Supreme Court turns away — for now — Trump's appeal seeking to fire agency official
Instead, the justices said they would weigh in on the matter only after a judge rules next week on whether the firing was legal.
The decision is a small but temporary setback for Trump and his lawyers,
Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan, Brett M. Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett agreed to put off a decision for now.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson said they would have rejected Trump's appeal. Meanwhile, Justices Neil M. Gorsuch and Samuel A. Alito said they would have granted and required the judge to reconsider her decision that blocked the firing.
Trump's lawyers may have overplayed their hand by rushing an appeal to the court on Sunday. They described the temporary halt on firing the head of the small agency that protects whistleblowers "an unprecedented assault on the separation of powers" which would impose "irreparable harm" on the president.
Last week, a federal judge in Washington issued a temporary restraining order to block the firing of Hampton Dellinger until Feb. 26.
Dellinger was appointed last year to a five-year term to lead the Office of Special Counsel, an independent agency created by Congress in 1978 to protect federal employees who report abuse or wrongdoing.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson granted the temporary restraining order and said she would issue a ruling after holding a hearing Feb. 26.
Trump and his lawyers have aggressively asserted his executive power as president. They say the president can fire officials who hold executive or policy-making positions throughout the government, including those in agencies which were given independent authority by Congress.
The Office of Special Counsel was created by Congress in 1978.President Jimmy Carter signed the bill into law and said the new independent agency would defend federal employees who suffered abuse or exposed wrongdoing.
The agency has 29 employees and and keeps a rather low profile.Last year, President Biden appointed North Carolina attorney Hampton Dellinger to a five-year term as head of the agency, and he was confirmed by the Senate.
On Feb. 7, Trump's personnel director sent him a one-sentence email saying he had been terminated immediately.
He sued arguing that his firing was in "flagrant disregard" of the law. Judge Jackson put his firing on hold temporarily.
The U.S. court of appeals refused, by 2-1 vote, to set aside her order. Trump's acting solicitor general Sarah Harris sent an emergency appeal to Chief Justice John G. Roberts on Sunday.
She called the judge's temporary reinstatement of Dellinger "an unprecedented assault on the separation of powers that warrants immediate relief."
Roberts has written several opinions holding that the president has the broad authority to remove officials who wield executive power.
Conservatives refer to this as independent executive theory which holds that the Constitution gave the president the power to control all the executive officers of the U.S. government.
"Under our Constitution, the 'executive power'—all of it—is vested in a President," he wrote in 2020. That means he has a nearly "unrestricted removal power" over officials who wield executive or policy-making authority, he said.
That decision said the president was free to remove the head of the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, even though Congress had said the appointed director could be fired only for cause. Trump's lawyers cited that precedent as confirming the president's authority over agency officials like Dellinger.
The chief justice's 2020 opinion did not overrule earlier decisions that said Congress could establish multi-member commissions or boards whose members would be appointed for fixed terms.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'We've Been Served': Paul Tudor Jones Warns AI Could Be a 'Cookbook' For Humanity In A Chilling 'Twilight Zone' Warning
"This is obviously the most disruptive technology in the history of mankind," billionaire investor Paul Tudor Jones said last month. "We've been served," Jones warned during an appearance on "Bloomberg Open Interest," casting artificial intelligence as a force that demands urgent scrutiny. His remarks sparked debate over looming job losses, classroom breakthroughs, and whether Congress can craft guardrails before machines outrun lawmakers. The Twilight Zone Cookbook Warning Jones invoked the 1962 "Twilight Zone" episode "To Serve Man," where grateful earthlings later learn the aliens' gift is a cookbook. "It seemed humanitarian, but it turns out to be a cookbook," he said, arguing that a helpful-looking algorithm could hide a deadly recipe. Don't Miss: Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Many are rushing to grab Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs — Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk echoed the fear during a February appearance on "The Joe Rogan Experience", estimating a 20% chance AI could wipe out humanity—a risk Jones said should "set off alarm bells throughout the world." Jobs Forecast Sparks Economic Alarm Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei told Axios in late May that U.S. unemployment could vault from about 4 % to between 10%-20 % within five years as large-language models automate routine white-collar roles, including contract drafting and balance-sheet analysis. He added that junior analysts, paralegals, and entry-level coders face the greatest risk because their duties mirror model-training data almost verbatim. The projection tracks with the World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report 2025, which expects automation to reshape 85 million positions globally by 2027. Jones warned that banking, consulting, law, and media tasks are "already being done faster, sometimes better, by machines," raising the chance of simultaneous layoffs that could test social-safety nets. Trending: $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. Tutors Bills And The Race To Regulate Even so, Jones said AI's upside "can be profound" in classrooms. The U.S. Department of Education's proposed fiscal 2025 budget includes nearly $500 million for adaptive-learning pilots. A Stanford-led study from 2024 found that students using AI-assisted tutoring were 4 percentage points more likely to master math concepts, with the largest gains—up to 9 percentage points—among those paired with lower-rated human tutors. Supporters argue that virtual tutors, available around the clock, could narrow stubborn achievement gaps. Regulation remains the wild card. Jones criticized President Donald Trump's so-called One Big Beautiful Bill for including a moratorium on new AI rules, saying it risks letting the "cookbook" publish itself. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is instead championing an independent oversight agency and at least $32 billion in emergency funding. Meanwhile, the National Institute of Standards and Technology released the AI Risk Management Framework in January 2023, yet Jones called voluntary guidance "nowhere near sufficient." Read Next: This AI-Powered Trading Platform Has 5,000+ Users, 27 Pending Patents, and a $43.97M Valuation — Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die."Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article 'We've Been Served': Paul Tudor Jones Warns AI Could Be a 'Cookbook' For Humanity In A Chilling 'Twilight Zone' Warning originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Nearly two-thirds disapprove of Trump's handling of inflation: Survey
Nearly two-thirds of Americans disapprove of how President Trump has handled inflation — one of his key campaign promises, a new poll has found six months into Trump's second term. The CBS News/YouGov poll released Sunday also found that half of U.S. adults think that the Trump administration's policies have made them 'financially worse off' and 62 percent think the White House's policies have driven food and grocery costs up. Inflation rose by 2.7 percent in June, as businesses passed the costs of Trump's tariff hikes onto consumers. Trump has insisted, though, that inflation has settled as he has pressed Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates. The White House has cited 'core inflation,' which excludes energy and food prices, as an indicator of positive movement on the issue. Core inflation hit 2.9 percent in June, below the expected 3 percent but up from 2.8 percent the month earlier. 'The USA is Rockin', there is VERY LOW INFLATION,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Friday. More than three-fourths of Republicans surveyed in the new poll said they approve of Trump's handling of inflation, while Democrats and independents overwhelmingly disapproved at 95 percent and 72 percent, respectively. The White House didn't immediately provide comment for this story, but it touted Trump's inflation record in a news release last week. 'Every month since President Trump took office, core inflation — the best measure of inflation — has beat or matched expectations,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement Tuesday. 'The data proves that President Trump is stabilizing inflation and the Panicans continue to be wrong about tariffs raising prices.' The president has pressed for lower interest rates, but economists warn that such a move could drive inflation higher. The CBS News/YouGov poll found people were split on the issue: 39 percent said that the White House's priority should be keeping interest rates where they are to try to control inflation; 34 percent said interest rates should be cut; and 27 percent said they were not sure. The CBS News/YouGov poll surveyed 2,343 adults nationwide Wednesday through Friday. The margin of error is 2.5 percentage points.


The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Over half of Americans say ‘big, beautiful bill' going to raise health care costs: Poll
More than half of Americans — 57 percent — said in a new survey that they think the GOP's sweeping package extending tax cuts and slashing welfare services will increase their health-care costs. Thirteen percent in the CBS/YouGov poll released Sunday said that the 'big, beautiful bill' will lower their health-care costs and 33 percent said there will be no impact. While the Congressional Budget Office has not yet released a final estimate for the measure as enacted, it projected that 16 million people would lose their health insurance by 2034 under an earlier House-passed version of the bill. This analysis has been the basis for many Democrats' messaging around health care, and health-care advocates have still warned that the final version could be devastating to communities relying on Medicaid. The sprawling package permanently extends many of the temporary tax cuts passed by Republicans during President Trump's first term, alongside making deep spending reductions to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and other welfare programs. The measure would primarily benefit wealthy Americans, an analysis by the Yale Budget Lab found last month. Democrats have assailed the legislation as a historic transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich and are looking to message around its cuts to health care for the 2026 midterms — even if some of the package's most significant changes don't kick in until 2028. Overall, six in 10 questioned in the CBS/YouGov survey disapprove of the GOP megabill. A similar percentage said that it will help wealthy people and hurt poor people. A separate AP-NORC poll released Saturday found that nearly two-thirds of Americans think the legislation will do more to help wealthy people. In the CBS/YouGov poll, 40 percent of respondents said they thought the measure will increase their taxes. Another 32 percent said they thought their taxes will not be impacted either way. A majority — 56 percent — said that they tied issues regarding the megabill significantly to how they evaluate President Trump's second term. A plurality of Americans, 44 percent, said they had a 'general sense' of the content of the legislation alongside some specifics. Meanwhile, roughly two in 10 — 22 percent — said they had a general idea of it but lacked specifics. The CBS/YouGov poll was conducted between July 16 and July 18, with a sample of 2,343 and a margin of error of 2.5 percentage points.