
U.S. political violence is landing on the doorstep now, with deadly effect
That's the assessment of analyst Riley McCabe, who helped compile a comprehensive report on that subject released in late 2024 by Washington think-tank the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
The shootings saw Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, killed by gunfire at their Brooklyn Park, Minn., home on June 13. Democratic state senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, somehow survived despite reportedly being shot several times each at their residence in a separate neighbourhood.
Vance Boelter, 57, charged with murder, attempted murder and stalking offences, allegedly texted his family "Dad went to war last night," per a federal criminal document. Several Democrats, even from outside the state, say police told them their names were found in the suspect's private writings.
While it's early days in the investigation, the Minnesota suspect may fit a phenomenon CSIS has increasingly tracked in the past decade, McCabe told CBC News, namely, "a partisan attack targeting the members of the opposite political party."
As well, unlike the high-profile shooting of Republican Steve Scalise almost exactly eight years to the day of the Hortman-Hoffman shootings, there haven't been uniform calls across the aisle for unity, or to rachet down demeaning language.
Man suspected of shooting 2 Minnesota lawmakers arrested after sweeping manhunt
3 days ago
Duration 4:40
More personal threats
Whereas a significant majority of attacks between 1991 and 2004 were inspired by general animus toward the federal government, CSIS reports, the inspiration has often become more individualized or specific in recent years.
Between 2016 to 2023, the think-tank documented 21 "terrorist attacks on public officials motivated by partisan political beliefs," as compared to just two over the previous two decades. Fortunately, the vast majority did not lead to death.
"In the last few years, elected officials have been receiving a much higher number of threats," Lilliana Mason, who co-authored the 2022 book, Radical American Partisanship: Mapping Violent Hostility, Its Causes, and the Consequences for Democracy.
"The Capitol Police report a larger number of threats to people in Congress, and judges are getting threatened more if they disagree with [President Donald] Trump."
And Democrats are not alone in being targets for violence. On the day Mason spoke to CBC, it was announced a Georgia man was being indicted for violent voicemail threats directed at Republican senators Ted Cruz and Deb Fischer.
Residential attacks
While the U.S. is outlier among G7 nations in terms of gun violence, it's important to stress the uniqueness of last week's attacks, even in American history.
Tennessee's Tommy Burks was, in 1998, the last state lawmaker specifically targeted in a political attack and killed. While South Carolina legislator Clementa Pinckney was killed in a 2015 mass shooting at a church, there was no indication the white supremacist gunman was motivated by his political function.
Federal politicians Scalise, and Democrat Gabrielle Giffords, forced to retire from U.S. Congress after a 2012 shooting, were attacked in public spaces. But the Minnesota shootings are part of a disturbing recent cluster of violence at residences.
Just this year, a man was charged with arson and other offences after a fire at the Pennsylvania governor's residence, while a former Republican candidate was convicted on an assortment of charges after hiring men who shot at the houses of New Mexico political rivals a few years ago.
Meanwhile, a 29-year-old will be sentenced later this year after travelling to Supreme Justice Brett Kavanaugh's street in Maryland in 2022. The armed Californian didn't commit violence, after spotting two federal marshals near Kavanaugh's residence.
Judges in high-profile cases have been doxxed via unsolicited pizza deliveries, while police have responded several times to a residence owned by Republican House member Marjorie Taylor Greene for swatting calls, once inadvertently causing another person's death.
Rhetoric matters
State or local public figures can't realistically afford the level of security provided to a Supreme Court justice, and even at the federal level there are limits to what can be done, Congress members in D.C. said this week. Former U.S. senator and business executive Mitt Romney once told a journalist he spent $5,000 out-of-pocket per day on security after the 2021 Capitol riot.
That makes the rhetoric of leaders very important, says Mason, who is also a political science professor at Johns Hopkins University. Since 2017, Mason and Nathan Kalmoe, associate professor of political communication in Louisiana State University, have conducted over a dozen surveys of between 1,000 and 3,000 Americans to probe views on political violence, in partnership with YouGov.
While Mason and Kalmoe stress there is little evidence that all but a very small slice of the population would commit a violent attack of a politicized nature, the surveys suggest a growing openness to the idea of political violence.
Mason and Kalmoe report that in their surveys, support for a statement that the opposing party is "downright evil" jumped from 40 to 59 per cent between 2017 and 2021. In early November 2020, 39 per cent of Democrats and 48 per cent of Republicans agreed that political violence might be justified if the opposing party was violent first, but by June 2024, the figures were 58 per cent of Democrats and 60 per cent of Republicans.
To contrast, in 1978-79 surveys conducted by two political scientists and later summarized in a book, only six per cent said violence was sometimes necessary to achieve a political goal.
Calming words from the right people could have a positive impact, even on the most passionate of partisans, the researchers say.
"We did an experiment where we just had people read one quote from either Joe Biden or Donald Trump that disavowed political violence, and even that one short little thing, people who read that were less approving of violence than people who didn't read anything," Mason told CBC.
'Ugly politics'
The universal condemnation and calls for comity seen after the Scalise shooting in 2017, sadly, no longer seem to occur, though the response this week from the MAGA right has arguably not reached the derision of 2022 when the likes of Donald Trump Jr. mocked the attack of Paul Pelosi in his San Francisco home. The Canadian attacker sought to confront Democrat Nancy Pelosi, who was in D.C., but viciously assaulted her husband.
Just hours after the Minnesota manhunt was made public, Utah Sen. Mike Lee and Elon Musk spread without evidence the theory that the suspect was from the "hard left" or "Marxist."
"A lot of what we see in the aftermath of these attacks is the attempt by both sides to push the perpetrator into the [other party's] camp, which I think is ugly politics, frankly," said McCabe, an associate fellow with the warfare, illegal threats and terrorism program at CSIS.
Lee was taken aside by Minnesota Sen. Tina Smith, who called several posts distasteful. Lee, with over 600,000 X followers, eventually took the posts down, but they were live for a couple of days.
Jon Stewart on The Daily Show was less circumspect in his language than Smith, taking Lee to task for "edgelord shitposting" at a time of tragedy.
'Why should I call him?'
While Trump called last weekend's attacks "horrendous" in a social media post, he doesn't appear to have reached out to state officials to emphasize support or express condolences.
"I think the governor of Minnesota is so whacked out. I'm not calling him. Why would I call him?" he said Tuesday.
Trump on Thursday continued his habit of using dehumanizing language — which in the past has included words like vermin, traitor, and treasonous — referring to former Biden White House officials as "scum."
Trump's combative approach remains unchanged even after the assassination attempt on his own life last year, with an arrest following weeks later of an armed man with known anti-Trump views. As well, Trump's first term saw a supporter of his sent pipe bombs — inoperable, fortunately — to the residences of several liberal or Democratic figures in 2018.
Joseph Thompson, acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota, said Monday he hoped the killings could at least be a "wake-up call to everyone that people can disagree with you without being evil," but part of that message isn't being received where it might matter the most.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
20 minutes ago
- CTV News
In rejecting U.S. jobs report, Trump follows his own playbook of discrediting unfavourable data
WASHINGTON — When the coronavirus surged during U.S. President Donald Trump's first term, he called for a simple fix: Limit the amount of testing so the deadly outbreak looked less severe. When he lost the 2020 election, he had a ready-made reason: The vote count was fraudulent. And on Friday, when the July jobs report revisions showed a distressed U.S. economy, Trump had an answer: He fired the official in charge of the data and called the report of a sharp slowdown in hiring 'phony.' Trump has a go-to playbook if the numbers reveal uncomfortable realities, and that's to discredit or conceal the figures and to attack the messenger — all of which can hurt the president's efforts to convince the world that America is getting stronger. 'Our democratic system and the strength of our private economy depend on the honest flow of information about our economy, our government and our society,' said Douglas Elmendorf, a Harvard University professor who was formerly director of the Congressional Budget Office. 'The Trump administration is trying to suppress honest analysis.' The president's strategy carries significant risks for his own administration and a broader economy that depends on politics-free data. His denouncements threaten to lower trust in government and erode public accountability, and any manipulation of federal data could result in policy choices made on faulty numbers, causing larger problems for both the president and the country. The White House disputes any claims that Trump wants to hide numbers that undermine his preferred narratives. It emphasized that Goldman Sachs found that the two-month revisions on the jobs report were the largest since 1968, outside of a recession, and that should be a source of concern regarding the integrity of the data. Trump's aides say their fundamental focus is ensuring that any data gives an accurate view of reality. Not the first time Trump has sought to play with numbers Trump has a long history of dismissing data when it reflects poorly on him and extolling or even fabricating more favorable numbers, a pattern that includes his net worth, his family business, election results and government figures: — Judge Arthur Engoron ruled in a lawsuit brought by the state of New York that Trump and his company deceived banks, insurers and others by massively overvaluing his assets and exaggerating his net worth on paperwork used in making deals and securing loans. — Trump has claimed that the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections were each rigged. Trump won the 2016 presidential election by clinching the Electoral College, but he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton, a sore spot that led him to falsely claim that millions of immigrants living in the country illegally had cast ballots. He lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden but falsely claimed he had won it, despite multiple lawsuits failing to prove his case. — In 2019, as Hurricane Dorian neared the East Coast, Trump warned Alabama that the storm was coming its way. Forecasters pushed back, saying Alabama was not at risk. Trump later displayed a map in the Oval Office that had been altered with a black Sharpie — his signature pen — to include Alabama in the potential path of the storm. — Trump's administration has stopped posting reports on climate change, canceled studies on vaccine access and removed data on gender identity from government sites. — As pandemic deaths mounted, Trump suggested that there should be less testing. 'When you do testing to that extent, you're going to find more people,' Trump said at a June 2020 rally in Oklahoma. 'You're going to find more cases. So I said to my people, 'Slow the testing down, please.'' While Trump's actions have drawn outcry from economists, scientists and public interest groups, Elmendorf noted that Trump's actions regarding economic data could be tempered by Congress, which could put limits on Trump by whom he chooses to lead federal agencies, for example. 'Outside observers can only do so much,' Elmendorf said. 'The power to push back against the president rests with the Congress. They have not exercised that power, but they could.' White House says having its own people in place will make data 'more reliable' Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, took aim at the size of the downward revisions in the jobs report (a combined 258,000 reduction in May and June) to suggest that the report had credibility issues. He said Trump is focused on getting dependable numbers, despite the president linking the issue to politics by claiming the revisions were meant to make Republicans look bad. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable,' Hassett said Sunday on NBC News. Jed Kolko, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics who oversaw the Census Bureau and Bureau of Economic Analysis during the Biden administration, stressed that revisions to the jobs data are standard. That's because the numbers are published monthly, but not all surveys used are returned quickly enough to be in the initial publishing of the jobs report. 'Revisions solve the tension between timeliness and accuracy,' Kolko said. 'We want timely data because policymakers and businesses and investors need to make decisions with the best data that's available, but we also want accuracy.' Kolko stressed the importance in ensuring that federal statistics are trustworthy not just for government policymakers but for the companies trying to gauge the overall direction of the economy when making hiring and investment choices. 'Businesses are less likely to make investments if they can't trust data about how the economy is doing,' he said. Not every part of the jobs report was deemed suspect by the Trump administration. Before Trump ordered the firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, the White House rapid response social media account reposted a statement by Vice President JD Vance noting that native-born citizens were getting jobs and immigrants were not, drawing from data in the household tables in the jobs report. Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer also trumpeted the findings on native-born citizens, noting on Fox Business Network's 'Varney & Co.' that they are accounting 'for all of the job growth, and that's key.' During his first run for the presidency, Trump criticized the economic data as being fake only to fully embrace the positive numbers shortly after he first entered the White House in 2017. White House says transparency is a value The challenge of reliable data goes beyond economic figures to basic information on climate change and scientific research. In July, taxpayer-funded reports on the problems climate change is creating for America and its population disappeared from government websites. The White House initially said NASA would post the reports in compliance with a 1990 law, but the agency later said it would not because any legal obligations were already met by having reports submitted to Congress. The White House maintains that it has operated with complete openness, posting a picture of Trump on Monday on social media with the caption, 'The Most Transparent President in History.' In the picture, Trump had his back to the camera and was covered in shadows, visibly blocking out most of the light in front of him. ___ Associated Press writer Michelle Price in Washington contributed to this report. Josh Boak, The Associated Press


CTV News
20 minutes ago
- CTV News
Tennessee readies for execution of man with working implanted defibrillator
This undated booking photo provided by the Tennessee Department of Corrections shows Byron Black. (Tennessee Department of Corrections via AP, File) NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Tennessee is gearing up for an execution on Tuesday that experts say would likely mark the first time a man has been put to death with a working defibrillator in his chest. Gov. Bill Lee declined Monday to grant a reprieve, clearing the way for Byron Black's execution after a legal battle and ongoing uncertainty about whether the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator will shock his heart when the lethal drug takes effect. The nonprofit Death Penalty Information Center said it's unaware of any other cases in which a person on death row made similar claims to Black's about defibrillators or pacemakers. Black's attorneys said they haven't found a comparable case, either. Lee said the courts have 'universally determined that it is lawful to carry out the jury's sentence of execution given to Mr. Black for the heinous murders of Angela Clay and her daughters Lakeisha, age 6, and Latoya, age 9.' The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected Black's appeals. The execution would be Tennessee's second since May, after a pause for five years, first because of COVID-19 and then because of missteps by state corrections officials. Twenty-seven men have died by court-ordered execution so far this year in the U.S., and nine other people are scheduled to be put to death in seven states during the remainder of 2025. The number of executions this year exceeds the 25 carried out last year and in 2018. It is the highest total since 2015, when 28 people were put to death. Black's condition Black, 69, is in a wheelchair, and he has dementia, brain damage, kidney failure, congestive heart failure and other conditions, his attorneys have said. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator he has is a small, battery-powered electronic device that is surgically implanted in the chest. It serves as a pacemaker and an emergency defibrillator. Black's attorneys say in order to be sure it's off, a doctor must place a programming device over the implant site, sending it a deactivation command, with no surgery required. In mid-July, a trial court judge agreed with Black's attorneys that officials must have his device deactivated to avert the risk that it could cause unnecessary pain and prolong the execution. But the state Supreme Court intervened July 31 to overturn that decision, saying the other judge lacked the authority to order the change. The state has disputed that the lethal injection would cause Black's defibrillator to shock him. Even if shocks were triggered, Black wouldn't feel them, the state said. Black's attorneys have countered that even if the lethal drug being used, pentobarbital, renders someone unresponsive, they aren't necessarily unaware or unable to feel pain. Kelley Henry, Black's attorney, said the execution could become a 'grotesque spectacle.' The legal case also spurred a reminder that most medical professionals consider participation in executions a violation of health care ethics. Black's case Black was convicted in the 1988 shooting deaths of his girlfriend Angela Clay, 29, and her two daughters. Prosecutors said he was in a jealous rage when he shot the three at their home. At the time, Black was on work-release while serving time for shooting Clay's estranged husband. Linette Bell, whose sister and two nieces were killed, recently told WKRN-TV: 'He didn't have mercy on them, so why should we have mercy on him?' Intellectual disability claim In recent years, Black's legal team has unsuccessfully tried to get a new hearing over whether he is intellectually disabled and ineligible for the death penalty under U.S. Supreme Court precedent. His attorneys have said that if they had delayed a prior attempt to seek his intellectual disability claim, he would have been spared under a 2021 state law. Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk contended in 2022 that Black is intellectually disabled and deserved a hearing under that 2021 law, but the judge denied it. That is because the 2021 law denies a hearing to people on death row who have already filed a similar request and a court has ruled on it 'on the merits.' In Funk's attempt, he focused on input from an expert for the state in 2004 who determined back then that Black didn't meet the criteria for what was then called 'mental retardation.' But she concluded that Black met the new law's criteria for a diagnosis of intellectual disability. Black also sought a determination by the courts that he is incompetent to be executed. Jonathan Mattise, The Associated Press


CTV News
44 minutes ago
- CTV News
One person dead, four others injured in head-on crash on Highway 48
Video One person dead, four others injured in head-on crash on Highway 48 near Aurora, and police are asking anyone with dashcam video to come forward.