
Medicare and preexisting condition waiting periods
Due to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Original Medicare (parts A and B), Medicare Advantage (Part C), and Part D drug plans cannot impose waiting periods for preexisting conditions or deny coverage based on such conditions.
However, Medicare supplement (Medigap) plans are not subject to the ACA. For this reason, people who wish to sign up for a Medigap plan should be aware of enrollment and waiting periods where preexisting conditions might be applicable. Medigap initial enrollment period
Private companies approved by Medicare offer Medigap plans, which are also called Medicare supplement plans. These plans cover costs that Original Medicare does not cover, such as deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments.
Since Medigap plans do not provide direct medical coverage and do not meet the ACA's minimum essential coverage requirements, insurers can deny coverage due to preexisting conditions. However, other federal laws impose certain restrictions, one of which applies during the initial enrollment period.
When a person turns 65 and enrolls in Medicare Part B, they enter a six-month Medigap open enrollment period. During this time, they can choose any Medigap policy without undergoing medical underwriting. Insurers cannot deny them coverage based on preexisting conditions, allowing the person to select the plan that best fits their needs.
If a person misses this enrollment period, they may face higher costs or experience coverage denial. Additionally, those under 65 who qualify for Medicare due to a disability might have to wait until they reach 65 before Medigap insurers must legally offer them coverage. » Learn moreDoes Medicare cover preexisting conditions?
Insurance companies can refuse to enroll a person in a Medigap plan based on preexisting conditions if the person applies outside the initial 6-month enrollment window.
However, exceptions exist in which a person can get protection from coverage denial even after this period ends. These exceptions, called 'guaranteed issue rights,' apply in the following specific circumstances:
A Medicare Advantage Plan either changes, becomes unavailable in the person's area, or the person moves outside its service zone.
A person with Original Medicare and an employer or union plan that offers coverage after Medicare, including the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA), loses that coverage.
A person with Original Medicare and a Medicare SELECT policy moves out of the policy's service area.
A person who initially joined a Medicare Advantage Plan or Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) when they first became eligible for Medicare decides to switch to Original Medicare within the first year.
A person who switched to a Medicare Advantage Plan (or Medicare SELECT) within the past year now wants to switch again.
A person's Medigap insurance provider goes bankrupt or cancels a person's policy through no fault.
A person changes or cancels their Medicare Advantage plan or Medigap policy due to a violation or misleading information from the provider.
Additionally, some states may have additional 'guaranteed rights' beyond what federal regulations require. » Learn more:What to know about Guaranteed Issue in Medicare
Ten Medigap plans offer different levels of coverage. A person who has held their current Medigap policy for more than 6 months and wants to switch to the same Medigap plan offered by another insurance plan cannot experience coverage denial based on preexisting conditions, nor do they have to wait for coverage.
But if a person wants to switch between different Medigap plans, they may have to wait 6 months for coverage. This is known as the preexisting condition waiting period.
However, their new insurer should account for the period when the person has had coverage from their existing Medigap plan. For example, if a person has had 2 months of coverage before switching, their new policy should only impose an additional 4-month wait. Medicare Advantage trial period
Medicare Advantage (Part C) plans must offer coverage equivalent to Original Medicare (parts A and B). According to the ACA, insurers providing Part C plans cannot deny coverage based on preexisting conditions.
However, since a person can only have Medigap for Original Medicare expenses, they must discontinue their Medigap plan if they choose a Part C plan.
For this reason, Medicare grants a 12-month trial period to allow a person to test a Part C plan without losing their Medigap coverage. The person may leave the Part C plan and return to Original Medicare within this period. In that case, they can rejoin their previous Medigap plan or select a new one without medical underwriting.
Original Medicare (parts A and B), Medicare Advantage (Part C), and Part D prescription plans have no preexisting conditions waiting periods. This means these plans cannot deny coverage because of preexisting conditions.
However, specific enrollment and waiting periods for preexisting conditions might apply to a Medicare supplement (Medigap) plan. These include a 6-month initial enrollment period, guaranteed issue rights, and a 12-month trial period to test a Part C plan.
The information on this website may assist you in making personal decisions about insurance, but it is not intended to provide advice regarding the purchase or use of any insurance or insurance products. Healthline Media does not transact the business of insurance in any manner and is not licensed as an insurance company or producer in any U.S. jurisdiction. Healthline Media does not recommend or endorse any third parties that may transact the business of insurance.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
FEMA announces funds for states to detain undocumented migrants
The Federal Emergency Management Agency has announced more than $600m (£446m) in funding for states and local entities to detain undocumented migrants while they await transfer to federal new grant comes as the Trump administration seeks to carry out mass deportations and redefine the disaster relief agency's mission and says the programme will relieve overcrowding at short-term holding facilities and increase detention capacity in local and state facilities. The agency had previously administered a shelter and services programme that helped states and cities support non-citizen migrants released by the Department of Homeland Security, its parent agency. That programme was terminated, however, and the new grant for detentions appeared to be a new iteration of those funds, William Turner, Connecticut's state emergency management director, told the have until 8 August to apply for the new frequently publishes funding opportunities for states, cities, and local communities to pay for emergency training, preparedness, and equipment. But this new grant comes as the Trump administration turns to states for assistance in carrying out its mass deportation states like Florida, led by Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, have assisted the White House in carrying out its goal. Florida now runs a detention facility known as "Alligator Alcatraz" with the capacity to house up to 2,000 people, according to state officials. The state converted an all-but-abandoned airport in Florida's Everglades for the purpose. Critics have challenged the alleged inhumane conditions inside the facility its location would lead to environmental of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has said "Alligator Alcatraz" will cost about $450m to operate and that funds would come from FEMA's prior shelter and services a visit this month, President Donald Trump said the detention centre was "surrounded by miles of treacherous swampland and the only way out is, really, deportation".At a press conference on Friday, DeSantis said the Trump administration had called on states to assist with the mass deportations and cast the Florida facility as a model."I would reiterate that call, I think it will make a difference," DeSantis said deportation flights have begun to depart from that detention facility and that "hundreds" of other detainees on the site in the Everglades have been processed for has undergone a transformation during the Trump administration, as the president and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem have floated the idea of shuttering the agency and transferring its responsibilities to individual emergency management officials have departed the agency along with hundreds of staff who left amid the Trump administration's effort to drastically reduce the federal workforce.


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Paramount Global says Skydance merger should close in two weeks
July 25 (Reuters) - Paramount Global (PARA.O), opens new tab said on Friday it expects to complete its merger with Skydance Media by August 7, following government approval for the $8.4 billion deal. Skydance CEO David Ellison is prepared to assume the helm at Paramount, home to the venerable Paramount Pictures, the CBS broadcast network, and a collection of cable television channels. The new chief executive already is confronted with questions from investors about the future of the Paramount+ streaming service, plans for Paramount's declining television assets, and forecasts for spending on content -- including professional sports. "Now that the long, drawn-out sale process is finally nearing its end, Skydance leadership is poised to take control," wrote MoffettNathanson media analyst Robert Fishman. "With that, the real work begins -- rebuilding Paramount, addressing the critical strategic questions ahead, and charting a path toward a more sustainable and competitive future." Announced more than a year ago, the merger will unite Paramount's prized film and TV library including classics such as "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" and "Breakfast at Tiffany's," with films it produced with Skydance, including "Top Gun: Maverick" and "Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning." Ellison was not available for comment. He has previously said he plans to expand Paramount's technological capabilities, rebuild the Paramount+ platform and grow the streaming business, and reorganize the business to prioritize cash flow. A year ago, he said the team had identified $2 billion in cost savings. The Federal Communications Commission cleared the deal on Thursday, just weeks after Paramount settled a lawsuit filed by U.S. President Donald Trump over CBS' editing of a "60 Minutes" interview with his Democratic opponent, former Vice President Kamala Harris. The $16-million settlement drew criticism that Paramount had effectively bought regulatory approval, with the Democratic dissenter in the FCC's 2-1 vote calling it a "cowardly capitulation" to the Trump administration. The agency has repeatedly said its review was independent of the lawsuit.


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
US appeals court strikes down SEC rule on 'audit trail' funding
WASHINGTON, July 25 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Friday struck down 2023 regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on funding a comprehensive market surveillance system, finding that Wall Street's top regulator had not provided a sufficient basis for allowing stock exchanges to pass on its costs to their members, court papers showed. The unanimous decision represented another blow to SEC regulations adopted under the previous Biden administration, which faced concerted opposition from industry and Republican lawmakers. It was also a setback for the Consolidated Audit Trail, a repository of investor and transaction data meant to give regulators overarching visibility into U.S. market operations, but which has faced delays and obstacles for more than a decade. The American Securities Association and Citadel Securities, which brought the lawsuit, both hailed the outcome. The ruling "prevents a tax hike on every American investor who buys or sells a share of stock," ASA President Chris Iacovella said in a statement. The SEC did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Over the objections of its Republican members, the SEC in 2023 split the operating costs among buyers, sellers, and exchanges. Officials said at the time this would divide costs evenly but also allow exchanges several years to recoup hundreds of millions already spent. This drew stiff objections from the investment industry, which said it could be left paying an unfairly large share. The two Republicans are now part of the five-member commission's controlling majority. In an opinion for a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for 11th Circuit, Circuit Judge Andrew Brasher said that, because the SEC had not advanced a sufficient justification in deciding how the system's cost would fall on different actors in the marketplace, "we conclude that the 2023 Funding Order is arbitrary and capricious" and therefore in violation of federal laws governing the crafting of regulations. The appeals court sent the rule back to the SEC for further processing in line with the court's decision. The SEC mandated the CAT's creation in 2012 as a response to the "flash crash" of 2010 when major Wall Street indexes temporarily erased nearly $1 trillion in market value in a matter of minutes. Officials say it can allow regulators to spot market manipulation and have cited its data in enforcement actions.