'Fly contamination' concerns over housing plans in Uckfield
The proposals followed on from an outline scheme approved in 2016, which secured planning permission to build up to 1,000 new homes on the overall site, and a new primary school and retail, community and leisure space.While both applications were eventually approved by the committee, Uckfield ward councillors Donna French and Ben Reed said there were some "unresolved issues"."Uckfield Town Council and myself are not trying to stop this application, we are just seeking to help deliver the best possible development for this site," Ms French said.The LDRS reported her concerns included the potential impact on an area of ancient woodland and a protected oak tree, parking and existing issues of swarming flies linked to Southern Water treatment works on the northern edge of the development.Ms French concluded by calling the committee to defer the application.
'Swarming with flies'
Conservative councillor Neil Cleaver said: "We have a fly population in Uckfield which is swarming. "People are going to buy these houses. They are going to be sitting in their gardens or sitting in their houses with their windows shut, because they can't open them swarming with flies.He added he "could not support" the application and the council should take steps to address the "unresolved issues" raised by ward councillors. He said the council's deputy leader, Rachel Millward, should meet Southern Water to discuss ways of mitigating the "fly contamination".
Proposing approval for the housing application, Labour councillor Daniel Manvell said: "There are numerous things in [the outline permission] I wouldn't be happy with."Only 15% affordable housing is atrocious, given we deliver 35% on most sites these days - and all of that really speaks to previous iterations of this council not getting a local plan sorted."Residents have been waiting for homes on these sites for years and I don't think it would be responsible to defer this yet again."The housing element of the proposal is expected to comprise 50 one-bed, 136 two-bed, 321 three-bed, 211 four-bed and 32 five-bed units. Of these, 15% would be allocated to affordable housing.It is set to be delivered by the developers Redrow Homes and Places for People.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Neo-Nazi group is quietly buying up land across the UK in a bid to create white-only enclaves
A neo-Nazi group is quietly buying up land across the UK in a bid to create white-only enclaves, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. The Woodlander Initiative (TWI) has already purchased more than 20 acres of land in four different locations and plans to buy up plots in every county in the UK to establish 'white heartlands'. The fascist land-buying scheme owns a large plot of land near a secluded village in rural Wales that has been used by Britain's largest fascist group to host 'camping' and training weekends. The group has raised more than £160,000 from far-Right donors and recently bought a section of woodland near Rye in an attempt to establish a white-only enclave in the East Sussex town. Experts say that owning large swathes of land has been a longstanding ambition of the British far-Right and described it as 'concerning' that Woodlander has been able to do so under the radar. TWI is run by former BNP and National Front member Simon Birkett who is now linked to Britain's largest neo-Nazi group - Patriotic Alternative (PA) - and was a speaker at its last annual conference. In a recent article for TWI members Birkett invoked conspiracy theories including the 'Great Replacement' and said that Woodlander is part of attempts to 'create an elite, a vanguard, an alternative group who will actively do what's best for us'. PA leader Mark Collett - a former British National Party official - has repeatedly championed the land-buying scheme and his activists have camped on the TWI land in Wales. Writing in the neo-Nazi magazine Heritage and Destiny, Collett described TWI as 'a fantastic initiative that allows nationalists to pool their money in order to purchase land and property'. 'This is a long-term plan that will hopefully catch on and turn into the establishment of indigenous heartlands; places for our people,' he wrote. Dr William Allchorn, a senior research fellow at Anglia Ruskin University who is an expert on the British far-Right, said that buying land is part of a broader strategy for fascist groups. 'It's the idea of creating a separate white heartland or parallel society where they can be completely off grid,' he said. 'This is worrying because while these camps can look fairly innocuous they involve things like paramilitary training or training in martial arts.' Dr Allchorn said it was concerning that TWI appears to have 'progressed fairly far' and that it has parallels with groups in the United States, East Germany and South Africa where 'neo-Nazis have been buying up land in order to create white-exclusive towns or communities that live in the style of the Nazi past'. He said that British far-Right groups had previously 'flirted' with buying land but had largely been focussed on trying to enter electoral politics, but their focus has shifted since the pandemic. 'They view this as a key moment,' Dr Allchorn said. 'If they can find land or they can find a place to build this enclave, it fits neatly with the broader ideological vision which all far-Right groups are aiming towards, which is the erasure and exclusion of minorities and migrants.' Woodlander has purchased land near the village of Llanafan Fawr, in mid Wales, and recently bought three and a half acres of woodland near the village of Beckley, East Sussex. It is also planning to buy land near Alston, Cumbria, and advertised this to PA members in an attempt to raise cash to build 'villages' exclusively for white Britons. In a video posted earlier this month Birkett spoke of 'building a village' for TWI members and on its website TWI says its plan is to 'take back control of our land, our freedoms and our future' for 'British people as a distinct group comprising of the English, Welsh, Scots and Irish'.
Times
3 days ago
- Times
How lawbreaking councils are killing Britain's self-build dream
Do you dream of building your own home? Ten years ago, the law changed to be on your side. It was supposed to 'make it much easier' to find land with planning permission. But a decade on, research shows more than half of councils are breaking that law. Successive British governments have promised to make it more mainstream to commission your own house. This is how around 60 per cent of homes are built in Germany and France — compared with only 5 per cent of homes in England. The Self-build and Custom Housebuilding Act 2015 was meant to turn the tide. It gave anyone who wants to commission their own house in England the legal right to sign a register kept by their local council. Within three years, each council must grant planning permission for enough plots to meet this self-build demand. • Read more expert advice on property, interiors and home improvement Ten years after this became law, The Times analysed the latest housing ministry data to track progress. About 57 per cent of local councils in England failed to meet their legal duty to permit enough self-build plots. This includes 126 councils — 40 per cent of local authorities — that missed their self-build requirement by at least half. 'They are failing to meet their legal obligations. We can shout about it but it's up to the central government to rap them over the knuckles,' says Peter Johns, chief executive of the National Custom & Self Build Association (NaCSBA). Twenty-three councils have recorded no self-build permissions whatsoever in the decade since the law took effect. Almost 65,000 individuals and groups are now on self-build registers across England. However, the annual number of self-build plot permissions has halved since its 2019 high of over 10,000, down to 5,182 in the year to October 2023. 'We are not surprised,' Johns says, 'because so many of the councils have tried to bury [self-build registers]. Some have embraced it, some of them have taken it to their heart and are delivering. But all too many are not.' Amy and Derek Hopkins, with their daughters Lily, 8, and Poppy, 6, experienced this first-hand. The family fought a six-year planning battle to build their own home near Winchester, Hampshire, on land they bought in 2016. 'Building our own home had always been a dream. Many of Derek and I's 'date days' were spent visiting home-building exhibitions. So when we saw this land, it felt like a perfect opportunity,' says Amy, 39. Earlier this year, they won an appeal for three self-build plots. The Hopkins will build their own home on one of the plots, with an annexe for Amy's mother, and fund it by selling the two neighbouring plots with consent 'to other like-minded self-builders who want to create their own dream homes', she says. 'It's probably my favourite permission I've ever achieved,' says Andy Moger, of Tetlow King planning consultancy, which won the appeal for them. 'We had things like anonymous letters telling people how to object. We had hedgerows around the site, which hadn't been cut for years. You could hardly see the site. The week before the appeal hearing, they were all cut back.' • I built my own home by the seaside at the age of 87 Amy adds: 'What's ironic is that our only immediate neighbour, the only person who might actually be affected, had no objection whatsoever … The local objections really took a toll, especially because when we suggested meeting everyone at the local pub so they could ask us anything directly, no one came. They were making all these claims about us without ever having spoken to us once.' The Hopkins were among almost 400 families who had joined Winchester city council's self-build register by 2021. In March, an appeal ruling found the council had a 'substantial' shortfall of self-build permissions, which justified allowing the three new self-build homes even though they were just outside the village boundary. Increasingly, refusals for self-builds are overturned by planning appeals where councils have not allowed enough such homes — even in cases where other factors would normally 'kill a scheme', Moger says. Last year, about 46 self-build appeals were decided every month, up from 28 per month in 2019, an NaCSBA report found. But it is not a panacea. 'Appeals on large sites are more likely to win than for individual plots — by a lot. You are around five times more likely to win on a large site appeal … The small guy is being failed by the system, and government legislation and rules are failing to deliver the cut-through that is required,' the report says. Amy Hopkins adds: 'The current planning system needs a complete overhaul. Local councils often lack the knowledge and understanding of self and custom-build that is needed to make fair, well-informed decisions. In our case, figures around self-build were not accurately represented, and despite repeated efforts, no one was willing to investigate or correct them. Families like ours end up paying far more, financially and emotionally, and lose years of progress.' If you are applying for a self-build home, check whether your council is in breach of its self-build duty. Ask your council, under freedom of information law, for the number of entries on its self-build register and the number of such permissions granted for every year since 2016. Check these figures against housing ministry data on self-build registers. • We're building our own home for £320,000 — now it's worth twice that You should also submit a legal agreement with your planning application that binds you to live in the house. 'You need a solicitor to draw a very simple unilateral undertaking for you. It's really important that there is such a mechanism in place to secure it, otherwise it won't count as self-build,' Moger says. More than a third of local authorities have put obstacles in place that make it harder to join their self-build register. Housing ministry data shows 38 per cent of councils require that you meet a local connection test, while 21 per cent will charge you a fee to sign up. Twelve per cent have a financial test in which you must prove you have enough money to build. There is hope, though, as one in six councils (17 per cent) have adopted policies that require a percentage of self-build plots on large developments. This ensures more variety and choice in new homes. That is why a scheme of 121 homes by Barratt, Britain's biggest housebuilder, in the village of Charfield, on the edge of the Cotswolds, included six self-build plots. South Gloucestershire council requires that developers set aside at least 5 per cent of large sites for self-build. Sold for between £125,000 and £140,000, most of the plots went to young couples building their first homes. It 'debunk[ed] what we refer to as the Grand Designs problem, where people think that self-build is all about rich people who go way over budget', Johns says. Nationally, NaCSBA estimates there is now a pipeline of 40,000 plots for self-builders and those who commission a 'custom-build' home. However, there is no guarantee that all these plots will get built out by the people who will live in the homes. Most are on sites controlled by large developers, which may use them to build mainstream market homes instead. No financial support for self-builders is on the cards under the Labour government. The previous Conservative government launched a £150 million Help to Build scheme in 2022, modelled on the now abandoned Help to Buy loans that funded almost 400,000 new homes built by developers. Help to Build promised interest-free loans of up to 40 per cent to build your own home. Robert Jenrick, then the housing minister, said at the time that it would 'help the thousands of people who'd like to build their own home'. It did not pay out for a single house and is now withdrawn with no prospects for a replacement. Specialist self-build mortgages are available at interest rates from 5.5 per cent, for up to 95 per cent of the land and build cost — provided a plot has at least outline planning permission. • Barratt to build Passivhaus homes for the masses However, build costs have soared about 30 per cent since the pandemic, reckons Raymond Connor, chief executive of BuildStore, a self-build mortgage broker. The pace of increase has 'slowed down quite considerably', but costs remain much higher than pre-Covid. 'We're looking at from £2,000 to £2,200 a square metre of build cost, and that's not for high-end. That's a nice, reasonable build. A lot of people will voluntarily go higher than that,' Connor says. To make building your own home genuinely easier, NaCSBA has urged the government to give the self-build law more teeth, ensure self-build plots on large sites are built out as planned and gear the planning system to ensure the likely answer for small sites is 'yes'. 'If they can do this, we will all benefit,' its report says.
BBC News
4 days ago
- BBC News
Kilsby new-build plans rejected despite previous approval
Plans for homes to be built near a village have rejected despite having been previously December, West Northamptonshire Council had granted planning permission for 19 homes, including seven affordable properties, towards the western edge of after changes to part of Section 106 contributions - money from the developer for infrastructure - the Barby Road application went back to the planning committee and has now been than 230 objections were raised by members of the public against the plans, which were also not supported by the area's Conservative MP, Stuart Andrew. Following the decision in December, the plans were heard again in June but deferred for a site visit before appearing in front of members for a final time on Thursday, the Local Democracy Reporting Service Gidley from the Kilsby Action Group said the need for more houses in the village - which lies a few miles outside Rugby, Warwickshire - was a "fallacy" and called on members to reject the proposals as it was outside of the village on behalf of the applicant, Alasdair Avila-Thorne said it was "clearly evidenced" that there were insufficient sites within the village boundary to meet the identified local housing voted to refuse the plans on the basis that the development would be outside the village confines and did not meet the 'exceptional criteria' necessary to do also found that the proposal would result in the loss of open land, which would conflict with the character of Estates have up to six months to appeal the decision with the planning inspectorate. Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
