UK will recognise state of Palestine unless Israel ends 'appalling situation' in Gaza
Speaking on Tuesday afternoon, Starmer set out the work that needs to be done between now and then, to prevent the UK from taking this step, including a huge increase in the supply of aid.
In an ultimatum to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government, Starmer said the UK will join France in recognising the state of Palestine "unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire, and commit to a long-term sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution".
In recent days, the PM has faced pressure from political opponents, as well as those in his own party, after 255 MPs from nine seperate parties wrote a letter calling on the UK to act faster in recognising Palestine's statehood.
Last week, Starmer issued his strongest words yet on the worsening situation in the Middle-East and Tuesday's announcement calls with UK allies France and Germany and talks with the US President Donald Trump in Scotland this week.
The plan announced on Tuesday follows an emergency Cabinet meeting in Downing street, which ministers dialled into from their recess breaks.
After the meeting, No 10 briefed Labour MPs on what was discussed.
In recent days ministers have maintained the position that Labour will recognise Palestine as a state, as promised in their election manifesto - it was just a question of when.
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, the prime minister said: "The suffering must end.
"I've always said that we will recognise a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process at the moment of maximum impact for the two state solution.
"With that solution now under threat, this is the moment to act."
Experts have warned the amount of aid reaching the people of Gaza is a miniscule amount compared to what is needed to alleviate the humanitarian crisis.
Starmer said he discussed this with President Trump, adding the UK was "mounting a major effort to get humanitarian supplies back in.
"We need to see at least 500 trucks entering Gaza every day," he added.
The prime minister's announcement stops somewhat short of immediate recognition and is contingent on Israel failing to take the steps outlined by Starmer.
These include: Allowing the UN to restart the supply of aid, committing to no annexations in the West Bank, agreeing to a ceasefire, committing to a long term sustainable peace.
Should Israel meet these commitments, the progress of which will be assessed in September, Starmer appeared to suggest the UK would not immediately recognise the state of Palestine, with the prospect of a more mutual two state solution now revived.
Speaking on the UK's expectations of Hamas, Starmer reiterated: "They must immediately release all of the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm, and accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza."
The prime minister's announcement comes the same day as Gaza's Health Authority brought the death toll up to over 60,000 Palestinians in the 21-month conflict. Adding to this number, over night Israeli strikes killed more than two dozen people, mostly women and children, according to health officials.
About 1,000 of these people have been killed by Israeli fire while seeking aid since May, according to witnesses, health officials and the UN human rights office.
Israel, which controls large areas of Gaza where aid is distributed, says it has only fired warning shots at those who approach its forces.
Last week, experts warned the remaining population of Gaza is dangerously close to starvation, something Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denied before being rebuffed by both Starmer and Trump.
Speaking from his golf resort, Donald Trump said his first priority was getting food to the people of Gaza, with Starmer saying the British public were revolted by the scenes they were seeing, calling them a humanitarian crisis.
Whilst the US President stopped short of stating his own postition on Palestinian statehood he did say he "didn't mind if he takes one," on Starmer's own stance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Bowen: UK move to recognise Palestinian state is a diplomatic crowbar to revive peace process
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's announcement that Britain will recognise Palestinian statehood is a major change in UK foreign offered to postpone recognition if Israel took "substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution."Israel's immediate rejection of his statement meant that Starmer's speech writers can start work now on what he will say at the UN General Assembly in September. UK recognition of Palestine looks "irreversible," according to a senior British won't be expecting Britain's change of policy to produce an independent Palestinian state any time soon – from the perspective of many Israelis, the best time for it would be never – but the intention, diplomatic sources say, is to empower moderates on both sides, Israelis and Palestinians. The British hope they can jolt them into believing that peace might be won't be easy, not just because of the way Hamas killed around 1,200 people, including hundreds of Israeli civilians, and took hostages on 7 October 2023, followed by Israel's vengeful response that has killed tens of thousands civilians and left Gaza in is also because every attempt to make peace has failed. Years of peace talks in the 1990s ended in bloodshed. Every attempt to revive them since then has collapsed. Israel's rejection came minutes after Keir Starmer finished speaking in Downing Street. Later in the evening, Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu posted a fiercely worded denunciation on social media."Starmer rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims. A jihadist state on Israel's border TODAY will threaten Britain TOMORROW.""Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails. It will fail you too. It will not happen."Netanyahu denies Israel has caused starvation and catastrophe in Gaza. Had he accepted Britain's conditions for a postponement, his government would have disintegrated. He depends on the support of ultra nationalist extremists who want to annex the occupied territories and force Palestinians out, not grant them Netanyahu is not their prisoner. He built a career opposing the two-state solution, the idea that peace can be built by creating an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. Earlier this month he said a Palestinian state would be a 'launchpad' for more 7 October style attempts to destroy will be hoping for the strong backing of the US government. Its position is that recognising a Palestinian state now rewards Hamas Trump told reporters as he flew back to the US after his golfing interlude in Scotland that he didn't support Britain's issue of Palestinian sovereignty could become another factor cracking apart transatlantic the last few weeks Keir Starmer was not convinced the time was right to recognise Palestine. But pictures of Palestinian children in Gaza starving to death were the last straw after so much killing and hardened in Downing Street and the Foreign Office, as well as in the Labour party and more widely in the decision to join France in recognising Palestine is another sign of Israel's increasing diplomatic isolation. Two of its major western allies, the UK and France, both permanent members of the UN Security Council, have dismissed Israel's attempt to block their recognition of Palestine when the General Assembly meets in New York in September. In New York just after Starmer's statement, David Lammy, the UK foreign secretary, was given a big round of applause when he announced Britain's decision at the UN's conference on a two-state solution and recognition of a Palestinian dismissed the accusation that Palestinian independence could be lethal for Israel."There is no contradiction between support for Israel's security and support for Palestinian statehood. Indeed, the opposite is true.""Let me be clear: the Netanyahu government's rejection of a two-state solution is wrong – it's wrong morally and it's wrong strategically."A British official said the atmosphere was electric as Lammy told the delegates that the UK's announcement was being made "with the hand of history on our shoulders." Lammy went on to delve into Britain's imperial past in Palestine which is deeply intertwined with the roots of the conflict between Jews and Arabs for control of the land Britain once captured Jerusalem from the Ottoman Empire in 1917 and controlled Palestine until in 1948, exhausted and out of ideas to deal with what was then a full-scale war between Arabs and Jews, it handed over responsibility to the UN and left Palestine. Immediately, Israel's first prime minister David Ben Gurion declared independence, and Israel defeated an invasion by Arab the UN David Lammy recalled how Arthur Balfour, his predecessor as foreign secretary had in 1917 signed a typewritten letter promising to 'view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.'But the document, known as the Balfour Declaration, also stated "that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine." It did not use the word Arab, but that is what was said Britain can be proud of the way it helped lay Israel's foundations, But the promise to Palestinians, Lammy said, was not kept, and that "is a historical injustice which continues to unfold."Britain's conflicting promises fuelled and shaped the conflict. A time traveller going back a century to Palestine in the 1920s would find the tension and violence depressingly way the UK hopes to end the misery in Gaza, create peace in the Middle East and remedy the historical injustice Lammy described is to revive the two-state conference in New York at which he was speaking was chaired by France and Saudi Arabia. It has produced a seven-page document aimed at creating a way ahead to revive the two-state solution, which includes condemnation by Arab states of Hamas and its 7 October attacks on window for peace through the two-state solution appeared to be locked shut after the collapse of the peace process that started with real hope in the decision to recognise Palestine is a diplomatic crowbar to try to reopen it.
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Albanese responds to question of recognition of Palestine following Starmer announcement
Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese says that to 'advance genuinely' a two-state solution, the 'legitimate aspirations' of the Palestinian people must sit alongside the recognition of Israel by the states around the Middle East. 'Sometimes out of a crisis comes a moment of opportunity to actually ... in a real way, advance forward for Israelis and Palestinians,' Albanese says
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
I live in Britain; I grew up in Israel. It's painful to say, but we need real UK sanctions to save Gaza
After months of complete blockade or extremely limited supplies, and with thousands of famished children in Gaza at risk of death, Israel finally relented last week to allow increased levels of aid, as well as electricity and water, into the territory. Yet given Israel's systematic destruction of Gaza's medical infrastructure, the aid will not prevent irreversible damage to many severely malnourished children. And even in the best scenario, this is but a hiatus. For many months now, Israel's far-right government has been unambiguous in its words and actions. It has made Gaza uninhabitable through the destruction of the built environment and infrastructure. The plan, repeatedly stated by Benjamin Netanyahu and his ministers, is the ethnic cleansing ('voluntary emigration') of the bulk of Gaza's population. It is now clear that the Israeli government is willing to slow down this campaign temporarily, but it will not stop unless it is forced to, by international pressure. Such pressure has been entirely inadequate. The UK has scaled up its rhetoric, to words such as 'appalled' and 'horrified'. It has also limited arms shipments to Israel, and placed sanctions on ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir. Yet surely a G7 member, the world's sixth largest economy and a close ally of Israel can do more. 'Netanyahu only listens to Trump, and even then only sometimes,' says Emily Thornberry, implying there's little to do beyond pleading with the US president. This is a profound misunderstanding of Israel, and an underestimation of the UK's options. Indeed, Netanyahu and his ministers would not listen to the UK. But Netanyahu is not an all-powerful dictator like Vladimir Putin, and Israel is no North Korea. Its economy is highly globalised, and its society cherishes its ties to the world. It has deep material and emotional investments in those connections, including to the UK. From the banking system to defence cooperation, from trade to tourism and academia, the UK is connected to Israel in myriad ways. By continuing business as usual, Israel's international partners are allowing the Israeli government to continue with its genocidal campaign with no consequences beyond symbolic gestures of disapproval and statements. After 7 October 2023, the horror of Hamas's massacre prompted western governments to support Israel as it launched its retaliation against Gaza, effectively giving the far-right government carte blanche. Despite unprecedented international criminal court arrest warrants against Netanyahu for the crime of starvation, international sanctions on Israel remain extremely limited. The Israeli government is banking on this. 'We can kill 100 Palestinians every night in Gaza and no one in the world cares,' said one member of the coalition recently. Sadly, so far he has not been proved wrong. Over the past 21 months, tens of thousands of Israelis have taken to the streets to demand a ceasefire and hostage release deal. While polls show overwhelming support for ending the war, the fragmented and demoralised opposition has not been able to bring the government down. This is partly because, despite pleas from the hostages' families and activists, Israel's key economic powerbrokers in the finance and IT industries and trade unions have been reluctant to take an active stand against the government, even if many of them are deeply opposed to it. This reluctance stems, at least in part, from the fact that Israel's economy has proved surprisingly resilient. True, Israel's credit rating was downgraded and the government deficit has ballooned. But at the same time, since July 2024, the Tel Aviv stock exchange has risen by close to 30%. Growth in 2026 is expected at 4.6%, and unemployment is extremely low. The war has even benefited key economic sectors: Israel's defence exports are booming, and the UK is one of those export destinations. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, between 2020 and 2024 Israel was the second largest supplier of arms to the UK. In the UK and Europe, there are new mobilisations of Israelis against the genocide, calling for sanctions. In December 2024, more than 500 Israelis in the UK called on the government to sanction Ben Gvir and Smotrich. In the past couple of months, a new group of Israelis in the UK, Mi-Neged – with which I am involved – called on Keir Starmer and David Lammy to impose far-reaching sanctions on Israel, not only on a few 'bad apples' but systemically. Such measures would include suspending the Trade and Partnership Agreement (TPA) and halting military cooperation. For many of us, this is a deeply painful moment. Calling on our government to sanction the state where we grew up, to which we are closely attached and where our families and friends live is not an easy step. But we are horrified not only by what has happened but also by what is likely to happen if we do not take such steps. UK suspension of Israel's preferential trade access could push the EU in the same direction. As a trading bloc, the EU is Israel's largest export destination, accounting for a third of Israeli exports. Proposals to suspend articles in Israel's EU association agreement are on the table. For now, there is an Israeli middle and upper-middle class receptive to external pressure. That constituency has sufficient power and influence to translate this into political action. Israeli civil society is still able to mobilise and challenge the government. Yet Netanyahu's clampdown on protesters and the press is intensifying: the government's power grab is rapid and far-reaching. There are serious fears that the next Knesset elections would not be free or fair. The less democratic and the more messianic Israel becomes, the less effective sanctions would be. The time to act is now. Yair Wallach is a reader in Israeli studies and head of the Centre for Jewish Studies at Soas University of London Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
