
Bitcoin just made Trump billions. But how much will it cost all of us?
Don't worry – I won't try to explain it today. But you should know that its boosters and their energy-consuming supercomputers have captured American politics, and they're hoping their industry will grow to immense proportions over the next four years.
In fact, these infamously anti-government crypto -bros were perhaps the biggest contributors to the 2024 presidential election. The crypto industry pumped more than $200 million in direct donations and hundreds of millions more into industry Super PACs. Like any big donor group, they're now expecting massive returns on their investments.
Their biggest libertarian dream is not only for the industry to expand, but for the US government to step in and subsidise their speculative investments by trading US gold reserves to buy a national reserve of billions of bitcoins.
You should also know that because these digital crypto-currencies require massive amounts of inter-connected computer power to perform thousands of complex calculations every time they want to 'mine' a new 'coin', they soak up electricity like a sponge. Admittedly, some are better than others. But just like any type of unregulated mining, the industry in general is an environmental disaster.
Right now, the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance projects that without any further growth, the electricity demand of all these computers mining and trading bitcoins alone could already reach 172 terawatt hours this year – that's greater than the annual electricity demand of Poland. And that is assuming no further growth or taking account of any of the hundreds of other cryptocurrencies online.
Since 2021, a lion's share of this complex computing has been happening in the USA, especially in Texas. The Energy Information Agency believes it's putting a massive strain on local power grids, especially at peak times, and estimates that it could represent up to 2.3 per cent of national electricity consumption.
As crypto-mania grows, so too will this terrible energy bill. And so too, it seems, will its political promoters.
If you didn't watch Trump 's two-part inauguration, you might have missed 'Paster Zo', more formally known as Pastor Lorenzo Sewell, who launched his very own cryptocurrency – quite literally from church – that rocketed to anestimated value of $4.5 million, but crashed and disappeared four hours later. It has now lost 93 per cent of its value, as have many of its everyday investors, with some estimates that individual investors may have lost tens of thousands of dollars each.
This came only days after the $Trump meme-coin launched, which could become one of his most successful money makers. The coin was launched last week while Trump 's inner circle attended an invite-only crypto ball in DC. Soon after, many of the party-goers were boosting the coin online, as were his family and the president himself. Trump launched the meme coin by inviting his followers on X to 'join my very special Trump Community'.
The meme-coin, which is 80 per cent owned by two of Trump's shell companies, rose by more than 600 per cent in its first day. It kept climbing as average Americans joined the weekend pile-on. By Sunday night, the price of a single coin had risen from under $10 when it opened to just under $75, reaching a market capitalisation of more than $15 billion.
Due to his shell company's 80 per cent share, Axios analysts estimated that the meme-coin could account for almost 90 per cent of Trump's net worth. Over the course of a weekend, a slew of crypto-boosters and everyday fans had made him an instant blockchain billionaire.
That is, until the price dropped dramatically. Late on Sunday night, the meme-coin lost half of its market value within an hour. A wave of major investors sold all at the same time, while the Trump family welcomed the newest family meme-coin, $Melania. Those who knew about the coin's launch, who invested early and calculated when to time their exit correctly, may have made millions in profits.
Analysis of the Solana blockchain suggests this to be the case, and that many others, especially the everyday traders following on Twitter or Truth Social, may have lost millions as well.
As such, in just the first week of his presidency, Trump and his inner circle of bitcoin bulls had just tried and tested a new and potentially far more lucrative form of energy-hungry political extraction.
What we do know is that the public explosion of bitcoin and cryptocurrencies globally is already destabilising local power grids, and will likely expand its already gargantuan environmental footprint.
What we don't know is whether or not it may also become a destabilising force for national sovereignty – as well as the climate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Will Trump pardon Diddy? We may have the answer
After Finnerty asked, "Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Would you consider pardoning him?" Trump responded: "Well he was essentially, I guess sort of, half-innocent. I don't know what they do, he's still in jail or something. He was celebrating a victory but I guess it wasn't as good of a victory." Trump 'should not pardon' Sean 'Diddy' 'Diddy' Combs, Megyn Kelly says On July 2, jurors found Combs not guilty of racketeering and sex trafficking ex-girlfriends Casandra "Cassie" Ventura Fine and a woman known as "Jane" in his sweeping trial that nearly lasted two months. He was convicted July 2 on two of the five counts against him for transporting those same women for prostitution, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years per count. During the interview, Trump said "probably..." before pausing and revealing to Finnerty, "You know, I was very friendly with him, I got along with him great, seemed like a nice guy. I didn't know him well, but when I ran for office he was very hostile." The Newsmax host noted then that "he said some not so nice things about you, sir." "Yeah, and it's hard. You know, like you, we're human beings and we don't like to have things cloud our judgement, right?" the president continued. "But when you knew someone and you were fine and then you run for office and he made some terrible statements... so I don't know... it makes it more difficult to do." President Trump reacts to media chatter of potential clemency or presidential pardons for figures like Ghislaine Maxwell, Sean "Diddy" Combs, and former Rep. George Santos. @RobFinnertyUSA — NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX) August 2, 2025 Then, Trump replied, "I'd say so," when Finnerty clarified by asking if it was "more likely a no for (pardoning) Combs?" In the interview, Trump was seemingly referencing Combs' expletive-filled 2017 comments in The Daily Beast, essentially saying that "(Black people) don't really" care about Trump. "The tomfoolery that's going on in D.C., that's just regular everyday business to Black folks," Combs told the left-leaning outlet in-part, adding later in the interview that he had to "keep it focused on that self-love that we need to give our race." Trump first weighed in on the possibility of pardoning Combs on May 30 in the Oval Office. "Nobody's asked" about a pardon, the president said. "But I know people are thinking about it. I know they're thinking about it. I think some people have been very close to asking." Trump added, "I haven't spoken to him in years. He really liked me a lot." Despite last month's verdict, Combs' legal saga continues. On Wednesday, July 31, lawyers for Combs requested his acquittal, or a new trial altogether, in court documents reviewed by USA TODAY. A day earlier, conservative host Megyn Kelly urged Trump against potentially pardoning Combs. Kelly said in an X post on July 30 that "Trump should not pardon Diddy" because "he doesn't deserve it." "He's a Trump hater. He's a woman abuser. MAGA is already upset over elites seeming to cover for each other. This would not help. GOP struggling w/young female voters, most of whom will HATE a Diddy pardon," Kelly wrote. Contributing: Taijuan Moorman


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Smithsonian responds after Trump removed from impeachment exhibit
Smithsonian: Display restored to 2008 appearance The "impeachment" display is housed within the larger, permanent gallery called "The American Presidency," which opened in 2000, according to an emailed statement from the Smithsonian. It features information and artifacts about Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon, according to the display's companion website. Nixon resigned before he could be formally impeached. In September 2021, a "temporary label on content concerning the impeachments of Donald J. Trump" was added, according to the Smithsonian's statement. "It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025." The display has since been returned to how it appeared nearly 20 years ago, according to the Smithsonian statement and the Washington Post's report, which also noted that the exhibit now says, "only three presidents have seriously faced removal," omitting Trump. "In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibition needed to be addressed," the museum's statement said. "Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the 'Impeachment' case back to its 2008 appearance." Website highlights other impeached president s The companion website for the display does not include a dedicated section for the Trump impeachments but notes in an introductory sentence, "The House of Representatives impeached Andrew Johnson in 1868, William J. Clinton in 1998, and Donald Trump in 2019 and again in 2021. In all four cases the Senate voted to acquit." It includes sections about Johnson's impeachment, including tickets and newspaper clips from the time; Nixon's Senate hearing and resignation, including testimony papers and photos from the proceedings; and Clinton's trial, with tickets and Senate question cards. 'All impeachments' coming in the future "A future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments," the Smithsonian statement said, noting that updating and renewing permanent galleries"requires a significant amount of time and funding." The Smithsonian declined to answer further questions about the change and the timeline for an updated exhibit. The controversy around the Smithsonian's change to the display comes after the White House in May pushed for the removal of art director Kim Sajet from her role as director of the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery, citing her "strong support" of "DEI." In March, Trump also signed an executive order demanding the removal of "anti-American ideology" from the Smithsonian and other cultural institutions.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump and TACO: New tariff rates issued after deadline
Tariffs are a tax on goods from other countries that importers pay, and economists generally agree it leads to higher prices for consumers. Trump began imposing tariffs on imports from the U.S.'s top trade partners in February, only to change their effective date, scope or rate over the following months. The on-again-off-again tariffs have been a theme of Trump's second term, leading to the creation of the term TACO. Here is what to know: Live updates: Trump fires head of labor statistics bureau after weak jobs report What does TACO mean? Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined "TACO trade" in May, describing how some investors anticipate market rebounds amid Trump's on-again, off-again tariff policies. The acronym stands for "Trump always chickens out." Armstrong describes TACO trade as many investors' strategy to buy into the market that dips when Trump announces steep tariffs on the assumption that he will back off his tariff order, and the market will rebound. Trump hit back at a reporter who asked about the term on May 28, saying, "you ask a nasty question like that. It's called negotiation." Trump's tariffs have been on-again-off-again Back in February, Trump announced a 25% tariff on goods from top trade partners Mexico and Canada and 10% on goods from China. Such was the start of a series of delays and negotiations that left Canada and Mexico relatively untouched when Trump expanded steeper tariff orders to the rest of the world in April. China and the U.S. were caught up in an intense trade war where the economic powerhouses retaliated until both sides issued tariffs in the triple digits. They reached a truce in May and have discussed extending the 90-day pause while they work out a deal. Trump on April 2 announced widespread tariffs in what he called "Liberation Day." Shortly after, he paused the climbing rates for 90 days. That pause was set to expire on July 9, but instead of the tariffs going into effect, Trump extended the deadline. That deadline was Aug. 1, and Trump had said the deadline would not change, but the recent order gives it another week. Mexico remains at 25% while it continues to work on a trade deal for the next 90 days, Trump said. Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @