logo
The UK is lowering the voting age to 16 — what possible reason could Australia have for not following suit? - ABC Religion & Ethics

The UK is lowering the voting age to 16 — what possible reason could Australia have for not following suit? - ABC Religion & Ethics

At the next general election, the United Kingdom will lower the age of eligible voters from 18 to 16 — a reform that will give an additional 1.6 million British citizens the right to vote. When I heard about this change, it felt like a massive step in the right direction. Having worked with the campaign Make It 16, I have advocated alongside my peers for the Australian federal government to allow 16- and 17-year-olds to vote.
The campaign has attracted a range of responses, however. To many, it feels like a groundbreaking proposition — the vast majority of democracies, after all, set the voting age at 18 or above. Perhaps the UK's decision makes this reform seem a little less daunting, now that the list of nations with a lower age threshold (among them, Austria, Ecuador, Argentina, Malta and Scotland) has expanded.
I've worked with the Make It 16 committee since 2023. As a young person myself, I have always been passionate about the rights and voices of fellow youth, and I truly believe that the right to vote is an important way to uphold these entitlements. In Australia, and in many nations around the world, 16- and 17-year-olds work, pay taxes, stand up for issues they care about, make legal decisions for themselves and are in numerous ways treated as adults. Children as young as 10 can be held criminally responsible for certain deeds, but we still have to wait until we are 18 to be considered responsible enough to vote.
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer echoed this same sentiment, when he said of young people:
They're old enough to go out to work, they're old enough to pay taxes … and I think if you pay in, you should have the opportunity to say what you want your money spent on, which way the government should go.
I just missed out on voting in the recent federal election. My eighteenth birthday was only a few weeks after the 3 May poll and yet I have to wait another three years before I can have a say in the next federal election. You can imagine my frustration when my classmates at university and friends asked me who I was voting for, and I had to admit, 'I can't vote yet.'
In countries around the world, young are growing increasingly frustrated by our exclusion from democratic politics. We are disillusioned by our governments' lack of action on issues that affect us. And rather than giving us agency, we are handed the usual list of consolation prizes: 'Why don't you just protest? Or create petitions? Or email your local MP?' Well, many of us have tried these things.
Despite the fact that hundreds of thousands of Australian young people turned out onto the streets to call on the government to honour its obligations to the health of our planet, precious little progress on climate change policy has been made. I have sent dozens of emails to my local MP on a range of issues — most recently, Australia's response to the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza — only to receive an automated response or some perfunctory reply thanking me for getting in touch.
Protesters take part in the School Strike 4 Climate rally on 21 May 2021 in Melbourne, Australia. (Photo by Graham Denholm / Getty Images)
These avenues of activism clearly have not and cannot achieve the kind of change we are seeking. That is not to say we should not pursue change through these more direct means, but it is disingenuous to tell young people that they are any substitute for the ability to vote.
Take issues such as cost-of-living pressures, housing affordability and environmental sustainability — all of which disproportionately affect the younger demographic. As Monash University Professor Lucas Walsh wrote in the lead-up to the 2025 federal election:
Young Australians are inheriting not only the weight of greater voting influence, but also disproportionate challenges related to affordable accommodation, work and climate change.
According to Monash's 2023 Youth Barometer Survey, only 35 per cent of young people felt confident they would have a place to live in the coming year due to a rental crisis already at full steam. I'd be willing to bet that percentage is considerably higher in 2025. And then there is the prospect that the effects of climate change are likely to be irreversible by 2030. Our citizens and our very planet are becoming increasingly inhospitable to young people, and yet we continue to be denied the democratic mechanism to do anything about it!
Young people are growing tired of the usual excuses and threadbare alibis that are used to justify denying us the right to vote — most often based on the stereotype technology-addicted, lazy, indolent, immature teens who can't even be responsible for their own lives, let alone the wellbeing of our country and planet. But isn't this prevailing stereotype directly contradicted by the responsibility, the passion even, demonstrated by student organisations like School Strike for Palestine and School Strike 4 Climate?
Where we are affected by, and capable of having meaningful input on, a range of highly consequential issues, depriving young people the right to vote is not only undemocratic — it is cruel.
The UK is showing the Australian federal government how it can enhance and strengthen our democracy: by enfranchising young people. Monique Ryan, Independent MP for Kooyong, has pledged to introduce a bill to parliament lowering the voting age from 18 to 16. I would urge the government to give that bill the consideration it deserves. I would also encourage my fellow youth to continue campaigning for the issues they care about and for the right to have their voices heard.
Anhaar Kareem is an 18-year-old Egyptian Muslim woman living on Wangal Land in Sydney, and studying law and media at the University of New South Wales. She has worked with the Wellbeing Health & Youth Committee, Islamic Women's Welfare Association Youth Committee and the Make It 16 campaign.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ali France, who unseated Peter Dutton, delivers emotional first speech to parliament
Ali France, who unseated Peter Dutton, delivers emotional first speech to parliament

SBS Australia

timean hour ago

  • SBS Australia

Ali France, who unseated Peter Dutton, delivers emotional first speech to parliament

Newly-elected Labor MPs Ali France and Sarah Witty delivered their first speeches to the House of Representatives on Tuesday night. Ali France, the MP who unseated Peter Dutton at the May election, paid tribute to her late son in an emotional maiden speech. France stunned political pundits when she beat Dutton, making him the first federal opposition leader to lose his own seat. 'He was convinced I would win' France spoke of the painful loss of her 19-year-old son Henry, who died from leukaemia in February 2024 after an 18-month battle. She said her late son was the driving force of her campaign. "He told me many times, that this election was my time," she said in the speech. "He was convinced I would win and said a number of times, 'don't make me the excuse for you not doing important things'. "His words, his courage, were with me every day of the campaign. Henry was instrumental in getting me to this place." France told the House of Representatives her journey to becoming an MP was not "a lifelong dream. Rather, it was hundreds of little steps." The single mother of two recalled the day she and her other son were hit by a car in 2011, in which she lost her leg, as a day she "was supposed to die". She was taking her youngest son Zac, then four years old, to an appointment at a Brisbane shopping centre when an out-of-control car came veering towards them. Her left leg was crushed from her thigh down as she was pinned against another vehicle. Martin Wullschleger, the trauma surgeon whose split-second decision to amputate saved France's life, was in the gallery to hear her maiden speech. Six surgeries in four years, PTSD and severe pain left France at the lowest point in her life. The refugee and surgeon also watched on from the gallery. 'People only saw disability' France described being pretty angry by the time she joined Labor in 2016. "Landing a job was incredibly difficult for me. People only saw disability," she said. She said her "epic journey" to sitting in federal parliament was not part of any grand plan, but rather the result of hundreds of little steps. France contested the seat of Dickson twice before defeating Dutton in the 2025 election. 'Our moment to fix the system' Experienced foster carer Sarah Witty beat former Greens leader Adam Bandt in the May election, and took the seat of Melbourne back to Labor for the first time in 15 years. It was one of the biggest upsets of the election and while she never expected to win, from her first day on the campaign trail, her appetite for change was clear. In her maiden speech, Witty thanked former Greens leader Adam Bandt, whom she unseated in the electorate of Melbourne. Labor member for Melbourne Sarah Witty delivered her first speech in the House of Representatives at Parliament House in Canberra on Tuesday. Source: AAP / Mick Tsikas The Richmond local also paid tribute to the city she now represents. "We are the home of the eight-hour working day and the union movement. The Victorian Trades Hall, the oldest continuously operating trades hall in the world, stands proudly in my electorate." Witty said Medicare, childcare and housing are at the top of her priorities for her constituents. "Homelessness is the harshest symptom of this failure," she said. "Safe houses are all that's needed… Without that foundation, everything else — health, work, education becomes so much harder. This is our moment to fix the system." She told the chamber that representing Melbourne is "not just an honour. It's a calling". "I bring with me the voices of renters demanding Justice, of people demanding climate action, of communities demanding to be heard, not managed." Witty and France were the first people elected at the May poll to give their maiden speech in the 48th parliament, with other first-term MPs to deliver their remarks in coming days. With additional reporting by the Australian Associated Press.

Greens co-founder Drew Hutton slams party as 'authoritarian, aggressive, unlikeable'
Greens co-founder Drew Hutton slams party as 'authoritarian, aggressive, unlikeable'

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Greens co-founder Drew Hutton slams party as 'authoritarian, aggressive, unlikeable'

Green's co-founder Drew Hutton has responded to his expulsion from the party, saying the Greens have lost focus on environmental issues and become "authoritarian and aggressive". He claimed the party had become "unlikeable" and there was evidence it was impacting their support amongst voters. Mr Hutton was expelled from the party at the weekend for refusing to delete transphobic comments made by others commenting on a Facebook post he made in 2022. In an interview with 7.30, Mr Hutton claimed the party refuses to allow frank debate on its transgender policy, which states people have "the right to their self-identified gender". "What I disagree with vehemently is the way that anybody who actually voices any dissent with that policy and do so from a credible position, that there is such a thing as biological sex and there are two sexes, is forced out of the party," Mr Hutton said. "That's extremely authoritarian. And what I worry about is that there is a very doctrinaire mentality developing in the Greens, especially with regard to this issue." Mr Hutton accused the Greens of being run by a "cult" intently focused on identity politics and showing a "disdain" for free speech. "There is a clear need for a party like the Greens … But there is also this fairly authoritarian and aggressive and unlikeable element to the Greens that I think people in the community are responding to," he said. According to an internal Greens' party account of the events leading to the expulsion, the comments on Mr Hutton's Facebook page were brought to the Greens' attention by "distressed" party members. Some of the comments seen by 7.30 used transphobic language, including claims that trans women pose a threat in women-only facilities. Mr Hutton refused to remove the comments, claiming they were "free speech". He told 7.30 he supports transgender rights but opposes what he calls an attempt to stifle debate. Greens leader Larissa Waters said she had not read the documentation about Mr Hutton's expulsion. "I haven't read the documentation because here I am in parliament hoping to talk tomorrow about introducing a climate trigger into our environmental laws and fixing the gender inequalities in our tax system," Ms Waters told 7.30. She rejected Mr Hutton's claim, however, that internal debate about transgender issues was stifled. "Our members are involved in formulating those very policies and those debates happen on a regular basis … And we love involvement in the democratic process," she said. Ms Waters said Mr Hutton did not debate "respectfully". "I believe that's the basis for which the party upheld the decision." Mr Hutton told 7.30 that former Greens leaders Bob Brown and Christine Milne had lent their support in an email. The email says: "Bob and Christine say that any member may hold a view different from Greens' policy. Consensus decision-making is the hallmark of Greens policy-formulation making … We oppose Drew Hutton's expulsion … and advocate that his membership be restored." Asked to comment on the request by the former leaders, Ms Waters said: "Like me, they respect his environmental achievements … But this was a decision that was reviewed by the party, taken by volunteer party members, many of whom uphold the code of conduct on a regular basis. "It's not hard to uphold the code of conduct." Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV Do you know more about this story? Get in touch with 7.30 here.

Mehreen Faruqi stages Senate protest, asks Albanese: 'Will you sanction Israel?'
Mehreen Faruqi stages Senate protest, asks Albanese: 'Will you sanction Israel?'

SBS Australia

time3 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

Mehreen Faruqi stages Senate protest, asks Albanese: 'Will you sanction Israel?'

Greens deputy leader Mehreen Faruqi held up a sign calling for sanctions against Israel and questioned the prime minister during an address marking the return of parliament. It comes after Australia condemned the "inhumane killing" of Palestinians in Gaza while calling for Israel to end its war in a joint statement, which a Labor frontbencher called it the strongest statement the government has made in the near two-year offensive. As part of a largely ceremonial return on Tuesday, Governor-General Sam Mostyn delivered an address to both houses in the Senate chamber, declaring the 48th parliament open. More than a dozen pro-Palestinian demonstrators were detained after protesting inside the foyer of parliament during Mostyn's speech, before being removed from the building. Hundreds of protesters called for sanctions on Israel on the lawns of parliament, with one woman arrested, federal police say. Traffic around Parliament House was also disrupted by the protests. During her address, Faruqi was pictured holding a sign that read: "Gaza is starving. Words won't feed them. Sanction Israel." As Prime Minister Anthony Albanese left the Senate, the Greens senator called out: "Prime minister, Gaza is starving, will you sanction Israel?" Later speaking on the ABC's Afternoon Briefing program, Science and Industry Minister Tim Ayres said he thought Faruqi's actions were "disrespectful to the parliament". "Parliamentary institutions, the ceremonies and the way that today has unfolded actually is important for the dignity of the institution," he said. "I think she has diminished herself," Ayres went on to say. "The institution is pretty robust but we've all got a responsibility to think about the way we participate in the institution and in public debate and in civic debate to lift the country up to get more people engaged. "I don't think that's served that purpose very well and I don't think it assisted the cause of Palestinians in Gaza one little bit." Australia calls for Gaza war's end A joint statement signed by Foreign Minister Penny Wong and more than 20 of her global counterparts — including from the United Kingdom, France, and Canada— calls for an immediate end to Israel's violence in the strip and condemns the denial of humanitarian assistance to starving Palestinians. The United States was not a signatory. Israel's foreign ministry rejected the statement, saying it is: "disconnected from reality and sends the wrong message to Hamas" — the Palestinian political and militant group that governs Gaza. The joint statement came as pro-Palestinian supporters rallied in Canberra on Tuesday for the first sitting day of parliament since the May federal election. The countries condemned what they called the "drip feeding of aid" to Palestinians in Gaza and said it was "horrifying" that more than 800 civilians had been killed while seeking aid, which they labelled "inhumane". The majority of those killed were in the vicinity of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) sites, which the US and Israel backed to take over aid distribution in Gaza from a network led by the United Nations. "The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity," the countries' foreign ministers said in a joint statement. "The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths." They said: "The war in Gaza must end now." In its statement criticising the statement, Israel's foreign ministry said: "The statement fails to focus the pressure on Hamas and fails to recognise Hamas's role and responsibility for the situation." Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar later said he spoke with his British counterpart David Lammy on Monday regarding regional issues, including Gaza. He blamed Hamas "for the suffering of the population and the continuation of the war". The US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, called the statement "disgusting" and said blaming Israel was "irrational" because Hamas rejects every proposal to end the war. Last week, following a call with Pope Leo, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office released a statement saying he had told the pontiff that Israel's efforts to secure a hostage release deal and 60-day ceasefire, "have so far not been reciprocated by Hamas". It came as Hamas' armed wing spokesperson Abu Ubaida said the group favoured reaching an interim truce in the Gaza war, but if that could not be made in negotiations, it could revert to insisting on a full package deal to end the conflict. Hamas has repeatedly offered to release all the hostages held in Gaza and conclude a permanent ceasefire agreement, and Israel has refused, Ubaida said. Hamas says any agreement must lead to ending the war, while Netanyahu says the war will only end once Hamas is disarmed and its leaders expelled from Gaza. 'So much of this is indefensible' Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke was asked on ABC News Breakfast on Tuesday whether this was the strongest statement Australia had issued since the conflict escalated on 7 October 2023. "It would be," Burke said. "There's been a series of very strong statements that we've made. What we've been making sure of is that whenever we make a statement of this nature that we're bringing as many other countries along with us at the same time." LISTEN TO SBS News 21/07/2025 01:16 English Burke said the hostages captured by Hamas on October 7 must be released, but the "slaughter" in Gaza "has to end". "We've seen too many images of children being killed, of horrific slaughter, of churches being bombed," Burke said. "The images that we've seen have been pretty clear that so much of this is indefensible and, as that statement referred to, aid being drip-fed in." Opposition leader Sussan Ley did not say whether or not she supported the joint letter. While Ley wanted "to see aid reach those who deserve it", she said the most "important thing" was rescuing the remaining hostages. Save The Children estimates between 50,000 and 80,000 Palestinian people are sheltering in Deir al-Balah. Source: Getty / Dawoud Abo Alkas While some of the hostages have been released, others have died and about 50 are believed to still be in captivity — although Israel believes about half of those are dead. Opposition frontbencher Jonathon Duniam said Israel had a "right to self defence" and said Australia signing the joint statement was not the right approach. "There is more to this issue than this letter portrays and I think it is a sad turn of events for our government to have joined with other countries in signing this letter," he told Sky News. Much of Gaza has been reduced to a wasteland during more than 21 months of the conflict that escalated when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel on 7 October 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages back to Gaza, according to Israeli tallies. Israel's campaign in Gaza has killed more than 59,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, with the latest deaths reported on Monday as Israel began a new incursion in central Gaza. — With reporting by the Australian Associated Press and Reuters news agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store