
Mayor Adams, in campaign kickoff, attacks Mamdani as a ‘silver spoon' candidate
Mayor Adams formally launched his mayoral campaign Thursday with a sharp attack on presumptive Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani as the incumbent deals with strong headwinds ranging from the fallout over his now-dismissed criminal indictment to accusations of being too tight with President Trump.
Despite those — and other — challenges, the political ground has shifted somewhat in the last few days. Adams' independent bid potentially stands to gain from Mamdani's stunning defeat of Andrew Cuomo, with Adams and Cuomo sharing similar stands on a number of key issues and the mayor offering an alternative to Mamdani's progressive political platform.
The mayor, who has largely stayed out of the campaign fray until now, slammed Mamdani as privileged and attacked some of his campaign promises while focusing on his own record over the last four years.
'This election is a choice between a candidate with a blue collar and one with a suit and silver spoon,' the mayor said.
'A choice between dirty fingernails and manicured nails. It is a choice between someone who's delivered lower crime, the most jobs in history, the most new housing built in decades than an assembly member who did not pass a bill.'
Mamdani has, in fact, sponsored three bills that were signed into law. The democratic socialist has centered his campaign on affordability, pledging that as mayor, he'd work to make buses and childcare free.
'When we launched this campaign, we did so to defeat Eric Adams' second term,' Mamdani said in a statement in response to the mayor's speech. 'New Yorkers have been suffocated by a cost of living crisis and this Mayor has taken almost every opportunity to exacerbate it, all while partnering with Donald Trump to tear our city apart.'
After Mamdani's victory on Tuesday, some of the city's business leaders have indicated that they might throw their support behind the mayor as their best shot at defeating Mamdani, who's said he'll push to raise taxes on the city's top 1%. Mamdani has also been accused of bolstering anti-semitism due to his statements on Israel's war in Gaza.
Cuomo, who's secured his own independent line on the November ballot, has not formally said whether he will stay in the race, but sources are saying it is unlikely he will.
At Thursday's event, attended by hundreds of Adams' backers hoisting signs reading 'Re-elect Eric,' the mayor was surrounded by many of his most steadfast supporters. Inez Dickens, a former state assemblymember, served as emcee. Faith leaders played a prominent role.
'We pray this morning, Father God, that a fresh wind would blow over New York, a wind of hope, a wind of love and a wind of justice for your people,' Bishop Dr. Chantel R. Wright said in an opening prayer.
Mijal Bitton, a Jewish leader, said the race was not about party lines but instead 'about those who want to build and those who want to burn down,' referring to Mamdani.
Rev. Herbert Daughtry, who stood by the mayor's side when he was indicted, was also there. Fernando Cabrera, a controversial pastor and former councilmember who has spoken out against gay marriage, made remarks.
The rally, steps from the mayor's offices at City Hall, was attended by several administration staffers, including Deputy Chief of Staff Menashe Shapiro, who was working for the campaign, Department of Transportation Commissioner Ydanis Rodriguez, Erick Salgado, an immigrant affairs employee. David Johnson, or DJ, an assistant to the mayor, helped wrangle the mayor's supporters.
Brianna Suggs, a major fundraiser for Adams during his 2021 run who was raided in connection with the federal investigation into Adams, organized the campaign launch. Former administration official Winnie Greco, whose homes were also raided by the feds, helped organize a group of Chinese New Yorkers wearing 'AAPI for Mayor Adams' t-shirts with messages of support in six languages.
To secure a victory in November, Adams, whose approval ratings have hit historic lows, would likely have to widen his base with help form the city's unions, members of the city's political class and industry leaders.
In 2021, Adams — who centered his campaign that year on a law-and-order message — enjoyed the support of some of the city's most important political institutions, including DC 37, New York's largest public sector union. In 2021, Adams was also endorsed by powerbrokers like Brooklyn Democratic Party boss Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn.
This time around, DC 37 has already announced it's backing Mamdani in the general election. Several other powerhouse unions that supported Adams in 2021, like 32 BJ and the Hotel and Gaming Trades Council, could follow DC 37's lead and throw their weight behind Mamdani, sources familiar with the matter told the Daily News on Thursday.
In running against him, Mamdani is expected to paint Adams as a pawn to Trump in a city where the Republican president is deeply unpopular.
Trump's Department of Justice in April secured a dismissal of Adams' indictment as part of a deal that many believe left the mayor beholden to Trump's agenda. Since then, Adams has developed a relationship with Trump, including by visiting him at the White House last month.
The event was marked by protests as well. Pro-Luigi Mangione protestors loudly booed throughout the event, prompting Adams' own supporters to chant dueling cheers.
'We utilize the letter F for Faith, our opponents use the letter F for Profanity,' Adams said after protesters interrupted him, calling him a 'f——g criminal' and saying he had 'sold' out the city to Trump.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
38 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump administration says Harvard risks ‘loss of all federal resources' due to alleged campus antisemitism
The Trump administration formally accused Harvard University of violating federal civil rights laws and failing to mount an appropriate response to alleged campus antisemitism. Monday's notice marked a stark and renewed threat to Harvard's federal funding amid quiet negotiations between the elite school and government authorities that have otherwise been replete with court fights, threats to Harvard's research funding and foreign student enrollment — and the recent possibility of a detente raised by President Donald Trump. 'Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard's relationship with the federal government,' administration officials, including Justice Department civil rights chief Harmeet K. Dhillon, wrote in a letter to Harvard President Alan Garber. 'Harvard may of course continue to operate free of federal privileges, and perhaps such an opportunity will spur a commitment to excellence that will help Harvard thrive once again,' the officials said. Harvard did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The institution could also lose federal student aid — one of the most severe consequences a university can face — if it doesn't agree to a resolution. About a fifth of Harvard's undergraduate students rely on a federal grant reserved for low-income students. The notice from the Justice Department's antisemitism task force marked the completion of a civil rights investigation into the university pursued by the Department of Health and Human Services, which, according to the administration, has awarded Harvard more than $794 million in federal financial assistance since the 2023 fiscal year. The government concluded Harvard has been 'in some cases deliberately indifferent, and in others has been a willful participant in anti-Semitic harassment of Jewish students, faculty, and staff' since the Israel-Hamas war began Oct. 7, 2023. A 57-page HHS report that accompanied Monday's notice, obtained by POLITICO, detailed what the government said was a 'pattern of unlawful and unchecked discrimination' that included student-on-student harassment, exclusion from campus spaces and institutional-level acceptance of antisemitism. Authorities also acknowledged an effort 'to secure compliance by voluntary means' through extended discussions with Harvard. HHS' civil rights division 'will make additional efforts to persuade Harvard to take appropriate corrective action, including through submission of a voluntary resolution agreement,' the report said. Authorities told Harvard they would refer the matter to the Justice Department 'as soon as possible after the mailing of this Notice absent voluntary compliance.' The Wall Street Journal first reported news of the government findings. The government's latest Harvard threat signals a shift in the administration's tone from just 10 days ago, when Trump declared a 'historic' deal between his administration and Harvard could soon be on the table. 'We have been working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social, the social media site he owns. One administration official expressed cautious optimism about talks last week, saying there was 'a level of trust that Harvard wants to resolve the conflict and we can see a resolution by the end of the month.' Now, that administration official said, Harvard 'hasn't lived up to its end of the bargain.' 'Talk is cheap, and the president isn't in the business of agreeing to deals in name only or falling for empty promises,' the administration official told POLITICO. 'He and his administration remain committed to working with Harvard, but it's a two-way street.' Bianca Quilantan contributed to this report.


UPI
42 minutes ago
- UPI
Gallup: American pride falls to record low
The percentage of Americans who say they are 'proud to be an American' is down nine percent from last year, a recent study shows. File Photo by Ken Cedeno/UPI | License Photo June 30 (UPI) -- The percentage of Americans who say they are "proud to be an American" has fallen to a record low, according to a Gallup poll released Monday. The poll found that 58% of U.S. respondents said they were "extremely (41%) or very proud (17%) " to be an American this year. The "extremely proud" Americans have not been shown a massive difference from prior years, 2022 (38%) and (39%) in 2023. The change is mostly in the "very proud" percentile. An additional 19% of respondents said they were "moderately" proud, while 11% said they were "only a little" and 9% "not at all" proud. In 2018, 10% of U.S. adults said they had little or no national pride. In January 2001, when Americans were first asked how proud they were, 87% said extremely or very proud. After the terrorist attacks of 9/11, this increased to 90% and it was at that level between 2002 and 2004. The percentage of American pride was higher than 80% until 2017, when 75% said they were proud and it has since then deteriorated. The Democratic party has seen the biggest drop in pride this year going from 62% to 36%. While the Republicans' national pride has typically stayed above 90%. Generation Z and millennials are the most distinct in pride between generations. Generation Z is at 41%, while millennials are at 58%. Generation X is 71%, the baby boom generation is 75% and 83% of the Silent Generation. According to this study, Generation Z and millennials are much less proud of their country than their elders. These changes seem to have occurred during "economic prospects for young people, widespread dissatisfaction with the state of the nation, greater ideological divides between the parties, unfavorable images of both parties and intense partisan rancor during the Trump and Biden administrations." The survey was conducted from June 2-19 before the United States launched strikes on Iran on June 21. It was conducted with


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Mamdani's victory brings concerns, and lessons, for Democrats
If a key takeaway from the 2024 election was that the Democratic Party needs to move closer to the center on economic and social issues, last week's elections in New York City make clear that Democrats haven't learned their lesson. Indeed, 33-year-old State Assembly member Zohran Mamdani's upset win over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo suggests that Democrats, rather than rediscovering their roots, continue moving further to the left. Moreover, while progressives and Democratic Socialists will rejoice at Mamdani's likely victory in the general election, moderate Democrats are uneasy, reflecting a party polarized between its moderate and progressive wings, unsure of which direction it wants to go in. To be clear, there is no denying that Mamdani's high-octane campaign should be a roadmap for Democrats. He tapped into deep underlying frustrations with the cost of living and energized young people who typically are less reliable voters. Further, he connected with voters in a way that Democratic party leaders largely failed to do in the last election. However, one can believe that Democrats should absorb the lessons of how to run an energetic, upbeat campaign while also being alarmed at the direction Democrats appear to be heading in. Mamdani ran on a platform with ideas so nonsensical that they managed to unite the editorial boards of the New York Times and New York Post in condemnation of his inability to lead a city as large as New York. In that vein, there are four fundamental concerns with Mamdani, and one additional lesson Democrats should internalize. The first concern is Mamdani's self-professed socialism and extreme ideas. Polling in the months that followed the 2024 election made clear that even Democratic voters want their party to move toward the center, not further to the left. A considerable plurality (45 percent) of Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents said they want their party to be more moderate, versus 29 percent who say the party should be more liberal, per Gallup polling. Compared to the same poll conducted in 2021, the share of Democratic voters wanting the party to move towards the center has increased by 11 points, while the share wanting the party to be more liberal has dropped by 5 points. Republicans will try to portray Mamdani's far-left policies of free public transit, defunding the police and opening city-owned grocery stores — which even the Soviet Union eventually realized was a bad idea — as representative of the entire Democratic Party. In fact, President Trump and Vice President JD Vance have already begun doing so. Trump blasted Democrats for selecting a '100 percent Communist Lunatic' and Vance offered tongue-in-cheek congratulations to Mamdani as the 'new leader of the Democratic Party,' additionally calling him an 'antisemitic socialist radical.' Second, as the New York Times noted, Mamdani is simply not qualified to run New York City. Aside from his far-left ideas, inexperience, and age, his attacks on capitalism, in what real estate executive Scott Rechler called 'the capital of capitalism,' and his plans to drastically ramp up taxes are bound to decimate the city's economy. In that same vein, the third concern is whether or not Mamdani will stand up to President Trump on certain issues. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), who is significantly more experienced and qualified, has done well in this regard, but even Newsom sometimes fails to navigate his relationship with the White House. Will Mamdani, who has no experience, do better? Or, more likely, will he find himself clashing with both Trump and his own governor, Kathy Hochul (D), who has already come out in opposition to Mamdani's tax policies, a cornerstone of his campaign. Assuming Mamdani wins the general election, which he is favored to do, one final concern emerges. That is, how will Mamdani govern? If his tenure mirrors that of Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, another socialist who ran a very similar campaign, it may do more than damage New York City; it may also tar Democrats. Mamdani would be sworn in next January, 10 months before the 2026 midterms. And the peak of his tenure would be during the 2028 Presidential election. If Mamdani has a similar approval rating to Johnson, just 26 percent in recent polling, at that time, Republicans will benefit. For their part, elected Democrats have expressed a range of reactions, ranging from lukewarm support to outright rejection. Party leaders Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) congratulated Mamdani but, importantly, stopped short of offering him a full-throated endorsement. More of New York's centrist Democrats, such as Reps. Laura Gillen, Tom Suozzi and Josh Gottheimer, all distanced themselves from Mamdani, with Gillen saying that Mamdani has 'a deeply disturbing pattern of unacceptable antisemitic comments.' And Larry Summers, Treasury secretary under former President Bill Clinton, wrote that he was 'profoundly alarmed about the future' of a party which elected 'a candidate who failed to disavow a 'globalize the intifada' slogan and advocated Trotskyite economic policies.' To be sure, despite these concerns, there is one very real takeaway for Democrats, especially as the party decides its future direction. Mamdani won because he ran a high-energy campaign that excited voters with its enthusiasm. At a time when voters on both the political right and left are fed up with the establishment candidates, Mamdani tapped into something very real. Likewise, the problems Mamdani campaigned on, primarily affordability, are legitimate concerns, even if his solutions are misguided. Voters have been telling candidates on both sides that the high cost of living is a top concern, yet very little has been done about it. With that in mind, it is critical that Democrats choose candidates and run campaigns that provide real solutions — not extreme ideas like Mamdani's, which are not grounded in reality. Consider the three issues that propelled Trump to victory in November: cost of living, crime and public safety, as well as immigration. On the first two, Mamdani has promised extremely high taxes that suffocate businesses to fund massive public spending projects and (at least in the past) to defund the NYPD. This is significantly further to the left than former President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, whose ideas voters rejected last November. And on immigration, if Mamdani doubles down on New York City's sanctuary city laws, it will reinforce the idea that Democrats care more about migrants — even violent criminals — than American citizens. Put another way, Democrats need candidates who connect with voters, speak to the issues they genuinely care about — not in platitudes, but with actual solutions — and run campaigns that generate enthusiasm. Ultimately, the Democratic Party finds itself at a crossroads, polarized between its moderate and progressive wings, which have vastly different ideas for the future. It is imperative that Democrats find their footing and decide which way the party will go. It is our hope that the moderate wing prevails and the Democratic Party returns to its roots, rather than continuing further to the left. New York City is in no way representative of most of America, and it's hard to see how, if candidates like Mamdani become the national face of the party, Democrats will emerge from the political wilderness anytime soon. Douglas E. Schoen and Carly Cooperman are pollsters and partners with the public opinion company Schoen Cooperman Research based in New York. They are co-authors of the book, 'America: Unite or Die.'