after leaving the Democratic Party and his ultimate support for Trump likely brought in some new support for the president, who is now letting Kennedy rethink US vaccine policy to the consternation of the scientific community. Kennedy is also trying to take on the food industry. Help from Kennedy's independents probably helped Trump win, but maybe not as much as the nearly $300 million Musk is known to have spent, mostly on Trump's behalf. Musk's political ventures may have now turned off Tesla's natural climate-concerned consumer base as well as the MAGA faithful. Regardless of the wealth he could spend, what middle would his America party fit into?
