Starmer to meet Trump to discuss Gaza and trade, as minister suggests UK could recognise Palestinian state
Date: 2025-07-28T08:30:52.000Z
Title: Starmer to meet Trump to discuss Gaza and trade, as minister suggests UK could recognise Palestinian state by next election
Content: Good morning. Keir Starmer has a lead role in the Trump show today. He is flying to Scotland for a meeting with the US president, who is combining a golfing holiday with meetings with leaders like Starmer, Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, and John Swinney, Scotland's first minister.
The von der Leyen talks culminated in the announcement of what Trump described as a 'powerful' trade deal (albeit one that only means the Trump tariffs won't damage US-EU trade as much as they otherwise might have done; it is not an improvement on the status quo ante.)
Starmer is set to spend a lot of time with Trump today. He is arriving before lunch, and he is not flying back to London until this evening, after what No 10 describes as a 'private engagement' (dinner?) at Trump's golf course in Aberdeenshire. There is a bilateral meeting schedule, but Trump does not like long meetings and Downing Street has not said much about what else the two men will be doing. Starmer has reportedly been working how to respond if Trump invites him to play a round of golf. According to my colleague Eleni Courea, who is Scotland covering the trip, that is one humiliation that Trump won't be inflicting on the PM, who is a good footballer but a total novice at Trump's favourite sport. But Starmer will also be flying to Aberdeen with the president on Air Force One, we expect. In White House terms, that is a token of respect.
Normally when political leaders meet, they speak to the press afterwards, to brief on what they have agreed. Today Trump and Starmer will hold their main event with reporters before their talks and so we are not expecting them to announce anything of substance at this point. Instead, we may just end up with Trump giving us one of his stream-of-consciousness peformance. While he has been in Scotland, these have include rants about European immigration ('you got to stop this horrible invasion that's happening to Europe – immigration is killing Europe') and wind turbines ('when they start to rust and rot in eight years you can't really turn them off, you can't burn them – the whole thing is a con job'.
At one point it was expected that Trump and Starmer would use the meeting today to tie up loose ends in the US-UK trade deal, particularly relating to steel tariffs. But Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, has been giving interviews this morning and he told the Today programme he 'wouldn't expect announcements from this visit' on trade.
Instead, the situation in Gaza may be the focus of the Trump/Starmer talks and, as Pippa Crerar reports, Starmer will urge Trump to use his influence with Israel to get Benjamin Netanyahu to resume peace talks with Hamas.
This is a difficult subject for Starmer because the PM is coming under increasing pressure from members of his own cabinet to recognise the state of Palestine. Doing this would anger Trump, who takes the Israeli view that this would amount to rewarding Hamas for the 7 October attack. And it would not have any immediate practical impact on the situation in Gaza. But Labour MPs are increasingly coming round to the view that, as Wes Streeting, the health secretary put it, it is best to recognise the state of Palestine 'while there is a state of Palestine left to recognise'. As Mark Malloch Brown, a former UN deputy secretary-general and a minister in Gordon Brown's government, told the Observer yesterday, recognition would also send a message to Israel that 'you can't bomb your way out of the reality that you're going to have to negotiate with the Palestinians.'
In interviews this morning Reynolds said that the UK was committed to recognising the state of Palestine; it was just a matter of timing, he said.
He told ITV's Good Morning Britain:
It is a case of when, not if.
It's about how we use this moment, because you can only do it once to have a meaningful breakthrough.
And on Sky News he went further, implying he expects recognition to happen during this parliament.
In this parliament, yes. I mean, if it delivers the breakthrough that we need.
But don't forget, we can only do this once. If we do it in a way which is tokenistic, doesn't produce the end to this conflict, where do we go to next?
Here is the agenda for the day.
Morning: Rachel Reeves, chancellor, is on a visit in Bournemouth.
11am: Nigel Farage, Reform UK leader, holds a press conference with 'a special guest'. According to the Daily Mail, he is Colin Sutton, a former detective chief inspector, who is joining the party as a crime adviser.
11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.
Around noon: Keir Starmer is due to arrive at President Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire, Scotland, where the two leaders are due to speak to the media at around 12.30pm. They will hold a formal meeting in the afternoon before flying to Aberdeen, where Trump owns another golf course and where they are expected to have a private dinner.
Around lunchtime: Kemi Badenoch is expected to record a media clip.
Afternoon: The Stop Trump Coalition holds a protest outside Trump's Aberdeenshire golf course.
Late afternoon: Angela Rayner, deputy PM, hosts a reception for the Lionesses following victory in the Women's Euro 2025.
Also, David Lammy, foreign secretary, is in New York for a meeting on a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
The one thing Donald Trump isn't saying about tariffs
Donald Trump's words and actions rarely align perfectly. If you watch carefully, what he doesn't say can be just as telling as what he does. 'Starting on day one, we will end inflation and make America affordable again, to bring down the prices of all goods,' he told the nation ahead of his re-election. The US president declared on 2 April would 'forever be remembered as the day American industry was reborn', only to pause tariffs a week later. He promised peace in Ukraine on day one of his presidency, only to later clarify this was 'said in jest'; and has claimed very few people can beat him at golf, only for footage from Scotland to raise questions over just how honest that round might be. As a real estate mogul, reality TV star and political campaigner, Trump learned to bend narrative to his will, even if it meant straying from reality. As president, this often leaves a gap between what he says and what he does. In many cases, the administration's actions are more important to follow than the firehose of words. If you were, say, a US business buying coffee from Brazil, you might have rushed to import it last week after Trump insisted 1 August was the cast-iron deadline for new tariffs. 'It stands strong, and will not be extended,' he wrote on Wednesday – hours before signing an executive order that said new steep tariffs on the country would come into force on 8 August, after all. And if you're a US consumer, you might reasonably ask how inflation can be 'dead', as the White House has claimed, if you're still shelling out more on groceries each month. The president has an awful lot to say about tariffs. They will, he argues, raise 'trillions' of dollars for the US federal government; eliminate trade deficits with other countries; and even punish Brazil for putting his ally, the former president Jair Bolsonaro, on trial for allegedly seeking to seize power after losing the 2022 presidential election. The list goes on. But what about what the president doesn't say? Trump was re-elected last November after repeatedly pledging to rapidly bring down prices for Americans. This assurance formed a central pillar of his election campaign – a regular refrain in rallies, interviews and debates – as millions found it harder to make ends meet after years of inflation. Every policy comes at a cost. Every tax must be paid by someone, somewhere. For consumers, The Budget Lab at Yale estimates the short-term price impact of Trump's tariff changes is equivalent to an average per household income loss of $2,400. What Trump doesn't really talk about the impact of his aggressive tariff agenda on US is prices. One of the few times he has acknowledged it might actually exacerbate inflation led to a bizarre tangent about dolls back in May. Acknowledging that tariffs might cause price rises, Trump suggested American children might have to settle for having 'two dolls instead of 30 dolls'. Back then, Joe Biden was still to blame for any signs of strife in the economy, according to Trump. Now, he argues almost daily Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell is responsible. The biggest indication yet that the US economy is creaking on Trump's watch came on Friday, when official data revealed the labor market had stalled this summer. He unceremoniously fired the veteran official in charge of the statistics – and alleged, without evidence, that the numbers had been rigged. With higher US tariffs now in place on a string of countries, the president and his administration will inevitably say a lot about the benefits of his economic strategy. They are already trying to stifle evidence of drawbacks. They might even raise the prospect of a handout – pitched as a sign of this policy's success, rather than a concession that many Americans are still hard up. But if you're running a small business reliant on trade, or walking into the grocery store on a budget, reality supersedes rhetoric. Words don't pay the bills.
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
BP increases staff cuts to 6,200 and signals further possible reductions
BP has revealed an extra 1,500 jobs and 1,200 contractor roles are being axed across its global workforce by the end of the year and signalled possible further cuts as it ramps up cost savings. The oil giant said it now expects 6,200 jobs to go – about 15% of its office-based workforce – which is higher than the 4,700 cuts announced at the start of the year. BP also said it had already slashed 3,200 contractor roles since January, with another 1,200 to go by the end of 2025. The group raised the possibility of further cuts as bosses unveiled plans to look for more cost savings and conduct a 'thorough' review of its portfolio as it comes under pressure from shareholders. Its 100,000-strong worldwide workforce will be reviewed further as part of the new push, it confirmed. BP did not give a country breakdown of the extra job cuts this year, but said they will go across its UK and overseas sites. The firm employed about 14,000 UK workers at the start of 2025. It comes as chief executive Murray Auchincloss pledged the FTSE 100 firm would do 'better for its investors' and said there was 'much more to do' under its current three-year plan. BP has been under pressure from shareholders to boost profits and cut costs, with activist investor Elliott Management recently taking a 5% stake in the group. The group saw half-year profits tumble by nearly a third as weaker oil prices weighed on earnings, although it posted a better-than-expected performance for the second quarter. It reported a 32% fall in underlying replacement cost profits – the group's preferred profit measure – to 3.73 billion US dollars (£2.81 billion) for the six months to June 30. Underlying profits fell 15% year-on-year to 2.35 billion dollars (£1.77 billion) between April and June, although this was a significant improvement from 1.38 billion dollars (£1.04 billion) in the first quarter and better than most analysts had forecast.
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ryanair sets monthly passenger record despite air traffic control strikes
Airline Ryanair said it carried a record high number of passenger last month despite French air traffic control (ATC) strikes. The Dublin-based carrier announced 20.7 million passengers travelled on its flights in July. That is up 3% from 20.2 million during the same month last year. Its load factor – which represents the average proportion of seat filled on its aircraft – was stable at 96%. Ryanair said it operated more than 113,000 flights in July and cancelled 680, mainly because of French controller strikes. French ATC staff took industrial action on July 3 and 4 in a dispute over working conditions. As well as disrupting flights to and from French airports, the walkouts affected flights scheduled to travel over French airspace. This meant many services to or from UK airports were delayed or cancelled. EasyJet chief executive Kenton Jarvis previously described the French strikes as 'very, very disruptive' as they forced the airline to cancel 660 flights and cost it £15 million. Around 70% of easyJet's flights either fly to or from a French airport, or over the country's airspace. European air traffic management body Eurocontrol estimated the strikes affected more than one million passengers. Meanwhile, a radar fault suffered by UK ATC provider Nats led to more than 100 UK flights being cancelled on July 30.
