Malema sees red after UK visa not approved in time to address students at Cambridge University
However, the British High Commission did not process and approve his visa in time.
The EFF has claimed that this move by the High Commission was deliberate.
The EFF has accused the British High Commission in South Africa of deliberately failing to process a visa application in time for party leader Julius Malema to visit the UK for an address at Cambridge University.
In a statement, EFF national spokesperson Sinawo Thambo said Malema was scheduled to address the 11th Annual Cambridge Africa Together Conference - an event hosted by the African Society of Cambridge University.
'In what can only be described as an administratively orchestrated ban on the president of the EFF, the British High Commission has actively delayed the processing and approval of the visa application by the CIC and has sent a letter of regret that it will not be processed in time for the address at Cambridge University which is scheduled for this weekend.
'This letter of regret was sent today [Wednesday], when the president was set to depart to the UK following a confirmation that the visa will be processed this afternoon [Wednesday],' Thambo added.
He described the failure to process the visa as nothing more than an 'expression of bureaucratic process being used to suppress political dissent and to ban the voices of the EFF from building global solidarity against Western imperialism'.
The African Society of Cambridge University invited Malema to address its 11th Annual Cambridge Africa Together Conference.
Thambo said the event was one of the university's most prestigious occasions, which was set to be delivered to Africa's leading policymakers, business leaders, economists and academics from universities across the globe.
'The EFF is well aware that this is a reflection of the attitude of imperialism against the commander-in-chief and the EFF, who has been a strong and critical voice against the United Kingdom for its role in the atrocities of colonialism, particularly the role of the British monarchy in the slave trade, its role in the sustaining of the genocide of the Palestinian people by Israel and the continued resistance by Britain regarding the paying of reparations to victims of colonial conquest.
He added:
The United Kingdom is not only suppressing academic freedom by essentially banning the president of the EFF from travelling to the country but is engaged in an open declaration of war against those who dare to stand up to warmongers, such as the British monarchy, which has the blood of the people of Kenya whom they brutalised during the Mau Mau rebellion still dripping from their hands.
Malema was highly critical of Queen Elizabeth, who died in 2022.
According to Thambo, the banning of Malema reflected the continued control of the political process in the UK by the British monarchy, which remains aggrieved by the EFF's posture following the death of the late monarch.
'As the EFF, we want to reaffirm our statement on the death of Elizabeth Mary Windsor and remind the bureaucracy in the UK that their monarchy still owes the world a huge debt for the crimes they committed against humanity through colonialism,' he said.
The EFF thanked the students at Cambridge University for recognising and appreciating Malema 'as one that is leading the resistance of imperialism and the independence of Africa'.
In a letter to EFF deputy president Godrich Gardee, British High Commissioner Antony Phillipson said he had been following the processing of the necessary visa for Malema.
Phillipson apologised that his colleagues at the UK Home Office said they would regrettably be unable to process the application.
This was due to the time owing to the necessary steps required to consider visa applications and the timing of some recent UK bank holidays.
'I recognise that this will be deeply disappointing, especially as the delegation applied in advance and some paid for priority service. I would like to assure you that I have taken a personal interest in this issue and have been in regular communication with relevant Home Office officials about this case including over the last week and this morning.
'I am afraid, though, that I have no means of intervening in the decision-making process itself, which is solely a matter for the Home Office.
'Given the fact that the purpose of the visit was to attend the Cambridge conference, and that will now no longer be possible ,it would be open to the delegation to withdraw their applications on this occasion. We have secured agreement from Home Office colleagues that should the delegation choose to do so, the Home Office will fully refund all application fees,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump hails Swinney as ‘terrific guy' at Aberdeenshire golf course opening
Donald Trump hailed John Swinney as a 'terrific guy' after a brief meeting with the First Minister ahead of the official opening of his new golf course in Aberdeenshire. The Scottish Government said the SNP leader and the US President discussed the situation in Gaza, and posed for photographs in front of a saltire and the Stars and Stripes. READ MORE Trump to open new golf course on final day in Scotland Trump hints at whisky deal as he talks of 'great love' for Scotland during visit Bagpipes, ballrooms and bluster: the day Trump came to Turnberry In a short speech before cutting the ribbon on the first tee, Mr Trump asked Mr Swinney to stand up. "The First Minister is here. John, would you stand up? John Swinney is a terrific guy who loves golf, loves the people of this country, and we really appreciated it. Thank you for everything, John." The pair had met on Monday night as part of a business dinner at the course, which was also attended by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar. During the ceremony, Mr Trump also spoke about Sean Connery's support for his Menie course, saying the James Bond star's backing helped overcome planning issues. The President said: "This has been an unbelievable development. "The land, they said it couldn't get zoned, it was an impossibility. "And Sean Connery said, 'Let the bloody bloke build his golf course'. "Once he said that everything came into line. John and I were talking about that last night." (Image: Colin Mearns/NQ) Mr Trump was the first to tee off. He said he would have a quick game before returning to Washington to "put out fires all over the world". "We started with a beautiful piece of land, but we made it much more beautiful. "The area has really welcomed us. If you remember at the beginning there wasn't quite a welcome, but it wasn't bad. "But with time they liked us more and more, now they love us and we love them." Mr Trump added: "I look forward to playing it today. "We'll play it very quickly and then I go back to DC and we put out fires all over the world. "We did one yesterday – you know we stopped the war. We've stopped about five wars. "That's much more important than playing golf. As much as I like it, it's much more important." READ MORE Donald Trump responds to John Swinney's new plan for independence vote Train operator to extend London to Edinburgh services to Glasgow Cost of investigation into SNP finances soars to £2.7 million The President has played a number of rounds of golf during his Scottish trip, spending time at his other resort in Turnberry. He held a bilateral with Sir Keir at the South Ayrshire course on Monday, where he also held a lengthy press conference. There, the President spoke of his "great love" for Scotland and said he wanted to see the nation "thrive". He was asked about Mr Swinney's plan for a second vote on the constitution. The First Minister said on Monday that the precedent set by the [[SNP]]'s 2011 election victory, when they won an unprecedented majority in Holyrood, would break the "logjam". He said there should be a "legal referendum recognised by all" on Scottish independence if the [[SNP]] manages the same feat at next year's [[Holyrood]] election. "We demonstrated how we break the logjam in the past, by electing a majority of SNP MSPs in 2011, and that led to an independence referendum in 2014," he told reporters. He invited supporters of independence to back his party in the constituency vote and to "demand independence" in the regional vote. Asked about the First Minister's proposal, the President said he did not want to "get involved" in Britain's domestic politics. "We got enough politics of our own," he added. He also claimed he had correctly predicted the result of the 2014 referendum, and suggested there should be a sizeable gap between votes. He told journalists: "I do say that when they made that deal, somebody said that it was – and I remember this very distinctly, I said, 'Could they do this all the time?' – there was a little bit of a restriction, like 50 or 75 years before you could take another vote. Because, you know, a country can't go through that too much."
News24
44 minutes ago
- News24
Madlanga inquiry's six-month investigation to cost R147.9m
Cyril Ramaphosa appointed Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga to investigate allegations of criminal infiltration into the SA justice system. Madlanga says the inquiry has already started its work, but needs to procure building space and internet reporting capacity before it can hold public hearings. The justice department has confirmed it is responsible for that procurement process. Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga's inquiry into KwaZulu-Natal police chief Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's allegations of criminal infiltration into the South African justice system has an estimated budget R147.9 million over a six-month period. That budget was confirmed by Department of Justice and Constitutional Development spokesperson Terence Manase on Tuesday, after Madlanga referred all queries about the budget to the department. 'Regarding your specific enquiry, we can confirm that the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development is responsible for the procurement process for services for the Commission in consultation with the Commission Chairperson and Secretary,' Manase told News24. 'Due to the timeframes, the department has applied for a deviation from standard procurement processes with the National Treasury for the Madlanga Commission and awaiting feedback. 'The estimated budget for the commission over a six-month period is R147.9 million'. On Monday, Madlanga announced that his inquiry had already started its work, but that it still needed to procure a building and internet reporting capacity before it could hold public hearings. He also announced that some of South Africa's most highly regarded advocates would be part of the team that aims to get to the bottom of Mkhwanazi's claims. This is a developing story.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
William Watson: Government-managed trade is sure to fail again
Those are some trade deals Donald Trump is shaking hands on — but so far not releasing details about. The U.S. gets tariff-free access to other countries while other countries pay stiff across-the-board tariffs going into the U.S. The U.K. pays 10 per cent, the EU and Japan 15 per cent, Indonesia and the Philippines 19 per cent and Vietnam 20 per cent. What China will pay remains to be determined. It typically pushes back more in response to Trump's jibes and jabs. Perhaps President Xi Jinping read the sections of the Art of the Deal about the need to stand up to bullies. Silly question: If a virtue of tariffs is that they're clean and simple, as the U.S. president always says, wouldn't it be a lot easier to have the same across-the-board rate for all countries? And whatever happened to 'reciprocity,' which the White House was big on a couple of months ago? Tariffs of 10-20 per cent for other countries' goods going into the U.S. but zero for American goods entering other countries are hardly 'reciprocal.' Yes, the rates chosen supposedly reflect the amount of procedural protectionism or non-tariff barriers (NTBs) that countries impose on U.S. goods. Except that no systematic study of that in fact much-studied problem has produced numbers that look like the pattern the deals reveal. And of course the U.S. itself is no stranger to NTBs and procedural protectionism. Just ask our softwood lumber industry. What the emerging regime looks like most is affirmative action for American businesses. They evidently can't compete with wily foreigners deploying unfair practices against them. And they're unwilling to abide by the (presumably rigged) decisions of international trade tribunals set up, under U.S. leadership actually, to make sure governments discriminate as little as possible against one another's firms. Even as the Trump administration abolishes affirmative action from U.S. society in general, it imposes it in international trade. Also strange are the commitments by other countries to invest given dollar amounts in the U.S. and to buy given amounts of U.S. goods, especially Boeing aircraft. Japan's going to buy 100 Boeing planes (not clear yet whether doors will be extra) and invest $550 billion in the U.S., with the U.S. somehow getting 90 per cent of the profit on this investment. Details to follow. When we economists teach international trade theory we customarily talk about (to cite the classic example) Portugal selling wine to the U.K. in return for wool. But in the real world, the non-communist parts of it at least, countries generally don't buy and sell goods and services to each other. Rather, people and companies in their millions and billions decide what goods and services to buy and their accumulated choices generate the trade flows we see. That type of trade system accords very well with the traditionally very American view that governments should not run economies, people and businesses should, with the government restricting itself to policing property rights and providing good public services at a reasonable tax price. But now governments, America's included, apparently want to manage the intricate details of the supply chain. In support of the Trump tariffs, some American politicians say it's simply not efficient for car parts to cross the Canada-U.S. or U.S.-Mexico border several times before cars are complete, as sometimes happens. But who are they to say? Since 1965's Canada-U.S. Auto Pact car companies have decided, free of tariffs, how best to put cars together. If it made economic sense to make and assemble all the parts in one location — if that's what maxed out their profits — you can bet that's what they'd do. If they don't do that, it's because that isn't the most efficient way to do things, given costs, technologies and transportation costs. Politicians should stick to matters such as Jeffrey Epstein and let car companies figure out how best to make cars. Why have Americans traditionally resisted government micro-management of the economy? Have a listen to the soundtrack of Hamilton. Because they abhor the concentration of power in a politico-industrial complex. Because not even a stable genius in the White House — not to suggest that's what we have now — would be smart enough to outsmart the combined intelligence and creativity of the entire American population when channelled through price- and efficiency-revealing markets. And, finally, because the invisible hand of competition is the best way to restrain the grasping hand of corruption. Corruption is not unknown in the private sector, of course. Humans are humans everywhere and always prey to temptation. But if you have competition — which in a small country like Canada is often provided by imports and foreign investors — companies or individuals that go astray get punished in the marketplace. And decisions don't get made for political reasons. Donald Trump always says he wants Canadian auto jobs to move to Michigan and Ohio, which, no coincidence, are two battleground states. Every president, not just the transparently venal, will favour places he wants his party to win in the next election, whenever that is. The only way to avoid such corruption is to remove power from politicians and vest it in markets. William Watson: All checks, no balances here in Nastyland William Watson: Our better-funded military will need to be more lethal I do understand such arguments are in disfavour at the moment. I bet the future vindicates them, as it always does. But the process won't be fun. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
