Hajj to cost a pilgrim in range of Rs1,150,000 to Rs1,250,000: govt
This was stated by Ministry of Religious Affairs Secretary Dr Syed Ataur Rehman, while chairing the meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Religious Affairs.
The committee was informed that the 64,000 pilgrims who were supposed to perform Hajj through private tour operators but unable to perform Hajj because of delay and lack of coordination between the Ministry and Saudi Government, dot not have to pay additional amount to perform Hajj.
Federal Minister for Religious Affairs Sardar Mohammed Yousaf said that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif already told the ministry to give priority to those pilgrims who were unable to perform Hajj because of change in policy by the Saudi Government which the ministry was unable to implement on time.
On this issue, Senator Aon Abbas presented the report of the sub-committee on the findings and reasons which deprived large number of pilgrims managed by private tour operators from performing the Hajj.
He said in the past, 902 tour operators used to provide services to pilgrims but this year the Saudi Government reduced their number to 42.
He said those 42 tour operators did not have the capacity to manage such a huge number of pilgrims.
He said the restriction of State Bank to provide foreign exchange only up to $0.3 million to tour operators also caused lot of problems for them.
Apart from this, the attitude of the Ministry of Religious Affairs was not cooperative towards the tour operators, he added. He said the DG Hajj because of unprecedented powers was not answerable to anyone.
Senator Aon Abbas, in his recommendations, said that the committee should directed the ministry that from now on, the DG Hajj should be appointed on merit and he must be familiar with Saudi culture and must know Arabic.
He said the committee and the ministry should also urge the State Bank to increase the buying limit of dollars for the tour operators from $0.3 million to $1 million.
Senator Allama Raja Nasir Abbas said that the government should have taken Shia and other Ulemas on board before barring pilgrims from travelling to Iraq and Iran by road for this year's Arbaeen pilgrimage due to regional security concerns.
He said thousands of Zaireen had already deposited billions of rupees to tour operators for the pilgrimage to holy places in Iran and Iraq.
He said the air fare for Iran and Iraq is very high which the majority of pilgrims cannot afford.
Religious Affairs Minister Sardar Mohammed Yousaf said that the Interior Ministry made this decision after consultations with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Balochistan Government, and key security agencies.
He said that the restriction is based on safety and national security concerns linked to threats along the land routes.
He said despite the ban on road travel, the government will facilitate pilgrims through air travel.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has directed authorities to arrange as many flights as possible to accommodate Zaireen in the coming days.
Officials said the decision aims to ensure public safety while allowing religious pilgrims to continue their journey by other means.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
39 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
The urgency of reforming madrassa system
Listen to article In a remote village in Shangla, a young boy was recently beaten to death by his teachers — for the "crime" of being absent from his madrassa for two days. His bruised and lifeless body now serves as a chilling indictment of a system that has gone unchecked for far too long. It tells a story of a failed educational model, a broken moral order, and a collective national negligence. The teachers involved were not lone wolves. They are part of a system that normalises violence, silences compassion, and rewards conformity over critical thinking. They are not educators; they are enforcers of a pedagogy built on fear, rote learning, and emotional suppression. And society continues to look away — shocked, perhaps, but ultimately silent. Let us be honest: this is not a one-off tragedy. It is a pattern. Madrassas, particularly in rural and underprivileged areas, are increasingly becoming hubs of psychological abuse, ideological rigidity, and physical violence. This is not to say that every madrassa or every teacher is guilty. But when a system regularly produces such outcomes and yet faces no structural reform, then the rot runs deep. Pakistan's madrassa network is vast — estimated to range between 30,000 and 40,000 institutions, educating millions of children. These children often come from the poorest segments of society. With no access to quality public schooling, their parents send them to madrassas hoping for a better future, spiritual guidance, and moral instruction. What they often receive, however, is a form of religious education stripped of the very essence of religion — mercy, reason, compassion, and balance. In many madrassas, the core focus is not on understanding Islam's universal ethical teachings. Instead, the curriculum revolves around memorisation, rigid interpretations of doctrine, and blind obedience to authority. The pedagogical tools are outdated; the teacher-student relationship is authoritarian; and the use of corporal punishment is alarmingly normalised. Even the language of instruction reflects this mindset. Traditional Arabic grammar lessons begin with daraba (he hit), darabtum (you hit), darabahu (he hit him) — a vocabulary that emphasises action through domination. This is not merely linguistic convention; it shapes a worldview. A child raised on the language of violence is likely to internalise aggression as the default response to disagreement or disobedience. This is not an argument against religious education. Quite the contrary. When rooted in prophetic ethics, religious instruction can nurture empathy, self-discipline, humility, and a deep sense of purpose. But today's madrassas — some backed by powerful religious lobbies and countries — do not aim to produce reflective moral agents. They churn out either passive conformists or ideologically rigid minds incapable of navigating a pluralistic modern world. What is worse is the appeasement policy of the state. Influential actors in official positions have long avoided confronting the madrassa establishment for fear of political backlash. The result is a dual education system where the elite study in secure, progressive schools, while the poor are abandoned to a pedagogical regime from the medieval age. Other countries have confronted this challenge. Turkey, for instance, shut down thousands of unregulated religious schools and integrated faith-based instruction into its mainstream education system — ensuring oversight, teacher training, and curricular modernisation. Pakistan faces the same crossroads. The choice is stark: either bring madrassas under state regulation, modernise their curriculum, and retrain their teachers — or phase them out entirely and move toward a single, inclusive education system for all. Children deserve better. They deserve an education that teaches both faith and reason, both discipline and empathy. And most of all, they deserve to be safe. If we continue to ignore the mounting evidence, if we keep excusing brutality under the guise of tradition, we will soon find that it is not just children being buried - but the very soul of Pakistan. This moment calls for decisive reform. Anything less is complicity.
Business Recorder
17 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Nawaz, Maryam & KSA envoy discuss various issues
LAHORE: President PML-N Muhammad Nawaz Sharif and Chief Minister Punjab Maryam Nawaz Sharif met Saudi Arabian Ambassador to Pakistan Nawaf Bin Saeed al-Maliki, to discuss matters of mutual interest, economic cooperation, defence partnership and issues related to the unity of Muslim Ummah. They conveyed their best wishes and heartfelt respect to the Custodian of Two Holy Mosques King Salman bin Abdulaziz and Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman, and reaffirmed their commitment to further strengthen historical, political, economic and defence relations between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. They agreed to further expand defence partnership, joint training, intelligence exchange and mutual cooperation. The Chief Minister said, 'Land of Saudi Arabia holds a special spiritual and respectable place in the heart of every Muslim. Leadership of Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Salman bin Abdulaziz is a symbol of hope, dignity and progress for the Muslim world.' Maryam Nawaz Sharif said, 'Relationship between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia is based on mutual trust, shared values and long-standing brotherhood. Relations with Saudi Arabia is a central pillar of Pakistan's foreign policy, which is continuously strengthening in political, economic and other areas.' She highlighted, 'Pakistan signed charter of Global Water Organization under the leadership of Saudi Arabia as a founding member, which is an expression of its commitment to addressing water challenges.' The Chief Minister said, 'The role of Saudi leadership for peace in the region is commendable. Pakistan seeks resolution of issues through dialogue despite Indian aggressive actions.' She underscored, 'Pakistan ratified Indus Waters Treaty through the arbitration decision of June 27, 2025.' Maryam Nawaz said, 'Pakistan seeks Saudi cooperation for early completion of GCC Free Trade Agreement,' adding, 'Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) is an effective platform for speedy completion of projects.' She flagged, 'I am grateful to Saudi government for hosting 2.5 million Pakistanis living in Saudi Arabia. Close and constant contact with Saudi Arabia at consular level is the top priority of Punjab government.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
18 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Challenging dominant ideology of patriarchy
EDITORIAL: That the scourge of toxic patriarchy has long made life a relentless battle for women in Pakistan — curbing their freedoms, crushing their agency and denying them basic rights in homes, workplaces, courts, and corridors of power — is a brutal reality that demands urgent reckoning. It is highly welcome then that the Supreme Court's July 23 verdict directly confronts one facet of this deeply entrenched patriarchal mindset, unequivocally condemning the cruel and discriminatory weaponisation of a woman's infertility as a means to strip her of rights guaranteed under Pakistani law. Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, while dismissing a petition in which a husband had challenged his wife's right to maintenance and dower, castigated him for the sheer cruelty he inflicted upon her, not just in marriage but through prolonged litigation. The petitioner had abandoned his wife within a year of their union and failed to provide any support or maintenance thereafter. Years later, when she turned to the courts seeking recovery of her dowry, maintenance and dower, he responded with some vindictive claims, alleging she was medically unfit for conjugal duties, incapable of bearing children, and effectively challenged her identity as a woman under the law to deny her rightful legal entitlements. This deeply offensive and baseless claim, disproven by medical evidence, formed the crux of his legal strategy. In doing so, he subjected his estranged wife to years of public humiliation, emotional trauma and highly invasive medical examinations through three tiers of court, causing the judicial process itself to become a tool of degradation. In his seven-page order, where the petitioner was also fined Rs500,000 for his malicious assertions, the chief justice made it unequivocally clear that infertility, in any case, cannot be used as a pretext to deny a woman her right to dower or maintenance, nor can it be grounds to question her womanhood. In a country where women are routinely deprived of maintenance on flimsy, fabricated or no grounds at all, the moral clarity and unambiguous reasoning of this ruling decisively shuts the door on all such regressive justifications. The Supreme Court's ruling is a commendable intervention, but more must be done to protect women against such malevolent legal harassment and systemic erosion of their rights. As the chief justice noted, '… women in our society constitute a vulnerable group, whose dignity requires vigilant protection and care'. In an ideal system, the respondent should never have had to defend her womanhood in open court, an ordeal that could have been avoided with greater sensitivity and restraint from the lower judiciary. While the Supreme Court has, in recent years, largely stood firmly on the side of justice for women facing systemic and social abuse, it is the lower courts where the adoption of more gender-sensitive approaches is essential to ensure that the legal process does not become a harrowing experience for female litigants. Therefore, more gender-sensitive training, procedural safeguards and legal protections must be introduced to ensure that women are not re-victimised by the very system they turn to for justice. Here, it is also important to question societal norms that have turned infertility and personal choices around child-bearing into sources of stigma, reducing a woman's worth to her reproductive capacity. This mindset not only fuels discrimination within families and communities but also enables structural injustices to be inflicted upon women without shame or consequence. Breaking this stigma is vital to ensuring women are treated with dignity, both in society and before the law. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
