logo
The life-or-death case for self-driving cars

The life-or-death case for self-driving cars

Vox04-05-2025
is an editorial director at Vox overseeing the climate, tech, and world teams, and is the editor of Vox's Future Perfect section. He worked at Time magazine for 15 years as a foreign correspondent in Asia, a climate writer, and an international editor, and he wrote a book on existential risk.
A white Waymo self-driving car with rooftop sensor equipment is stopped at an intersection in San Francisco's Financial District on March 18. Gado via Getty Images
I have some bad news: You are almost certainly a worse driver than you think you are.
Humans drive distracted. They drive drowsy. They drive angry. And, worst of all, they drive impaired far more often than they should. Even when we're firing on all cylinders, our Stone Age-adapted brains are often no match for the speed and complexity of high-speed driving. There's as much as a 2.5-second lag between what we perceive and how fast we can react in a vehicle traveling 60 mph, which means a car will travel the equivalent of two basketball court lengths before its driver can even hit the brake.
The result of this very human fallibility is blood on the streets. Nearly 1.2 million people die in road crashes globally each year, enough to fill nine jumbo jets each day. Here in the US, the government estimates there were 39,345 traffic fatalities in 2024, which adds up to a bus's worth of people perishing every 12 hours.
The good news is there are much, much better drivers coming online, and they have everything human drivers don't: They don't need sleep. They don't get angry. They don't get drunk. And their brains can handle high-speed decision-making with ease.
Because they're AI.
AI takes the wheel
The average American adult will spend around three years of their life driving. If robots could take the wheel instead, well, think of all the Netflix shows we could stream instead.
But the true benefit of a self-driving revolution will be in lives saved. And new data from the autonomous vehicle company Waymo suggests that those savings could be very great indeed.
In a peer-reviewed study that is set to be published in the journal Traffic Injury Prevention, Waymo analyzed the safety performance of its autonomous vehicles over the course of 56.7 million miles driven in Austin, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and San Francisco — all without a human safety driver present to take the wheel in an emergency. They then compared that data to human driving safety over the same number of miles driven on the same kind of roads.
The results of the study, almost certainly the biggest and most comprehensive research on self-driving car safety yet released, are striking.
A master class in driving safety
Compared to human drivers, the Waymo self-driving cars had:
81 percent fewer airbag-deploying crashes
85 percent fewer crashes with suspected serious or worse injuries
96 percent fewer injury crashes at intersections (primarily because Waymo detects red lights faster than humans)
92 percent fewer crashes that involve injuries to pedestrians.
Had the typical human-driven fleet of cars covered those same 56.7 million miles, the Waymo researchers project it would have resulted in an estimated 181 additional injury crashes, 78 additional air-bag crashes, and 11 extra serious-injury crashes.
But the numbers really get eye-popping when you extend this data across all 3.3 trillion vehicle miles driven by humans in the US in a typical year. Back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that if the same 85 percent reduction seen in serious crashes held true for fatal ones — a big if, to be clear, since the study had too few fatal events to measure — we'd save approximately 34,000 lives a year. That's five times the number of Americans who died in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined.
Don't get in the way of progress
Of course, there are plenty of caveats to the Waymo study and even more obstacles before we could ever achieve anything like what's outlined above.
In part because serious injury crashes are (thankfully) very rare, even 56.7 million miles isn't long enough for researchers to be really sure that such crashes would occur significantly less often with robot drivers, so more data will be needed there. Waymo's cars were also being driven largely in warm, sunny locations, operating in geofenced areas that had been heavily mapped by the company. It's far less certain how they might do in, let's say, the snowy streets of Boston in the winter.
This is also a company-run study, though it has been peer-reviewed by outside experts. And even if we decided to go all in on AI drivers, actually producing enough autonomous vehicles to begin to replace human-driven cars and trucks would be an enormous undertaking, to say the least.
Still, the data looks so good, and the death toll on our roads is so high that I'd argue slowing down autonomous vehicles is actually costing lives. And there's a risk that's precisely what will happen.
Too often the public focuses on unusual, outlier events with self-driving cars, while the carnage that occurs thanks to human drivers on a daily basis is simply treated as background noise. (That's an example of two common psychological biases: availability bias, which causes us to judge risk by outlier events that jump easily to mind, and base-rate neglect, where we ignore the underlying frequency of events.) This misapprehension is something I often see in news coverage and consumption, and it's one of the reasons I started Good News.
The result is that public opinion has been turning against self-driving cars in recent years, to the point where vandals have attacked autonomous vehicles on the street. And of course, given that nearly 5 million Americans make their living primarily through driving, any wide-scale movement to self-driving vehicles would bring significant economic disruption.
But still, 34,000 lives saved on an annual basis would represent tremendous progress. Maybe, after about 100 years of trying, it's time to give something else a chance behind the wheel.
A version of this story originally appeared in the Good News newsletter. Sign up here!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mistral in talks with VC firms, MGX to raise funds at $10 billion valuation, FT reports
Mistral in talks with VC firms, MGX to raise funds at $10 billion valuation, FT reports

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Mistral in talks with VC firms, MGX to raise funds at $10 billion valuation, FT reports

(Reuters) -French artificial intelligence startup Mistral is in talks with investors, venture capital firms and Abu Dhabi's MGX to raise $1 billion at a valuation of $10 billion, the Financial Times reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. The company launched in June Europe's first AI reasoning model, which uses logical thinking to create a response, as it tries to keep pace with American and Chinese rivals at the forefront of AI development. The funding would accelerate the commercial rollout of Mistral's Le Chat chatbot and support continued development of its large language models, the report said. MGX and Mistral did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. The startup raised 600 million euros in a Series B funding round that valued the company at 5.8 billion euros last year. Industry observers consider Mistral as Europe's best-positioned AI company to rival Silicon Valley leaders, though the French firm has yet to achieve comparable market traction or revenue scale. Mistral counts Nvidia, Andreessen Horowitz and Lightspeed Venture Partners among its investors. Sign in to access your portfolio

SuperMotocross, Monster Energy extend sponsorship through 2030, includes playoffs
SuperMotocross, Monster Energy extend sponsorship through 2030, includes playoffs

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

SuperMotocross, Monster Energy extend sponsorship through 2030, includes playoffs

Monster Energy has renewed its agreement with Feld Motor Sports' American Motorcycle Association (AMA) Supercross Championship for an additional five years, running through 2030. In addition, they will become the title sponsor of the entire SuperMotocross World Championship (SMX) series. According to Adam Stern, the deal is in the mid-eight-figure range in total revenue for the league during the contracted period. Beginning in 2007, Monster Energy and Supercross will have a 24-year history, making it one of the longest-running relationships in the energy drink brand's history, according to Mitch Covington, Senior Vice President of Sports Marketing at Monster Energy. The SMX League combines points from Supercross and the AMA Pro Motocross series, encompassing 28 regular-season rounds of competition. The three-round playoffs bring the total to 31 rounds. Negotiations for the extension were held between the two companies, with Feld Motor Sports VP/Global Partnerships Dave Muye leading the effort for the series. During the 2025 Supercross season, 828,796 spectators attended events, including more than 329,000 who participated in the popular pre-race FanFest activities, where companies like Monster Energy had the opportunity to engage directly with fans. Also in 2025, the Supercross series accounted for eight of the 10 most-streamed races ever on NBC Sports' streaming service, Peacock TV. More SuperMotocross News Roger De Coster retires as US MXoN managerKTM AG returns to full productionMotocross of Nations to return to U.S. in 2028, 2031Washougal 450 Results | 250 ResultsJo Shimoda earns second Motocross win of 2025 at WashougalChase Sexton beats Jett Lawrence at WashougalHaiden Deegan wins Washougal Moto 1 over Jo ShimodaChase Sexton wins Washougal Moto 1, Jett Lawrence thirdJason Anderson out for remainder of 2025 SMX season Loretta Lynn's News Lachlan Turner sweeps first two races in Women's division with Moto 2 winGordon ends Temmerman's streak with Open Pro Sport Moto 2 winThree for Temmerman, Enzo scores third win in 250 Pro Sport Moto 2Enzo Temmerman wins Open Pro Sport Moto 1 at Loretta'sWMX leader, Lachlan Turner, wins first Women's motoEnzo Temmerman Lorretta's 250 Pro Sports Moto 1Loretta's Lap-a-Thon Benefitting St. Jude returns for 2025

Half of Baby Boomers Spend More Than Three Hours on Their Phones Daily
Half of Baby Boomers Spend More Than Three Hours on Their Phones Daily

Newsweek

time5 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Half of Baby Boomers Spend More Than Three Hours on Their Phones Daily

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Half of baby boomers are spending more than three hours on their phones each day, according to a new survey from The older age cohort, which includes ages 61 to 79, showed signs of potential digital addiction despite stereotypes that phone and social media overuse mainly impacts younger age groups. Why It Matters The report from found that 50 percent of their mostly baby boomer sample reported spending more than three hours daily on their smartphones. Roughly 20 percent spent more than five hours per day. Adults are recommended to limit their recreational screen time to less than two hours per day, according to A report from found that 50 percent of their mostly baby boomer sample reported spending more than three hours daily on their smartphones. A report from found that 50 percent of their mostly baby boomer sample reported spending more than three hours daily on their To Know A 2024 study from Pew Research discovered that nearly half of American teens are online "almost constantly," but that behavior isn't limited to young Americans. While baby boomers grew up without cellphones and the internet, they have a high usage rate of cellular devices in their golden years. The survey was based on responses from 2,000 people ages 59 to 77, making the majority of respondents baby boomers. Of that group, 40 percent said they felt anxious or uncomfortable when they don't have access to their digital devices. And 50 percent said they check their phone within an hour of waking up every day. What People Are Saying HR consultant and generational expert Bryan Driscoll told Newsweek: "Boomers spend hours glued to their phones, but it's not connection—it's isolation. Many struggle to separate fact from fiction online, making them more vulnerable to misinformation and digital echo chambers. This isn't just about screen time, it's about a generation grappling with loneliness and a shifting sense of what's real." Ruth Hernandez, a mental health counselor at told Newsweek: "Honestly, it's not that surprising anymore to see baby boomers spending hours on their phones. Many of them use smartphones for everything these days, such as texting with family, managing their health apps, reading the news, staying in touch on social media, and even streaming shows or watching videos. It's become part of their daily routine, just like it is for younger folks." What Happens Next The findings of the survey indicate that digital addiction is not a problem exclusive to younger generations, Hernandez said. "This really pushes back on the old stereotype that older people aren't tech-savvy or don't care about digital life," she said. "The truth is, boomers have adapted, many of them pretty quickly, and in some cases, they're just as glued to their screens as the rest of us. "At the end of the day, it shows that digital habits aren't tied to age anymore. They've become part of how we all live, work and connect. Whether you're 25 or 75, the pull of your phone is real."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store