Washington sues federal government to block distribution of forced reset triggers
"Communities are less safe with these mass-shooting devices in circulation," Washington Attorney General Nick Brown said in a statement Monday. "Essentially deregulating them is another example of (the Trump Administration) being driven by extreme ideology rather than commonsense."
The lawsuit follows a settlement by the Department of Justice, which announced in May it would resolve a case that challenged the ATF designation of the device as "machine guns."
"This Department of Justice believes that the 2nd Amendment is not a second-class right," Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement announcing the settlement. "And we are glad to end a needless cycle of litigation with a settlement that will enhance public safety."
The device allows an operator to fire their weapon in quicker succession by mechanically resetting the trigger after each shot. Washington law bans machine guns, as well as any "mechanism or instrument" that does not require the trigger to be pulled for each shot.
Federal law similarly bans the possession of machine guns.
According to the complaint, at least 100,000 of the devices have been sold throughout the country.
"A forced reset trigger uses a spring assist in shoving the trigger shoe back forward, resetting the trigger," said Jeremy Ball, owner of Sharpshooting Indoor Range and Gun Shop. "A forced reset trigger does not change the mechanical makeup of a gun; all it does is assist the shooter in resetting the trigger."
Ball added that while the device still requires the user to pull the trigger, it takes less effort and skill to fire the weapon more quickly.
Still, Ball said the device has limitations.
"Anytime we're talking about shooting a gun fast, the only thing that matters is whether you're able or not to hold that gun on a target," Ball said.
Forced Reset Triggers have been at the center of several legal battles in recent years amid an increase in machine gun fire incidents. In 2022, ATF determined that some of the devices would be classified as machine guns under the National Firearms Act, making them illegal to own.
According to the Washington Attorney General's office, ATF seized "thousands" of the devices following the designation. The Department of Justice then filed a lawsuit against Rare Breed Triggers, which produced and sold the devices online.
Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that ATF had exceeded its authority by designating bump stocks, which allows a shooter to fire a gun more rapidly by using the weapon's recoil to bump the trigger, as a machine gun.
A federal judge in Texas cited that ruling, finding similarly that the agency could not designate forced reset triggers as a machine gun.
As part of the settlement with the Justice Department, Rare Breed cannot develop or design forced reset triggers for use in any pistol and will enforce its patents to prevent infringement. Rare Breed also agrees to promote the safe and responsible use of its products.
In May, the U.S. Attorney General's Office noted the settlement is in alignment with President Donald Trump's "Executive Order Protecting Second Amendment Rights" and the "Attorney General's Second Amendment Enforcement Task Force."
The lawsuit brought by Washington alleges the settlement violates a federal prohibition on owning a machine gun and seeks a preliminary injunction to prevent the Trump administration from distributing the seized devices.
According to the Washington Attorney General's Office, machine gun conversion devices allow firearms to shoot up to 20 bullets in one second.
Use of the devices has increased in recent years, with machine gun fire incidents up 1,400% from 2019 through 2021, according to ShotSpotter, Inc., which has placed acoustic sensors in about 130 U.S. cities.
Ball said while he doesn't "necessarily have a dog in the fight or care" about the disagreement regarding forced reset triggers, a rise in the usage of "Glock switches" is a reason for concern. The small, mostly 3-D-printed devices can be attached to the end of a firearm and transform a semi-automatic pistol into a fully-automatic weapon.
"That is a device that legitimately turns a firearm into a machine gun," Ball said.
In September, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts seized 350 internet domains that were used to illegally import the switches and silencers from China. Between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31 of last year, U.S. Customs and Border Protection in Chicago alone seized more than 1,500 of the devices, according to the agency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Sparks Gun Group Lawsuit Within Hours
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Several gun rights groups filed a lawsuit to dismantle what is left of the National Firearms Act (NFA) shortly after U.S. President Donald Trump signed his package of tax breaks and spending cuts into law on Friday. The legislation reduced the NFA's excise tax on suppressors, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns and any other weapons to $0. Gun Owners of America (GOA) and other plaintiffs argue in the lawsuit—which they have dubbed the "One Big Beautiful Lawsuit"—that the Supreme Court had upheld the NFA as a tax statute and the constitutional justification for it no longer applies once the tax is eliminated. Newsweek has contacted the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives—which are listed as defendants in the lawsuit—for comment via a contact form on the DOJ's website and email. File photo: Donald Trump signs the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law on the South Lawn of the White House on July 4, 2025 in Washington, D.C. File photo: Donald Trump signs the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law on the South Lawn of the White House on July 4, 2025 in Washington, Context The National Firearms Act was first enacted in 1934 to regulates firearms considered the most dangerous and crack down on gangland crime in the Prohibition era. The law had imposed a $200 tax on machine guns and shotguns and rifles with barrels shorter than 18 inches, and also required the federal registration of these types of firearms. Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act eliminates the $200 fee that gun owners are charged when purchasing silencers and short-barreled rifles, but it remains in effect for machine guns and explosive devices. What To Know In a press release on Thursday, Gun Owners of America said its team had been "working behind the scenes" with lawmakers since the November election to repeal the NFA fully. The group said congressional Republicans had allowed "an unelected bureaucrat" to block the provision. GOA added that Congress ultimately "settled for reducing the NFA's $200 excise tax to $0 on suppressors, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and any other weapons or AOWs—teeing up GOA's legal challenge." GOA also said it has also long argued that the NFA's registration mandates "violate the Second Amendment and are an unconstitutional overreach of federal power." The authors of the NFA "left no doubt that the NFA was an exercise of the taxing power, and the Supreme Court upheld it on that basis," says the lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. "But the NFA no longer imposes any tax on the vast majority of firearms it purports to regulate. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which Congress and the President enacted on July 4, 2025, zeros the manufacture and transfer tax on nearly all NFA-regulated firearms. That means the constitutional foundation on which the NFA rested has dissolved. And the NFA cannot be upheld under any other Article I power. With respect to the untaxed firearms, the Act is now unconstitutional." What People Are Saying Erich Pratt, senior vice president of GOA, said in a statement: "This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to dismantle one of the most abusive federal gun control laws on the books. With the tax struck down by Congress, the rest of the NFA is standing on air. We're ready to take this fight to the courts and finally end the federal registry once and for all." Sam Paredes said in a statement on behalf of the board for Gun Owners Foundation: "The Supreme Court has made clear that the NFA survives only as a tax law. Once the President signs this bill and the tax disappears, the registry becomes an unconstitutional relic. GOF is prepared to go to court and challenge every remaining provision that violates the Second Amendment." Representative Mike Thompson, a Democrat and chairman of the House Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Congressional Republicans are giving a handout to the gun lobby by eliminating the $200 tax on silencers and easily concealable short-barreled rifles and short-barreled shotguns. We've regulated silencers and these guns for 90+ years for a reason: to keep people safe." Emma Brown, the executive director of GIFFORDS, an organization focused on preventing gun violence, said in a statement this week: "Almost 100 years of precedent has kept silencers and short-barreled firearms out of easy reach for criminals. But with this bill, Republicans are laying the groundwork to gut safeguards that stopped criminals from getting these deadly weapons. This vote is proof that the 'law and order' rhetoric Donald Trump has pushed for years rings hollow. In siding with the gun industry CEOs, he has handed criminals a win, and communities will suffer the deadly consequences." What Happens Next The lawsuit asks the court to declare that the NFA's registration and transfer requirements pertaining to untaxed firearms "exceed Congress's enumerated powers" and block the defendants from "implementing, enforcing, or otherwise acting under the authority of the NFA with respect to untaxed firearms."
San Francisco Chronicle
17 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Exclusive: Owner of fireworks company linked to deadly explosion was denied federal license
The owner and CEO of the fireworks company linked to a deadly explosion in Yolo County is a former San Francisco resident who built his business over many years, putting on Fourth of July and New Year's displays in numerous local cities, even though federal regulators barred him from acquiring or possessing fireworks, records and interviews show. It's not clear why Kenneth Chee, a 48-year-old optometrist, was denied a license by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, nor whether he needed that license to own or act as head of Devastating Pyrotechnics. Two years ago, federal authorities approved a license for another man, Gary Chan Jr. of San Francisco, to operate Devastating Pyrotechnics, documents show. An attorney representing Chee and his company declined to comment, and ATF officials, who are investigating Tuesday's explosion at a warehouse on a property in the farm town of Esparto, did not respond to interview requests. But Chee had apparently rebuilt his life after early trouble. As a young man in 1998, he was sentenced to five years in prison after being convicted of assault with a firearm and firing a gun from a motor vehicle at a person, according to state records. Chee served his time at the prison now called San Quentin Rehabilitation Center in Marin County. Under ATF regulations, anyone who has been convicted of a crime punishable by more than a year in prison cannot obtain a federal explosives license. Yet additional records obtained by the Chronicle show Chee — who filed the company's articles of incorporation with the California Secretary of State — obtained approval to operate his fireworks company from California officials. Devastating Pyrotechnics held three licenses from the Office of the State Fire Marshal to import and export materials, sell fireworks and launch public displays, all under Chee's name. Chee's status is one of many complexities investigators are sorting through in the aftermath of the explosion. The Esparto property, 35 miles northwest of Sacramento, was zoned for agriculture through Yolo County, and KCRA-TV reported it was owned by Sam Machado, a lieutenant with the Yolo County Sheriff's Office. Meanwhile, the Chronicle viewed maps showing the operations of Devastating Pyrotechnics and another company on the property, Blackstar Fireworks. Devastating Pyrotechnics was permitted to store display-grade fireworks, the type used in municipal shows, in large metal storage containers far away from the building that burst into flames. The company's closest storage magazine was almost 2,000 feet away, or a third of a mile. On Friday, the burned warehouse continued to smolder as several families of company workers awaited news. Authorities said seven people were missing, and a source familiar with the investigation told the Chronicle that one death had been confirmed. The blast also injured two people, and led to cancellations of at least a dozen July Fourth displays the company had been planning in the region. On Thursday, a spokesperson for the state's Cal Fire agency, Jason Clay, said the facility's owner held valid state and federal licenses for storing explosives. 'Part of our investigation will be to go through and determine the materials that were in there,' he said. Federal authorities in 2023 approved the license for Gary Chan Jr. to operate Devastating Pyrotechnics. ATF records indicate Chan owned the company. But in October 2023, while negotiating with the Solano County city of Rio Vista to display fireworks at an anniversary celebration, the company listed Chee as 'Owner/CEO,' Jack Lee as operations manager and Neil Li as general manager. There was no mention of Chan. 'Devastating Pyrotechnics currently employs 3 full-time individuals and maintains dozens of licensed and trained pyrotechnicians,' said a letter from Li to the city. 'All staff and technicians working on your display will be fully trained, federally approved, Devastating Pyrotechnics employees.' A year earlier, while bidding to produce Pinole's Fourth of July fireworks show, Devastating Pyrotechnics listed Chee as a 'licensed ATF explosives importer & manufacturer.' The company said then that its administrative staff consisted of Chee, Lee and senior show producer Craig Cutright, who now owns Blackstar Fireworks and is a volunteer firefighter for the Esparto Fire Protection District. The transfer and inserting of ignitors into fireworks is closely regulated. At the last ATF inspection a year ago, federal authorities found the company had properly stored the more powerful display fireworks in the storage containers which line the nearby agricultural fields. After the explosion, Devastating Fireworks disabled its website, replacing it with a statement attributed to management. 'Our hearts and thoughts are with those we lost, their families, and everyone impacted in our community,' the statement read. 'We are grateful for the swift response of law enforcement and emergency personnel. Our focus will remain on those directly impacted by this tragedy, and we will cooperate with the proper authorities in their investigation.' In past communications with cities, the company said it had safely put on fireworks displays for cities including San Jose and Redwood City, at a private inauguration party for the late San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee, and at amusement parks and casinos. The precise cause of the blast in Esparto is under investigation. Julie Heckman, executive director of the American Pyrotechnics Association, a leading trade group, said that while explosions of commercial-grade fireworks are extremely rare, they are generally caused by human error. 'A product is not just going to self-propagate,' she said. She said that the building that was engulfed, based on footage she's seen, was not equipped for fireworks storage. She said it could have been a place where fireworks were being temporarily held, loaded for shipment or prepped for shows. In all of these cases, she said, the facility would have required licensing or the work would have had to abide by certain standards. Often, for example, such facilities are built with noncombustible materials and equipped with rods and plates that personnel can touch to discharge static electricity. One of the riskiest activities performed in such buildings, which she called a potential 'pack house' or 'preparation area,' is installing 'electric matches' on the fireworks so they can be detonated from afar, for public shows. This action can accidentally prompt a deadly spark. 'We're all kind of eager to find out exactly what happened there,' Heckman said.
Forbes
18 hours ago
- Forbes
FBI Warning—Do Not Take These Calls On Your Smartphone
These calls are not what they seem. Republished on July 4 with further police and federal agency warnings that fraudulent callers are now targeting smartphone users in the U.S. This is not the FBI. That was the stark warning from the bureau in June, as attacks on smartphone users frightened victims into sending money to avoid arrest, 'spoofing FBI phone numbers nationwide and impersonating government agents.' Less than a month later and those warnings are now being amplified. Both ATF and U.S. Marshals have just issued similar alerts as attackers widen the net. ATF is 'working with the FBI, which is actively investigating this scam. The public is urged to exercise caution and avoid sharing personal or financial information with unsolicited callers.' The U.S. Marshals will 'NEVER call you to collect money or resolve a court case,' warning that scammers use 'real USMS names' in their attacks. 'HANG UP,' it says in its own public alert, 'and REPORT to your local FBI office.' The FBI says callers trick victims 'into thinking an arrest is imminent unless they send money,' which does not happen. 'The FBI will never call you demanding money to get out of criminal charges. It's a scam. Hang up and visit the FBI's to file a report.' These attacks are not limited to federal agencies, and we have seen a raft of state and local reports warning of the same attacks. The New York State Police has alerted citizens to 'an ongoing phone spoofing scam in which scammers impersonate members of law enforcement or government agencies in an attempt to solicit sensitive personal information from individuals across New York State and beyond.' ATF says the attacks impersonating its own agents instruct victims 'to purchase Apple gift cards in amounts of $500 or $1,000 to 'clear a red flag' from their accounts. Victims are then asked to provide gift card numbers to the callers.' In its July 2 public advisory, ATF says citizens should 'report suspicious calls to the ATF at 1-888-ATF-TIPS or the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center at And anyone falling victim should 'contact local law enforcement immediately.' ATF will never 'call or email private citizens to demand payment or threaten arrest. You will not be asked to wire a 'settlement' to avoid arrest; ask you to use large sums of your own money to help catch a criminal; request you send money via wire transfer to foreign accounts, cryptocurrency, or gift/prepaid cards; [or] call you about 'frozen' Social Security numbers or to coordinate inheritances.' The FBI warns there are many versions of this scam, 'and they all exploit intimidation tactics.' Callers use 'an urgent and aggressive tone, refusing to speak to or leave a message with anyone other than their targeted victim.' They also warn victims 'not to tell anyone else, including family, friends, or financial institutions.' There should be doubts as to the variety of these law enforcement impersonation scams — every avenue is being explored. These include a warning on Thursday that a jury scam is 'using real police officer's names,' with one police department warning citizens that callers use the name and ranks of serving officers, warning that jury service had been missed and a payment was due in order to avoid arrest. Similarly, police forces warn scammers pretending to be police officers are demanding money for missing court appearances. In reality, it doesn't matter what script is used, when phone numbers can be spoofed it's easy to gain a victim's confidence. Even the FTC has been the subject of these impersonation scams, with victims receiving calls warning of 'fraudulent activity on their Apple ID.' Again the financial ask is spurious, but works given the threat of fines or arrest. As the FBI says, no federal agent 'will ever call or email you to demand payment or threaten arrest.' If you ever receive any of these calls, hang up and do not engage. If you have any doubts, call local law enforcement and explain what has happened.
