Federal judge restricts Trump administration's efforts to withhold school funding based on DEI
The ruling, issued by New Hampshire federal Judge Landya McCafferty, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, is limited to schools that participate with the plaintiffs in the case, the National Education Association and the Center for Black Educator Development.
McCafferty said Trump's action would "cripple the operations of many educational institutions," and would constitute a violation of executive branch power in overseeing local school districts.
The NEA is the nation's largest teachers union with more than 3 million members.
"The Department's attempt to punish schools for acknowledging diversity, equity and inclusion is not only unconstitutional, but it's also extremely dangerous -- and functions as a direct misalignment with what we know to be just and future forward," Sharif El-Mekki, Center for Black Educator Development CEO and founder, said in a statement.
"Today's decision is a critical step toward protecting the freedom to teach and the freedom to learn."
The suit was filed after the Trump administration demanded that public schools in all 50 states not participate in programs that violate its interpretation of what constitutes a violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
The Education Department pushed back against the lawsuit, saying public schools in the United States have embraced "pervasive and repugnant race-based preferences," which "emanated throughout every facet of academia" and did so by holding the "false premise that the United States is built upon 'systemic and structural racism.'"
The administration demanded that public schools comply with existing civil rights laws or risk losing potentially billions of dollars in federal aid earmarked for low-income students.
In her ruling, McCafferty also said the Trump administration's definition of diversity, equity and inclusion is unlawful, and in "stark contrast to the dictionary definition of DEI." She added that the administration's stance is "inconsistent with the ordinary meaning of the phrase."
Trump signed a flurry of executive orders in January that took aim at eliminating DEI programs at various institutions and government departments across the country.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
Could Tariffs Actually Accelerate The Move To A Circular Economy?
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 02: U.S. President Donald Trump holds up a chart while speaking during a ... More 'Make America Wealthy Again' trade announcement event in the Rose Garden at the White House on April 2, 2025 in Washington, DC. Touting the event as 'Liberation Day', Trump is expected to announce additional tariffs targeting goods imported to the U.S. (Photo by) A lot has been said about President Trump's tariff policy, particularly from an economic perspective, but could they also hasten the move to a more circular economy, particulary in the U.S? The circular economy is a popular concept in sustainability circles, and is defined by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation as one where products and materials are kept in circulation through processes like maintenance, reuse, refurbishment, remanufacture, recycling, and composting. The concept also tackles climate change and other global challenges, like biodiversity loss, waste, and pollution, by breaking the links between economic activity from the consumption of finite resources. David Linich, sustainability principal at PwC U.S, said he believes tariffs could accelerate the business case for circularity, in an interview. Despite concerns over rising costs, he said circular business models could make strategic sense – not just to avoid tariff exposure, but to spark innovation, reduce operating costs and drive long-term growth. He said there are several key reasons why tariffs could fuel circularity, including how tariffs will increase input costs for businesses, in an interview. Linich added consumers are also increasingly expect more sustainable products and packing, and advances in artificial intelligence and robotics will mean improved sorting and reuse from waste streams. 'Any contamination of the recycling stream reduces the value of it, but if you can sort out the impurities, then you are left with a higher value stream, which you can reuse in a number of different applications,' he told me. Linich said a number of states in the U.S now have various extended producer responsibility laws, which are helping to fund new waste infrastructure. And he said a number of businesses are now setting targets around how much of the content of their products contains reused or recycled materials. He added many of raw materials in electric waste, like cobalt and copper are expensive and increasingly harder to source. 'More and more companies are recognizing these are becoming scarce commodities, and there is a lot of value in the waste stream today to harvest that material and to reuse it,' said Linich. He said PwC's Second Annual State of Decarbonization report shows 37% of companies are increasing their ambitions around sustainability, while only 16% are dialing them back in some way. 'The business value of climate action is becoming clearer to most organizations. As a proof point, we see between a 6% and 25% revenue uplift from products that are marketed with sustainability attributes compared to those which are not.' Vishal Agrawal, business of sustainability initiative academic director at Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business, said there are several key issues when considering the move towards a circular economy, in an interview. In terms of recycling, Agrawal added the introduction of tariffs could foster more recycling infrastructure, particularly in Western countries, but any potential benefits would require an 'incredible amount' of investment and take a long time to pay off. But he added the impacts on reuse, which is another cornerstone of the circular economy, could be more interesting, particularly in some sectors where tariffs could have a big impact, like domestic appliances and electronics, because it could mean consumers holding onto products for longer. 'But, no matter how much new things cost, people will still want the latest style, so perhaps there will be more potential for the prolonged use of certain products. 'The best thing you could do in terms of sustainability is incentivize customers to keep these products longer, because most of the environmental impact,' he added. Another cornerstone of the circular economy is design and Agrawal said if the tariffs continue to be in place, firms could respond by using less materials, being more efficient when they design the product, or designing it to be more longer lasting. 'The push towards the circular economy requires a lot of change in consumer behavior, as well as huge investments in infrastructure, collection, recycling, reuse, and like any other investments, people might wait to see how all of this pans out,' he added.
Business Insider
31 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump considers skipping G20 summit, slams South Africa's 'very bad' policies
United States President Donald Trump has indicated he may not attend the upcoming G20 summit scheduled to take place in South Africa this November, citing his disapproval of the country's policies. President Trump may skip the upcoming G20 summit in South Africa due to policy disagreements. Tensions between the U.S. and South Africa have escalated over issues including land reform laws, foreign policy stances, and relations with BRICS nations. Trump's potential absence highlights growing diplomatic friction, which could impact U.S.–Africa relations long-term. Trump's remarks come amid a deepening strain in U.S.–South Africa relations, fueled by long-standing disagreements over a range of issues including South Africa's land reform laws, its pro-Palestinian stance in the Israel–Gaza conflict, and its growing alignment with BRICS nations. These tensions have prompted the Trump administration to impose multiple sanctions on South Africa, including a 30% tariff on selected South African goods, a move that has further deteriorated bilateral relations. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said, 'I think maybe I'll send somebody else because I've had a lot of problems with South Africa. They have some very bad policies.' South African officials have yet to issue a formal response to the statement. However, analysts warn that Trump's comments could escalate diplomatic friction ahead of the summit, which many see as a pivotal opportunity for developing countries to press for more inclusive global governance. Trump's policy dispute with South Africa Since the start of his second term in 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump has intensified tensions with South Africa, reviving a diplomatic chill driven by ideological rifts and competing global alliances. His administration has openly criticized South Africa's growing ties with Russia and China, its opposition to Western foreign policy, and its leadership role in BRICS and the Global South. The strain deepened earlier this year when US Secretary of State, Senator Marco Rubio declined an invitation to a G20 preparatory meeting in Johannesburg, citing South Africa's alignment with anti-Western regimes. Soon after, the White House instructed the U.S. Embassy in Pretoria to avoid making logistical arrangements for the G20 summit, signaling a potential boycott unless South Africa altered its stance. The friction reflects Washington's broader frustration with Pretoria's increasingly independent foreign policy, including support for Palestine, resistance to U.S.-backed sanctions, and its decision to host Russian President Vladimir Putin despite an ICC warrant. With the G20 summit now in focus, Trump's administration sees South Africa as part of a rising bloc challenging U.S. influence. What began as diplomatic friction has grown into a full-blown policy standoff that could redefine U.S.–Africa relations for years to come. Trump's potential absence from the summit could have diplomatic implications, as it would mark a rare snub of a major global economic forum hosted on African soil.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UN investigator says US sanctions over her criticism of Israel will seriously impact her life
Italy Israel Palestinians ROME (AP) — An independent U.N. investigator and outspoken critic of Israel's policies in Gaza says that the sanctions recently imposed on her by the Trump administration will have serious impacts on her life and work. Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur for the West Bank and Gaza, is a member of a group of experts chosen by the 47-member U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva. She is tasked with probing human rights abuses in the Palestinian territories and has been vocal about what she has described as the 'genocide' by Israel against Palestinians in Gaza. Both Israel and the United States, which provides military support to its close ally, have strongly denied that accusation. Washington has decried what it called a 'campaign of political and economic warfare' against the U.S. and Israel, and earlier this month imposed sanctions on Albanese, following an unsuccessful U.S. pressure campaign to force the international body to remove her from her post. 'It's very serious to be on the list of the people sanctioned by the U.S.,' Albanese told The Associated Press in Rome on Tuesday, adding that individuals sanctioned by the U.S. cannot have financial interactions or credit cards with any American bank. When used in 'a political way," she said the sanctions 'are harmful, dangerous.' 'My daughter is American. I've been living in the U.S. and I have some assets there. So of course, it's going to harm me,' Albanese said. 'What can I do? I did everything I did in good faith, and knowing that, my commitment to justice is more important than personal interests.' The sanctions have not dissuaded Albanese from her work — or her viewpoints — and in July, she published a new report, focused on what she defines as 'Israel's genocidal economy' in Palestinian territories. 'There's an entire ecosystem that has allowed Israel's occupation to thrive. And then it has also morphed into an economy of genocide,' she said. In the conclusion of the report, Albanese calls for sanctions against Israel and prosecution of 'architects, executors and profiteers of this genocide.' Albanese noted a recent shift in perceptions in Europe and around the world following an outcry over images of emaciated children in Gaza and reports of dozens of hunger-related deaths after nearly 22 months of war. 'It's shocking," she said. "I don't think that there are words left to describe what's happening to the Palestinian people.' The war began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel and killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 people captive. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed over 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not differentiate between combatants and civilians but says more than half the dead are women and children. Nearly 21 months into the conflict that displaced the vast majority of Gaza's 2.3 million people, the United Nations says hunger is rampant after a lengthy Israeli blockade on food entering the territory and medical care is extremely limited. Solve the daily Crossword
