WeWork's former top lawyer is building an 'AI-native' law firm. Her model for client cost savings? TurboTax.
Founded by two former general counsels and backed by $4 million in venture funding, Covenant is betting that private markets are ready for a software-first approach to legal advice. Its tools use large language models to root through hundreds of pages of legal documents, raise red flags, and suggest stronger terms that are tailored to the investor's own playbook.
In the world of venture capital and other private funds, investors still pay law firms to tell them where and how to park their money. Endowments, pensions, and other institutional allocators rely on white-shoe lawyers to review limited partner agreements (LPAs), the legal backbone of a private investment fund. In theory, the bigger the law firm, the better the insight because it has seen more deals. But prestige doesn't come cheap, and neither does the billable hour.
Covenant is selling directly to institutional investors, not law firms, with the hope of cutting straight to the client and their bottom line.
Just as TurboTax made many Americans question whether they really needed an accountant, Covenent aims to give private market investors a reason to ask whether Big Law's invoices are still worth it.
The company tells Business Insider it's raised $4 million in a seed round led by Flybridge Capital Partners, with Neil Barsky, a former journalist and hedge fund manager, participating.
ReWork
Through the late aughts, Berrent was chief legal officer and co-president at WeWork, where she walked one of the trickiest tightropes in corporate law: counseling a high-flying, often chaotic startup and its mercurial founder, Adam Neumann. In 2019, former employees told Business Insider that Berrent was the person who tamed the chaos and protected the company as crisis after crisis unfolded.
She left WeWork in 2020. At first, Berrent set out to build a tool to help founders negotiate legal contracts. But she and Richard Perris, Covenant's cofounder and president, realized that opportunity was limited. Term sheets, offer letters, and non-disclosure agreements are relatively short, standardized, and not all that complex.
The bigger pain, Perris says, lives in private fund docs: LPAs and side letters, which carve out specific terms for specific investors. Their high-stakes fine print demands hours of expensive lawyer time. That's where large language models, Perris says, could "come in and crush this problem."
But before Covenant had a product or revenue, Flybridge made "a bet on Jen," says Jesse Middleton, who helped scale WeWork as an operator before becoming an investor at Flybridge.
Over the past 18 months, Berrent says Covenant has brought on around 45 customers, including endowments, foundations, pension plans, funds of funds, and sovereign wealth funds.
She declined to name any clients, but says monthly transaction volume has grown 50% since January.
Law Firm 2.0
Covenant is part of a new wave of law firms with the skeleton of a tech company and legal services layered on like tissue. Zach Posner, a venture capitalist who correctly called the legal tech boom in 2019, calls this category Law Firm 2.0. His fund is launching an accelerator to back the companies that compete head-on with law firms.
Zach Abramowitz, a consultant who advises law firms and legal departments on which software to buy, says he expects to see star attorneys peeling off from big firms to start their own tech-enabled practices.
To Abramowitz, the real upside isn't in building the next legal-tech unicorn like Harvey or Ironclad. It's in the long tail — what he describes as the Shopify phase of legal tech. Just as Amazon and Shopify unlocked a wave of entrepreneurs who built their own stores on top of those platforms, Abramowitz believes artificial intelligence will enable a surge of "bionic boutiques" that can generate significantly more revenue per lawyer.
"That's a much bigger opportunity," he said, "that inures to the benefit of more people."
Covenant joins a growing list of software companies with big backers and even bigger promises to strip the drudgery from legal work. But murmurs of a legal tech bubble are growing louder, especially as flashy tools like Harvey and Legora jockey for relevance in a still-cautious market.
For now, Covenant doesn't compete directly with those platforms, which sell into law firms and corporate legal departments. Instead, it occupies a lane closer to contract review tools like Luminance and Spellbook, which are also built for lawyers, not private market investors. To Berrent, the key distinction is that Covenant is selling legal services to customers who typically hire Big Law to do this work.
Berrent says she sees the next big opportunity not in AI for law firms, but in entirely new firms built around the tech. Call it counsel-as-a-service.
"Uber didn't sell software to taxi companies," she said. Instead, it redefined how people think about getting from point A to B. That's the kind of shift she's after.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
What's Trump's approval rating? Latest polls on job performance, immigration
A string of recent polls shows President Donald Trump's approval rating has remained largely steady over the last week, even as a new Gallup survey gave him his lowest numbers of his second term. Aggregations of recent approval polling from the New York Times and RealClearPolitics place Trump's approval between 44% and 45%, respectively, with a 53% to 42% disapproval. See last week's polling: Trump approval drops in new poll as more Americans oppose immigration policies In a July 25 poll from Emerson College, the president had a 46% approval rating and 47% disapproval. That's a one-point increase on both counts from the survey's June results. "About six months into the second Trump administration, the president's approval rating has stabilized in the mid-40s," the poll's executive director, Spencer Kimball, said in statement. "While his disapproval has steadily increased about a point each month since the inauguration and now stands at 47%." In a Gallup poll released a day prior, the president's approval rating was significantly lower, coming in at 37%. The pollsters called it the lowest mark of his second term and only a few points higher than his all-time-low rating of 34% at the end of his first term. Both polls showed what has long been a deep divide between Republicans and Democrats when it comes to Trump and his policies, especially over immigration, foreign policy and the economy. Here's a round-up of some of the last week's polls. Emerson College poll Trump notched his highest single-issue approval rating on immigration, the poll said, with 45% approving and 46% disapproving of Trump's policies. The highest disapproval numbers were on the economy, with a 41% approval rating and 51% disapproval. That continued to sink with Trump's tariff policy, with 36% approving while 50% disapproved. Trump's support – both on overall job performance and on specific issues – was fueled by Republican respondents in the poll. Just 10% of Democrats said they like the president's job performance, compared to 87% of Republicans and 38% of independents. The difference support was widest by party on immigration, with 12.9% of Democrats approving compared to 80% of Republicans. More: 16% of voters approve of Trump's handling of Epstein files, poll shows The survey of 1,400 registered voters was conducted July 21-22 and has a margin of error of ±2.5 percentage points. Gallup poll The poll marks a 10-point drop from the 47% approval rating Americans gave Trump at the beginning of his second term in January. About 29% of independent voters said they're pleased with Trump's job performance in the new survey, the lowest Gallup has tracked with the group in either of Trump's two terms. It's a 17-point decline from the 46% the president enjoyed among independents at the start of his second term earlier this year. Trump's ratings on some of the most significant issues facing the country also faltered, according to Gallup pollsters. He received the strongest support for his handling of the conflict with Iran, at 42% approving, followed by foreign policy at 41%. The president's handling of Iran – where U.S. troops bombed three nuclear sites last month – earned Trump the greatest support from independents, at 36%, while the federal budget gave him the lowest at 19%. The survey of 1,002 Americans was conducted July 7-21, and has a margin of error of ±4 percentage points. Fox News poll Trump's support was lowest on issues of inflation and tariffs, with 36% of respondents backing the way Trump has approached two central forces in America's economy. He received his highest ranking for border security, with 56% of respondents approving and 44% disapproving. Along party lines, support was highest among Republicans, with 88% backing the president. Thirty-seven percent of independents and 7% of Democrats agreed. The survey was conducted by Beacon Research/Shaw & Co. Research. 1,000 registered voters were surveyed July 18-21, and the poll has a margin of error of ±3 percentage points. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.


CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
'Quishing' scams dupe millions of Americans as cybercriminals turn the QR code bad
QR codes were once a quirky novelty that prompted a fun scan with the phone. Early on, you might have seen a QR code on a museum exhibit and scanned it to learn more about the eating habits of the woolly mammoth or military strategies of Genghis Khan. During the pandemic, QR codes became the default restaurant menu. However, as QR codes became a mainstay in more urgent aspects of American life, from boarding passes to parking payments, hackers have exploited their ubiquity. "As with many technological advances that start with good intentions, QR codes have increasingly become targets for malicious use. Because they are everywhere — from gas pumps and yard signs to television commercials — they're simultaneously useful and dangerous," said Dustin Brewer, senior director of proactive cybersecurity services at BlueVoyant. Brewer says that attackers exploit these seemingly harmless symbols to trick people into visiting malicious websites or unknowingly share private information, a scam that has become known as "quishing." The increasing prevalence of QR code scams prompted a warning from the Federal Trade Commission earlier this year about unwanted or unexpected packages showing up with a QR code that when scanned "could take you to a phishing website that steals your personal information, like credit card numbers or usernames and passwords. It could also download malware onto your phone and give hackers access to your device." State and local advisories this summer have reached across the U.S., with the New York Department of Transportation and Hawaii Electric warning customers about avoiding QR code scams. The appeal to cybercriminals lies in the relative ease with which the scam operates: slap a fake QR code sticker on a parking meter or a utility bill payment warning and rely on urgency to do the rest. "The crooks are relying on you being in a hurry and you needing to do something," said Gaurav Sharma, a professor in the department of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Rochester. Sharma expects QR scams to increase as the use of QR codes spreads. Another reason QR codes have increased in popularity with scammers is that more safeguards have been put into place to tamp down on traditional email phishing campaigns. A study this year from cybersecurity platform KeepNet Labs found that 26 percent of all malicious links are now sent via QR code. According to cybersecurity company, NordVPN, 73% of Americans scan QR codes without verification, and more than 26 million have already been directed to malicious sites. "The cat and mouse game of security will continue and that people will figure out solutions and the crooks will either figure out a way around or look at other places where the grass is greener," Sharma said. Sharma is working to develop a "smart" QR code called a SDMQR (Self-Authenticating Dual-Modulated QR) that has built-in security to prevent scams. But first, he needs buy-in from Google and Microsoft, the companies that build the cameras and control the camera infrastructure. Companies putting their logos into QR codes isn't a fix because it can cause a false sense of security, and that criminals can usually simply copy the logos, he said. Some Americans are wary of the increasing reliance on QR codes. "I'm in my 60s and don't like using QR codes," said Denise Joyal of Cedar Rapids, Iowa. "I definitely worry about security issues. I really don't like it when one is forced to use a QR code to participate in a promotion with no other way to connect. I don't use them for entertainment-type information." Institutions are also trying to fortify their QR codes against intrusion. Natalie Piggush, spokeswoman for the Children's Museum of Indianapolis, which welcomes over one million visitors a year, said their IT staff began upgrading their QR codes a couple of years ago to protect against what has become an increasingly significant threat. "At the museum, we use stylized QR codes with our logo and colors as opposed to the standard monochrome codes. We also detail what users can expect to see when scanning one of our QR codes, and we regularly inspect our existing QR codes for tampering or for out-of-place codes," Piggush said. Museums are usually less vulnerable than places like train stations or parking lots because scammers are looking to collect cash from people expecting to pay for something. A patron at a museum is less likely to expect to pay, although Sharma said even in those settings, fake QR codes can be deployed to install malware on someone's phone. QR code scams are likely to hit both Apple and Android devices, but iPhone users may be slightly more likely to fall victim to the crime, according to a study completed earlier this year by Malwarebytes. Users of iPhones expressed more trust in their devices than Android owners and that, researchers say, could cause them to let down their guard. For example, 70% of iPhone users have scanned a QR code to begin or complete a purchase versus 63% of Android users who have done the same. Malwarebytes researcher David Ruiz wrote that trust could have an adverse effect, in that iPhone users do not feel the need to change their behavior when making online purchases, and they have less interest in (or may simply not know about) using additional cybersecurity measures, like antivirus. Fifty-five percent of iPhone users trust their device to keep them safe, versus 50 percent of Android users expressing the same sentiment. A QR code is more dangerous than a traditional phishing email because users typically can't read or verify the encoded web address. Even though QR codes normally include human-readable text, attackers can modify this text to deceive users into trusting the link and the website it directs to. The best defense against them is to not scan unwanted or unexpected QR codes and look for ones that display the URL address when you scan it. Brewer says cybercriminals have also been leveraging QR codes to infiltrate critical networks. "There are also credible reports that nation-state intelligence agencies have used QR codes to compromise messaging accounts of military personnel, sometimes using software like Signal that is also open to consumers," Brewer said. Nation-state attackers have even used QR codes to distribute remote access trojans (RATs) — a type of malware designed to operate without a device owner's consent or knowledge — enabling hackers to gain full access to targeted devices and networks. Still, one of the most dangerous aspects of QR codes is how they are part of the fabric of everyday life, a cyberthreat hiding in plain sight. "What's especially concerning is that legitimate flyers, posters, billboards, or official documents can be easily compromised. Attackers can simply print their own QR code and paste it physically or digitally over a genuine one, making it nearly impossible for the average user to detect the deception," Brewer said. Rob Lee, chief of research, AI, and emerging threats at the cybersecurity training focused SANS Institute, says that QR code compromise is just another tactic in a long line of similar strategies in the cybercriminal playbook. "QR codes weren't built with security in mind, they were built to make life easier, which also makes them perfect for scammers," Lee said. "We've seen this playbook before with phishing emails; now it just comes with a smiley pixelated square. It's not panic-worthy yet, but it's exactly the kind of low-effort, high-return tactic attackers love to scale."

Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Medicare and hospice scams are on the rise
Medicare and hospice scams are on the rise. In a rare show of bipartisanship, the U.S. House of Representatives unanimously passed the Senior Security Act - a bill aimed squarely at protecting older Americans from financial scams. Championed by Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), the bill would establish a Senior Investor Task Force within the Securities and Exchange Commission. Its job? Don't miss the move: SIGN UP for TheStreet's FREE daily newsletter To identify and address the risks older investors face - from outright fraud and financial exploitation to the more subtle threats tied to cognitive decline. Image source: Chaozzy Lin on Unsplash The Senior Investor Task Force is long overdue. For years, advocates have called for stronger investor protections for seniors, and this legislation delivers. Here's what it would do: Identify challenges that senior investors face navigating the financial systemRecommend changes to SEC rules or those of self-regulatory organizations to better protect seniorsCoordinate efforts with other SEC offices, the Elder Justice Coordinating Council, and other relevant agenciesCollaborate with state securities regulators, law enforcement, and insurance departments Related: Retired workers to see frustrating change to Medicare in 2026 The task force would also deliver a biennial report to Congress, summarizing: Trends and innovations reshaping the investing landscape for older AmericansRegulatory and industry practices that impact senior investorsKey observations from enforcement actions and investor education effortsThe most serious issues confronting senior investorsRecommendations for changes in regulation, guidance or legislation For retirees trying to safeguard their nest eggs - and for the advisers who help them - this is an important step toward turning concern into real protection. In 2024, Americans reported a record-shattering $16.6 billion in losses to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center - a 33% increase over 2023. According to the 2024 IC3 Annual Report, IC3 received 859,532 complaints - more than 2,000 a day. A staggering 83% of those losses were tied to cyber-enabled fraud. Older adults were hit especially hard. Those aged 60 and older reported $4.9 billion in losses - a 43% jump from the previous year. They filed 147,127 complaints, up 46%. Among seniors who lost more than $100,000, the average loss was $83,000 - a life-altering amount for most. That's why efforts like the Senior Security Act - and public education campaigns about scams - are more important than ever. Speaking of public education campaigns, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) just issued a warning to beneficiaries about a disturbing new scam: fraudsters posing as salespeople offering "free" services or gifts in order to enroll unsuspecting seniors in hospice care - without their knowledge or need. In a July 16 fraud alert, CMS outlined how the scam works: Scammers contact you via text, phone, email, fake ads - or even knock on your offer "free" perks like cooking, cleaning, groceries, or medical return, they ask for your Medicare number and a use that information to enroll you in hospice care, allowing them to bill Medicare fraudulently. Related: Millions of Medicare beneficiaries could see major price shock Hospice care, CMS noted, is for individuals who are terminally ill and should only be considered after discussions with a person's doctor. Enrolling without medical necessity could jeopardize their future Medicare coverage. CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz issued a video message warning Medicare beneficiaries to stay alert for such scams and to guard their Medicare numbers carefully. The Federal Trade Commission is also sounding the alarm. In a recent post, FTC consumer education specialist Kira Krown also warned that scammers are luring older adults into fraudulent hospice enrollment by offering free services like housekeeping or gift cards. "What they likely won't tell you is how," Krown wrote. "They want to commit fraud by signing you up for Medicare hospice - that's right, hospice - care. Then, they can bill Medicare for all kinds of services in your name. If you're signed up and don't need it, this could affect your Medicare coverage in the future. Anyone who tells you differently is a scammer." To protect yourself, the FTC recommends: Never share your Medicare number with anyone offering "free" sign up for hospice in exchange for perks like groceries, gift cards, or that Medicare will never send someone to your home to enroll you in services. If you suspect hospice fraud, call 1-800-MEDICARE (1-800-633-4227) or file a report at You can also reach out to your local Senior Medicare Patrol (SMP) for assistance. What to do with Form 1099-R, Distributions From Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.