logo
Missouri governor signs bill banning state from seizing foster kids' benefits

Missouri governor signs bill banning state from seizing foster kids' benefits

Yahoo09-07-2025
Rep. Melissa Schmidt, R-Eldridge, speaks on the House floor in February about her foster benefits bill (Tim Bommel/Missouri House Communications).
After Aug. 28, Missouri will end the state's longstanding practice of seizing foster children's Social Security benefits to cover the cost of foster care.
Gov. Mike Kehoe on Wednesday signed a bill that would also ban child marriage and stop child sex abusers from using non-disclosure agreements to silence their victims. The bill was sponsored by Republican state Rep. Melissa Schmidt of Eldridge, and handled by Republican state Sen. Jamie Burger of Benton in the upper chamber.
Missouri's child welfare agency takes millions of dollars each year in foster children's benefits and uses the money to help pay for foster care. In fiscal year 2024, the Children's Division spent more than $10.6 million recovered from children's benefits. Over 1,200 foster kids were receiving benefits in Missouri of late last year, or just over 10% of all kids in care.
As a result, kids who are orphaned or have disabilities are responsible for paying toward the cost of their care in state custody.
The bill would ban the state from using those benefits to pay itself back for routine foster care expenses. Instead, the division could use the funds for the child's 'unmet needs' beyond what the division is obligated to pay, such as housing as the child prepares to age out of foster care.
The effort to ban the practice won bipartisan support during the 2024 session and was on the verge of passing. But it died when GOP infighting forced the state Senate to adjourn early.
The foster benefits ban was the starting point for the bill, with other provisions, including the ban on child marriage added when it reached the state Senate.
Other provisions include:
Increasing a tax credit for donations to certain youth programs.
Stating that the state Children's Division cannot hold itself harmless in contracts with private service providers when there are issues resulting from the state's negligence.
Requiring Children's Division caseworkers to present identification of themselves when conducting investigations of child abuse and neglect, and inform parents of their rights.
Requiring the Children's Division to take into consideration the religion of the foster child when determining placement, in order to ensure children are in households of a similar religion to their families' when practicable.
Under current Missouri law, anyone under 16 is prohibited from getting married. But 16 and 17 year olds can get married with parental consent to anyone under 21.
Under the new law, which goes into effect Aug. 28, marriage for anyone under age 18 will be illegal.
The bill garnered bipartisan support, but an outspoken group of Republican lawmakers condemned the child marriage ban — saying they knew couples who were married as teens and are still together and warning that more teens would get abortions if they couldn't marry.
'There are legitimate reasons for people 16, 17 to become married,' state Rep. Dean Van Schoiack, a Savannah Republican, said during an April House debate. 'A pregnancy could be a legitimate reason to become married, for one thing.'
Last year, the bill stalled due to GOP critics.
In 2023 Republican state Sen. Mike Moon's opposition to the child marriage ban garnered national attention when he said: 'Do you know any kids who have been married at age 12? I do. And guess what? They're still married.'
The bill also voids nondisclosure agreements in childhood sexual abuse cases and expands access to legal counsel for families in child abuse and neglect cases.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Social Security phasing out paper checks as Trump pushes payment overhaul
Social Security phasing out paper checks as Trump pushes payment overhaul

New York Post

time7 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Social Security phasing out paper checks as Trump pushes payment overhaul

The Trump administration's effort to modernize federal payment systems is coming to Social Security, which will start phasing out paper Social Security checks. The Social Security Administration (SSA) announced in mid-July that it would no longer issue paper checks starting on Sept. 30. Advertisement The agency noted in a blog post announcing the move that electronic funds transfers (EFTs) get payments to beneficiaries faster than paper checks, while also providing increased security against fraud and saving the federal government millions of dollars annually – as paper checks cost about 50 cents each to issue while EFTs are less than 15 cents. While the SSA is looking to transition as many beneficiaries as possible to direct deposit or a prepaid debit card designed for federal benefit payments, known as the Direct Express card, the agency does plan to continue issuing paper checks under some limited circumstances. Most Social Security beneficiaries have already transitioned away from paper checks, though the SSA says it's working to notify those who are receiving paper checks about the upcoming changes and how to prepare. 3 The SSA said that they will no longer issue paper checks starting on Sept. 30. MargJohnsonVA – Advertisement 'Less than one percent of Social Security Administration currently receive paper checks. SSA is proactively contacting those beneficiaries to alert them about the change and the process to enroll in direct deposit or receive Direct Express cards. Where a beneficiary has no other means to receive payment, we will continue to issue paper checks,' a Social Security spokesperson told FOX Business. At the time of the agency's announcement in July, the SSA said that in addition to reaching out to beneficiaries receiving paper checks directly, it will include an insert with all benefit checks that explains how a beneficiary can transition to electronic payments with the assistance of SSA technicians. 3 Donald Trump delivers remarks before signing an executive order to create a White House Olympics task force to handle security and other issues related to the LA 2028 summer Olympic games, August 5, 2025. REUTERS SSA's announcement that paper checks are being phased out also noted the security concerns with mailing checks to beneficiaries. Advertisement 'Paper checks are 16 times more likely to be lost or stolen compared to electronic payments, increasing the risk of fraud. Electronic payments provide a safer, more secure way to receive benefits,' SSA wrote. The electronic payment push is being pursued under an executive order issued by President Donald Trump in March, as well as federal policies that predated the second Trump administration to encourage electronic payments. 3 The majority of Social Security beneficiaries have already moved away from paper checks. visuals6x – SSA noted in its mid-July announcement that beneficiaries may update their payment options at any time online through their personal Social Security account. Advertisement The agency also has an informational webpage outlining how beneficiaries can enroll in direct deposit or obtain a Direct Express card.

GOP's Rep. Lawler on Texas redistricting: ‘I think it's wrong'
GOP's Rep. Lawler on Texas redistricting: ‘I think it's wrong'

The Hill

time7 minutes ago

  • The Hill

GOP's Rep. Lawler on Texas redistricting: ‘I think it's wrong'

Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) said what Texas Republicans are doing is 'wrong' after they passed a gerrymandered congressional map, which would result in five new GOP seats in the House ahead of next year's midterm elections, as he seeks reelection in his New York swing district. 'I think it's wrong, what Texas is doing,' he said of Texas Republicans' release of the new map during a Tuesday evening appearance on CNN. 'I don't support it. I think it is wrong.' Lawler compared the situation to the situations in Illinois and New Jersey, which have also been criticized for doing the same, in some cases, even seeing their maps struck down because of it. 'We have to actually have neutral districts across this country,' he said. 'It would serve the country better.' Lawler mentioned that he plans to introduce legislation to 'outright ban gerrymandering,' a term coined over 200 years ago in the U.S. that's used to describe political manipulation in legislative map-making, according to the Associated Press. 'This is fundamentally why Congress is broken,' he continued. 'You do not have competitive districts, and so most members are focused on primaries and not actually engaging in a general election.' Lawler's comments come as he seeks reelection in his battleground House district in New York, where Democrats will seek to oust him as part of the party's efforts to win back control. Democrats fell short in the district by more than 6 points in November. In the backdrop, Texas Democrats on Sunday traveled for various strategic trips to Illinois, New York and Massachusetts to deny Republicans a quorum, or the minimum number of lawmakers needed present to conduct legislative business, as the GOP tries to pass the new congressional lines. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) threatened to remove the Democrats as they go into day three of their trips, which is in response to the Texas GOP, at the behest of President Trump, redrawing the state's congressional maps. While redistricting was initially on the agenda items for the special session called by Gov. Greg Abbott (R), it was added later. Typically, lines aren't withdrawn until after a census — making the move a clear power play.

Texas Attorney General Says He'll Seek to Remove Democrats Who Don't Return by Friday
Texas Attorney General Says He'll Seek to Remove Democrats Who Don't Return by Friday

Epoch Times

time8 minutes ago

  • Epoch Times

Texas Attorney General Says He'll Seek to Remove Democrats Who Don't Return by Friday

DALLAS—Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton vowed to seek judicial orders declaring 'runaway Democrats' as having vacated their elected office if they do not return to the state House by Friday, when it reconvenes. 'Starting Friday, any rogue lawmakers refusing to return to the House will be held accountable for vacating their office,' Paxton stated in an Aug. 5 press release. 'The people of Texas elected lawmakers, not jet-setting runaways looking for headlines. If you don't show up to work, you get fired.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store