Met Police issue warning after Palestine Action ban comes into force
Palestine Action lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday, which sought to stop the protest group being banned, less than two hours before the new legislation came into force at midnight.
Protesters outside the Royal Courts of Justice on The Strand (PA)
The designation as a terror group means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
It comes as a group said it is set to gather in Parliament Square on Saturday holding signs supporting Palestine Action, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries.
Proscription makes it a criminal offence under the Terrorism Act 2000 (TACT) to invite or express support for an organisation through chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos, the Met said.
The Met also said it is a criminal offence to:
– belong, or profess to belong, to a proscribed organisation in the UK or overseas (Section 11 TACT);
– invite support for a proscribed organisation (Section 12(1A) TACT);
– express an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation (Section 12(1A) TACT);
– arrange, manage or assist in arranging or managing a meeting in the knowledge that the meeting is to support or further the activities of a proscribed organisation, or is to be addressed by a person who belongs or professes to (Section 12(2) TACT);
– wear clothing or carry or display articles in public in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that the individual is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation (Section 13 TACT);
– publish an image of an item of clothing or other article, such as a flag or logo, in the same circumstances (Section 13(1A) TACT)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
UK police hold pro-Palestine protester, 80, for almost 27 hours and search house
An 80-year-old woman arrested for holding a placard at a pro-Palestine rally has said she is deeply traumatised after she was held by police for almost 27 hours, during which officers forced their way into her house and searched it. Marianne Sorrell from Wells, Somerset was detained at a rally in Cardiff on suspicion of supporting Palestine Action, which earlier this month became the first direct action group to be banned under UK anti-terrorism laws. She said officers removed 19 items from her house, including iPads, a Palestine flag, books on Palestine, material related to Extinction Rebellion and the climate crisis, as well as drumsticks for – and a belt that holds – her samba drum. A friend who went to feed the cats and walked in on the police searching the house said there appeared to be a geiger counter –which measures radiation – on the table. Sorrell, a retired teacher, said: 'At 80, to be treated like a dangerous terrorist is deeply shocking. I've been very traumatised by this. Every morning I wake up feeling sick, nauseous. [I have] had to take anti-sickness pills. 'They've actually not taken anything that could be classed as illegal but it's very confusing that they're beginning to think anything connected to Palestine or support for Palestine is illegal in some way.' She said the arrests at the 12 July Defend Our Juries rally took place five minutes from the scheduled end of the one-hour demonstration, the timetable of which had been communicated to the police in advance. Sorrell was arrested with her friend Trisha Fine, 75, also from Wells and a retired teacher, who was held for the same period of time. The pair said they gave 'no comment' interviews in which they were asked whether they knew that Palestine Action supported violence and whether they were individually prepared to use violence. Eleven other people were arrested at the Cardiff rally. Sorrell said officers broke into her house through the back door before replacing the lock. Neighbours told her that about 10 officers were present for approximately three hours and her friend who went to feed the cats said she saw them poking long cotton buds into Sorrell's jars of dried goods. 'Whenever I open a drawer or cupboard, I can see that they've been searched,' said Sorrell. 'I'm not sure what they were looking for.' The women have been bailed until October. Their bail conditions prohibit contact with each other and spending any nights away from their homes. Fine said: 'This restriction about staying at home is an issue because my husband is recovering from cancer treatment and we planned a couple of treats which we've already booked and paid for: a trip to Madrid in late August, and a trip driving around Europe for September. I can't do those so that is pretty onerous. He's had a tough time and he deserves a break. 'And, well, am I a 75-year-old terrorist? I don't think so. It's completely out of order. You just wonder what the hell is happening with this country and this government.' She said that during her detention officers refused to let her have antibiotics she was taking for a serious gum infection and failed to call her husband to tell him about her arrest, despite having agreed to do so. Under the Terrorism Act the friends face a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. Sorrell said: 'I just feel if I'm put in prison for this, and even if I die in prison for this, I can't think of a better thing to die for really than for the justice of the people who've been persecuted now for almost my lifetime.' South Wales police did not directly address any of the matters raised. A spokesperson said the investigation led by Welsh counter-terrorism police was continuing.
ITV News
2 hours ago
- ITV News
Sadiq Khan defends plans to shut Met Police station front counters, despite election promise
Sir Sadiq Khan has defended plans to shut police station front counters across London, despite an election promise he made last year. The Metropolitan Police Service wants to cut the number of police stations open to the public 24 hours a day in a bid to save money. The force is facing what it called 'tough choices' after government spending plans left it a £260m budget shortfall. There are 32 police stations open 24/7 - one in each London borough. But the proposals would see just eight front counters staffed around the clock - one for every three boroughs. Eleven of the 32 stations would switch to reduced opening hours but 13 would shut their front counters. Sir Sadiq pledged in his 2024 election manifesto: 'I'll continue to ensure the Met is able to effectively respond to the public, including maintaining a 24-hour police front office counter in every borough.' But today he told ITV News: "The commission's got three criteria when it comes to front counters - resources, funding, and the demand of the front counts. "Some front counters will stay open 24 hours a day in some boroughs in London where there is a demand, resources and funding. "Some boroughs, frankly speaking, nobody uses the front counters after office hours, they'll stay open during office hours, but after office hours there will be other ways." The Met said there was no decision yet on which police stations will lose their front counters. A spokesperson said: 'Just five per cent of crimes were reported using front counters last year, with the vast majority of Londoners doing it over the phone, online, or in person with officers elsewhere. "Given the Met's budget shortfall and shrinking size, it is no longer sustainable to keep all front counters open.' But the proposed cuts were criticised by the Conservative rival Khan defeated in the election. Susan Hall, leader of the Greater London Authority Tories, said: "Sadiq Khan is keeping Londoners completely in the dark about which police counters will be axed from their communities. 'This secrecy is utterly unacceptable when people are genuinely worried about losing this vital lifeline to report crimes and access police services. The Mayor has broken his manifesto promise and now he won't even have the decency to tell 'Londoners which areas will be worst hit by his failures. We will fight these closures tooth and nail, but we can't do that whilst Khan continues to hide behind this wall of silence. What does he have to hide? What wasn't he told? This is a disgrace."
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Comedian cancels Fringe show over bail terror charge conditions
Comedian Susan Riddell was one of three women charged under the Terrorism Act 2000 after the incident at the Leonardo factory in Crewe Road North, Edinburgh on Tuesday, July 15. At a private hearing at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Monday, she made no plea to a charge of malicious mischief, aggravated by having a "terrorist connection". Her new show titled How Do You Sleep at Night? had been due to run for a month at the festival from next week. READ MORE: Donald Trump protest planned near mother's birthplace during Scotland visit On the official Fringe site, the show is now listed as "cancelled". In an Instagram post, Riddell said: "Thanks to everyone who has shared my Edinburgh fringe show but unfortunately due to bail conditions I'm barred from Edinburgh for the foreseeable so I won't be doing my show." Bail restrictions impose the Glasgow-based comedian from travelling into the city. Riddell is a BBC regular, and has written and starred in her own BBC mini-sitcom pilot Dregs. READ MORE: News organisations express concern over starvation facing journalists in Gaza The protest Riddell allegedly took part in alongside Allegra Fitzherbert, 34, of London, and Naomi Stubbs-Gorman, 31, of Glasgow was part of the Shutdown Leonardo campaign. The Leonardo factory has been subject to numerous protests amid Israel's genocide in Gaza. Last November, for example, campaigners shut down the factory by blockading the entrance. Leonardo produces weapons for the Israeli military including guns used in the maritime blockade of Gaza and its wholly-owned subsidiary RADA Electronic Industries makes software which supports the country's 'Iron Fist' system which provided cover for tanks used in the ground invasion and levelling of Gaza, according to the Who Profits Research Centre.
