Inside the final moments of Air India 171—the hrs leading up to take-off & the 32 seconds before crash
AI 171, scheduled to fly from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, tragically crashed soon after take-off, resulting in the loss of 275 lives. This includes all 241 individuals aboard—229 passengers and 12 crew members—and people on the ground. The sole survivor was passenger Vishwashkumar Ramesh, who managed to escape through the emergency exit.
New Delhi: The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has released a preliminary report of the initial investigation into the 12 June crash of Air India Flight AI 171 in Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
Before take-off
11:17:00 IST The aircraft concerned—a Boeing 787-8, VT-ANB—touched down at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport and was parked at Bay 34.
11:55:00 The crew of flight AI 171 arrived at the airport, and breath analyser tests found all of them fit to fly.
12:10:00 The aircraft was released for flight after Air India's on-duty Aircraft Maintenance Engineer carried out troubleshooting, according to the Flight Information Manual.
The crew of the previous flight, AI423, using the aircraft, had made a 'pilot defect report' entry related to a stabiliser sensor—status message 'STAB POS XDCR'—in the tech log.
12:35:00 The boarding gate CCTV recording showed the AI171 crew arriving for duty. The flight crew included a pilot-in-command holding an airline transport pilot licence, a co-pilot holding a commercial pilot licence, and 10 cabin crew.
13:10:00 The scheduled start time for AI171-related operations. The co-pilot was supposed to fly, and the senior pilot was to monitor the flight. They arrived in Ahmedabad from Mumbai on 11 June and had adequate rest.
13:13:00 AI171—a Boeing 787-8, VT-ANB—requested pushback and startup. There were 230 passengers on board. Fuel on board was 54,200 kg, and the take-off weight was 2,13,401 kg—within the limit allowed. There were no 'dangerous goods' on board the aircraft.
13:13:13 Air Traffic Control (ATC) approved pushback.
13:16:59 ATC approved engine startup clearance.
13:18:38 ATC queried if the aircraft required the full length of the runway, and the aircraft confirmed the requirement of the full length of Runway 23. The aircraft was observed departing from Bay 34.
13:25:15 The aircraft requested taxi clearance, and the ATC granted it.
13:26:08 Aircraft taxied from the bay towards Runway 23 via Taxiway R4.
13:32:03 The aircraft control was transferred from 'Ground' to 'Tower'.
13:33:45 Aircraft was instructed to line up on Runway 23.
13:37:33 Aircraft was cleared for take-off from Runway 23. The wind was coming from 240 degrees (west-southwest) at a speed of six knots.
13:37:37 AI171 started rolling.
13:38:33 The aircraft crossed the take-off decision speed (V1)—the point beyond which take-off must continue even if an issue arises—and subsequently achieved 153 knots indicated airspeed (IAS), indicating a commitment to take-off and sufficient speed for liftoff or rotation, according to the enhanced airborne flight recorder (EAFR).
13:38:35 The aircraft reached the Vr speed of 155 knots—the rotation speed at which the pilot begins to gently lift the nose wheel off the runway, initiating the aircraft's take-off and transition to flight.
13:38:39 The aircraft air/ground sensors transitioned to air mode, consistent with liftoff. Everything was normal up to this point.
After take-off
13:38:42 IST The aircraft reached its maximum recorded airspeed of 180 knots indicated airspeed, representing the highest speed measured by the aircraft's instruments.
Immediately after, the fuel switches for Engine 1 and Engine 2 were turned off one after the other, just one second apart. As the engines stopped getting fuel, their speeds began dropping from the take-off levels. According to the cockpit audio, one pilot asked the other why he turned the fuel off, and the other pilot replied that he didn't do it.
The airport's CCTV footage showed the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) deployed right after the plane took off during its initial climb. At the time, there were no signs of birds near the flight path. The aircraft began to lose height before it even passed the airport's perimeter fence.
13:38:47 Both engines slowed down below the lowest speed required to run properly, so the small emergency turbine called the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) started working to supply hydraulic power and keep important systems functioning, according to the EAFR.
13:38:52 The fuel switch for Engine 1 was turned back on from the off position (cutoff) to the on position (run), meaning fuel started flowing to the engine again, according to the EAFR.
13:38:54 The Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) inlet door started to open automatically, i.e., the system was getting ready to start the APU on its own.
13:38:56 The fuel switch for Engine 2 was turned back on from off (cutoff) to on (run). When this happens during flight, the engine's automatic control system—FADEC (Full Authority Digital Engine Control)—takes over to restart the engine and bring its power back by managing the fuel and ignition.
The temperature at the back of both engines—EGT (Exhaust Gas Temperature)—went up, indicating that the engines were trying to restart. Engine 1 stopped slowing down and started getting back to normal speed. Engine 2 managed to restart but kept slowing down, so the system kept adding fuel again and again to try to speed it up and recover properly.
13:39:11 The EAFR recording stopped.
Crash
13:39:05 IST One of the pilots transmitted 'Mayday Mayday Mayday'. The air traffic control officer (ATCO) enquired about the call sign. The ATCO did not get any response but observed the aircraft crashing outside the airport boundary and activated the emergency response.
13:44:44 Crash fire tender left the airport premises for rescue and firefighting, with the fire and rescue services of the local administration joining them.
(Edited by Madhurita Goswami)
Also Read: Why do airplanes still crash?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Pilot error? Don't jump to conclusions, there are other questions: Experts on Ahmedabad plane crash
THE PRELIMINARY report of the ongoing investigation into the June 12 crash of Air India flight AI 171 is far more detailed than what industry veterans and experts expected, and gives an indication of the direction the probe may be headed in. The 15-page report from the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), an office attached to the Ministry of Civil Aviation, has zeroed in on the most probable primary cause of the accident— the engines being starved of fuel with the transitioning of the fuel control switches from 'RUN' to 'CUTOFF' position within a second of each other moments after lift-off. From the cockpit voice recorder data, the report notes that one of the pilots asked the other why he cut off the fuel, to which the other pilot responded saying he did not. While some interpret these findings as hinting at human error, aviation industry veterans said it is too premature to arrive at any conclusion based on just the preliminary report. The report, they said, does answer some key questions, but also raises many that only a meticulous investigation would be able to clear up. Union Civil Aviation Minister K Ram Mohan Naidu warned against jumping to conclusions and Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol said commenting or drawing any conclusion on the basis of the preliminary report wouldn't be appropriate. 'The initial finding that the fuel control switches went to cut-off mode is truly shocking. They (investigators) now have the most probable cause, and now they must investigate to figure out how it happened and why it happened. These are the key questions that must be answered in the final investigation report. The real investigation has actually started now,' a former air accident investigator told The Indian Express. An aircraft is an extremely sophisticated and complex machine, and detailed and painstaking investigations are required to ascertain the exact cause or combination of causes. The odds that an aviation accident has a single trigger are rare; there could be many, or one leading to another. The AAIB is expected to release the final probe report within a year of the crash, as per international guidelines. To be sure, the report just says the engine fuel control switches that allow and cut fuel flow to the plane's engines transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF. It does not state these were moved by either of the pilots to the CUTOFF mode. The report does mention one pilot asking the other why he cut-off fuel supply, with the other responding he didn't. Experts say accidental movement of the switches is not quite possible. The spring-loaded switches have brackets on either side to protect them and there is a stop lock mechanism that requires the pilots to lift the switch up before moving it between either of its two positions—RUN and CUTOFF. 'No sane pilot would move the switches during the flight and that too at such low altitude, unless there was a dual engine failure to be dealt with. And even that would be in coordination, not a unilateral move. Moving them by accident is also not really a possibility, as they have to be pulled up to disengage the lock and then moved mechanically to one or the other mode,' said a senior airline pilot with years of experience on the Boeing 787 aircraft. Experts believe only the full audio and transcript of the cockpit voice recorder would be able to give more information on the pilots' discussions and actions in the cockpit in the minutes leading up to the tragedy. Meanwhile, a pilot association has raised concerns on the direction the AI 171 crash investigation appears to be taking. 'The tone and direction of the investigation suggest a bias toward pilot error. ALPA-I categorically reject this presumption and insist on a fair, fact-based inquiry,' Sam Thomas, president of the Airline Pilots' Association of India (ALPA-I) said in a statement. The pilots' body has reiterated its request to be included 'at the very least, as observers' in the air crash investigation. 'Apart from looking into the action of pilots, the investigators should look if the fuel switch cut-off could be due to any other electrical or system-related issues. Could it be an electrical or software malfunction that signalled to the aircraft system that the switches were in cut-off mode, even if they had not been actually moved?' a senior airline pilot asked, considering the Boeing 787 is a modern electrically heavy aircraft. Another airline pilot said it was theoretically possible to have such a scenario without the physical movement of the switches. Further analysis of the aircraft's black boxes should be able to establish whether the switches were indeed moved mechanically, or whether the cut-off was due to some other issue. The pilots and the former aircraft accident investigator concurred that during the critical take-off phase of the flight, pilots had no business in keeping their hands anywhere close to the fuel control switches, as per established standard operating procedures. This is to prevent accidental or inadvertent toggling of any critical switch. The fact that the preliminary report has not issued any recommendation to the operators of the Boeing 787 aircraft and the GE GEnx-1B engines suggests that the investigators, at least for the time being, do not have sufficient reason to believe that an electrical or system malfunction could have led to the fuel control switches 'transitioning' to CUTOFF. Experts also pointed out that these switches are manual and not motorised, and cannot be physically moved by electrical signals or the plane's avionics. Notably, the report also makes mention of the 2018 Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), regarding the 'potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature'. Air India, however, did not carry out the inspection as the SAIB was merely advisory and not mandatory. Moreover, the cockpit's throttle control module—which houses the fuel control switches among others—was replaced in 2019 and 2023, but the reason for replacement was not linked to the fuel control switches. The initial report said that no defect pertaining to the fuel control switches on the aircraft was reported since 2023. Nevertheless, could the disengagement of the switch lock, component fatigue, or a mechanical failure move the switches? Experts said this is unlikely. The possibility of even one disengaged switch being flicked by accident was highly unlikely, they said, pointing out the report's findings that both switches appeared to have changed positions. Sukalp Sharma is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and writes on a host of subjects and sectors, notably energy and aviation. He has over 13 years of experience in journalism with a body of work spanning areas like politics, development, equity markets, corporates, trade, and economic policy. He considers himself an above-average photographer, which goes well with his love for travel. ... Read More
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Air India says will review preliminary plane crash report with pilots
Air India on Saturday said it will take on board its pilot community by holding dedicated sessions in the coming days to review the preliminary investigation report of the June 12 Ahmedabad plane crash. The 15-page preliminary report by Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AIIB), released early on Saturday, has found that the fuel supply to both engines of Air India flight AI171 was cut off within a second of each other, causing confusion in the cockpit and the airplane plummeting back to ground almost immediately after taking off. On June 12, the London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner began to lose thrust almost immediately after taking off from the Ahmedabad airport and ploughed into a medical college hostel, killing all but one of the 242 persons onboard and another 19 on the ground in the deadliest aviation accident in a decade. 'Preliminary investigation report has been officially released in the recent tragic accident involving our flight AI 171 from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick on June 12. As aviation professionals, we understand top importance from every safety event is the learning to ensure safe skies,' Air India senior vice president for flight operations, Manish Uppal, said in a communication to pilots. This tragedy, he said, has deeply influenced the aviation fraternity and Air India pilot community. 'The initial report gives the airline an initial insight. This is not the last word, but an important step in identifying factors and ensuring that all possible measures are taken to prevent such a tragedy from reoccurring,' he said in the communication. In the communication, he also said that pilots are trained to stay under pressure, to continuously learn, and to act decisively when it matters most, adding, 'Let us apply the same now. Together, we will reflect, react and rise more than before.' 'We will organise a dedicated session in the coming days to review the report together,' he said in the communication. The preliminary investigation report into the disaster revealed that fuel-control switches of the two engines moved from the 'run' to the 'cutoff' position, within the space of one second, leading to immediate loss of altitude. In the cockpit voice recording, one pilot is heard asking the other why he cut off the fuel. The other denied having done so. The investigation was conducted with assistance from the U.K.'s Air Accident Investigation Branch and the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board. Aviation experts have said it is difficult for pilots to inadvertently move the fuel switches, as there is a little mechanical gate built into the switch. Switches need to be lifted up over this little gate to shut off supply. They also asked why the report made no reference to cockpit camera footage. The Airlines Pilots Association of India raised the issue with the report, saying the investigation is 'shrouded in secrecy', appears to be biased against the pilot and has come to a conclusion hastily.
India Gazette
4 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Pilots did everything right": Captain Umang N Jani on AI 171's crash report
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) [India], July 12 (ANI): Captain Umang N Jani, Head of Department (HoD) Aviation at Indus University, on Saturday said that the pilots of the crashed Boeing 787-8 Air India flight 171 did 'everything right' by attempting to restart the engines. He said that the preliminary report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) mentions that the fuel switch was at the 'run' position. 'The pilot did everything right. It is part of the training that when engines fail, you attempt to restart them. The report also suggests that the fuel switch is in the run position. This aircraft has an FADEC (Full Authority Digital Engine Control) system in place. When you start the engine, there is a complete sequence that needs to be followed, and this system automatically follows this entire sequence,' Captain Jani told ANI. He informed that the engines stop working when the fuel supply stops, which makes such types of incidents possible. He said that the fuel switch is situated on the throttle quadrant in the aircraft, which was found to be in the 'run' position, indicating that the pilot tried to restart the engine. 'It mentions fuel cutoff. When the fuel supply stops, both engines stop working, and then the type of incident that happened is possible. If I talk about the throttle quadrant, there is a fuel cutoff switch here. In the crash, it has been found that the fuel switch was in the 'run' position. It seems that the pilot tried to restart the engine. This process of whether to supply fuel to the engine is controlled manually from the cockpit,' Jani added. 'Generally, the fuel switch is not put on cutoff after takeoff. This is done in two situations: normal and emergency. You put the switch on cutoff once the aircraft has landed and parked during normal times,' he stated. The Captain said that further investigation was required into the flight crash. 'This is a preliminary report. Now, there may be further investigation and the final report that will come, it is possible that we may get to see more information and more details in it,' Jani said. The AAIB's Preliminary Report, released on Friday, said that both the engines of the aircraft were moved from 'run' to 'cutoff' in quick succession, which resulted in the fuel supply being cut off. The report says that in the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he did the cutoff, which the other pilot denied ever doing so. 'The aircraft achieved the maximum recorded airspeed of 180 Knots IAS at about 08:08:42 UTC, and immediately thereafter, the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec. The Engine N1 and N2 began to decrease from their take-off values as the fuel supply to the engines was cut off,' the preliminary report said. 'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he cut off. The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' the report added. As per the Enhanced Airborne Flight Recorder (EAFR) accessed by the AAIB, engine 1's fuel cut switch transitioned from 'cutoff' to 'run' at about 8:08:52 UTC (Coordinated Universal Time), and at 8:08:56 UTC, Engine 2's fuel switch also went from 'cutoff' to run'. According to the report, just 13 seconds later, at 8:09:05 UTC, one of the pilots transmitted the Mayday call, which the Air Traffic Control Officer (ATCO) enquired about, but did not receive a reply. Shortly after, the aircraft was observed crashing outside the airport boundary, and the emergency response was activated. The Airline Pilots' Association of India on Saturday also called for a 'fair, fact-based inquiry,' into the incident and rejected the 'tone and direction of the investigation' which suggested a bias towards pilot error. 'The report was leaked to the media without any responsible official signature or attribution. There is a lack of transparency in investigations as investigations continue to be shrouded in secrecy, undermining credibility and public trust. Qualified, experienced personnel, especially line pilots, are still not being included in the investigation team,' the association said in a statement. Notably, Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol urged people not to draw conclusions based on the preliminary report. While speaking to mediapersons, the MoS said, 'The AAIB has brought out a preliminary report. This is not the final report. Until the final report comes out, we should not arrive at any conclusion. AAIB is an autonomous authority, and the ministry does not interfere in their work.' (ANI)
