Images of deadly beef Wellington revealed
"Guilty," the jury's foreperson repeated four times to each count: first to Ian Wilkinson's attempted murder, then his wife Heather's murder, followed by the murders of Gail and Don Patterson.
After a trial that gripped the world and spanned almost three months, the 50-year-old mother - who served death cap mushroom-laced beef Wellington parcels to her estranged in-laws - is now a convicted killer.
Within hours of the verdict, the Supreme Court released dozens of pieces of evidence that helped prosecutors secure the conviction.
This included photos showing remnants of beef Wellington leftovers as they were tested by toxicologists, after police found them inside a bin at Patterson's home
A video of Erin Patterson discharging herself from Leongatha Hospital, minutes after she had arrived, was also released and showed her speaking to hospital staff at the entrance.
Images of Patterson at Leongatha Hospital, after she took herself there, revealed a pink phone police say they never recovered.
Prosecutors said this was Patterson's primary phone in 2023 and claimed she had used it to find death cap mushrooms online.
Photos of yellow mushrooms on scales were released, along with footage of Patterson getting rid of a food dehydrator at Koonwarra tip.
The Sunbeam dehydrator, which she bought three months before the lunch, was found to contain death cap mushroom toxins.
The jury's guilty verdicts came seven days after they had been sent away to deliberate and 11 weeks into the trial in Morwell, regional Victoria.
Patterson faces a sentence of life in prison for the three murders and one attempted murder.
The families of the murder victims, who died in hospital days after eating lunch at Patterson's Leongatha home on July 29, 2023, were absent for the verdicts, as was sole lunch survivor Ian Wilkinson.
Homicide Squad Detective Dean Thomas said the families had asked for privacy.
"It's very important that we remember ... that three people have died and we've had a person that nearly died and was seriously injured as a result and that has led to these charges," he said outside court.
"I ask that we acknowledge those people and not forget them."
Patterson's supporter Ali Rose Prior said she was "saddened" by the verdicts.
"I didn't have any expectations, it's the justice system and it has to be what it is," she told reporters.
She confirmed Patterson had told her "see you soon" and she would visit her friend in prison.
Patterson had pleaded not guilty and claimed not to have intentionally poisoned her lunch guests.
She took to the witness box for eight days and claimed she had eaten the same meal but threw up the remnants soon after.
She admitted she may have accidentally included foraged mushrooms in the meal, despite lying about this to police when she was first interviewed.
Prosecutors laid out an extensive circumstantial case to prove the poisoning was deliberate.
This included evidence from Mr Wilkinson, who said Patterson had served individual beef Wellingtons to her guests on different plates to her own.
The prosecution accused Patterson of telling lies to cover up the murders, including to doctors, nurses and toxicologists while they were trying to identify why her lunch guests were sick and save their lives at hospital.
After hearing nine weeks of evidence from more than 50 witnesses, a jury of 14 was whittled down to 12.
The courtroom fell silent as the foreperson read out four guilty verdicts.
Justice Christopher Beale thanked the jury for its service and gave members dispensation from serving on another jury for 15 years.
"You've been an exceptional jury," he said.
Patterson was driven to prison in Melbourne from Morwell on Monday evening and will return to court for a pre-sentence hearing later in 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
The stuff of nightmares
Warnings about picking and eating unknown fungi are handed down by many parents to children at an early age, along with other important life lessons of crossing a road safely and not plugging in electrical appliances with wet hands. Mushrooms and their poisonous relatives toadstools, both the fruiting bodies of the group Basidiomycota, have always had a somewhat fearsome reputation, not always thoroughly deserved. We all know how delicious some mushrooms are and how good they are for you. Most of us recognise the toxic toadstools to steer clear of, including the pretty, bright red-and-white fly agaric and the far more deadly death cap, with its pale greeny-yellow top and white stalk. We place a great deal of trust in those who prepare food for us, and have to hope that if they are using fungi, and have been out foraging, they know exactly what they are doing. How horrific then that three Australians who died after eating a beef wellington containing death cap have now been found to have been murdered by mother Erin Patterson, a true-crime stories buff. After a week of deliberations in the Supreme Court in Victoria's Morwell, the jury on Monday also found Patterson guilty of attempting to murder a fourth guest at her July 2023 lunch. The case has caught the public's imagination in the way trials do which feature bizarre crimes or high-profile defendants. It's one of the most ghoulish aspects of human nature that people are fascinated by unusual offences, celebrities in court or seemingly "normal" people caught up in extraordinary circumstances. Many people wanted to see justice done in what became known glibly as the "mushroom murders". They were impatient for the verdict to be handed down. The jury of 12 determined Patterson, 50, murdered the parents of her estranged husband and also her maternal aunt, whose husband somehow survived. Pieces of death cap were added to the individual beef wellingtons which were served on four grey plates for the guests while Patterson had hers on an orange plate. Within hours, the deadly amatoxins were starting to eat into and destroy the organs of the three, who died an awful death over the course of about a week. While Patterson was caught lying during the court case, the judge warned the jury that was not necessarily a sign she was guilty. But in the end, they believed the lies about her health, about owning a food dehydrator which she dumped and was later found to contain traces of the toadstools, and evidence she had been looking online for local patches of death caps were too compelling to ignore. Open letter season It sure does feel like open season on open letters, thanks to former prime minister Dame Jacinda Ardern, Dunedin business leader Sir Ian Taylor, and a cast of, well, several. Is an open letter a "thing", you say, and not just a frequently used arrow in Sir Ian's quiver? It certainly is. Viewed through a pen-is-mightier-than-the-sword lens, this particular weapon is something written to an individual, though not really for their eyes only but for the delectation of a much wider group. Sir Ian's letter to Dame Jacinda last week about her government's Covid-19 lockdown failures and repercussions, her book A Different Kind of Power and her glamorous appearances in fashion magazines, relitigates a good deal of what he has previously said in columns in The New Zealand Herald and in a 2022 article in the NZ Listener . Last week's open letter was quickly followed by a Steve Braunias parody in Newsroom and the Otago Daily Times at the weekend, which in turn sparked another open letter from Sir Ian back to Mr Braunias, before The Spinoff joined in the party yesterday with an open letter to Dame Jacinda about open letters to her. Wonderful stuff. This increasingly ludicrous and Monty Pythonesque spectacle is something to brighten us all up at this dark and cold time of year. But where will it end? Remember that infinity mirror effect, where you look at mirrors through other angled mirrors and the image goes on down the corridors of forever? There must be a way our ailing NZ Post can capitalise on all these open letters.
1News
3 days ago
- 1News
Full scope of mushroom trial media circus revealed
The full scope of the circus surrounding the mushroom murder trial has been revealed as the biggest media matter the Supreme Court has managed in recent history. As the Victorian trial entered week 11 on Monday, almost double its expected six weeks, a jury returned with four guilty verdicts and convicted Erin Patterson of three murders and one attempted murder. Her estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and aunt Heather Wilkinson, 66, all died after Patterson served them beef Wellington laced with death cap mushrooms in July 2023. A total of 252 media outlets had been interested in the case, the Supreme Court of Victoria confirmed this afternoon. This included 15 international media from the United Kingdom, the United States and New Zealand, which grew to 22 after the verdicts were handed down, a court spokeswoman said. ADVERTISEMENT There were nine authors, including acclaimed writer Helen Garner, seven podcasts, seven documentary film crews, including one from streamer Stan, and one drama series – ABC's Toxic. "These figures make the trial the biggest matter media-wise the court has managed in recent history," the court's media and public affairs manager Anthea Cannon said. The court actively monitored the extensive trial coverage and issued 16 directions to media to remove content, including four for social media commentary, she said. The working-class town of Morwell has been the backdrop of one of the world's most talked-about trials. (Source: 1News) Most were related to breaches of sub judice, a form of contempt related to publishing information that might improperly influence a jury, and a small number of inaccuracies were corrected. Cannon said the court was pleased with the quality and diligence of reporting, but was concerned some outlets and commentators with no direct contact with the trial were purporting to cover the case. "At least one such outlet has been referred to the Office of Public Prosecutions for contempt as a result," she said. ADVERTISEMENT "The way this trial captured the public's attention and was discussed and dissected in popular culture was particularly challenging and should serve as a reminder why the principle of sub judice exists – to ensure every person who appears in court is afforded a fair trial." Justice Christopher Beale told the trial, while the jury was out on June 16, that the Kyle and Jackie O Show would be referred to prosecutors for potential breach of sub judice for commenting about it live on air. 1News Australia correspondent Aziz Al Sa'afin speaks to Breakfast in the wake of yesterday's verdict. (Source: Breakfast) Meanwhile, the court has confirmed sequestered jurors were placed in the same hotel as the police informant Stephen Eppingstall and prosecutors while they deliberated. Justice Beale's associate emailed both defence and prosecution about the incident but said there had been no interaction between prosecutors, police and the jury. "The jury have had a separate floor to themselves and have eaten their meals in a conference room separate from other guests of the hotel. But all guests use the same entrance at the hotel," the email said. Most hotels had been booked out as national tennis table championships were being held in the Latrobe Valley at the same time as the jury entered its final days deliberating. ADVERTISEMENT On Monday morning, the prosecution emailed the associate to say they were no longer staying at the same hotel. The email said the informant had been staying in a different wing of the hotel and was using a different entrance to the jurors. "And he took steps to avoid common areas from the point that he became aware that they were there," the email said. The prosecution's legal team had to move from its accommodation on Friday and tried to move again when it became aware the jury was at its new accommodation. However, due to a lack of available accommodation, they could only move senior counsel and prosecution solicitors stayed at the same accommodation. "We confirm that the prosecution solicitors did not interact with the jury at any stage and also took steps to avoid any incidental contact in common areas," the prosecution email said. ADVERTISEMENT Patterson will next face court later in 2025 for a pre-sentence hearing.
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Death By Fungi: Cashing In On Erin Patterson
She has become a notorious figure of international interest, shamelessly exploited for news cycles, commercial worth and career advancement. After a trial lasting nine weeks, conducted at the Latrobe Valley Law Courts in Morwell, Victoria, Erin Patterson, a stocky, thick set mother of two was found guilty for three murders and an attempted murder. Date: July 29, 2023 in the town of Leongatha. Her weapon in executing her plot of Sophoclean extravagance: death cap mushrooms (Amanita phalloides) served in a beef Wellington. Her targets: in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, and Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson. Of the four, only Ian survived the culinary killings - barely. Prudently, estranged husband Simon chose not to attend. News outlets thought it useful to produce graphics about this Australian's terminating exploits. CNN produced one with voyeuristic relish, making it appear much like a Midsomer Murders episode. Details aplenty are provided, including the gruesome end for the victims. 'Gail and Heather died on August 4 [2023] from multiorgan failure, followed by Don on August 5 after he failed to respond to a liver transplant.' Fortunately, Ian Wilkinson survived, but the rumour mongering hack journalist can barely take it, almost regretful of that fact: 'after almost two months of intensive treatment', he was discharged. Having an opinion on this case has become standard fare, amassing on a turd heap of supposition, second guessing and wonder. The range is positively Chaucerian in its village variety. The former court official interviewed about the killer's guilty mind and poisoning stratagems, stating the obvious and dulling. The criminologist, keen on career advancement and pseudo-psychology, attempted to get into Patterson's mind, commenting on her patent ordinariness. One example of the latter is to be found in The Conversation, where we are told by Xanthe Mallett with platitudinous and forced certainty how Patterson, speaking days after the incident, 'presented as your typical, average woman of 50.' If attempting to kill four people using fungi is a symptom of average, female ordinariness of a certain age, we all best start making our own meals. But Mallett thinks it is precisely that sense of the ordinary that led to a public obsession, a mania with crime and motivation. 'The juxtaposition between the normality of a family lunch (and the sheer vanilla-ness of the accused) and the seriousness of the situation sent the media into overdrive.' This is certainly not the view of Dr. Chris Webster, who answered the Leongatha Hospital doorbell when Patterson first presented. Realising her link to the other four victims suffering symptoms of fungi poisoning, Webster explained that death cap mushrooms were suspected. Asking Patterson where she got them, she replied with one word: 'Woolworths.' This was enough for the doctor to presume guilt, an attitude which certainly gave one of Australia's most ruthless supermarket chains a graceful pardon. 'She was evil and very smart to have planned it all and carried out but didn't quite dot every 'i' and cross every 't'.' The marketer, thrilled with branding and promotion, suggests how Patterson Inc. can become an ongoing concern of merchandise, plays and scripts. (Think of a shirt sporting the following: 'I ate beef Wellington and survived'.) The ABC did not waste much time commissioning Toxic, a show created by Elise McCredie and Tony Ayres, aided by ABC podcaster Rachel Brown. Ayres hams it up by saying that, 'True stories ask storytellers to probe the complexities of human behaviour. What really lies beneath the headlines? It's both a challenge and a responsibility to go beyond the surface – to reveal, not just to sensationalise.' Given that this project is a child of frothy publicity born from sensationalism and hysteria, the comment is almost touching. The media prompts and updates, mischaracterising Patterson as 'The Mushroom Murderer', leave the impression that she really did like killing fungi. But an absolute monster must be found, and the press hounds duly found it. Papers like the Herald Sun preferred the old Rupert Murdoch tactic: till the soil to surface level to find requisite dirt. According to a grimy bit of reporting from that most distinguished of Melbourne rags, 'the callous murderer, whose maiden name was Scutter before marrying Simon Patterson in 2007, was secretly dubbed 'Scutter the Nutter' among her training group.' The Australian was in a didactic mood, unhappy that the judge did not make it even more obvious that a crime, committed by a woman involving poison and 'not a gun or a knife', was equally grave. To complete matters was an aggrieved home cook, Nagi Maehashi, who also rode the wave of publicity by expressing sadness that her recipe had become a weapon for lethal effect. (Presumably, Maehashi did not have lethal mushrooms in her original recipe, but precision slides in publicity.) Overcome with false modesty in this glare of publicity, Maehashi did not wish to take interviews, but felt her misused work deserved a statement. 'It is of course upsetting to learn that one of my recipes – possibly the one I've spent more hours perfecting than any other – something I created to bring joy and happiness, is entangled in a tragic situation,' she moaned on Instagram. Those familiar with Maehashi will note her tendency to megalomania in the kitchen, especially given recipes that have been created long before she turned to knife and spatula. The ones forgotten will be those victims who died excruciatingly before their loved ones in a richly sadistic exercise. At the end of it all, the entire ensemble of babblers, hucksters and chancers so utterly obsessed with what took place in Leongatha should thank Patterson. Her murders have excited, enthralled and given people purpose. She will start conversations, fill pockets, extend careers and, if we are to believe some recent reporting, make meals for her fellow inmates in prison. Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He currently lectures at RMIT University. Email: bkampmark@
