logo
Minister confirms review of home loan scheme as Kildare house prices exceed borrowing limits

Minister confirms review of home loan scheme as Kildare house prices exceed borrowing limits

Irish Examiner30-05-2025
Housing minister James Browne has confirmed a review has taken place into a council-led loan scheme after affordable houses in Kildare were found to be above the borrowing threshold.
The review comes after reports of affordable homes in Kildare being ineligible for the Local Authority Home Loan scheme, as the cost of the houses is above the threshold at which people can borrow.
'I have asked for a review to be carried out around the home loan scheme to make sure it matches across the country in terms of those limits,' Mr Browne said.
'Those proposals are with me now, they actually already arrived yesterday. I'll be making a decision on those very rapidly.' The eight affordable homes in question, at Lattin Place in Naas, first went on sale earlier this week.
Three types of houses are available, with a two-bed mid-terrace starting at €295,000, a three-bed mid-terrace starting at €365,000, and a three-bed end-terrace starting at €370,000.
However, in Kildare, the maximum property value to allow someone to access the Local Authority Home Loan is €360,000.
Mr Browne said he wanted to see the limits increased 'where they need to be increased' to remove any disparity around the Local Authority Home Loan scheme.
Housing minister James Browne has confirmed a review has taken place into a council-led loan scheme. Picture: Sam Boal/Collins Photos
He admitted that the scheme was not aligned in Kildare, but he was not aware of any other specific situations where the threshold did not align with the cost of an affordable home.
'I want to try and get them aligned so that we don't have this type of disparity because I know it causes stress for families… I don't want that situation happening,' Mr Browne said, following reports in the Irish Times.
'The Government is spending record funding on delivering housing, on supporting people to get those homes. So that misalignment, I certaintly want to see an end and intend to bring an end to that.'
Meanwhile, Mr Browne has said the secretary-general at the department of housing, Graham Doyle, is 'fully supportive' of the creation of the Housing Activation Office.
It followed comments from Mr Doyle on Thursday, where he said there was no need for a 'housing tsar'. The term has become widely associated with whoever is due to lead the new Housing Activation Office.
However, Mr Browne said Mr Doyle had only gotten into a 'semantics debate' about the description of the job and 'what it should be called'.
'He's fully supportive of it. I've spoken with him since and his support is very much there,' Mr Browne said.
'It is the Government that makes the decisions and the Government will be driving on with really key decisions. The Housing Activation Office is one of those.'
Read More
Taoiseach and President warn Ireland is target of Israeli propaganda over Gaza stance
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Twelve times more properties available for short-term lets than for renters, new figures show
Twelve times more properties available for short-term lets than for renters, new figures show

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

Twelve times more properties available for short-term lets than for renters, new figures show

There are 12 times more 'entire' properties available for rent on short-term letting platforms than there are available for long-term living, new figures show. Nearly 22,000 properties advertised on short-term letting websites are offering tourists, holidaymakers, and those heading to concerts and events the opportunity to rent 'entire' houses or properties. This compares to just 1,800 properties or fewer that were available for hard-pressed renters countrywide on Tourism Minister Peter Burke confirmed 34,000 short-term lets were advertised across four platforms in May — up from 33,000 in April. He said 'approximately 64% of these properties are advertised as 'entire' houses and apartments' — about 21,760 properties. In Dublin, some 3,850 (55%) of 7,010 properties available for short-term let offered the entire property. In response to a parliamentary question from Social Democrats housing spokesperson Rory Hearne, Mr Burke said as there was no register, there was 'no way of knowing whether these are people's principal private residences or otherwise'. He also noted there was an annual 10% increase in the short-term letting sector. The number of properties available for renters across the country on has differed over the last week. On Wednesday, there were 1,800 properties countrywide. This dropped to 1,688 properties on Thursday. By Friday, this had fallen further to 1,669, and decreased further to 1,633 on Monday. There were 868 properties for rent on Daft in Dublin on Friday. This fell to 838 on Monday. In May, the same month as the short-term letting data was captured, there were 15,747 people classified as homeless. This included 4,844 children. There were 2,273 families in emergency accommodation. The latest homelessness figures for June rose to 15,915, including 4,958 children and 2,230 families. Mr Hearne told the Irish Examiner the number of properties available shows the 'real negative impact of short-term lets on the housing disaster'. 'There are twice as many entire properties being let as short-term lets (21,760) as the number of households who are homeless (2,320 families and 7,060 individuals),' he said. That we could house everyone in homelessness twice over in the number of full homes being let short-term is a shocking indictment of the Government's housing failures. 'The increasing impact of short-term lets is a result of a rampant lack of regulation and enforcement, resulting from a policy failure on the part of the Government. 'These houses did not just spring up on the market like mushrooms. They were allowed to by policy and a lack of enforcement.' A short-term let is when a property is rented out for periods not exceeding 15 days. Currently, people must apply for planning permission to rent out their principal private residence for less than 14 days at a time. This is not required if the owner rents out the property for fewer than 90 days a year. If the property is not their principal private residence, the 90-day exemption does not apply, and planning permission is needed for the property to become a short-term let. In April, Mr Burke secured Cabinet approval to progress the general scheme of the new Short-Term Letting and Tourism Bill. However, it will not go through the full legislative process in the Oireachtas until later this year. The proposed legislation will introduce a register for all short-term lets from May 2026, with Fáilte Ireland put in charge of implementing and managing the register. Hosts offering accommodation for periods up to 21 nights will be obliged to register and hold a valid registration number. This must be displayed when advertising their property. The legislation will restrict short-term lets in towns with populations of more than 10,000 people. However, people in these towns will still be allowed to rent out their primary residences for up to 90 days. The bill will also introduce sanctions for hosts who do not have a registration number. An administrative financial sanction procedure will also be introduced for platforms that do not comply with their obligations.

Nature is worryingly absent from the National Development Plan review
Nature is worryingly absent from the National Development Plan review

Irish Examiner

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Nature is worryingly absent from the National Development Plan review

Albert Einstein once said, look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. But even somebody with the cerebral capacity of Einstein would struggle to understand and get their head around the latest National Development Plan. This is a plan which purports to chart the progress of the country over the coming years, but which bizarrely fails to allocate any finance to nature in the middle of, what our current Taoiseach had referred to as, a biodiversity crisis. Low on detail, high on promises was how the Irish Examiner's Mick Clifford Podcast accurately described the NDP. Unfortunately when it comes to nature, it was worse – no detail and not even a promise. The gutting of nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund (ICNF) to finance transport, energy and water infrastructure projects in the National Development Plan is very alarming, deeply disappointing and flies in the face of the Government's previous guarantees on nature restoration. The decision is even more concerning given that the Programme for Government committed that the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund will 'ensure ongoing protection for our environment for future generations', while also committing to the development of Ireland's Nature Restoration Plan which requires ambitious nature restoration at land and at sea under the EU's flagship Nature Restoration Law. However, the National Development Plan announced by the Government this week has allocated nothing to nature, instead taking €3.15 billion from the Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund for transport, energy and water infrastructure. It appears that the Government is saying one thing but doing the opposite on nature restoration. It has decided to gut Nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund, instead using the budget to fund investment in transport, energy and water infrastructure. The Environmental Pillar has repeatedly criticised the absence of ringfencing for nature within the ICN fund, criticism that has been fully vindicated this week by the Government's shortsightedness. There is now a genuine concern that nature restoration funding is losing out to infrastructure projects that prioritise economic growth over measures to address the biodiversity emergency. It seems like a cynical sleight of hand to use ICN funding for a project that has been talked about for decades in various different forms and which pre-dates the fund. The Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund's purpose is to support State expenditure: where there is a significant deterioration in the economic or fiscal position of the State, and in the years 2026 to 2030, on designated environmental projects. But, while everyone acknowledges that we are living in uncertain times economically, the Government is not proposing to invoke the 'economic deterioration' provision, designed 'to provide for countercyclical capital expenditure in the event of an economic or fiscal downturn' (NTMA), so all the allocated spending for 2026 to 2030 must therefore be for 'designated environmental projects'. Under Section 20 of the Future Ireland Fund and Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund Act 2024, such projects must contribute to the achievement of various national and EU environmental regulations such as on water quality, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, the Birds and Habitats Directives, the National Biodiversity Action Plan and the Wildlife Act. However, the proposed allocation of the €3.15 billion that can be spent before 2030, laid out by Government in the NDP, contains no allocation for nature and looks much more like what the fund would be spent on if the 'economic deterioration' condition was being invoked to ensure 'countercyclical capital expenditure' in infrastructure. This is not an argument against funding for Metrolink. Ireland needs greater investment in public transport – whether it is Metrolink in Dublin, light rail in other major cities, expanded bus routes and active transport infrastructure. But in this case, there is over €100 billion of other money allocated to infrastructure by 2030 under the NDP so that provision clearly does not apply. This is not to mention the billions of euros in Apple back-taxes which Jack Chambers in a budget statement last October said provided the country with one-off revenue that has the capacity to be transformational and address the known challenges that we face in housing, energy, water and transport infrastructure. An artist's impression of the MetroLink rail project's Tara Street entrance. The Government has decided to gut Nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund, instead using the budget to fund investment in transport, energy and water infrastructure. File picture And then, there's the €305 million from the sale of the final AIB shares. It is all the more disappointing therefore that the dedicated Climate and Nature Fund is being diverted from its nature focus to further boost infrastructure spending which is not short of other funding. The lack of any funding for nature in the financial allocations for the NDP is even more shocking and worrying given that the State is currently engaging in an extensive consultation process involving farmers, fishers and environmentalists to inform the development of a national Nature Restoration Plan. The financing of that plan remains a key concern for all stakeholders. Ireland's Nature Restoration Plan has to be underpinned by significant investment. The Government has repeatedly told farmers that any nature restoration under the Nature Restoration Law would be funded and voluntary and that the main burden of restoration would take place on public lands. They have clearly been misleading farmers and Irish society as there is no indication that the Government intends to allocate new and additional funding towards nature restoration. And there is no sign that the Government is willing to take the kind of action that is needed to utilise Coillte and Bord Na Mona lands to the extent that is needed to achieve Ireland's legally binding targets. The Environmental Pillar is calling for the ringfencing of a substantial proportion of the Climate and Nature Fund for spending on nature. And we are in the fortunate position of knowing how much and where to invest that money. Unlike the vague and abstract NDP, a detailed financial needs assessment for biodiversity is available. Ireland needs greater investment in public transport – whether it is Metrolink in Dublin, light rail in other major cities, expanded bus routes and active transport infrastructure. File photo: Sasko Lazarov / The National Parks and Wildlife Service tasked UCD with carrying out a Biodiversity Financial Needs Assessment on how much would be required to reach the targets of the 4th National Biodiversity Action Plan 2023-2030 and international obligations including the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030. This was delivered in 2021 and updated in 2023 to take account of the draft Nature Restoration Law. The study estimated the expenditure required for nature restoration in Ireland at €463.5m per annum, according to the report Funding Ireland's Biodiversity: A Financial Needs Assessment for Biodiversity in Ireland. And last year, Natural Capital Ireland was commissioned by the Irish Environmental Network to deliver a report on high-level recommendations for funding nature restoration in Ireland. This project brought together a diverse group of subject matter experts from academia, business, environmental NGOs, farming, government departments, and semi-state bodies to workshop high-level recommendations for funding nature restoration. These would be good places for the Government to start if it's serious about nature restoration. Nature is conspicuous by its absence in the National Development Plan. Given that we are at a crucial time in relation to the biodiversity crisis in Ireland, it is inexcusable that no funding was earmarked for nature restoration. Biodiversity supports and underpins our society, whether it is food production or clean air or a stable climate. It is imperative that nature is adequately funded. Ciarán Brennan is communications officer at the Irish Environmental Network

Irish Examiner view: Two-state option is the viable solution for Israel and Palestine
Irish Examiner view: Two-state option is the viable solution for Israel and Palestine

Irish Examiner

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Irish Examiner view: Two-state option is the viable solution for Israel and Palestine

A two-state solution in the Holy Land, whereby a Palestinian nation will be established and allowed co-exist alongside Israel, is once more becoming obvious as the only genuine answer to solving the seemingly endless warfare in the region. The merciless horror that has been visited upon the Palestinian people over the last two years by Israel requires a solution and there is an increasing realisation that the battle lines between moderate and extremist visions for the future of Gaza and the West Bank are becoming clearer. On one hand, you have the views of such as Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his voluble far-right minister for finance, Bezalel Smotrich, backed by the benign inaction of the White House in Washington, trying to bury — literally — the two-state vision. On the other, there are those increasingly nauseated by what the Israeli government is doing, who have finally realised that that goal — of two countries living alongside each other harmoniously — will be dug into Palestinian soil unless they act now. The French and British have indicated their willingness to finally recognise Palestinian statehood, but only because the increasingly genocidal administration in Tel Aviv is demonstrating little enthusiasm for any potential settlement. Certainly, we are going to have to see, amongst other things, a reformed Palestinian Authority come into being if the Israeli government is to stop waging war in Gaza and make the two-state solution workable, but such an outcome is far from being beyond the realms of possibility. Hamas is not helping its cause, or that of the people it claims to represent, by screening images of skeletal hostages. Indeed, it is only buttressing hardline Israeli views. All concerned have to come to the realisation that the two-state option is the only realistic and workable solution and the sooner the increasingly entrenched radical views on either side come to this conclusion, the sooner the bloodshed will stop. Trump silencing critics Not alone has Donald Trump changed the face of global trade with his scattergun tariffs, but he and his administration are engaged in a witchhunt — a favourite word of the US president — against a wide array of American media outlets and outspoken academics, which is threatening the very fabric of democracy there. Trump has effectively silenced much of the media criticism against him personally, and his wider regime, because corporate owners fear his wrath. CBS — along with parent company Paramount — effectively fired the hugely popular late-night show host Stephen Colbert in order to secure administration approval of the sale of Paramount to Skydance. Similarly, Amazon billionaire and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos silenced any criticism of the Trump regime on the editorial pages of his newspaper, because he fears the wrath of Trump will impact on his businesses' profitability. So too American universities — for eons bastions of democracy and free speech — have had to crawl cap in hand to the White House to get funding restored after incurring that wrath because high-profile staffers have criticised his illegal, unconstitutional actions. This silencing of media and universities willing to criticise the notoriously thin-skinned Trump is happening across America. However, the shame is on those media outlets and educationalists that have allowed it. Bezos proudly amplified the Washington Post's 'Democracy Dies In Darkness' tagline when he bought the newspaper. Yet he has himself allowed a darkness to descend on one of America's most valued independent media resources. The silencing of those who have helped America to understand just how alarming this regime has become is a terrible indictment for a country that prides itself on being the leading player in a 'Free World'. What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Sprat ban overdue The Government's proposed ban on the inshore fishing of sprat by large trawlers is not before time. In fact, the move might have come a little too late, as overfishing of the species has already had a dramatic effect on the wellbeing of our native maritime wildlife, from sharks, dolphins, and whales, to sea birds such as puffins and kittiwakes. As a result of large-scale fishing, sprat numbers have seen a huge decline, and thus reduced the food supply to a wide variety of native species. The plan to stop trawlers over 18m in size from fishing within six nautical miles of our coastline can only boost sprat numbers, thus improving prospects for other maritime creatures. Sadly, however, the new restrictions will run only from October 1 until September 30, 2026. And while it may be that the authorities here are only trialling this inshore fishing ban and planning for more focused action in the future, it seems Government action may have come too late. For too many years now, the native Irish fishing industry has been treated as the poor relation to the agriculture sector when it comes to doling out necessary financial supports. This has meant that we have allowed our rich maritime resources to be plundered by other nations who care less about the wellbeing of Irish aquatic wildlife. Their fishing fleets, invariably better resourced and equipped than ours, do not discriminate in what they catch and therefore species which they have little use for, are arbitrarily and routinely over-fished. Hopefully, this limited ban will have an immediate effect in conserving a fish vital to our rich and abundant animal kingdom. It seems almost certain, however, this is a subject that will have to be revisited. Read More Irish Examiner view: Cork Crime series prompts us to seek out the roots of criminality

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store