
Earth is spinning faster, leading timekeepers to consider an unprecedented move
July 10 was the shortest day of the year so far, lasting 1.36 milliseconds less than 24 hours, according to data from the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service and the US Naval Observatory, compiled by timeanddate.com. More exceptionally short days are coming on July 22 and August 5, currently predicted to be 1.34 and 1.25 milliseconds shorter than 24 hours, respectively.
The length of a day is the time it takes for the planet to complete one full rotation on its axis —24 hours or 86,400 seconds on average. But in reality, each rotation is slightly irregular due to a variety of factors, such as the gravitational pull of the moon, seasonal changes in the atmosphere and the influence of Earth's liquid core. As a result, a full rotation usually takes slightly less or slightly more than 86,400 seconds — a discrepancy of just milliseconds that doesn't have any obvious effect on everyday life.
However these discrepancies can, in the long run, affect computers, satellites and telecommunications, which is why even the smallest time deviations are tracked using atomic clocks, which were introduced in 1955. Some experts believe this could lead to a scenario similar to the Y2K problem, which threatened to bring modern civilization to a halt.
Atomic clocks count the oscillations of atoms held in a vacuum chamber within the clock itself to calculate 24 hours to the utmost degree of precision. We call the resulting time UTC, or Coordinated Universal Time, which is based on around 450 atomic clocks and is the global standard for timekeeping, as well as the time to which all our phones and computers are set.
Astronomers also keep track of Earth's rotation — using satellites that check the position of the planet relative to fixed stars, for example — and can detect minute differences between the atomic clocks' time and the amount of time it actually takes Earth to complete a full rotation. Last year, on July 5, 2024, Earth experienced the shortest day ever recorded since the advent of the atomic clock 65 years ago, at 1.66 milliseconds less than 24 hours.
'We've been on a trend toward slightly faster days since 1972,' said Duncan Agnew, a professor emeritus of geophysics at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and a research geophysicist at the University of California, San Diego. 'But there are fluctuations. It's like watching the stock market, really. There are long-term trends, and then there are peaks and falls.'
In 1972, after decades of rotating relatively slowly, Earth's spin had accumulated such a delay relative to atomic time that the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service mandated the addition of a 'leap second' to the UTC. This is similar to the leap year, which adds an extra day to February every four years to account for the discrepancy between the Gregorian calendar and the time it takes Earth to complete one orbit around the sun.
Since 1972, a total of 27 leap seconds have been added to the UTC, but the rate of addition has increasingly slowed, due to Earth speeding up; nine leap seconds were added throughout the 1970s while no new leap seconds have been added since 2016.
In 2022, the General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) voted to retire the leap second by 2035, meaning we may never see another one added to the clocks. But if Earth keeps spinning faster for several more years, according to Agnew, eventually one second might need to be removed from the UTC. 'There's never been a negative leap second,' he said, 'but the probability of having one between now and 2035 is about 40%.'
The shortest-term changes in Earth's rotation, Agnew said, come from the moon and the tides, which make it spin slower when the satellite is over the equator and faster when it's at higher or lower altitudes. This effect compounds with the fact that during the summer Earth naturally spins faster — the result of the atmosphere itself slowing down due to seasonal changes, such as the jet stream moving north or south; the laws of physics dictate that the overall angular momentum of Earth and its atmosphere must remain constant, so the rotation speed lost by the atmosphere is picked up by the planet itself. Similarly, for the past 50 years Earth's liquid core has also been slowing down, with the solid Earth around it speeding up.
By looking at the combination of these effects, scientists can predict if an upcoming day could be particularly short. 'These fluctuations have short-period correlations, which means that if Earth is speeding up on one day, it tends to be speeding up the next day, too,' said Judah Levine, a physicist and a fellow of the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the time and frequency division. 'But that correlation disappears as you go to longer and longer intervals. And when you get to a year, the prediction becomes quite uncertain. In fact, the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service doesn't predict further in advance than a year.'
While one short day doesn't make any difference, Levine said, the recent trend of shorter days is increasing the possibility of a negative leap second. 'When the leap second system was defined in 1972, nobody ever really thought that the negative second would ever happen,' he noted. 'It was just something that was put into the standard because you had to do it for completeness. Everybody assumed that only positive leap seconds would ever be needed, but now the shortening of the days makes (negative leap seconds) in danger of happening, so to speak.'
The prospect of a negative leap second raises concerns because there are still ongoing problems with positive leap seconds after 50 years, explained Levine. 'There are still places that do it wrong or do it at the wrong time, or do it (with) the wrong number, and so on. And that's with a positive leap second, which has been done over and over. There's a much greater concern about the negative leap second, because it's never been tested, never been tried.'
Because so many fundamental technologies systems rely on clocks and time to function, such as telecommunications, financial transactions, electric grids and GPS satellites just to name a few, the advent of the negative leap second is, according to Levine, somewhat akin to the Y2K problem — the moment at the turn of the last century when the world thought a kind of doomsday would ensue because computers might have been unable to negotiate the new date format, going from '99' to '00.'
Climate change is also a contributing factor to the issue of the leap second, but in a surprising way. While global warming has had considerable negative impacts on Earth, when it comes to our timekeeping, it has served to counteract the forces that are speeding up Earth's spin. A study published last year by Agnew in the journal Nature details how ice melting in Antarctica and Greenland is spreading over the oceans, slowing down Earth's rotation — much like a skater spinning with their arms over their head, but spinning slower if the arms are tucked along the body.
'If that ice had not melted, if we had not had global warming, then we would already be having a leap negative leap second, or we would be very close to having it,' Agnew said. Meltwater from Greenland and Antarctica ice sheets has is responsible for a third of the global sea level rise since 1993, according to NASA.
The mass shift of this melting ice is not only causing changes in Earth's rotation speed, but also in its rotation axis, according to research led by Benedikt Soja, an assistant professor at the department of civil, environmental and geomatic engineering of The Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Switzerland. If warming continues, its effect might become dominant. 'By the end of this century, in a pessimistic scenario (in which humans continue to emit more greenhouse gases) the effect of climate change could surpass the effect of the moon, which has been really driving Earth's rotation for the past few billions of years,' Soja said.
At the moment, potentially having more time to prepare for action is helpful, given the uncertainty of long-term predictions on Earth's spinning behavior. 'I think the (faster spinning) is still within reasonable boundaries, so it could be natural variability,' Soja said. 'Maybe in a few years, we could see again a different situation, and long term, we could see the planet slowing down again. That would be my intuition, but you never know.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AstraZeneca to invest $50B in US economy by 2030
British biopharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca plans to invest $50 billion in the U.S. by 2030, the company announced on Monday. The investment is expected to create tens of thousands of new, highly skilled direct and indirect jobs across the U.S., AstraZeneca said. The "cornerstone" of the investment is a proposed new multibillion-dollar manufacturing facility in Virginia that will produce drug substances for the company's weight management portfolio that includes oral GLP-1 medications. AstraZeneca said the facility will be its largest single manufacturing investment in the world. "Today's announcement underpins our belief in America's innovation in biopharmaceuticals and our commitment to the millions of patients who need our medicines in America and globally," AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot said in a statement. "I look forward to partnering with Governor Youngkin and his team to work on our largest single manufacturing investment ever. It reflects the Commonwealth of Virginia's desire to create highly-skilled jobs in science and technology, and will strengthen the country's domestic supply chain for medicines." Eli Lilly Investing $27B More In Us Manufacturing The investment also includes: expansion of its R&D facility in Gaithersburg, Maryland; R&D center in Kendall Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts; next-generation manufacturing facilities for cell therapy in Rockville, Maryland and Tarzana, California; continuous manufacturing expansion in Mount Vernon, Indiana; specialty manufacturing expansion in Coppell, Texas; new sites to supply clinical trials; and growing research and development investment in novel medicines. "We are proud that AstraZeneca has made the decision to bring substantial pharmaceutical production to our shores," Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a statement. "This historic investment is bringing tens of thousands of jobs to the U.S. and will ensure medicine sold in our country is produced right here." Read On The Fox Business App AstraZeneca also announced last November $3.5 billion of capital investment in the country, focused on R&D and manufacturing. The company said it included $2 billion of new investment that would create more than 1,000 new, high-skilled jobs in the U.S. Who's Investing In America? 23 Big Companies That Just Promised Billions Under Trump Part of the investment included a $300 million cell therapy manufacturing plant located in Maryland that opened in May. Once in operation, the site will use a relatively new cancer treatment called CAR-T cell therapy to help treat blood cancers like lymphoma and leukemia. The U.S. is AstraZeneca's largest market and represents 42% of the company's total revenue. The pharma giant's goal is to increase that figure to 50% by 2030. AstraZeneca employs 18,000 people and supports 92,000 jobs overall in the U.S. It also currently has 19 R&D, manufacturing and commercial sites in the country. The company said it contributed $5 billion directly to the nation's economy and created about $20 billion worth of overall value for the U.S. economy. Monday's announcement marks the latest investment in America under the Trump administration. Other drugmakers, including Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson, previously announced intentions to invest billions in the U.S. for R&D, manufacturing and factory article source: AstraZeneca to invest $50B in US economy by 2030


Medscape
2 hours ago
- Medscape
Experts Outline Safety Guidelines for Fully Ablative Lasers
Despite the growing use of fully ablative laser resurfacing for photodamaged skin, standard protocols for managing adverse events remain limited. A newly published international consensus statement now aims to close that gap. Published in the June 2025 issue of Lasers in Surgery and Medicine , the consensus statement brings together expert recommendations on how to prevent and manage complications related to fully ablative laser resurfacing of the face. The authors emphasize that, while individual practice styles vary, consistent themes emerged — highlighting the importance of patient selection, comprehensive counseling, and detailed pre- and postprocedural care to improve safety and outcomes. Why This Matters Fully ablative carbon dioxide and erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet lasers remain gold standards for treating photodamaged skin because of their ability to provide deep resurfacing and robust collagen remodeling. But these benefits come at a cost: More extensive skin injury and a higher risk for complications compared with fractional or nonablative lasers, according to the authors. Arisa Ortiz, MD Risks include prolonged erythema, infection, pigmentary alterations, and scarring — issues that can be distressing to patients and difficult to manage without a standardized care framework. The consensus authors emphasized that, until now, clinical protocols for the prevention and management of complications have been largely based on anecdotal and variable experience. Asked to comment on the consensus statement, one of the consensus authors, Arisa Ortiz, MD, dermatologist and director of Laser and Cosmetic Dermatology at UC San Diego Health, San Diego, called the statement 'a landmark in laser dermatology.' 'This consensus is a landmark in laser dermatology, finally providing unified, expert-backed guidance for a procedure that has historically lacked standardization. It gives clinicians a clear, practical roadmap for safe and effective fully ablative resurfacing,' Ortiz said. Pooja Sodha, MD Pooja Sodha, MD, associate professor of dermatology at George Washington School of Medicine & Health Sciences and director of the Center for Laser and Cosmetic Dermatology, both in Washington, DC, agreed with this sentiment, emphasizing the document is especially useful in clinical practice. 'This consensus helps to organize the thought process of how to prepare, counsel, and treat patients, almost providing a step-by-step guide of items to consider. This is great for new and old practitioners,' Sodha told Medscape Medical News . She was not an author of the statement. Key Recommendations The consensus outlines detailed step-by-step strategies to help clinicians reduce the risk for complications following fully ablative laser resurfacing. These recommendations span the entire patient journey — from pretreatment counseling to postoperative monitoring and management of adverse effects: Infection prevention. The authors recommend antiviral prophylaxis for all patients undergoing full-face resurfacing, even when treatment is limited to perioral or periocular areas. 'The preferred agent for antiviral prophylaxis is valacyclovir, unless otherwise indicated,' they wrote. The consensus group also noted that oral or topical antibacterial prophylaxis may be appropriate in higher-risk individuals, such as those with diabetes or a history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization. The authors recommend antiviral prophylaxis for all patients undergoing full-face resurfacing, even when treatment is limited to perioral or periocular areas. 'The preferred agent for antiviral prophylaxis is valacyclovir, unless otherwise indicated,' they wrote. The consensus group also noted that oral or topical antibacterial prophylaxis may be appropriate in higher-risk individuals, such as those with diabetes or a history of methicillin-resistant colonization. Postprocedural wound care. The authors emphasized the importance of frequent cleansing with soaks and keeping the skin moist with emollients. 'It is beneficial to apply topical lanolin‐free ointment or other appropriate posttreatment topical product,' the group noted. The authors emphasized the importance of frequent cleansing with soaks and keeping the skin moist with emollients. 'It is beneficial to apply topical lanolin‐free ointment or other appropriate posttreatment topical product,' the group noted. Early recognition of infection. Patients should be educated to report signs such as increasing pain, drainage, erythema, or fever. 'It is appropriate to promptly evaluate (in person or virtually) patients with signs or symptoms concerning for infection,' the authors wrote. Patients should be educated to report signs such as increasing pain, drainage, erythema, or fever. 'It is appropriate to promptly evaluate (in person or virtually) patients with signs or symptoms concerning for infection,' the authors wrote. Addressing pigmentary changes. The authors note that pigmentary changes such as hyperpigmentation, a common postprocedural complication, often resolve over 6-12 months, but proactive management may improve outcomes. The panel supports the use of 'topical lightening or bleaching agents' as helpful for treating hyperpigmentation and considers laser-based interventions or oral tranexamic acid in select patients, provided clotting risks are ruled out. The authors note that pigmentary changes such as hyperpigmentation, a common postprocedural complication, often resolve over 6-12 months, but proactive management may improve outcomes. The panel supports the use of 'topical lightening or bleaching agents' as helpful for treating hyperpigmentation and considers laser-based interventions or oral tranexamic acid in select patients, provided clotting risks are ruled out. Scarring management. The consensus group recommended addressing scarring at the earliest signs. Interventions include intralesional corticosteroids or 5-fluorouracil, vascular lasers, or 'laser-assisted drug delivery of corticosteroid and/or 5‐fluorouracil,' according to the authors. Challenges and Controversies While the consensus process produced strong agreement in many areas, some topics remained divisive. Only a subset of proposed adverse events and contraindications reached full consensus. For instance, pretreatment counseling about eruptive keratoacanthomas or milia as possible adverse events did not meet agreement thresholds, according to the authors. Ortiz noted that disagreement over rare complications reflects the complexity of real-world care. 'While most statements achieved strong agreement, there were important areas — like counseling for rare complications or defining contraindications — where expert opinions diverged,' she explained. 'These gray zones underscore the need for continued discussion and individualized care.' The risk for vitiligo induction after laser resurfacing is still under debate. While not a formal contraindication, the authors suggest that 'practitioners might consider incorporating family history assessments into pretreatment consultations.' The panel also noted that while darker Fitzpatrick skin types are not a contraindication to fully ablative laser resurfacing of the face, these patients face higher risks for postinflammatory pigmentary changes. Providers should employ strategies to reduce risk, which include conservative settings, rigorous sun protection, and topical corticosteroids after treatment when appropriate, according to the consensus group. Sodha emphasized this point as an important area for ongoing refinement: 'I believe this statement is important — 'Darker Fitzpatrick skin types were not considered a contraindication to treatment' — and it highlights that our settings in this population need to be adjusted and these patients need to be counseled on the pigmentary risks, but treatment is still possible,' she explained. 'Building continued comfort here and defining the right parameters is worthy of a little more consideration in future guideline development.' Sodha also noted that although the recommendations may seem straightforward, successful integration takes practice. 'The steps themselves are not difficult. This is about common sense,' she said. 'These recommendations remind us how important repetition is in integrating these principles so they are second nature.' Looking Ahead This expert-driven consensus offers a foundation for safe and consistent care in laser resurfacing but also highlights areas for future research, according to the authors. Ortiz told Medscape Medical News that future data will be essential to address gaps in evidence. 'There's a pressing need for high-quality studies focused on managing complications like hypopigmentation and scarring, particularly to better understand long-term pigmentary outcomes and optimize treatment safety across diverse populations.' The study received no specific funding. Several authors disclosed financial relationships with industry, while Ortiz and Podha reported no relevant disclosures.


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
EPA Plans to Ditch Linchpin Climate Policy, Washington Post Says
The US Environmental Protection Agency is considering scrapping a landmark almost two-decade old legal opinion that greenhouse gas emissions are harmful to human health, the Washington Post reported. The so-called ' endangerment finding,' published in 2009, has been the legal basis of a wide range of climate rules under the Clean Air Act. A draft proposal to formally abandon the policy is being considered by the EPA, though is still subject to change, the newspaper reported, citing two sources familiar with the details which it didn't name.