.png%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
British spies and special forces soldiers had data leaked in Afghan breach
The breach, made by a Ministry of Defence official in February 2022, exposed the details of Afghans seeking an escape to the UK because of claimed links to British forces.
The huge blunder saw 16,000 Afghans affected by the data breach evacuated to Britain, with some 8,000 still to come, and prompted an unprecedented two-year-long superinjunction preventing the publication of any details.
More than 100 names of British government personnel were also exposed by the leak. Defence sources say that these included MI6 spies, members of the SAS, MPs, government ministers, and other senior military figures.
Defence secretary John Healey told MPs on Tuesday that 'in a small number of cases, the names of Members of Parliament, senior military officers and government officials were noted as supporting the application'.
In a public court hearing in front of a High Court judge on Thursday, Jude Bunting KC said 'it was a matter of surprise to the [media] defendants that the secretary of state was able to report those details we weren't'.
He added: 'We can now report those details.'
Cathryn McGahey KC, for the government, said that the defence secretary was giving 'urgent consideration' to the wording of an ongoing gagging order on the press, which remains in place.
The further revelations come after the Intelligence and Security Committee, an influential group of MPs, demanded answers about why they were not briefed about the Afghan data leak.
Lord Beamish PC, chairman of the committee, said that MPs wanted to be provided with the intelligence assessments on which the superinjunction rested for so long. He wanted these to be sent 'immediately' to the committee.
And in a statement in response to the Afghan data breach, former armed forces James Heappey said that it was 'gut-wrenching to find out that someone in the MoD had screwed up so awfully', but said the individual was 'incredibly dedicated to those we served with in Afghanistan'.
He also said that the department's decision-making on sanctuary applications from former Afghan special forces, known as the Triples, was 'flawed'. He said he 'pushed and pushed with the MoD for clarification in response to what was said in the press, parliament and by campaigners'.
'I said in public what very senior officials and the military had briefed me. It was hugely frustrating that proved to be wrong,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Farage repeats ‘no idea' six times over Reform mayor's 600% allowance hike
Nigel Farage has responded that he has 'no idea' six times in an interview with the BBC 's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg. The Reform UK leader was asked about Scarborough Town Council increasing its mayor's allowance by 600 per cent, despite his party promising to cut costs for taxpayers. Asked about the rise, from £500 to £3,500, Mr Farage said: 'I have no idea… whether what you say is true or not, I have no idea.' Asked whether it is the right thing to do, Mr Farage again said he has 'no idea', before saying he has 'no idea' whether Thomas Murray, Reform's mayor of Scarborough Town Council, does the role as a full-time job. He went on to say he has 'no idea' how much humans have contributed towards climate change.
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Minister pressures water boss to refuse rise doubling salary to £1.4m amid furious row over exec pay and sewage leaks - but rules out nationalisation
Southern Water's chief executive should refuse a pay rise that almost doubled his income to £1.4million, the Environment Secretary has said. Steve Reed told the BBC 's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg that Lawrence Gosden's £691,000 salary increase was 'outrageous' and implored the company to 'think about how this looks to their customers'. It comes amid a furious row over the pay and bonuses enjoyed by executives at water utilities which oversaw huge spikes in sewage leaks last year. The number of serious pollution incidents caused by water firms rose by 60 per cent in just 12 months, the Environment Agency revealed on Friday. Asked whether Mr Gosden should turn down the pay rise, Mr Reed said: 'I think it would be right if he did .. I don't think Southern Water has performed well enough for that kind of pay increase to be merited.' He added: 'Trust between the customers and the water companies is at the lowest point probably ever, and by paying their senior executives rises of that kind, what message are they sending to their customers? 'I really would urge them to think about this very, very, very carefully.' The Government is bracing for the release of a landmark review into the water industry, which could reportedly lead to the abolition of embattled water regulator Ofwat. The Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, will outline recommendations to turn around the floundering sector in its final report on Monday. The review was commissioned by the UK and Welsh governments as part of their response to systemic industry failures, which include rising bills, record sewage spills and debt-ridden company finances, although ministers have ruled out nationalising companies. The Government will respond to the recommendations in Parliament later on Monday. The review reportedly includes proposals to establish a new system of regulation, which is currently split between Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate. Ministers will announce a consultation that could lead to axing Ofwat, which oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, according to the Guardian. Ofwat has faced intense criticism for overseeing water companies during the years that they paid shareholders and accrued large debts while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed. In an interview with the Sunday Times, Environment Secretary Steve Reed suggested he was in favour of a new model where regional boards managed water in their areas, including representatives from water companies, local authorities and other organisations. He said: 'I think the catchment-based model has a lot to commend it. Because if you can manage what's going into the water better, you can clean up the water faster.' But speaking to the BBC he again ruled out the possibility of nationalising the water industry, saying it would cost too much and take years during which pollution would get worse. The Environment Secretary told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: 'Nationalisation would cost upwards of £100 billion that we'd have to take away from the National Health Service and schools to give to the owners of the companies that are polluted.' He added: 'If we try to unpick the current model of ownership, it would take years, and during that period, pollution would get worse because the companies wouldn't invest knowing that they were going to be nationalised. The EA report found there were 2,801 sewage leaks last year, up from 2,174 in 2023. Just three firms were behind 81 per cent of the most serious - Thames, Southern and Yorkshire. The agency revealed consistently poor performance from all nine water and sewerage firms in the country despite its expectations for pollution incidents to decrease. Meanwhile, just two companies – Northumbrian Water and Wessex Water – had no serious incidents last year, meeting the Environment Agency's expectations to see a trend to zero serious pollution incidents by 2025. It also follows a report released by the Public Accounts Committee earlier on Friday, in which the cross-bench group of MPs called the level of pollution 'woeful' and recommended an overhaul of the regulation system. Under the Water (Special Measures) Act introduced by the Government last year, the watchdog will have greater powers to take swift action against polluting companies. To boost funding for water regulation, the Environment Agency is also consulting on a new levy on the water sector to recover the cost of enforcement activities, while the Environment Department (Defra) last week confirmed a 64 per cent increase in its funding from 2023/24. A Water UK spokesperson said: 'While there have been some improvements, it is clear that the performance of some companies is not good enough. 'This is finally being put right, with a record £104 billion investment over the next five years to secure our water supplies, support economic growth and end sewage entering our rivers and seas. 'However, fundamental change to regulation is also needed. We hope that the recommendations of the Independent Water Commission next week will ensure the sector continues to get the investment it needs to drive down pollution incidents.'
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Sheffield Council offers apology to more tree campaigners
Sheffield City Council has accepted an independent review's recommendation for a full apology for its "heavy-handed" legal threats against four tree 2017, several protestors were threatened with injunctions which would have stopped them from disrupting the council's controversial tree-felling programme, or encouraging others to do council issued a full apology for its failings over the scandal after an independent review in 2023, but the complaints of the four campaigners were not considered in that said it accepted the recommendations of the latest investigation "in full" and had issued apologies. The review said the council issued legal letters to some Sheffield residents setting out their intention to obtain injunctions preventing them from continuing to protest against its £2.2bn street improvement who received the letters were given the opportunity to agree to stop campaigning in terms set out by the authority as an alternative to not proceeding to court."In broad terms, it meant the complainants would not have to risk the granting of an injunction and the costs consequences for them personally of proceeding to a contested hearing in the High Court," the report new information about the scandal came to light in 2020 and 2021, the individuals made several complaints about the council's "intimidating" legal threats, which they said went "further than was reasonably necessary". 'Bunker mentality' Several complaints were upheld following the independent investigation by legal firm VWV that concluded in February, with its findings published ahead of a meeting on report described the legal basis against the complainants as "sound", but concluded the authority's action "was a result of the bunker mentality at the council at the time and the desire to 'get the job done'."It also labelled the authority's approach as "heavy-handed".It said the impact on the complainants "cannot be underestimated" and criticised the delay."The handling of the complaints means there are four residents who have been let down," the report added."It will not be enough to simply apologise again."The council admitted the process had "taken longer than necessary, and an external investigator should have been commissioned earlier".As well as calling for "full and complete apologies", the report's other recommendations related to governance, how the council's legal team works, and the authority's have advised councillors to accept its findings in full and endorse an action plan when they meet on Monday.A previous independent review of the council's behaviour during dispute, known as the the Lowcock Inquiry, said there had been a "failure of strategic leadership".In response, the authority acknowledged its "poor" behaviour towards campaigners and residents and issued personal apologies to some individuals. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
