
Two leaders met in the bathroom to stop Pakistan from dividing, why was there a need to create Bangladesh?
Violence has erupted once again in our neighbouring country Bangladesh. People have come out on the streets. The ancestral house of India's great filmmaker Satyajit Ray was also vandalised. Last year too, riots started in Bangladesh in July which soon turned into severe violence. Due to which Sheikh Hasina not only had to leave the post of PM, but also had to leave the country to save her life and had to take refuge in India. Did you know Dhaka Television had clearly refused to play the Pakistani national anthem?
That is when the Pak Army considered the Awami League a separatist organization.
In fact, on March 23, 'Lahore Resolution Day' was being celebrated, the idea of an independent Muslim country was announced for the first time.
However, this time the scene is a little different from the last time, this time there are clashes between the workers of two parties. On the other hand, after the Pakistani army and intelligence agency, now Pakistani terrorist groups have also entered Bangladesh. In such a situation, should it be believed that Bangladesh is once again on the path of becoming Pakistan?
Why there was a need to create Bangladesh, what was going on in Pakistan a few months before the creation of Bangladesh?
Why did Bangladesh become a separate country?
When India got independence from the British in 1947, it was divided into two parts. On the basis of religion, a new country Pakistan was created on the map. The newly-formed nation Pakistan was divided into eastern and western provinces. People of East Pakistan spoke Bengali. Women wore colorful saris. On the contrary, Urdu and Punjabi were dominant in West Pakistan. There was a culture of burqa and hijab.
55 percent of Pakistan's population lived in East Pakistan and 45 percent in West Pakistan. Out of the total 313 seats in the Parliament of Pakistan i.e. the National Assembly, 169 were in East Pakistan (present Bangladesh) and 144 in West Pakistan (present Pakistan).
Despite this, 80 percent of the budget was spent on only 45 percent of the people. That is, it was spent on West Pakistan. The leaders who ran the government were also from the West and they considered the people of East Pakistan as second class citizens and for the Pak Army they were nothing more than insects.
When the people of East Pakistan raised their voice against inequality and economic discrimination, the Pak Army suppressed their voice. Abusive words were used against East Pakistanis. They were considered weak and inferior. If they went to the police to tell their plight, the police also blamed them. In 1952, there was a movement in Pakistan regarding the Bengali language, in which many students lost their lives. This was just the beginning.
Why did Bangabandhu file a case?
Sheikh Mujibur Rahman alias 'Bangabandhu', the head of East Pakistan's political party Awami League, raised his voice against political inequality and economic discrimination towards his province. After the Indo-Pak war of 1965, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman said in Lahore, 'Provincial autonomy is also necessary to bring uniformity in the economic development of both the provinces.'
This suggestion of Awami League leader Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was not only ignored, but a case was lodged against him in 1968 under the 'Agartala Conspiracy'. It was alleged that he was conspiring with India to break East Pakistan.
1970 elections added fuel to the fire of Partition
Neither the government considered the East Pakistanis important nor the administration listened to them. The people were growing angry with the attitude of the people in the government and the misbehavior of the police and the army. While demanding their rights, the East Pakistanis started demanding an independent nation. The general elections held in December 1970 added fuel to the fire of partition in Pakistan.
Before the 1970 general elections, Pakistan was under President's rule and dictator General Yahya Khan was the President. In the general elections, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's Awami League had fielded candidates on 169 seats including East Pakistan, out of which it won 167 seats, while the Pakistan People's Party won only 81 seats out of 138 seats in West Pakistan. The majority figure to form a government in Pakistan was 157 seats.
Sheikh Mujiburahman had the majority to form the government, but the leaders of West Pakistan did not want Bengalis to rule them. Pakistan's military dictator General Yahya Khan refused to make Sheikh Mujiburahman the Prime Minister.
On March 7, 1971, Sheikh Mujiburahman gave a historic speech at the Race Course Ground in Dhaka. He declared East Pakistan independent and named the country Bangladesh.
'Let western leaders form the government', the conversation that took place in bathroom
After this, on March 15, 1971, when Yahya Khan reached Dhaka to talk about the transfer of power, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman came to meet him in a white car. There was also a black flag on the car. When Yahya Khan took Sheikh Mujibur Rahman to the drawing room of the Government House for talks, Sheikh protested.
John Sisson and Leo Rose, while referring to this meeting in their book 'War and Secession: Pakistan, India and Creation of Bangladesh', wrote- Sheikh Mujiburahman wanted to talk in private. Yahya Khan ordered two chairs to be placed in the bathroom. After this, the talks to save Pakistan started in the bathroom. The talks lasted for about two and a half hours.
On 19 March, Yahya invited Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, leader of the Pakistan People's Party, to Dhaka to join the talks. Once again the three – Sheikh, Yahya and Bhutto – met. Yahya tried to mediate between Bhutto and Sheikh, but the two were not on speaking terms.
Then Yahya joked to lighten the atmosphere and said- 'You both are behaving like a newly married couple.' Yahya held their hands and asked them to talk, then Bhutto and Sheikh Mujibur started talking to each other.
After this discussion, it was agreed that Bangladesh would exist within a united Pakistan, but on 23 March, all plans were ruined. In fact, on 23 March, 'Lahore Resolution Day' was being celebrated all over Pakistan. On this day in 1940, the idea of an independent Muslim country was announced for the first time.
On 3 December 1971, Indian soldiers jumped into the battlefield to stop the brutality of the Pakistani army. The war between India and Pakistan took place on all three fronts. Within 13 days, the Pakistani army had to surrender. In this war, more than 93 thousand Pakistani soldiers surrendered to the Indian army and a new nation was born in the form of Bangladesh.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
24 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Rahul Gandhi claims Arun Jaitley was sent to 'threaten' him fr opposing farm laws
ANI "I don't think you have an idea...": Rahul Gandhi claims Arun Jaitley sent to "threaten" him Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Saturday claimed that the NDA government had sent the late Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley to "threaten" him for trying to fight against the farm laws that were introduced by the Narendra Modi government earlier."I remember when I was fighting the farm laws, Arun Jaitley was sent to me to threaten me. He told me, 'If you carry on opposing the government, fighting the farm laws, we will have to act against you. ' I looked at him and said 'I don't think you have an idea who you are talking to,'" Rahul Gandhi said. The Congress leader addressing the Annual Legal Conclave 2025 also launched a scathing attack on the Election Commission of India (ECI), alleging its complicity in large-scale voter fraud."The truth is that the election system in India is already dead. The Prime Minister of India holds office with a very slim majority. If 15 seats were rigged, we suspect that the number is over 70 to 80, he would not have been the Prime Minister of India. We are going to prove to you in the coming few days how a Lok Sabha election can be rigged and was rigged," Gandhi said. The Congress leader went on to credit lawyers, among others, for obtaining freedom from British rule, saying that the freedom movement was fought legally in actuality. However, he alleged that the constitutional architecture built by lawyers was being "destroyed". In the annual legal conclave titled 'Constitutional Challenges - Perspectives & Pathways' organised by Congress, Gandhi said that all talks about the constitution wouldn't happen if it weren't for lawyers. "You (lawyers) are the people who started Congress. Congress was essentially (made up of) lawyers. We wouldn't have got freedom if the lawyers of this country had not fought for freedom. All this talk about the constitution, the constitution would not be here if it had not been for lawyers," Gandhi said while addressing the gathering here. Crediting lawyers for envisioning the constitution, the Leader of Opposition (LoP) Lok Sabha said that the entire constitutional architecture is a result of a legal mind and fraternity, since it would have been impossible for people who don't understand law to frame the constitution. "Freedom movement was actually fought, in large measure, legally. You are the backbone of the Congress party. You are also the people who envisioned the constitution. It would have been impossible for people who don't understand the law to frame this (constitution). It was the legal mind, fraternity that built the entire architecture," he added. Gandhi asserted that the architecture built by lawyers was being "destroyed" systematically at every front. "I am telling you this, that it is the architecture that you build, which is being destroyed today. It is being systematically unravelled on every front. Some of it is visible while the other is hidden," he said. Speaking on the Rafale deal, Gandhi claimed that a document clearly mentioned that the PMO and the National Security Agency (NSA) interfered with the deal. He said that the document would have brought down any government in any country of the world, but nothing happened. "We had a document on the Rafale deal. The document said clearly, black and white, that the Prime Minister's office and the NSA have interfered in the Rafale deal and damaged it. This document itself would have brought down any government in any country of the world. Nothing happened. You know where the document went. You know where the document died," he top leaders, including Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, KC Venugopal, Abhishek Singhvi, Ajay Maken, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Mukul Wasnik, Jairam Ramesh, Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah, Telangana CM Revanth Reddy, Himachal Pradesh CM Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu, Ashok Gehlot, Bhupinder Hooda, Prithviraj Chavan, Digvijaya Singh, Bhupesh Baghel, Gaurav Gogoi, Salman Khurshid, DK Shivakumar were present at the conclave.


India.com
26 minutes ago
- India.com
Modi govt upset as these two Muslim countries were included in SCO summit, they were once India's friend, names are...
Modi govt upset as these two Muslim countries were included in SCO summit, they were once India's friend, names are... India has strongly objected to the participation of Pakistan's allies in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit to be held in Tianjin, China. Heads of 20 countries from around the world may participate in this summit to be held in early September. According to reports, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Prime Minister Narendra Modi may also visit Tianjin. According to a report in the Economic Times, before the summit, India has made it clear that the presence of Turkey and Azerbaijan who sided with Pakistan during Operation SIndoor and were seen supporting terrorism may undermine the objectives of the SCO. What is the fault of these two countries? In fact, after the Pakistan-sponsored terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22, Turkey and Azerbaijan started showing brotherhood with Pakistan. While on one hand the rest of the Muslim countries also condemned the terrorist attack and adopted a balanced stance on Operation Sindoor, Turkey and Azerbaijan openly supported Pakistan. Even during Operation Sindoor, Pakistan was using drones made in Turkey to attack India. At the same time, Azerbaijan was fully supporting Pakistan politically. Azerbaijan was also maintaining brotherhood with Pakistan because Pakistan supports Azerbaijan in its war with Armenia. Pakistan has not even recognized Armenia as a country. In such a situation, Pakistan's policy in the case of Azerbaijan and Armenia has been one-sided. There is a dispute between Azerbaijan and Armenia over the Nagorno-Karabakh region. On the one hand, India is adopting a balanced attitude on this issue, while Pakistan supports Azerbaijan one-sidedly. Talking about trade relations, relations between India and Azerbaijan are also good. However, in terms of political support, Azerbaijan supported Pakistan. One reason for this is also the closeness between Azerbaijan and Turkey. What is SCO summit? The Shanghai Cooperation Organization has 10 full members. It was formed in 2001 in China itself. It earlier included Kazakhstan, China, Kyrgyzstan, Russia and Tajikistan. In 2017, India and Pakistan also joined this organization. In 2021, Iran was also given full member status in the organization. Belarus has been included in the organisation as the 10th full member. This time, China has invited Turkey, Azerbaijan, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Armenia, Egypt, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Maldives, Myanmar, Bahrain and UAE as dialogue partners. What is India's stance? Last month, when External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar visited China, he had clearly said during the SCO meeting that countries supporting terrorism will have to be sidelined. He had said that the purpose behind the Pahalgam attack was to harm the tourism economy of Jammu and Kashmir and create hatred between Hindus and Muslims. He had said that the SCO countries will have to jointly fight terrorism, separatism and radicalism.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Post Op Sindoor: As Pak works channels to create ‘spy network', Punjab Police leads dismantling efforts
A series of arrests — from Punjab and Haryana to Rajasthan and Uttarakhand — in two months following Operation Sindoor has once again put in focus the efforts being made by the Pakistan's intelligence agency ISI to gather information critical to India's national security by establishing new espionage networks while targeting serving military personnel and civilians working in defence establishments. A senior Punjab Police officer who has been dealing with countering ISI's agenda told The Indian Express that an increased tempo of ISI activity in Punjab has been noticed during and after Operation Sindoor. The Punjab Police has in the recent past has busted several modules and arrested several persons who it believes were involved in espionage at Pakistan's behest. 'The ISI has established extensive espionage network in India by exploiting financial hardships, ideological leanings, personal vulnerabilities, and impersonating as Indian entities. Honey-trapping remains a key tactic, with operatives leveraging personal or intimate relationships to coerce targets into sharing sensitive intelligence,' said a senior intelligence officer of Punjab Police. The officer added that 'recruits' are tasked with gathering critical information on troop movements, strategic sites, and border deployments, with payments routed through hawala channels and encrypted apps to maintain secrecy. 'Punjab Police, working in coordination with central agencies, have proactively dismantled these deeply entrenched networks over the years, exposing the ISI's systematic efforts to destabilize India's security and reaffirming an unwavering commitment to national integrity,' said DGP Gaurav Yadav. He added that in view of the recent developments, Punjab Police intensified its efforts to identify and bust Pakistani espionage networks spread across India. In this regard, he added, several suspects from different states came to notice for being connected with Pakistan Intelligence Officers (PIOs) through encrypted communication platforms. Some of the PIOs have been found to be working in close association with terrorist groups in Pakistan. Subsequently, details of these individuals were shared with police in respective states and central agencies, leading to dismantling of a wide espionage network. In May and June, Punjab Police identified such espionage networks operating in state that led to arrest of several individuals in seven different cases. Among the individuals who have been arrested across various states in connection with Pakistan's ISI-backed espionage and propaganda activities are Jyoti Malhotra, alias Jyoti Rani, a YouTuber from Hisar in Haryana, Nauman Ilahi, a resident of Kairana in Uttar Pradesh; Devinder Singh from Kaithal, Haryana, Maulvi Qasim and his brother Asim from Rajasthan, Abhishek Bhardwaj from Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, Suraj Masih and Phalaksher Masih from Ajnala; Rakib from Uttarakhand, Sukhpreet Singh and Karanbir Singh from Gurdaspur, Harpreet Singh, alias Pittu, alias Happy from Amritsar Jail; Gazala and Yameen Mohd from Malerkotla; Gagandeep Singh alias Gagan from Tarn Taran and Jasbir Singh, a YouTuber from Ropar in Punjab. Apart from these, two Army jawans have also been arrested for passing on information to Pakistan. Devinder Singh was arrested on July 14 from a Rashtriya Rifles battalion in Uri in Jammu and Kashmir's Baramulla district for allegedly leaking classified defense information to the ISI. He was arrested following the interrogation of Gurpreet Singh, alias Gopy Foji, a jawan serving in the Sikh Regiment who was arrested on June 21 from Amritsar for allegedly sharing sensitive military information with ISI operatives. 'These individuals were found to be involved in various activities such as sharing sensitive information, establishing contacts with PIOs, receiving payments for intelligence sharing, and assisting in anti-national logistics and communication,' a Punjab Police officer said. Another officer said that investigations initiated over these months have uncovered attempts by ISI to target Indian nationals — particularly social media influencers and content creators — under the false pretense of cultural diplomacy and digital peace initiatives. Individuals were lured through well-orchestrated outreach, aiming to manipulate online narratives and mislead public opinion in favor of anti-national agendas. Punjab Police investigations have also revealed that this network sought to exploit the popularity and credibility of Indian digital voices to push pro-Pakistan narratives and subtly influence public sentiment within India. These efforts are part of a broader psychological campaign aimed at undermining national unity and eroding institutional trust. 'The Punjab Police, through its vigilant monitoring and robust intelligence-sharing mechanisms, has contributed significantly to the identification and disruption of these networks,' says the officer handling investigations into ISI activities. Arrests made across different parts of the country have directly stemmed from intelligence inputs and coordinated action, reflecting the effectiveness of inter-agency cooperation, said an officer.