Ministers draw up plans to shut Hammersmith Bridge for cars
A government-led taskforce examining what to do about the 138-year-old bridge, which has been closed for six years for repairs, is focusing on making it a bridge for cycling and walking only, according to the minutes of a closed-door meeting held in January.
Officials are examining three options but just one would allow cars. That would involve building a new road above the route for pedestrians and cyclists in a temporary 'double-decker' crossing.
However, the minutes show officials are concerned about the 'considerable cost' of this option. Two other vehicle-friendly solutions that would have involved installing replacement bridges have already been rejected.
The other two remaining options would involve reopening the bridge for cyclists, pedestrians and single-decker buses only. Officials involved in the meeting praised these options as being good for the environment and cheaper, according to the minutes.
Details of the meeting were obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and seen by The Telegraph. The document suggests that the bridge, which is among the world's oldest suspension bridges, is unlikely to allow cars when it reopens.
Any moves to bar drivers would reverse a long-held government pledge to ensure motorists would be able to use Hammersmith Bridge following the repairs.
In 2022 Grant Shapps, then transport secretary, vowed to 'reopen the bridge to motorists'. Baroness Vere, then roads minister, promised the landmark would be 'reopened to motorists as soon as possible and returned to its former glory'.
Sir Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, told the Standard in January last year that he 'want[ed] the bridge reopened for vehicles'.
Nigel Edwards, the chairman of the Hammersmith Bridge SOS campaign group, said: 'It is extraordinary that in this day and age, we should have a Government that seems to think it's appropriate not to have any viable options for transport for this bridge, for the entire population.'There's an eight-mile stretch of west London that does not have any priority roads across the river. Hammersmith Bridge, Putney Bridge, Wandsworth Bridge – none of them are priority bridges.'
Hammersmith Bridge has been closed for long-running works to fix cracks, causing a huge headache for hundreds and thousands of drivers in the area.
Findings from Basemap, a transport data provider, suggest travel times have increased to as much as an hour by bus from Barnes to Hammersmith station when it would otherwise take 10 minutes. Tens of thousands of car journeys have also gotten longer.
The taskforce meeting was chaired by Simon Lightwood, the minister for local transport, and attended by local councillors representing each side of the bridge as well as MPs and officials from Transport for London (TfL) and City Hall. It was the first meeting of the group in four years.
The cost of repairs has spiralled to an estimated £250m and various levels of government have been in dispute over how to pay for the work. Under a 2021 funding agreement, the bill for repairs would be split between the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham, the Department for Transport (DfT) and TfL.
However, the borough, which owns the bridge, has already said it cannot afford to pay its share unless it introduces a toll or road user charge, a measure that the DfT and TfL do not appear to support. The upcoming Whitehall Spending Review, which sets departmental budgets for three years, will likely determine how any future works on the bridge would be funded.
A DfT spokesman said: 'While the Government faces a difficult situation with Hammersmith Bridge, where decisions about its future have been ducked for many years, we recognise the frustration its closure causes motorists.
'The Hammersmith Bridge Taskforce met on January 30 to consider the potential next steps for the long-term future of the bridge. A range of possible engineering solutions were discussed, and further updates will be made available in due course.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
6 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Eavesdropping complaint filed against Naperville D203 school board member
A Naperville District 203 School Board member censured in January for her conduct is now the subject of an eavesdropping complaint submitted to the Naperville Police Department and the DuPage County state's attorney office, according to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. In a letter sent to the state's attorney office from the district's legal counsel, district officials allege board member Melissa Kelley Black made a recording of a budget advisory committee meeting without getting the consent of those in attendance, as required by state law. No response to the complaint has been issued or charges filed as of this past week, according to the state's attorney's office. The recording came to light at a June 2 school board meeting at which budgetary issues were being discussed, documents show. During the discussion, Kelley Black said she had attended a May 14 meeting of the Citizens Finance Committee, a group made up of five Naperville community members, two district administrators and two board members, at which concerns were raised about district finances, including whether there would be a need to cut positions or to seek a tax referendum. As part of her comments, she mentioned that she had recorded the committee meeting. Because the committee is not a public body, its meetings are not covered by the Illinois Open Meetings Act, according to the letter from the district's attorneys. Participants would have to give permission to be recorded under state law. Kelley Black said during the June 2 meeting that her recording device was 'right in front of us,' which was also noted in the district lawyer's letter to State's Attorney Robert Berlin. In an interview with the Naperville Sun, she said she did not want to get into the details of the recording because it is the subject of a legal complaint, but stressed that she believes it is her duty as a school board member to ask difficult questions, especially on the budget, and to ensure district money is spent wisely. She said she welcomes a third-party investigation, and is certain she will be cleared of any wrongdoing. 'I am disappointed they so carelessly throw around accusations,' she said. At the June 2 school board meeting, Superintendent Dan Bridges made note of the fact that she had recorded what committee members had said, documents show. 'Did you get permission from everybody who attended or did you just violate the Eavesdropping Act in Illinois?' he asked. Later he said, 'I will be following up on the statement about recordings.' A list of members of the Citizens Finance Committee was provided to the Naperville Police Department by the district's attorneys. Police Chief Jason Arres responded via email that an 'investigation will begin promptly.' Bridges also contacted the committee members to let them know about the recording, and stressed that Kelley Black's action was not condoned by the school district or by board policies, according to documents received through the FOIA request. One member, whose name was redacted from the FOIA request, responded that they were 'somewhat shocked' that Kelley Black would record the meeting without their consent. Kelley Black, in an email sent to the Naperville Sun, said she believes Bridges deliberately ignored the budget questions she raised at the June 2 meeting by seizing on her comment about the recording. 'After requesting clarification from Superintendent Bridges regarding his comments about potential staff reductions, student service cuts and a possible referendum, I raised concerns about inconsistent financial messaging and the board's limited access to key financial documentation. This information is essential particularly as we continue voting on major capital projects and other long-term commitments. 'Rather than addressing these concerns collaboratively, the superintendent responded with public accusations and initiated a complaint without authorization from the board. I believe this response has generated unnecessary conflict and distraction at a time when unity and professional dialogue are especially important.' According to the district's communications department, the Citizens Finance Committee serves as an advisory group for the review of key financial matters, such as the budget, levy and audit. It meets two to three times a year in closed forums designed to encourage open dialogue. The committee does not have any decision-making authority, the district said. 'Due to the ongoing investigation into this matter, we are unable to comment further on the specifics of the incident at this time,' Lisa Xagas, assistant superintendent for strategy and engagement, said in an email. During a recent board meeting, Kelley Black said she believed the district was trying to indimidate her by having police officers come to her house to question her on the issue, especially right before the school board's self-evaluation session. 'There's something wrong that an elected official giving back to their community has to endure that,' Kelley Black said at the July 14 school board meeting. 'This just isn't good governance in my opinion. I think an outside evaluation would correct it and then we can all stop arguing and work together.' Kelley Black also questioned whether the district's lawyers, who represent the school board, should be involved in the matter. Legal counsel should advise the board as a collective body, not the private interests of an administrator or individual board members, she said. 'Our community entrusts us with the responsibility of using district funds, and we must ensure that every expenditure, especially for legal counsel, is aligned with the board-approved purposes and complies with our ethical obligations,' she said. At the meeting where she raised questions about the complaint, board President Charles Cush stressed that Bridges had openly stated that he planned to follow up on the fact that Kelley Black had said she recorded the meeting. 'There is a third party already investigating this, and they will handle it,' Cush said. Board Vice President Kristine Gericke added that she believes it is her responsibility to alert authorities when she believes a law has been broken. 'I heard an admission of what I reasonably thought was breaking a law,' she said. '…I also believe it's important for the community to understand that we do take our responsibilities very seriously, and that to me was common sense to report that we felt a law was broken.' In an email back to Kelley Black, Cush accused her of trying to distract from the issue at hand. 'Your attempt to attack and threaten the superintendent for performing his duties as the administrative head of the District is clearly an attempt to divert attention from your misconduct,' he wrote. 'The District will continue to cooperate in having a review of your admissions on recording private discussions without consent. In the meantime, the Board meeting will proceed as scheduled and the Board will continue to conduct the business of the District.' The board has had previous conflicts with Kelley Black, and in January voted to censure her for unprofessional and damaging actions, citing her disclosure of private student information, spread of false information and release of collective bargaining information. Kelley Black, who was elected to the board in April 2023, denied the allegations. She has said she is a proponent of transparency, wants to ensure fiscal responsibility and ran for school board because of her love of education. Board members said at the time that they had tried to resolve issues with her over her conduct for about a year and a half before acting to censure her. According to recent documents, the school board is still trying to resolve those issues. The board wrote to Kelley Black in April notifying her that she was in violation of a censure resolution. 'Member Kelley Black continues to disrupt Board meetings, both open and closed sessions, with frequent unwarranted criticism and attacks on the Superintendent and his administrative team,' according to a June letter from Cush to the DuPage County Regional Office of Education. The letter states that the criticism and attacks are generally performative and Kelley Black willfully refuses to read the information provided to her by the administrative team. 'Tragically, the Board has had to divert significant resources including public funds purposed for its educational mission to address Member Kelley Black's willful refusal to perform her duties,' according to Cush's letter, which was prepared with the help of the district's attorney. Kelley Black said she was unaware of the letter and worries that decisions are being made by individual board members and not as a collective body. 'I have never once received a complaint from a parent or a staff member,' Kelley Black said.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Who can afford the electric revolution? The £700m question
The UK government recently unveiled a £700 million package aimed at jumpstarting the electric vehicle (EV) transition. At the heart of the plan is a £640 million subsidy scheme to help drivers cover the upfront cost of a new electric vehicle, and an additional £63 million to expand EV charging infrastructure. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The Insurance Savings You Expect The message from Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is clear: electric vehicles must become more accessible to the average motorist. 'There are a lot of people out there who think that EVs are just for the very wealthiest,' she admitted to The Telegraph. And on the surface, she's not wrong. The average price of a new electric car in Britain is just shy of £50,000, more than double the cost of a typical petrol model. But the message beneath the headline is more ambiguous. Is this plan enough to truly democratise the EV market? Or is it just another patchwork attempt to meet the looming 2030 petrol and diesel car ban, without fully reckoning with the underlying economics of the transition? Too steep for the mass market Let's be blunt: for the vast majority of households in Britain, a £50,000 vehicle is simply not in the realm of possibility. Even with a government grant, rumoured to prioritise UK-made EVs like the upcoming Nissan Leaf from Sunderland, the affordability gap remains vast. The previous Conservative government scrapped EV subsidies in 2022, claiming the market had matured. Since then, demand from private buyers has plummeted, with new consumer EV enquiries dropping 65% year-on-year. It's not just the sticker price. EVs face high depreciation rates due to battery degradation, and many consumers remain wary of both their long-term reliability and resale value. Buying an EV is still perceived by many as a financial risk, not a forward-looking investment. This is the crux of the problem: net zero targets depend on mass adoption, but mass adoption depends on affordability. And the market has failed to close that gap on its own. A patch for a broken model? To be fair, the government's new package includes more than just subsidies. Councils will receive £25 million for cross-pavement gullies, allowing people in terraced houses to charge their EVs at home using cheaper electricity rates. A further £63 million will expand public charging infrastructure and improve signage, a necessary step to address so-called 'range anxiety.' Yet infrastructure is not the primary barrier, it's economics. According to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), EVs accounted for about 20% of new car sales in the first half of 2025. But that growth is increasingly driven by fleet and leasing schemes, not individual consumers. Motability One potentially transformative idea comes from Julian Rose of Asset Finance Policy, who argues that the government could build on the existing Motability scheme to create a fairer and more effective solution to the EV affordability crisis. Rose proposes a revised scheme focused on used EVs and hybrids, with eligibility expanded to include not just those with medical conditions, but also households on low incomes. Key to the idea is removing VAT from lease payments, as with the current Motability model, and offering a modest upfront grant — perhaps £1,000 — to reduce monthly payments. Rose also suggests capped interest rates and using the proven administrative frameworks of Clean Air Zone vehicle replacement schemes to prevent abuse. This approach, he argues, would not only 'help struggling families obtain vital mobility at an affordable monthly cost,' but would also 'strengthen the used car EV market,' reducing depreciation risk and encouraging new EV purchases. With used EV prices currently low, Rose sees this as a 'one-off opportunity' to both support families and build resilience into the second-hand EV market—complementing, not competing with, the government's newly announced subsidy programme. Leasing Meanwhile, private leasing continues to offer a critical bridge. UK-based and continental initiatives like Belgium's LIZY have made second-hand EV leasing more accessible, offering fixed monthly costs that are often lower than car loans. These platforms are proving essential for younger, urban drivers and SMEs who need flexibility and lower upfront investment. Such business models show that affordability isn't just about the purchase price, it's about the total cost of use. Leasing could help normalise EVs in the public mind and serve as a bridge to wider ownership, but these solutions are only scalable if backed by supportive policies and a competitive second-hand EV market. Risk of a two-tier transition What the government is offering now is a partial step forward, welcome, but insufficient. A £640 million grant scheme may provide short-term stimulus, especially for British-made models, but it won't fix the structural problems of price, depreciation, and market segmentation. There's a very real risk we're heading toward a two-tier EV transition: one where company fleets and wealthy households lead the charge, while ordinary drivers are left behind. That undermines both climate goals and social equity. If this revolution is truly meant for everyone, then it can't be designed around those who can already afford to participate. The electric future must be one the average person can actually buy into — literally. So yes, £700 million is a big number. But unless it translates into genuine affordability for the mass market, it won't be nearly enough. "Who can afford the electric revolution? The £700m question" was originally created and published by Motor Finance Online, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Axios
a day ago
- Axios
Noncriminal ICE arrests surge in Washington, Oregon and Alaska
More than half of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrests last month in Washington, Oregon and Alaska involved people with no criminal charges or convictions — a sharp increase from recent norms, newly obtained data shows. Why it matters: The numbers illustrate a major shift that came soon after the Trump administration tripled ICE's arrest quota. Zoom in: In June, people without criminal charges or convictions made up an average of 53% of daily ICE arrests in the area covered by the agency's Seattle field office (Oregon, Washington and Alaska). That's up from 28% in April, before the quota increase. The average number of daily arrests for those with charges or convictions also increased in June, but not to the same degree. How it works: The data was obtained by the UC Berkeley School of Law's Deportation Data Project via Freedom of Information Act requests, and is based on seven-day trailing averages. Zoom out: As of June 26 — the most recent data available — ICE was reporting a nationwide average of 930 arrests per day, about 42% of which involved people without charges or convictions. The big picture: The spike in non-criminal ICE arrests came despite the Trump administration's claimed focus on criminals living in the country illegally. And it happened just after the Trump administration told ICE to arrest at least 3,000 people daily, up from 1,000. Context: Being in the U.S. illegally, such as by overstaying a visa, is a civil, not criminal, violation. What they're saying: Malou Chávez, executive director of the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, told Axios the only way for ICE to meet its new quota is to arrest people who have no criminal backgrounds. That's "creating so much fear" locally — even among immigrants who aren't undocumented, she said. "The reality is they are going after anyone who they see as a potential person they can place in deportation proceedings," Chávez said. The other side: Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin disputed reports that ICE isn't targeting criminal immigrants, telling Axios by email that some people labeled "non-criminals" are "actually terrorists, human rights abusers or gang members — they just lack a U.S. criminal record."
