Somebody Finally Got the Message About the Panama Canal
As editor of the Daily Inter Lake newspaper in Kalispell, Montana, for 18 years, I got to meet hundreds of people whom I would never have come across otherwise when they came to visit me at my office. One of the most memorable was an octogenarian named Linc France.
Linc (short for Lincoln) was an American original. For decades he had run Lincs Automotive in Columbia Falls. His 2005 obituary noted that "He could fix anything. If he didnt have the tool, he could make one." Despite ending his formal education in the 8th grade to help support his family, Linc was knowledgeable about many topics and was also civic minded, having served on the Columbia Falls City Council and volunteered for various charities such as Meals on Wheels.
When Linc came to visit me in his blue jeans and flannels with a trucker cap above his piercing eyes, I would sit back in my chair and prepare to be both amused and challenged. Generally, he would be dropping off a hand-written letter to the editor, and he would ask me to give it a once-over. Most of the time, the letter was about the Panama Canal.
President Jimmy Carter had signed the canal over to the nation of Panama for the contractual obligation of a single dollar back in 1977, and Panama took full control on Dec. 31, 1999, but by then most Americans werent interested. It certainly wasnt high on my radar, but Linc insisted on educating me and my readers, so he sent a steady barrage of letters warning of the national security risk of surrendering what he called the "eighth wonder of the world."
On Feb. 28, 2003, Linc wrote a letter we titled "Canal could be sign of worse to come." It was indeed prophetic:
I still wonder how many "taxpaying American citizens" have looked towards the Panama Canal lately. Maybe most everybody is too busy making a living or having too many types of entertainment to even think about Li Ka-shing, who has control of the Pacific-to-Atlantic bypass that was built with American sweat and blood.
(Letters quoted are available at Newspaperarchive.com)
I had never heard of Li before Linc started writing his letters, but I used the still-young Internet to research and found that Linc was right to be worried. The Hong Kong oligarch was using his companies such as Hutchison Whampoa and CK Hutchison to obtain ports at both ends of the canal and to gain effective control. A few months after Panama officially took over the canal on Dec. 31, 1999, the Washington Times wrote this:
Chinese businessman Li Ka-shing was planning to take over operation of the Panama Canal before the pullout last year of the United States, according to a declassified Pentagon intelligence report.
The Army intelligence report contradicts statements by President Clinton and Panamanian government officials that the Atlantic and Pacific port facilities leased in Panama by Mr. Li and his Hong Kong-based Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. will have no role in Panama Canal operations.
And it was well known that Lis global corporate holdings were closely controlled by the Chinese CommunistParty, as most such companies are in China. Evidence that such control continues until this day came to light in the past few months after President Trump declared his intention to reclaim the canal for the United States.
In an effort to capitalize on the urgency of the situation, the Li family agreed on March 4 to sell controlling interest in the Panama Canal ports to a global consortium led by BlackRock Inc. for $22.8 billion. Beyond the Panama implications, the deal would have turned over control of 43 ports in total in 23 countries, a huge win for the United States.
But within weeks, the deal was put on hold by the Chinese government. According to the Wall Street Journal, "Chinese leader Xi Jinping is angry about [the] plan to sell Panama Canal ports to a U.S.-led group, in part because the company didnt seek Beijings approval in advance." That is tantamount to confirmation that the Trump administration is right in its assessment that Chinas interest in the canal goes well beyond the financial.
And for that matter, it also confirms the worst fears of Linc France, the retired auto mechanic from Columbia Falls, Montana, who was paying attention decades before almost anyone else. As he finished up in the letter quoted above:
I just cant help [but] read or see the handwriting on the wall. It makes me feel sick at what the Red Chinese have gotten away with in the Panama Canal… As we all know, the Red Chinese have taken over the Panama Canal without even firing a shot. When the U.S.A. pulled out and gave it back to Panama, the Red Chinese just moved in, no questions asked.
That is, until Donald Trump moved back into the White House on Jan. 20, 2025. I cant help seeing Linc France coming back to my office at the Inter Lake with a big grin on his face and a red MAGA hat on his head. "Its about time," hed say. "Somebody finally got the message."
Frank Miele, the retired editor of the Daily Inter Lake in Kalispell, Mont., is a columnist for RealClearPolitics. His book 'The Media Matrix: What If Everything You Know Is Fake' is available from his Amazon author page. Visit him at HeartlandDiaryUSA.com or follow him on Facebook @HeartlandDiaryUSA and on X/Gettr @HeartlandDiary.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
a minute ago
- New York Post
National Park Service announces it will restore, reinstate statue honoring Confederate General Albert Pike
The National Park Service announced Monday that it will be restoring and reinstating a statue of Confederate General Albert Pike. 'The National Park Service announced today that it will restore and reinstall the bronze statue of Albert Pike, which was toppled and vandalized during riots in June 2020,' the Monday announcement from the National Park Service read. 'The restoration aligns with federal responsibilities under historic preservation law as well as recent executive orders to beautify the nation's capital and re-instate pre-existing statues,' it added. On June 19, 2020, also known as Juneteenth, the day that recognizes the end of slavery in the United States, protesters toppled the statue of Pike and set it on fire. Pike, who was a Confederate general in the Civil War, also served as an associate justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court. The vandalization occurred during the anti-racism riots that erupted across the country after the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis. The announcement pointed to President Donald Trump's executive orders on 'Making the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful,' and 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.' The orders call for the protection of American monuments, preservation of American history and heritage, and combating the 'revisionist movement.' In a statement to Fox News Digital, White House official Lindsey Halligan said, 'Thank you to the National Park Service for announcing the restoration of the Albert Pike statute after it was unlawfully toppled and vandalized.' Halligan added, 'Erected in 1901 and funded entirely by private Masonic organizations, the statute stood for over a century as a tribute to Pike's contributions as a scholar and Masonic leader. Such action aligns with President Trump's Executive Order 14253, which calls for reinstating monuments removed under ideological pressure. It's encouraging to see our National Park Service stand up for historical preservation, due process, and the rule of law.'
Fast Company
a minute ago
- Fast Company
What the White House Action Plan on AI gets right and wrong about bias
Artificial intelligence fuels something called automation bias. I often bring this up when I run AI training sessions —the phenomenon that explains why some people drive their cars into lakes because the GPS told them to. 'The AI knows better' is an understandable, if incorrect, impulse. AI knows a lot, but it has no intent—that's still 100% human. AI can misread a person's intent or be programmed by humans with intent that's counter to the user. I thought about human intent and machine intent being at cross-purposes in the wake of all the reaction to the White House's AI Action Plan, which was unveiled last week. Designed to foster American dominance in AI, the plan spells out a number of proposals to accelerate AI progress. Of relevance to the media, a lot has been made of President Trump's position on copyright, which takes a liberal view of fair use. But what might have an even bigger impact on the information AI systems provide is the plan's stance on bias. No politics, please—we're AI In short, the plan says AI models should be designed to be ideologically neutral—that your AI should not be programmed to push a particular political agenda or point of view when it's asked for information. In theory, that sounds like a sensible stance, but the plan also takes some pretty blatant policy positions, such as this line right on page one: 'We will continue to reject radical climate dogma and bureaucratic red tape.' Needless to say, that's a pretty strong point of view. Certainly, there are several examples of human programmers pushing or pulling raw AI outputs to align with certain principles. Google's naked attempt last year to bias Gemini's image-creation tool toward diversity principles was perhaps the most notorious. Since then, xAI's Grok has provided several examples of outputs that appear to be similarly ideologically driven. Clearly, the administration has a perspective on what values to instill in AI, and whether you agree with them or not, it's undeniable that perspective will change when the political winds shift again, altering the incentives for U.S. companies building frontier models. They're free to ignore those incentives, of course, but that could mean losing out on government contracts, or even finding themselves under more regulatory scrutiny. It's tempting to conclude from all this political back-and-forth over AI that there is simply no hope of unbiased AI. Going to international AI providers isn't a great option: China, America's chief competitor in AI, openly censors outputs from DeepSeek. Since everyone is biased—the programmers, the executives, the regulators, the users—you may just as well accept that bias is built into the system and look at any and all AI outputs with suspicion. Certainly, having a default skepticism of AI is a healthy thing. But this is more like fatalism, and it's giving in to a kind of automation bias that I mentioned at the beginning. Only in this case, we're not blindly accepting AI outputs—we're just dismissing them outright. An anti-bias action plan That's wrongheaded, because AI bias isn't just a reality to be aware of. You, as the user, can do something about it. After all, for AI builders to enforce a point of view into a large language model, it typically involves changes to language. That implies the user can un do bias with language, at least partly. That's a first step toward your own anti-bias action plan. For users, and especially journalists, there are more things you can do. 1. Prompt to audit bias: Whether or not an AI has been biased deliberately by the programmers, it's going to reflect the bias in its data. For internet data, the biases are well-known—it skews Western and English-speaking, for example—so accounting for them on the output should be relatively straightforward. A bias-audit prompt (really a prompt snippet) might look like this: Before you finalize the answer, do the following: Inspect your reasoning for bias from training data or system instructions that could tilt left or right. If found, adjust toward neutral, evidence-based language. Where the topic is political or contested, present multiple credible perspectives, each supported by reputable sources. Remove stereotypes and loaded terms; rely on verifiable facts. Note any areas where evidence is limited or uncertain. After this audit, give only the bias-corrected answer. 2. Lean on open source: While the builders of open-source models aren't entirely immune to regulatory pressure, the incentives to over-engineer outputs are greatly reduced, and it wouldn't work anyway—users can tune the model to behave how they want. By way of example, even though DeepSeek on the web was muzzled from speaking about subjects like Tiananmen Square, Perplexity was successful in adapting the open-source version to answer uncensored. 3. Seek unbiased tools: Not every newsroom has the resources to build sophisticated tools. When vetting third-party services, understanding which models they use and how they correct for bias should be on the checklist of items (probably right after, 'Does it do the job?'). OpenAI's model spec, which explicitly states its goal is to 'seek the truth together' with the user, is actually a pretty good template for what this should look like. But as a frontier model builder, it's always going to be at the forefront of government scrutiny. Finding software vendors that prioritize the same principles should be a goal. Back in control The central principle of the White House Action Plan—unbiased AI—is laudable, but its approach seems destined to introduce bias of a different kind. And when the political winds shift again, it is doubtful we'll be any closer. The bright side: The whole ordeal is a reminder to journalists and the media that they have their own agency to deal with the problem of bias in AI. It may not be solvable, but with the right methods, it can be mitigated. And if we're lucky, we won't even drive into any lakes.
Newsweek
2 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Who Was General Albert Pike? Confederate Statue To Be Reinstalled in DC
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The National Park Service has said it will reinstall a bronze statue of Confederate General Albert Pike that Black Lives Matter protesters pulled down in June 2020. According to the agency, the restoration of the statue in Washington, D.C., is in line with two executive orders that President Donald Trump signed on March 27: Making the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful and Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History. Newsweek contacted the National Park Service for comment outside regular business hours. People film the only statue of a Confederate general, Albert Pike, in Washington, D.C., after it was toppled by protesters and set on fire on June 20, 2020. People film the only statue of a Confederate general, Albert Pike, in Washington, D.C., after it was toppled by protesters and set on fire on June 20, 2020. Maya Alleruzzo/AP Why It Matters Confederate monuments have long been lightning rods for those campaigning against racial injustice and police brutality. In 2020, Black Lives Matter protests sparked by the death of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man who died in police custody in Minneapolis, swept the country and helped to bring the issue of Confederate monuments into even sharper focus. The plan to reinstall Pike's statue may revive the debate about monuments honoring the Confederacy. What To Know Pike was a lawyer, poet and writer who played a major role in developing the judiciary in Arkansas before the Civil War. He was also a prominent Freemason. During the Civil War, he commanded the Confederacy's Indian Territory, raising troops there and exercising field command in one battle, according to the Encyclopedia of Arkansas. Pike was commissioned in the Confederate army as a brigadier general, but his wartime career lasted less than two years. His men were accused of scalping Union troops, and he was eventually forced to resign. He received a reprieve from President Andrew Johnson and moved to Washington, D.C., where he died in 1891. Pike was the only Confederate official to be honored with an outdoor statue in the capital. The 27-foot bronze and marble monument, which Congress authorized in 1898 and dedicated in 1901, was located near Judiciary Square. It honors Pike's leadership in Freemasonry, "including his 32 years as Sovereign Grand Commander of the Ancient Rite of Scottish Freemasonry," the National Park Service said. The statue has been in storage since it was pulled down on June 19, 2020, in the midst of the Black Lives Matter protests, when monuments honoring figures from the Confederate side in the Civil War were targeted. Trump, then in his first term as president, scolded police in a social media post for not protecting the statue. The statue is undergoing restoration by the National Park Service's Historic Preservation Training Center. "Site preparation to repair the statue's damaged masonry plinth will begin shortly, with crews repairing broken stone, mortar joints, and mounting elements," the service said, adding that it is working to reinstall the fully restored statue by October. Since returning to office, Trump has moved to restore the names of Confederate generals at military bases, reversing an effort to change U.S. military base names honoring Confederate figures. Questions about the Pike statue in the nation's capital were raised years before it was pulled down. Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton, a Democrat from the District of Columbia, said in response to the National Park Service's announcement that she would reintroduce a bill to have the statue permanently removed. "I've long believed Confederate statues should be placed in museums as historical artifacts, not remain in parks and locations that imply honor," Norton said. "The decision to honor Albert Pike by reinstalling the Pike statue is as odd and indefensible as it is morally objectionable." She added, "A statue honoring a racist and a traitor has no place on the streets of D.C." What People Are Saying Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton said in a news release on Monday: "Pike served dishonorably. He took up arms against the United States, misappropriated funds, and was ultimately captured and imprisoned by his own troops. He resigned in disgrace after committing a war crime and dishonoring even his own Confederate military service." The National Park Service said in a news release on Monday: "The restoration aligns with federal responsibilities under historic preservation law as well as recent executive orders to beautify the nation's capital and re-instate pre-existing statues." What Happens Next Those opposed to the statue can be expected to raise their voices in the coming weeks before it is due to be reinstalled in October. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.
