Irish court rejects McGregor appeal in civil rape case
The plaintiff, Nikita Hand, alleged that McGregor sexually assaulted her on December 9, 2018. A jury in Ireland's High Court last November found in favour of Hand and ordered McGregor to pay her nearly 250,000 euros ($285,250) in damages.
McGregor, 36, denied the allegation and said he had "fully consensual sex" with Hand. He also denied causing bruising to the plaintiff.
In the appeal heard earlier this month, lawyers for McGregor said the judge erred in directing the jury to decide whether he "assaulted" rather than "sexually assaulted" the victim.
Judge Brian O'Moore said on Thursday that the appeal court had no doubt the overall effect of the trial judge's charge was to tell them the central allegation by Hand against McGregor was that he had raped her.
"The jury found as a fact that Mr. McGregor had assaulted Ms Hand by raping her," O'Moore said, reading out the ruling.
McGregor's legal team had also argued that the judge should not have allowed a line of questioning during cross-examination regarding McGregor's "no comment" responses in a police interview. That ground was also rejected.
Hand embraced a number of people beside her after the appeal court ruling.
"To every survivor out there I know how hard it is but please don't be silenced ... You deserve to be heard, you also deserve justice. Today, I can finally move on and try to heal," Hand said in a statement outside the court.
Hand told the high court in November that she and a friend made contact with McGregor, whom she knew, after a work Christmas party. She said they were driven by McGregor to a party in a penthouse room of a Dublin hotel where drugs and alcohol were consumed.
She said McGregor, who was not in court on Thursday, took her to a bedroom in the penthouse and sexually assaulted her.
Hand's lawyer told the jury that when she was referred to a sexual assault treatment unit the day after the alleged assault, a doctor was so concerned that he directed that photographs be taken of her injuries.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Gangs promoting small boats crossings on social media face jail under new crackdown
Gangs promoting small boat Channel crossings on social media will face up to five years in prison as part of a new crackdown announced by the government. An amendment to the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill – currently going through parliament – will introduce a new, UK-wide offence to criminalise the creation of material for publication online which promotes or offers services facilitating a breach of UK immigration law. This could include small boat crossings, the creation of fake travel documents like passports or visas, or explicitly promising illegal working opportunities in the UK. While facilitating illegal migration is already a crime, the government said the proposed changes would 'add another string to law enforcement's bow, better enabling them to disrupt the gangs while they are publicising people smuggling activities and provide an additional tool when building a case against those peddling this content'. Approximately 80 per cent of migrants arriving via small boats told officials that they used social media during their illegal journey to the UK, including to locate or communicate with an agent or facilitator associated with an organised crime group, according to Home Office analysis. Individuals caught by the offence could receive a prison sentence of up to five years and a fine. It comes after the number of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel topped 25,000 in record time, after some 898 people made the journey in 13 boats on Wednesday – the third highest daily number of crossings this year. The home secretary said ministers are 'determined to do everything we can' to prevent people smuggling gangs from helping people to make the dangerous crossing. 'Selling the false promise of a safe journey to the UK and a life in this country – whether on or offline – simply to make money, is nothing short of immoral', said Yvette Cooper. 'These criminals have no issue with leading migrants to life-threatening situations using brazen tactics on social media.' She added: 'We have to stay one step ahead of the ever-evolving tactics of people-smuggling gangs and this move, part of our Plan for Change to boost border security, will empower law enforcement to disable these tactics faster and more effectively, ensuring people face proper penalties.' Rob Jones, director general of the National Crime Agency, said: 'We know many of the people-smuggling networks risking lives transporting people to the UK promote their services to migrants using social media. 'The majority of migrants arriving in the UK will have engaged with smugglers in this way. This is why we work with social media companies to target smugglers' accounts, and we've increased the pace of takedowns.' In 2025 so far, 25,436 people have made the dangerous journey across the Channel – up 51 per cent on this point last year (16,842) and 73 per cent higher than at this stage in 2023 (14,732), according to PA news agency analysis. It is the earliest point in a calendar year at which the 25,000 mark has been passed since data on Channel crossings was first reported in 2018. Last year, the figure was passed on 22 September, and in 2023, it was on 2 October. With Nigel Farage's Reform UK surging in the polls, the figures come as a fresh blow to Sir Keir Starmer, whose pledge to tackle small boat crossings is a central pledge of his mission for government. The high numbers of crossings come despite the prime minister announcing a major 'one in, one out' returns deal with France last month. While it is hoped the deal will bring the spiralling numbers under control, the crossings have so far continued at pace.
Daily Mirror
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Lucy Letby convictions under scrutiny as experts challenge trial evidence in new ITV doc
An ITV documentary, Lucy Letby: Beyond Reasonable Doubt?, features medical experts questioning the evidence that convicted nurse Lucy Letby of killing seven babies and attempting to kill seven others, as her legal team pursues a potential appeal Several medical experts criticise the 'deeply disturbing' and 'flawed' evidence used to convict killer nurse Lucy Letby in a new documentary on TV tonight. Letby was found guilty of murdering seven newborn babies and attempting to kill seven others and was handed 15 whole life sentences, meaning she will never be released from prison. But in ITV 's Lucy Letby: Beyond Reasonable Doubt? her barrister Mark McDonald says: 'There's no direct evidence, no one saw her do anything wrong.' It comes after it was reported that 'scared' Letby can't lose weight as she hoards 'junk food' behind bars. He adds: 'In the trial, they started from the starting point, 'She has done harm. Now we have to show how she has harmed each just going to put together a theory.' And she was convicted on that theory.' Two appeals have failed. But in February a panel of medical experts, led by Dr Shoo Lee, found Letby did not murder any babies. Her defence team has now submitted an application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission. Dr Neena Modi, ex-president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, says: 'It's been deeply disturbing that one can have such a... tremendously important trial that seems to have been conducted with so many flaws.' One alleged flaw is a shift chart, used to prove Letby was always present when the babies were harmed at the Countess of Chester Hospital from 2015 to 2016. But statistician Professor Jane Hutton says some incidents, when Letby was not working, were left off, adding: 'This is a summary that is so crude it can only be described as grossly misleading.' It was also claimed Letby must have caused one baby's death by removing a breathing tube. But several experts say the tubes can be dislodged for a 'variety of reasons'. Notes by Letby, including the phrase 'I am evil I did this' were presented as confessional in court. But it is claimed she was encouraged by hospital staff to write down her feelings to help cope with stress. It is also alleged the prosecution's lead expert, Dr Dewi Evans, has altered his view about how three babies died since the case. But he denies this, saying his evidence has been agreed by a jury and the Court of Appeal. He also argues the case by Dr Shoo Lee's panel has not been held to scrutiny in court and contains significant factual errors. The CPS said: 'Lucy Letby was convicted of 15 separate counts following two jury trials. 'In May 2024, the Court of Appeal dismissed Letby's leave to appeal on all grounds, rejecting her argument that expert prosecution evidence was flawed.' It added that it is considering police files on further baby deaths and collapses at the Countess of Chester and Liverpool Women's Hospital.
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Teenage boys using 'nudifying' AI apps to make X-rated images of girls and teachers at school
Experts have warned of 'a massive explosion' in boys – some as young as 13 – using free AI programs to create lifelike fake nude images of fellow pupils. It is claimed that girls have even been driven to suicide after falling victim to the so-called 'nudifying' smartphone apps. The apps can turn fully clothed photos of classmates – as well as teachers – into realistic-looking explicit nude images. They are thought to now be in use in 'every classroom' and teenage pupils have already been convicted of creating and sharing the images. Under current law, creating, possessing and distributing an indecent image of a child are offences which carry substantial prison terms. Marcus Johnstone, a criminal defence lawyer, said that there has been a 'massive explosion' in such crimes by children who are often unaware how serious their actions are. 'I am aware of some perpetrators being 13 but they're mostly 14 and 15,' he said. 'But they are getting younger. 'Even kids at primary schools have knowledge of it and are looking at porn on their phones. It is happening in most, if not all, secondary schools and colleges. 'I expect every classroom will have someone using technology to nudify photographs or create deepfake images. Posts on LinkedIn have even appeared promoting the 'best' nudifying AI tools available 'It has a devastating effect on the girls – who are almost always the victims. It affects their mental health. We have heard stories of suicides.' Children's Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza called on the Government to 'go much further and faster' to protect children, telling The Mail on Sunday that the apps 'are seriously harmful and that their existence is a scandal'. She added: 'Nudifying apps should simply not be allowed to exist. It should not be possible for an app to generate a sexual image of a child, whether or not that was its designed intent.' Among previous criminal cases, a Midlands boy was given a nine-month referral for making 1,300 indecent images of a child, starting when he was 13. And a 15-year-old in the South East was handed a nine-month referral after making scores of indecent images, also beginning when he was 13. The Crime and Policing Bill 2025 is expected to introduce a new offence of creating sexually explicit so-called 'deepfake' images or films. Tech giant Meta is suing Hong Kong-based firm Joy Timeline amid claims it was behind nudifying apps including free to download CrushAI. It followed reports it had bought thousands of ads on Instagram and Facebook, using multiple fake profiles to evade Meta's moderators. Derek Ray-Hill of the Internet Watch Foundation said: 'This is nude and sexual imagery of real children – often incredibly lifelike – which we see increasingly falling into the hands of online criminals with the very worst intentions.' Latest statistics show there were about 1,400 proven sexual offences involving child defendants in England and Wales in the year to March 2024 – nearly a 50 per cent increase on the previous 12 months.
