Kanwar yatra: Plea in Supreme Court against UP's QR code order for eateries
NEW DELHI: A petition has been filed in
Supreme Court
challenging
Uttar Pradesh
government's directive to shopkeepers to put up QR codes at their eateries along the route of Kanwar Yatra, which could be scanned to reveal the names of the owners.
SC is likely to hear the matter on July 15.
In July last year, SC had stopped govts of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand, among others, from implementing their directives to shop owners and hawkers along the routes of Kanwar Yatra to display their names, along with those of staff members, at their outlets, and held that food sellers only needed to mention the kind of food they were serving. "We deem it appropriate to pass interim order prohibiting the enforcement of the impugned directives.
In other words, the food sellers (including dhaba owners, restaurants, foods and vegetable sellers, hawkers, etc) may be required to display the kind of food that they are serving to the kanwariyas. But they must not be forced to display the name/identity of the owners and the employees deployed in their respective establishments," the court said in its order passed on July 22.
Challenging the new order of UP govt, the plea filed in the apex court by Delhi University professor Apoorvanand Jha and activist Aakar Patel said that the measure amounted to violation of SC's last year order, since it was intended to achieve the same discriminatory profiling that was stopped by the court.
"(News reports) confirm that all eateries on the Kanwar route are required to display QR codes that allow 'customers to access ownership details'. These steps effectively serve the same unconstitutional end through digital means, in wilful disobedience of this Court's directions," the petition said.
"Vague and overbroad directives deliberately mix up the licensing requirements with the other unlawful demand to display religious identity, and leave scope for violent enforcement of such a manifestly arbitrary demand both by vigilante groups and by authorities on the ground. There is grave and imminent risk of irreparable injury to the fundamental rights of affected vendors, particularly from minority communities, unless this Court issues immediate directions to restrain Respondents from continuing this indirect implementation," it added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Initiative launched to empower frontline tribal functionaries
Bhubaneswar: In a landmark move towards fostering inclusive development and enhancing last-mile service delivery, the 4th Adi Karmayogi Regional Process Lab (RPL) was inaugurated on Friday in Bhubaneswar. This week-long initiative, part of the Dharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan (DAJGUA), is designed to empower frontline tribal functionaries with essential tools and knowledge to promote responsive, people-centric governance. The inauguration ceremony was led by Nityananda Gond, minister of SC/ST development, minorities and backward class welfare department. The programme, facilitated by Bharat Rural Livelihoods Foundation (BRLF), brings together 25 selected participants from Jharkhand, Bihar and Odisha. It is part of the Adi Karmayogi – Responsive Governance Programme, a pioneering initiative by the ministry of tribal affairs aimed at building the capacity of tribal frontline workers and govt functionaries across various administrative levels. Key objectives of the programme include enhancing effective implementation of welfare schemes, promoting convergence across departments such as health, education, women & child development, rural development, Jal Shakti and forests, encouraging participatory learning and community engagement, and establishing transparent and accountable governance mechanisms. "The Regional Process Lab (RPL) in Odisha is a crucial component of a cascading model of capacity building. Trained State Master Trainers (SMTs) will spearhead state and district process labs, ensuring the dissemination of contextual and localised knowledge. This initiative marks a significant stride in empowering tribal communities and ensuring that governance is both inclusive and effective, ultimately contributing to the holistic development of the region," a govt statement read.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Tamil Nadu govt. urges Madras HC to exempt ‘Ungaludan Stalin' and ‘Nalam Kaakum Stalin' schemes from prohibitory order
The Tamil Nadu government has approached the Madras High Court urging it to clarify that its interim order prohibiting the use of the name of any living personality in the nomenclature of government schemes would not be applicable to 'Ungaludan Stalin' and 'Nalam Kaakum Stalin' schemes. Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan on Thursday (August 3, 2025) accepted a request made by Advocate General P.S. Raman for an early hearing of the modification petition since the Nalam Kaakum Stalin scheme was all set to be launched across the State on Saturday (August 2, 2025). The judges said, the petition, if filed by Friday, would be taken up for hearing on Monday (August 4, 2025). Within a couple of hours, a modification plea was filed by the State government in the High Court Registry along with a detailed affidavit sworn by Public department secretary Reeta Harish Thakkar. The affidavit said the public outreach programme titled 'Ungaludan Stalin' had been in operation for quite sometime now and even the public interest litigation petitioner Shanmugam, in whose case the interim order was passed, had not sought any ex-parte interim order against that scheme. Similarly, a Government Order for the Nalam Kaakum Stalin scheme, aimed at taking healthcare to the doorsteps of the beneficiaries, was issued on June 3, 2025 itself, the Public Secretary said, and contended that only the launch was scheduled to be held on August 2, 2025 by conducting health camps in all districts. Further, stating that the pamphlets, brochures, application forms and other related documents for the scheme had already been printed, Ms. Thakkar said, enormous efforts taken to launch the scheme on Saturday would go waste if the prohibitory interim order was made applicable to it. 'The scheme has been introduced in the name honourable Chief Minister who is a constitutional authority and it cannot be construed to have been introduced in the name of a political personality. Usage of photos of former Chief Ministers is also not expressly prohibited by the Supreme Court,' her affidavit read. Stating that the government was prepared to contest the main PIL petition by filing a detailed counter affidavit, the secretary said: 'The present petition is being filed for the limited purpose of seeking clarification so that the order may not be applicable to the Nalam Kaakum Stalin scheme that is being launched tomorrow.'
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Religion vs dissent: Which right wins?
The Supreme Court has, through multiple judgments, affirmed the right to protest while imposing 'reasonable restrictions' on its exercise in public spaces. The Court's rationale has been that the right to protest cannot be exercised at the expense of public order, with considerations such as the smooth flow of traffic weighing on the court's mind. As the Kanwar Yatra ended this year, the Delhi Police saw a surge in complaints on traffic congestion, excessive noise and disturbances well into the night over the span of a few days. There have been reports of hooliganism, aggression and violence by the kanwariyas. In India, streets are not just for commuting: The everyday affairs of community, religion, celebration, mourning, and social life play out on them too. (ANI) There are few legal challenges to these acts or restrictions on the Kanwar Yatra. Religious practice, the reasoning goes, must be given a longer rope. But does such accommodation on disruption of regular life in the city pass muster? Every year, several groups of kanwariyas traverse the streets of North India. In recent years, the Kanwar Yatra has grown in both popularity and scale — large trucks are hired, food stalls set up (with QR codes displaying information on the seller's religion in some places) and roaring boomboxes announce its arrival. It may seem that the yatra has turned into an opportunity for unrestrained revelry and lawlessness. Often, the yatra seems no more about personal, pious observations, but a means of loud and disruptive assertion. By and large, the kanwariyas have a de facto immunity — actions that would normally invite the attention of law enforcement agencies are ignored and even actively permitted. In India, streets are not just for commuting: The everyday affairs of community, religion, celebration, mourning, and social life play out on them too. But the access to this public space, and the degree to which rights can be exercised, are differentiated. Who may occupy a public space and for what purpose is neither universal nor equal. In Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (2018), the Supreme Court held that the rights under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of protestors have to be balanced with the rights of commuters. Permission for a demonstration or public meeting should be granted keeping in view its effect on traffic, human safety, and public tranquillity. Similarly, in Himat Lal Shah (1973), the Court held that the right to a public street can be regulated so that all can enjoy that right. In the wake of protests at Shaheen Bagh against the Citizenship Amendment Act, the Supreme Court found in 2020, that the right to dissent could not be at the cost of inconvenience to commuters and authorities must take action to prevent undue encroachments and obstructions in public spaces. In 2021, during the farmers' protests, the Supreme Court once again remarked that protests could not inconvenience the general public and lead to roads being blocked. The only time that the Kanwar Yatra has been made subject to legitimate restrictions was in 2021, when the Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of the yatra held despite the rising cases of Covid-19. No doubt, all sects have a right to profess and practise religion, subject to 'public order, morality and health'. The right to protest is restricted by similar considerations. Should the State then not be equally concerned by the civic inconveniences caused by religious processions, as it is by the peaceful public gathering of dissenters? If freedom and liberty are the cornerstones of our Constitution, their equal application is its chief anchor. The popular saying 'your right to swing your wrist ends where my nose begins' must apply in equal measure to all those who lay claim to a public space. Katyayani Suhrud and Trisha Chandran are lawyers practising in the Supreme Court of India. The views expressed are personal.
