NordicTrack Vs. Sole: Comparing Two Top Fitness Brands
Does NordicTrack or Sole better meet your needs? Here's what you need to know to reach the right ... More conclusion. Illustration: Forbes / Photo: Retailers
In this guide, I cover everything you need to know about these well-established brands before investing in a piece of equipment. After a brief overview to lay out the basics, I compare each brand's equipment—organized by category—and highlight the key features they offer.
From there, I dive into important details like durability and warranty coverage, and take a closer look at two best-selling models—the NordicTrack Commercial 1750 vs. Sole F80 treadmills. Whether you're narrowing down your options or starting your search from scratch, this guide will help you pick the right brand and equipment to work up a sweat.
NordicTrack and Sole are both well-established fitness brands that come from different backgrounds. NordicTrack was founded in 1975 when Ed Pauls invented the original NordicTrack ski machine. Over the next decade, Ed and his wife, Florence, grew the company before selling it in 1986, and in 1998, it was purchased by its current parent company, Icon Health & Fitness. While the original NordicTrack ski machine is (sadly) no longer in production, the brand now offers a much wider selection of fitness equipment.
Sole Fitness , on the other hand, began in 2001 and is currently headquartered in Salt Lake City. Originally, its machines were found in hotel gyms, where they received praise for their ability to support many different users and withstand regular use. The company expanded over the years to design durable home gym equipment, and an online library of fitness content under its Sole+ label helps you engage in activities from home.
NordicTrack treadmills are a great option if you're looking for interactive workouts and techy features. The Commercial 1750 model is one of the most popular options on the market—and the best model overall in our guide to the best treadmills—thanks to its 16-inch touch screen, incline and decline settings, and access to a range of online workouts through iFit, NordicTrack's workout subscription service. If you're looking for a machine that's more immersive, the X24 provides a bigger screen and steeper incline options. Both of these models are great for guided workouts and daily training, with loads of entertainment options to choose from.
Sole, on the other hand, prioritizes durability and performance with models like the F63 that's solid and built to last. Meanwhile, the F80 offers more power thanks to a stronger motor and upgraded belt cushioning, making it a great option for more serious runners. Sole machines are often compared to models in hotels or gyms due to the company's origins, so they're a great pick if you want a reliable treadmill that doesn't prioritize high-end tech.
The NordicTrack Commercial 1750 is a full-size treadmill with a large screen and adjustable deck. NordicTrack Ellipticals
If you're looking for guided workouts and variety, NordicTrack's X16 elliptical is a top-of-the-line model complete with a 16-inch HD touch screen, incline options and access to iFit services. You can follow trainers through hikes, full-body cardio sessions and studio classes to work up a sweat and stay engaged.
Sole takes a more traditional approach to ellipticals with models like the E25 and E35 that feel smooth and reliable. The E25 is a great entry-level choice for just over $1,000 that features a solid range of stride and resistance options, while the bigger E95 features a heavier flywheel and power incline. Sole's ellipticals are easy on your joints, making them a great low-impact cardio option if you don't need a large touch screen or subscription-based classes. Rowing Machines
NordicTrack's immersive rowing machines are made for those who want more than a handle and a place to sit. For example, the RW900 features a massive 24-inch touch screen, Bluetooth headphone connectivity and built-in speakers for premium sound. It also adjusts resistance automatically during workouts, so you don't have to fumble with knobs or dials as you go.
Sole keeps things simpler with options like the SR550—the only rower in the brand's lineup. It combines air and magnetic resistance to deliver a smooth, quiet ride, though the 10.1-inch touch screen is a bit lackluster. Ultimately, it's a great option if you want a dependable rower that feels good and doesn't cost an arm and a leg.
The Sole SR550 is the only rowing machine in the brand's lineup. Sole Bikes
NordicTrack shines in the bike category with models like the X24 and S24 Studio. The former features a 24-inch touch screen and incline and decline settings, while the latter uses the same size touch screen, though it lacks incline settings, which makes it a bit more affordable. If you're into structured workouts and visuals that make rides more compelling, these are great options for the money.
Sole's bikes focus more on quality and comfort without tying you to a subscription. The SB900, for example, is a great entry-level bike with a basic compact display and a hefty flywheel for smooth pedaling and consistent cadence. If you prefer a more relaxed ride, the LCR recumbent bike is a bit more comfortable and built like a tank, with 40 resistance levels that help you dial in the workout. These Sole bikes are great options if you want to hop on for a ride and get a solid workout in without fumbling over figures, stats and instructions. NordicTrack Vs. Sole: Durability And Warranty Durability
NordicTrack machines are generally well made, focusing on tech features like large screens, speakers and content that make a workout more enjoyable and immersive. All of the NordicTrack equipment I've tried over the years feels sturdy enough for regular use, including high-end options like the Commercial 1750 treadmill or X24 Studio bike. Cushioned decks and solid frames make them comfortable and adaptable, but keep in mind the added tech might be a point of concern when it comes to long-term reliability.
Sole has a reputation for making incredibly durable cardio equipment, with a vast selection of machines that feel and operate like those you'd find at the gym. (Sole machines were originally built for commercial use, after all.) Whether it's the heavy-duty frame on the F80 treadmill or solid flywheel on the SB900 bike, you're investing in equipment that's built to last and looks beyond features that can break down or cause issues over time.
The NordicTrack X16 elliptical offers an immersive workout experience. NordicTrack Warranty
A strong and reliable warranty makes it easier to purchase expensive equipment with peace of mind. NordicTrack's warranties technically vary by machine, but the standard warranty on most machines is ten years for the frame, two years for parts and one year for labor. And if you purchase the Commercial 1750, Commercial 2450, X16 or X24 treadmills, the motor is covered for life.
Sole, on the other hand, offers an equally solid five-year warranty on the frames of its treadmills, ellipticals, bikes and rowers. From there, motors come with a two-year warranty, and parts and labor are covered for one year. Sole also offers a 30-day satisfaction guarantee, though a nonrefundable return shipping fee of $250 and a 10% restocking fee will be deducted from the final refund.
While both brands offer strong warranties, I had an incredibly hard time finding warranty information on NordicTrack's website. Only after chatting with customer service was I able to pinpoint exact frame, part and motor warranties—it shouldn't be that difficult to find such information. With that said, you can purchase a machine with confidence from either brand, knowing you're covered by good protection. NordicTrack Commercial 1750 Vs. Sole F80: Best-Selling Treadmill Models
The NordicTrack Commercial 1750 and Sole F80 are two of the most popular treadmill models on the market, and they both appear in our guide to the best treadmills of 2025. Featuring strong performance, durability and solid value for the price, you can't go wrong with either one, though they technically cater to different types of users when you break them down.
The Commercial 1750 is the better pick if you're after an interactive, tech-driven workout. It comes with a 16-inch HD touch screen display, incline and decline settings and access to NordicTrack's library of iFit workouts. Really, it's designed for people who want to follow along with trainers, enjoy scenic workout routes and make use of a machine that adjusts automatically during guided runs. Its features keep you motivated for $2,499, when it isn't on sale.
The Sole F80 is a great pick if you care more about durability and simplicity. Its 10.1-inch touch screen is a bit smaller, but it still features a powerful motor, cushioned running belt and even a wireless phone charger. At $1,900, it costs quite a bit less than the Commercial 1750—you're sacrificing some modern tech for a simpler, streamlined workout experience.
The Sole F80 doesn't have quite as many features as the Commercial 1750, but it's still a capable ... More treadmill. Sole NordicTrack Vs. Sole: Which One Is Right For You?
Ultimately, choosing between NordicTrack and Sole comes down to your preferences and how you like to work out.
If you prefer guided workouts, scenic runs or studio-esque training with an instructor, NordicTrack is probably the better fit. The brand's many machines are built around iFit, and features like big screens, incline adjustments, speakers, cooling fans and interactive workouts feel a lot more engaging. It's a great choice if you need the extra motivation or just want a tech-heavy experience.
Meanwhile, Sole is hard to beat if you value simplicity, durability and long-term reliability. That's not to say NordicTrack isn't reliable, but Sole offers generous warranties and you don't need to pay for a subscription to take full advantage of its machines. They're ideal for those who prefer gym-quality performance without technical distractions or vulnerable add-ons that cost more. Why Trust Forbes Vetted
The gear team at Forbes Vetted dedicates countless hours to testing, evaluating and reviewing a wide range of products, including at-home fitness equipment. We've covered not only such brands as NordicTrack and Sole, but specific product categories, too, like rowing machines , walking pads and exercise bikes . This guide was written by Forbes Vetted gear editor Cam Vigliotta , who's spent years covering health and wellness products. With a degree in kinesiology and a deep understanding of human movement, he enjoys evaluating equipment that helps you stay active and healthy.
, who's spent years covering health and wellness products. With a degree in kinesiology and a deep understanding of human movement, he enjoys evaluating equipment that helps you stay active and healthy. This story was edited by Christine Colby, a Forbes Vetted commerce editor who has specialized in product testing and reviews for four years. She's currently long-term testing the Titan Plus Luxe Mattress and recently covered the best elliptical machines for Forbes Vetted.
We return to this guide on a regular basis to ensure the information we provide is up-to-date and relevant, so you have the tools to find the right brand for your needs, whether that's NordicTrack or Sole. This guide was published in June 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
9 hours ago
- Fast Company
Trump rollback on clean energy subsidies stalls major solar, wind projects and manufacturing plans
Singapore-based solar panel manufacturer Bila Solar is suspending plans to double capacity at its new factory in Indianapolis. Canadian rival Heliene's plans for a solar cell facility in Minnesota are under review. Norwegian solar wafer maker NorSun is evaluating whether to move forward with a planned factory in Tulsa, Oklahoma. And two fully permitted offshore wind farms in the U.S. Northeast may never get built. These are among the major clean energy investments now in question after Republicans agreed earlier this month to quickly end U.S. subsidies for solar and wind power as part of their budget megabill, and as the White House directed agencies to tighten the rules on who can claim the incentives that remain. This marks a policy U-turn since President Donald Trump's return to office that project developers, manufacturers and analysts say will slash installations of renewable energy over the coming decade, kill investment and jobs in the clean energy manufacturing sector supporting them, and worsen a looming U.S. power supply crunch as energy-hungry AI infrastructure expands. Solar and wind installations could be 17% and 20% lower than previously forecast over the next decade because of the moves, according to research firm Wood Mackenzie, which warned that a dearth of new supplies could slow the expansion of data centers needed to support AI technology. Energy researcher Rhodium, meanwhile, said the law puts at risk $263 billion of wind, solar, and storage facilities and $110 billion of announced manufacturing investment supporting them. It will also increase industrial energy costs by up to $11 billion in 2035, it said. 'One of the administration's stated goals was to bring costs down, and as we demonstrated, this bill doesn't do that,' said Ben King, a director in Rhodium's energy and climate practice. He added the policy 'is not a recipe for continued dominance of the U.S. AI industry.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. The Trump administration has defended its moves to end support for clean energy by arguing the rapid adoption of solar and wind power has created instability in the grid and raised consumer prices – assertions that are contested by the industry and which do not bear out in renewables-heavy power grids, like Texas' ERCOT. Power industry representatives, however, have said all new generation projects need to be encouraged to meet rising U.S. demand, including both those driven by renewables and fossil fuels. Consulting firm ICF projects that U.S. electricity demand will grow by 25% by 2030, driven by increased AI and cloud computing – a major challenge for the power industry after decades of stagnation. The REPEAT Project, a collaboration between Princeton University and Evolved Energy Research, projects a 2% annual increase in electricity demand. With a restricted pipeline of renewables, tighter electricity supplies stemming from the policy shift could increase household electricity costs by $280 a year in 2035, according to the REPEAT Project. The key provision in the new law is the accelerated phase-out of 30% tax credits for wind and solar projects: it requires projects to begin construction within a year or enter service by the end of 2027 to qualify for the credits. Previously the credits were available through 2032. Now some project developers are scrambling to get projects done while the U.S. incentives are still accessible. But even that strategy has become risky, developers said. Days after signing the law, Trump directed the Treasury Department to review the definition of 'beginning of construction.' A revision to those rules could overturn a long-standing practice giving developers four years to claim tax credits after spending just 5% of project costs. Treasury was given 45 days to draft new rules. 'With so many moving parts, financing of projects, financing of manufacturing is difficult, if not impossible,' said Martin Pochtaruk, CEO of Heliene. 'You are looking to see what is the next baseball bat that's going to hit you on the head.' About face Heliene's planned cell factory, which could cost as much as $350 million, depending on the capacity, and employ more than 600 workers, is also in limbo, Pochtaruk said in an interview earlier this month. The company needs more clarity on both what the new law will mean for U.S. demand, and how Trump's trade policy will impact the solar industry. 'We have a building that is anxiously waiting for us to make a decision,' Pochtaruk said. Similarly, Mick McDaniel, general manager of Bila Solar, said 'a troubling level of uncertainty' has put on hold its $20 million expansion at an Indianapolis factory it opened this year that would create an additional 75 jobs. 'NorSun is still digesting the new legislation and recent executive order to determine the impact to the overall domestic solar manufacturing landscape,' said Todd Templeton, director of the company's U.S. division that is reviewing plans for its $620 million solar wafer facility in Tulsa. Five solar manufacturing companies – T1 Energy, Imperial Star Solar, SEG Solar, Solx and ES Foundry – said they are also concerned about the new law's impact on future demand, but that they have not changed their investment plans. The policy changes have also injected fresh doubt about the fate of the nation's pipeline of offshore wind projects, which depend heavily on tax credits to bring down costs. According to Wood Mackenzie, projects that have yet to start construction or make final investment decisions are unlikely to proceed. Two such projects, which are fully permitted, include a 300-megawatt project by developer US Wind off the coast of Maryland and Iberdrola's 791 MW New England Wind off the coast of Massachusetts. Neither company responded to requests for comment. 'They are effectively ready to begin construction and are now trapped in a timeline that will make it that much harder to be able to take advantage of the remaining days of the tax credits,' said Hillary Bright, executive director of offshore wind advocacy group Turn Forward.
CNN
9 hours ago
- CNN
Tesla's stock is tumbling after Elon Musk failure to shift the narrative
Elon Musk's big promises apparently no longer seem to be enough for many Tesla investors. Shares of Tesla (TSLA) fell 9% on Thursday following another dismal earnings report, released after the bell Wednesday. Tesla's earnings and revenue both fell by double-digit percentages following the biggest sales drop in the company's history. The automaker also faces a number of financial headwinds, including the loss of a $7,500 tax credit for US EV buyers starting in October, and the vanishing market for regulatory credit sales, which has earned Tesla $11 billion since 2019. But Tesla CEO Elon Musk barely talked about that on the earnings call Wednesday, although he did acknowledge the company 'probably could have a few rough quarters.' Instead, he talked about his grand vision for the future, including Tesla's long-promised robotaxi service; and its humanoid robot, Optimus, which is still in development. The lack of details about the company's plans to solve problems in the near term disappointed some investors and analysts. 'Investors have been very forgiving of Tesla for several quarters now, despite obvious headwinds to their business,' Garrett Nelson, analyst at CFRA Research, told CNN Thursday. 'But I think its investors are taking a more realistic view of the story at this point. Some of his brilliance has been his ability to keep investors focused on the long term and ignoring the near term and intermediate term. Now, headwinds are difficult to ignore.' Nelson downgraded the company's stock to a neutral rating in April. But even some of the Tesla bulls on Wall Street are saying that the time for Musk to take action is running out. 'The street is losing some patience,' Wedbush Securities tech analyst Dan Ives told CNN Thursday, although he said he still believes in the autonomous vehicle and artificial intelligence vision laid out by Musk and Tesla. Musk has made big promises about his robotaxi service, including that it would be in service within a year as early as 2019. Tesla's robotaxis finally rolled out in June this year, albeit in a limited portion of Austin, Texas, to friends and fans of the company, and with an employee sitting beside the empty driver's seat. However, that limited rollout wasn't enough to stop Musk from making extraordinary claims on Wednesday that the service would be available to half the nation's population by year's end. To achieve that, Tesla will need to get regulatory permission to operate in two states per week through the rest of the year, including New York, which does not allow autonomous vehicles on its roads. Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein said that while he does believe Tesla will eventually be successful in its robotaxi venture, 'the software will require further testing' and he does not expect a full robotaxi product until 2028. But Musk has a history of making grand promises that do not pan out. Like the Cybertruck – the only new vehicle Tesla has offered in the last six years. Musk said Tesla was supposed to be delivering 250,000 vehicles annually by this year. But full-year sales of the Cybertruck and Tesla's two other expensive models were less than 80,000. Sales of the three plunged 52% in the most recent quarter. Tesla also started the year forecasting it would achieve higher sales following its first annual sales drop in its history in 2024. But after two quarters of record sales declines, most investors now assume that it will not meet that goal either. And with Musk himself barely mentioning car sales during an hour-long conference call, it doesn't appear that is enough for shareholders any longer. 'We are mixed on Tesla's ability to meet its robotaxi timelines, cost targets, and scale,' wrote Ben Kallo, an analyst for Baird, in a note to clients late Wednesday. 'So far Tesla has received a pass due to how ambitious/revolutionary these products are, but we think continued sluggishness in the auto business could cause more focus on the near term.'
Entrepreneur
9 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
4 Signs It's Time to Abandon Your Patent
How to make smart, strategic calls on when to abandon patents — and why doing so is essential to long-term innovation and budget health Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Patents are often filed early, before a startup knows what the market really wants. That's smart, but it comes with a challenge: Not every idea turns out to be worth protecting. Markets shift. Products pivot. And eventually, founders ask: Should we keep paying for this patent or cut our losses? It's a tough call. Abandoning a patent midway can feel like giving up. But continuing just because you've already spent money? That's the sunk cost trap, and it quietly drains your budget. Many startups keep prosecuting every idea, paying rejections, annuities and attorney fees. But a smart IP strategy means knowing what to keep and what to walk away from. Here's how to make that call strategically. Related: How to Identify the Patent-Worthy Innovations in Your Business Built-in checkpoints in patent lifecycle — use them Roughly, you can split a patent's entire lifecycle cost into three parts. The first third goes to drafting the application, another third is for arguing the patent through issuance, and the final third covers patent maintenance fees for the next 20+ years. In a way, these financial checkpoints are decision checkpoints, too. When drafting, consider whether the invention aligns with your core business or is just a side experiment that may never get to market. During prosecution, evaluate whether it's still worth the legal wrangling, as each round of argument is costly. And when renewal fees come due, ask if the patent still supports your product, blocks competitors or adds leverage against others in the market. Unfortunately, many startups treat these pivotal stages as administrative formalities. Instead of evaluating whether continued investment is justified at each stage, many companies default to pushing forward — whether by extending prosecution unnecessarily, filing continuations without a clear purpose, or simply paying maintenance fees — without assessing strategic alignment. That's how portfolios get bloated with low-impact patents. The only solution here is patent pruning: Abandon some patent filings at the right checkpoints. Related: Don't Let Patent Costs Crush Your Startup — Here's How to Protect Your IP Without Breaking the Bank What are the signs that it's time to abandon a patent? Every dollar spent defending or maintaining a weak patent is a dollar not spent protecting something truly valuable. Therefore, you must look for the signs at different checkpoints to spot a patent to discard. Here are some signs to look for: 1. No market validation A patent is only valuable if the protected product actually sells. If your invention fails to gain customer traction, the patent will be a failure. Experts emphasize focusing on "high-impact" problems with real demand. Without that market pull, even a granted patent is a dead weight. For example, Google Glass — once hyped as the future of AR eyewear — never found a viable consumer market. It was pulled from sale in 2015 (and again in 2023) due to poor adoption, illustrating how patents tied to unvalidated products offer no return. 2. Shifting industry direction Industries evolve, and a patent can lose value if the tech horizon moves on. In practice, companies are advised to ask whether their invention still aligns with "the target industry and market." If adjacent innovations eclipse your solution (for example, cloud services replacing old networking hardware), the patent's relevance vanishes. In that scenario, it makes little sense to keep paying maintenance fees. Better to refocus on protections for innovations that fit the new direction of your field. 3. Prior art kills the novelty Sometimes, what initially feels like a breakthrough ends up being something others have already attempted or fully disclosed. If prior art eclipses your claims, the chances of securing meaningful protection drop significantly. At that point, even if you receive a patent, it may be so narrow that it offers little real-world value. Continuing to prosecute a case like this can quickly become a drain on time and legal budget. 4. Weak business use case Every patent in your portfolio should earn its keep through business impact or the potential to do so on your current roadmap. If it's not protecting a revenue-generating product, blocking a competitor or supporting licensing efforts, its value is questionable. Startups often hang on to patents without a clear path to monetization or strategic use. But unless a patent strengthens your market position or serves a legal or commercial purpose, it's just another expense on the books. To actively prune your patent portfolio, just looking for signs isn't enough. As the portfolio grows, you need a deliberate, repeatable process for patent abandonment assessment. Build a patent pruning system: Health checks and ranking framework An effective patent pruning system should take two things into consideration: 1) lifecycle stage and 2) multiple perspectives. For the first one, you want to start by ranking each patent across key lifecycle stages: At the idea stage : Is this innovation aligned with your product roadmap or market differentiation? Post-filing : Has the landscape shifted? Is the application still strategically relevant? Pre-renewal: Is the granted patent still supporting revenue, blocking competitors or enhancing leverage? The higher a patent scores at a certain stage, the more you want to invest in it. Please note that not only your legal counsel team but also others, such as product, technology, marketing and finance, must contribute to this ranking system, as pruning cannot be undone. The goal is to ensure that patents are evaluated through a business lens, not just a legal one. Consider using patent management tools that provide full portfolio visibility and enable seamless collaboration as part of your patent pruning process. Related: 4 Surprising Patent Myths That Could Cost You Big — What You Need to Know Now Pruning a patent portfolio isn't just about saving money; it's about fueling what's next with the reclaimed budget. In 2020, IBM stepped back from chasing patent volume. "We're no longer pursuing patent leadership," they said. "We're being more selective." The result? Fewer filings, stronger focus and more investment in high-growth areas like AI and quantum computing. That's the lesson: Pruning isn't cutting back. It's reallocating toward where your business is growing. Because IP should follow your future, not fund your past.
