Pilot's chilling final words over tannoy before 183 passengers killed in fireball crash
The final moments aboard a doomed passenger aircraft were captured in a spine-chilling final transmission from the pilot just seconds before the devastating crash that killed everyone on board.
Captain Zygmunt Pawlaczyk of LOT Polish Airlines Flight 5055 delivered a heart-wrenching farewell over the plane's intercom: "Dobranoc! Do widzenia! Czesc, giniemy!" which translates to the bone-chilling words, "Good night! Goodbye! Bye, we're dying!".
The ill-fated Ilyushin II-62M was travelling from Warsaw to New York on May 9, 1987, with a scheduled fuel stop before continuing to San Francisco.
However, all 172 passengers and 11 crew perished when the aircraft plummeted into the Kabaty Woods nature reserve near Warsaw 56 minutes after departure, becoming Poland's worst aviation disaster and the deadliest incident involving an Ilyushin II-62M. Mass tragedies like this have become less common in recent decades despite increasing flight numbers, and yet last month, 260 people died when an Air India flight failed to ascend after takeoff.
Air traffic control recordings preserved the cockpit's last words at 11.12am local time.
Captain Pawlaczyk, aged 59 with an extensive 19,745 flight hours under his belt, commanded a crew of Polish crew members who perished either from fire or were thrown from the aircraft during the sudden loss of cabin pressure.
That tragic day saw 172 people on board: 155 Polish nationals and 17 Americans.
The doomed voyage commenced with air traffic control directing the crew to ascend to 5,500m altitude as rapidly as possible. When the crew pushed the engines to maximum power for take-off, the faulty bearings in the second engine reached a catastrophic temperature of 1800 degrees and failed completely, resulting in the shaft's explosive destruction.
The flight crew swiftly recognised that both the elevator controls had been compromised and the engines were no longer functioning.
Travellers were reportedly aware of their perilous predicament, with Halina Domeracka, 58, penning a haunting message in her New Testament: "9.05.1987 The aircraft's damaged... God, what will happen now... Halina Domeracka, R. Tagore St. Warsaw.."
Following the devastating accident, the nation held two days of national mourning, whilst international leaders, including Polish-born Pope John Paul II, conveyed deep grief over the disaster.
The service remained operated by the Ilyushin II-62M until 1989, before switching to the inaugural Boeing 767 and later upgrading to the Boeing 787 in 2012.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Air India plane skids off runway as three tyres burst on landing at Mumbai
An Air India plane has skidded off a runway and burst three of its tyres as it landed in Mumbai. The plane, an Airbus A320, suffered damage to the underside of an engine, forcing the runway at Mumbai International Airport to shut down amid heavy rain in the region. Air India flight AI2744, which had flown from the Indian city of Kochi, lost control and veered off the airport's main runway onto an unpaved area before stopping on a taxiway. Photos of the plane showed significant damage to the outermost part of the plane's engine, as well as clumps of wet grass lodged into its wing. A spokesperson for Air India said: 'Flight AI2744, operating from Kochi to Mumbai on 21 July 2025, experienced heavy rain during landing, resulting in a runway excursion after touchdown. 'The aircraft taxied safely to the gate and all passengers and crew members have since disembarked. The aircraft has been grounded for checks. 'The safety of passengers and crew remain our top priority.' Mumbai International Airport said in a statement that its primary runway suffered 'minor damages' during the incident. The airport said a backup runway has now been 'activated' to allow planes to arrive and depart. Air India is already facing heavy scrutiny following the release of a preliminary report into the deadly crash of one of its Boeing 787 Dreamliners in the Indian city of Ahmedabad last month, killing 260 people. Just one person, British national Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, 40, who was sitting in seat 11A, managed to walk away alive, only suffering cuts to his face and some chest injuries. A further 19 people were killed after the plane collided into a densely populated part of the city. The 15-page report revealed that the switches controlling fuel supplied to the plane's engines were in the 'cutoff' position, instead of the 'run' position. The report read: 'The Engine N1 and N2 began to decrease from their take-off values as the fuel supply to the engines was cut off.' Vishwash's family said he is still haunted by nightmares where he sees 'everyone die.' He is reportedly wracked with guilt as he faces the reality of being the only person out of 242 passengers and crew to survive the crash after the jetliner slammed into the ground and burst into flames. He struggles to sleep at night, according to a member of his extended family, Krunal Keshave, 24, from Leicester. 'He sleeps but doesn't sleep properly. When he sleeps, he dreams he is on the flight. He remembers seeing everyone die in front of his eyes.' The miracle survivor previously said he feels 'terrible' he could not save his brother Ajay, 35, and feels tormented with guilt over his death. The pair ran a fishing business in Diu, India and would live there during the fishing season - which begins in September and ends in May - then would return to Leicester for the off-season. 'He sees him speaks but he doesn't speak about the crash. He is currently trying to have a normal life, but he is not going out too much. He is spending time at home with the family. He was living in the house in Diu with his brother before the crash,' Krunal told The Sunday Times. Another relative said: 'He feels guilty that he is the only one to have lived when everybody else, including his brother, died. It's a lot to live with.' The 40-year-old told The Sun: 'It's a miracle I survived. I am OK physically but I feel terrible that I could not save Ajay.' Vishwash had tried to book two seats next to each other on flight AI171, which crashed into a densely populated part of the city of Ahmedabad shortly after takeoff. But by the time he came to make the reservation, he was forced to pick two seats apart from each other in row 11. Vishwash said: 'If we had been sat together we both might have survived. 'I tried to get two seats together but someone had already got one. Me and Ajay would have been sitting together.
Scottish Sun
8 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Air India plane veers off runway in horror landing with three tyres burst & engine damaged in latest terrifying incident
It comes as Air India is under scrutiny due to the tragic plane crash that killed 260 people on June 12 JET PANIC Air India plane veers off runway in horror landing with three tyres burst & engine damaged in latest terrifying incident AN AIR India plane skidded off the runway and sustained damage as it landed at Mumbai International Airport amid heavy rain on Monday. Three tyres on the Airbus A320 burst, the underside of an engine was damaged and the runway had to be shut, according to reports. 4 Damage to the engine covering after an Air India jet veered off a runway on Monday Credit: X 4 Damaged wing of the Air India jet Credit: X 4 Grass and debris seen on the plane's wing Credit: X On the day of the plane's dodgy landing, the suburbs of Mumbai were drenched in 4.5 inches of rain, according to the India Meteorological Department (IMD). Air India flight AI2744, which had flown from the Indian city of Kochi, veered off the main runway onto an unpaved area before coming to a stop at a taxiway, Times of India reports. The outer casing of the plane's engine - known as the cowling - was damaged and three tyres burst, the newspaper adds. TV footage from NDTV and India Today reveals a number of dents on the cowling. An Air India spokesperson said: 'Flight AI2744, operating from Kochi to Mumbai on 21 July 2025, experienced heavy rain during landing, resulting in a runway excursion after touchdown. "The aircraft taxied safely to the gate and all passengers and crew members have since disembarked. The aircraft has been grounded for checks. "The safety of passengers and crew remain our top priority." The Mumbai airport said in a statement that there were "minor damages reported to the airport's primary runway" as a result of a "runway excursion". It said that a secondary runway had been "activated" to ensure operational continuity. Though the Mumbai airport has two intersecting runways, only one operates at a time - making it effectively a single-runway airport and one of the busiest in the world. Airline pilot forced to pull off 'aggressive' move to avoid catastrophic midair collision with Air Force B-52 bomber All passengers and crew were safe following the incident, the airport added. It comes as Air India has faced scrutiny after a Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed in the Indian city of Ahmedabad last month and killed 260 people. All but one of the 242 passengers and crew died, with Vishwash Ramesh, 40, the only survivor. Another 19 people were killed on the ground in Ahmedabad. A 15-page preliminary report into the crash, released by Indian authorities, indicates switches to the engines' fuel supplies were moved from the "RUN" position to "CUTOFF". "The Engine N1 and N2 began to decrease from their take-off values as the fuel supply to the engines was cut off," the report said. This may have triggered a loss of thrust, which resulted in the jet crashing into a medical college.
BBC News
18 hours ago
- BBC News
Air India crash report: Cockpit voices fuel controversy over doomed flight
When the preliminary report into the crash of Air India Flight 171 - which killed 260 people in June - was released, many hoped it would bring some measure of the 15-page report added fuel to a firestorm of speculation. For, despite the measured tone of the report, one detail continues to haunt investigators, aviation analysts and the public after take-off, both fuel-control switches on the 12-year-old Boeing 787 abruptly moved to "cut-off", cutting fuel to the engines and causing total power loss - a step normally done only after cockpit voice recording captures one pilot asking the other why he "did the cut-off", to which the person replies that he didn't. The recording doesn't clarify who said what. At the time of take-off, the co-pilot was flying the aircraft while the captain was we know so far about Air India crash investigationRead the preliminary reportAre India's skies safe? Air safety watchdog responds amid rising concernsThe switches were returned to their normal inflight position, triggering automatic engine relight. At the time of the crash, one engine was regaining thrust while the other had relit but had not yet recovered power. The plane was airborne for less than a minute before crashing into a neighbourhood in the western Indian city of speculative theories have emerged since the preliminary report - a full report is expected in a year or so. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and Reuters news agency have reported that "new details in the probe of last month's Air India crash are shifting the focus to the senior pilot in the cockpit". Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera claimed that its sources had told them the first officer repeatedly asked the captain why he "shut off the engines". Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, was the captain on the flight, while Clive Kunder, 32, was the co-pilot who was flying the plane. Together, the two pilots had more than 19,000 hours of flight experience - nearly half of it on the Boeing 787. Both had passed all pre-flight health checks before the the wave of speculative leaks has rattled investigators and angered Indian theories swirl about Air India crash, key details remain unknownLast week, India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), the lead investigator, stated in a release that "certain sections of the international media are repeatedly attempting to draw conclusions through selective and unverified reporting". It described these "actions [as] irresponsible, especially while the investigation remains ongoing".Jennifer Homendy, chairwoman of the US's National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which is assisting the investigation, said on X that the media reports were "premature and speculative" and that investigations of this magnitude take time". Back in India, the Indian Commercial Pilots' Association condemned the rush to blame the crew as "reckless" and "deeply insensitive", urging restraint until the final report is out. Sam Thomas, head of the Airline Pilots' Association of India (ALPA India), told the BBC that "speculation has triumphed over transparency", emphasising the need to review the aircraft's maintenance history and documentation alongside the cockpit voice recorder the heart of the controversy is the brief cockpit recording in the report - the full transcript, expected in the final report, should shed clearer light on what truly happened. A Canada-based air accident investigator, who preferred to remain unnamed, said that the excerpt of the conversation in the report presents at several example, "if pilot 'B' was the one who operated the switches - and did so unwittingly or unconsciously - it's understandable that they would later deny having done it," the investigator said. "But if pilot 'A' operated the switches deliberately and with intent, he may have posed the question knowing full well that the cockpit voice recorder would be scrutinised, and with the aim of deflecting attention and avoiding identification as the one responsible."Even if the AAIB is eventually able to determine who said what, that doesn't decisively answer the question 'Who turned the fuel off?'"."We may even never know the answer to that question."Investigators told the BBC that while there appeared to be strong evidence the fuel switches were manually turned off, it's still important to keep "an open mind". A glitch in the plane's Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) system - which monitors engine health and performance - could, in theory, trigger an automatic shutdown if it receives false signals from sensors, some pilots if the pilot's exclamation - 'why did you cut-off [the fuel]?' - came after the switches moved to cut-off (as noted in the preliminary report), it would undermine that theory. The final report will likely include time-stamped dialogue and a detailed analysis of engine data to clarify has been fuelled less by who said what, and more by what wasn't preliminary report withheld the full cockpit voice recorder (CVR) transcript, revealing only a single, telling line from the final moments. This selective disclosure has raised questions: was the investigation team confident about the speakers' identities but chose to withhold the rest out of sensitivity? Or are they still uncertain whose voices they were hearing and needed more time to fully investigate the matter before publishing any conclusions?Peter Goelz, former NTSB managing director, says the AAIB should release a voice recorder transcript with pilot voices identified."If any malfunctions began during take-off, they would be recorded in the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) and would likely have triggered alerts in the flight management system - alerts the crew would almost certainly have noticed and, more importantly, discussed."Investigators are urging restraint in drawing conclusions."We have to be cautious because it's easy to assume that if the switches were turned off, it must mean intentional action - pilot error, suicide, or something else. And that's a dangerous path to go down with the limited information we have," Shawn Pruchnicki, a former airline accident investigator and aviation expert at Ohio State University, told the the same time, alternative theories continue to circulate. Indian newspapers includig the Indian Express flagged a possible electrical fire in the tail as a key focus. But the preliminary report makes clear: the engines shut down because both fuel switches were moved to cut-off - a fact backed by recorder data. If a tail fire occurred, it likely happened post-impact, triggered by spilled fuel or damaged batteries, an independent investigator week, AAIB chief GVG Yugandhar stressed that the preliminary report aims to "provide information about 'WHAT' happened"."It's too early for definite conclusions," he said, emphasising the investigation is ongoing and the final report will identify "root causes and recommendations". He also pledged to share updates on "technical or public interest matters" as they up, Mr Pruchnicki said the probe "boils down to two possibilities - either deliberate action or confusion, or an automation-related issue"."The report doesn't rush to blame human error or intent; there's no proof it was done intentionally," he other words, no smoking gun - just an uneasy wait for answers that may never even fully emerge.
