Why rice prices are soaring in Japan
AFP looks at the factors behind the sharp increase, which started several months ago, and how it has become a major headache for the government of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba.
Shortages
Experts say that the main reason for the spike in rice prices is simply because of a shortage of the food staple, which for centuries has been deeply ingrained in Japanese culture.
Factors behind that include a record hot summer in 2023 that hit harvests, followed by a surge in demand in 2024, in part fuelled by panic-buying following a warning of a massive earthquake, which did not materialise.
Unprecedented numbers of tourists hungry for sushi and other foods using rice have also been blamed, as have alleged hoarding by some distributors.
Falling acreage
For years, with rice consumption falling, government policy has been to reduce the amount of land used to grow the grain in favour of other crops.
At the same time, in line with Japan's ageing population, many rice farmers are old and their children don't want to take over.
Nearly 90% of individual farms are run by farmers over 60, and 70% have no successor secured, according to the agricultural ministry.
The amount of land used for rice paddies shrank to 2.3 million hectares (5.7 million acres) in 2024, down from a peak of 3.4 million hectares in 1961.
"The Japanese authorities have long focused on how to reduce the scale of rice production in the name of market control, and they haven't focused on how to increase rice consumption," said Tadao Koike, the third-generation master of a Tokyo rice retailer dating back over 90 years.
"Now we are all dealing with the payback," Koike told AFP.
Stockpile
The government started to auction some of its emergency reserves in February, having previously tapped into them during disasters. This is first time since the stores were built in 1995 that supply chain problems are behind the move.
However, as the latest data show, the move has had little impact so far.
Masayuki Ogawa, assistant professor at Utsunomiya University, said this was because the reserve feeds into "blended rice" and not into the more popular branded grains from a particular region or variety.
"In terms of average prices, the price of brand-name rice has risen enough to offset the effect of stockpiled rice pushing down the average price, making it difficult for retail prices in supermarkets to fall even when stockpiled rice is released," Ogawa told AFP.
Political backlash
After years of stagnant or falling prices, inflation is now squeezing Japanese consumers and by extension hitting support for the government.
The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which has governed almost non-stop for decades, lost its majority last year and had to cobble together a coalition.
Last weekend the farm minister sparked public anger with controversial comments about accessing supplies.
Taku Eto told an event that he "never bought rice myself because my supporters donate so much to me".
Eto resigned but the episode will likely have added to a sense among voters that the LDP - which faces upper house elections in July - is out of touch.
Still, Marcel Thieliant, at Capital Economics, said "weekly rice prices are showing signs of stabilisation so rice inflation should start to soften again before long".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Post
13 hours ago
- Irish Post
US-Japan trade deal signals risk for Ireland and the EU
THE United States' recent trade deal with Japan may be seen as a political success in Washington, but for Ireland and the EU, it's a major shift in global trade dynamics. The agreement introduces a 15% tariff on Japanese exports to the US, replacing a previously threatened 25% tariff on cars. While that appears to offer Japan temporary relief, it still marks a harsh rollback of more than a decade of progress on global trade cooperation. For Ireland, a small, open economy heavily dependent on international trade, especially with America, the implications are serious. The food and drink sectors are especially at risk. Exports like butter and whiskey could become less competitive if slapped with steep US tariffs, especially when compared to similar products from Northern Ireland or Britain, which already secured a more lenient 10% tariff arrangement in an earlier deal. Though far from perfect, that deal now appears favourable compared to what the EU may soon face. The European Commission is currently in negotiations with Washington, aiming to avoid a looming 30% tariff the U.S. has threatened to impose from August 1. In response, the EU has approved a list of countermeasures worth €93 billion in tariffs on US goods, set to take effect on August 7 if no deal is reached. Ireland's exposure is particularly high. The Irish government initially flagged €12 billion of imports at risk from inclusion in the EU's countermeasure list. Following negotiations, this has been trimmed by €2.4 billion, with nearly €1 billion worth of sensitive Irish imports, like pharmaceutical components, being removed. Thirty specific agri-food products valued at €33 million, including purebred horses, sugar, molasses and some chocolate products, were successfully excluded following intensive lobbying. Still, this relief is partial at best. Ireland's pharmaceutical sector, one of its most critical exports to the US, remains vulnerable. President Trump's vocal focus on drug pricing seems to suggest that pharmaceuticals will become tariff targets. Additionally, Japan's concession to accept US vehicle safety standards sets a worrying precedent. It hands regulatory influence to Washington and pressures Europe to follow suit, potentially undermining EU regulatory sovereignty. The investment dimension of the US-Japan deal adds to EU concern. The $550 billion in Japanese capital earmarked for US infrastructure represents a massive diversion of resources. If similar terms were demanded of the EU, Ireland could be forced to channel investment into projects that prioritise US interests. The EU's previous lack of a unified response to US tariffs has only emboldened the current American administration. When the US imposed a blanket 10% tariff on numerous countries earlier this year, the EU's limited and fragmented reaction did little to deter further measures. As a result, the US continues to apply pressure on major economies individually, knowing few are willing to risk short-term economic pain in defence of long-term principles. Simon Harris, Ireland's Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, emphasised that while Ireland supports reaching a negotiated deal, it is also crucial to prepare credible countermeasures to protect EU interests. 'This is not escalatory,' Harris noted. 'It's a continuation of our calm, measured preparation.' However, the risks remain severe. Seamus Coffey, chairperson of the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council, has warned of major uncertainty in the lead-up to the tariff deadline. He noted that Irish companies, especially pharmaceuticals, are pausing investments, in anticipation of potential disruption. While some diversification of supply chains is underway, the short timeframe limits effective risk mitigation. Ireland's limited leverage in global trade negotiations, coupled with its deep reliance on US trade, makes it particularly susceptible to shifting tides.
Irish Independent
2 days ago
- Irish Independent
EU and US move toward trade deal that could include a 15pc baseline tariff on EU goods with possible exemptions
European negotiators were hoping to reach an agreement to dodge the 30pc tariff rate Trump has said he would impose on imports from the 27-nation bloc on August 1. The rate, which could also extend to cars, would mirror the framework agreement the U.S. has struck with Japan, which Trump announced late on Tuesday. There could be concessions for sectors like aircraft and lumber as well as some medicines and agricultural products, which would not face tariffs, the diplomats said. Washington does not, however, appear willing to lower its current 50pc tariff on steel, they said. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro told Bloomberg News the report from the EU should be taken with "a grain of salt." As talks continued, the European Commission said it would press on with potential counter-measures in case a deal was not reached. EU member states were set to vote on 93 billion euros of counter-tariffs on U.S. goods on Thursday, European diplomats said. A broad majority of members support using anti-coercion instruments if there is no deal, they said. Trump was aiming to secure an agreement on the heels of a complicated deal reached with Japan, the largest foreign investor in the U.S. That deal included a $550 investment and loan pledges from Japan and its commitment to buy 100 Boeing airplanes and boost purchases of U.S. agricultural products. That investment - to be spent at Trump's discretion - would focus on key industries like energy, semiconductors, critical minerals, pharmaceuticals and shipbuilding, the White House said on Wednesday. Tariffs on Japan's auto sector will drop from 27.5pc to 15pc as part of the agreement, reviving hopes for similar treatment for European cars. Asian and European stock markets rallied as investors cheered the U.S.-Japan agreement, but U.S. stocks showed a more modest rise and earnings reports were gloomy. American businesses making everything from chips to steel reported downbeat results on Wednesday, revealing how the Trump administration's chaotic trade policy has hurt profits, added to costs, upended supply chains and weighed on consumer confidence. U.S. automakers signaled their unhappiness with the Japan deal, raising concerns about a trade regime that cuts tariffs on Japanese auto imports while leaving 25pc tariffs on imports from their plants and suppliers in Canada and Mexico. "Any deal that charges a lower tariff for Japanese imports with virtually no U.S. content than the tariff imposed on North American-built vehicles with high U.S. content is a bad deal for U.S. industry and U.S. auto workers," said Matt Blunt, the president of the American Automotive Policy Council, which represents General Motors, Ford and Chrysler parent Stellantis. Automobile stocks led the climb of European shares after the Japan deal spurred hopes that the U.S. was budging over tariffs on EU cars. EU officials have previously said Washington has shown little sign of doing so. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview with Bloomberg Television that Japan received the 15pc rate on auto tariffs "because they were willing to provide this innovative financing mechanism" that he did not think other countries could replicate. Trump, however, has appeared open to a range of options as the U.S. negotiates trade deals. "I will only lower tariffs if a country agrees to open its market," Trump wrote in a social media post on Wednesday. The Republican president said late on Tuesday that other countries would be coming to Washington for talks this week. Governments were scrambling to close trade deals before next week's deadline that the White House has repeatedly pushed back under pressure from markets and intense lobbying by industry. U.S. and Chinese officials plan to meet in Stockholm next week to discuss extending an August 12 deadline for negotiating a trade deal. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt on Wednesday would not discuss expectations for the meeting, but said Bessent "looks forward to continuing discussions with his Chinese counterparts."
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
EU and US closing on 15% tariff deal to break impasse
The European Union and the US are progressing toward an agreement that would set a 15% tariff for most products, according to diplomats briefed on the negotiations. Member states could be ready to accept a 15% tariff and EU officials are pushing to have that cover sectors including cars, the diplomats said. Steel and aluminium imports above a certain quota would face the 50% duty, one of the diplomats added. The diplomats said that while the EU is optimistic that a deal can be reached, they are also cautious that any final agreement will need sign off from US president Donald Trump and his ultimate decision is difficult to predict. The EU has prepared plans to hit the US with 30% tariffs on some €100bn worth of goods in the event of no deal and if Mr Trump carries through with his threat to impose that rate on most of the bloc's exports after August 1. As a part of a first wave of countermeasures, the EU would combine an already approved list of tariffs on €21bn of US goods and a previously proposed list on an additional €72bn of US items into one package, a European Commission spokesman said yesterday. The US exports, which include industrial goods such as Boeing aircraft, US-made cars, and bourbon whiskey, would face a levy that matches Mr Trump's 30% threat, sources said. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent dismissed talk of €100bn tariffs by the EU as a 'negotiating tactic', adding: 'It's what I would do if I were in their place'. Mr Trump announced two tariff deals on Tuesday — one with the Philippines and another with Japan, and both featured across-the-board duties on their imports that were lower than initially threatened. Also noteworthy was the 15% US levy on Japanese autos that was lower than the current 25% rate on major car exporters including the EU. Mr Bessent said the EU has not yet brought anything as innovative as the Japanese offer. 'Talks are going better than they had been,' he said. 'I think that we are making good progress with the EU, but as I've said before, the EU has a collective action problem with 27 countries.' The EU's most potent trade tool is the ACI, and a growing number of member states is pushing for its use if a deal isn't reached. The instrument is primarily designed as a deterrent and is currently not on the table, with its activation requiring a qualified majority of member states to support the move. The ACI would enable the EU to launch a broad range of retaliatory actions, including new taxes on US tech giants, targeted curbs on investments, and limiting access to the EU market. The commission is discussing the instrument with members, the sources said. While some capitals having been pushing to use the tool, most want to wait to see how the situation develops beyond August 1 before progressing discussions further to try to achieve the required majority, they added. The overwhelming preferencewas to keep negotiations with Washington on track. European leaders are in Tokyo and Beijing this week for talks with some of the bloc's biggest trading partners in Asia. European automakers' stocks rallied after the US-Japan trade deal sparked hopes that American import tariffs on their vehicles could be cut. Bloomberg
