The Irish Times view on the State selling out of AIB: competition in banking is now the issue
The State's
long withdrawal from the banking sector
after the post-crash bail-outs has reached another milestone, with
the sale of its remaining shareholding in AIB.
Warrants, which give the State the right to buy some shares, are now likely to be effectively bought out by the bank. AIB will finally return completely to private hands.
The direct financial cost to the State of the AIB bail-out was €20.8 billion and – including the cash for the warrants – the total amount returned over the years to the exchequer is likely to fall around €700 million short of this.
While the return of the bulk of the funds is welcome, the total costs of the banking collapse to the State were, of course, much greater than the cash cost of bailing out these institutions. The banks were not solely responsible for the financial crash, but they were an important part of it. The tighter regulation, restructurings and restrictions on executive pay that followed were entirely appropriate. So was the bank levy, which should remain.
With the pay cap in Bank of Ireland now lifted after its return to private ownership – even if a limit on bonuses remains in place – it was inevitable that the same would happen at AIB. In this context, there seemed little point in maintaining the pay cap at Permanent TSB, where the State still holds a 67 per cent stake.
READ MORE
With the two main banks now in private hands, State policy needs to focus not only on regulation but also on encouraging competition. As well as the financial and economic costs, the crash also led to the departure of a number of banks from Ireland – most notably Ulster Bank – severely limiting competition in many parts of the market, to the disadvantage of consumers.
New entrants have provided competition in some areas, but often on a limited scale. The soaring profitability of the banks reflects not only the strength of the economy, but also their large market share. Their large deposit books remain a competitive asset. The more recent entrants to the market are welcome, but more is needed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
37 minutes ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on UK politics: budget trouble for the Labour government
Last July, Keir Starmer may have secured a victory in the UK general election on a scale comparable to what Tony Blair achieved with New Labour in 1997, but that is where the similarities end. Blair inherited a growing economy and a benign global backdrop, which ensured an extended honeymoon period for his party. Starmer took on an economy that was already struggling due to the fall-out from Brexit and a highly uncertain global backdrop. This meant the briefest of honeymoon periods. In last October's budget, Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, raised £40 billion in taxes, mainly through a £25 billion rise in employers' national insurance and hikes in capital gains and inheritance taxes. Her critics warned that these measures would weigh on growth. If there is one thing that the UK needs, it is growth. However, next October's budget is shaping up to be even more contentious. Earlier this month, Reeves unveiled £300 billion in spending increases to cover the remainder of the parliamentary term to 2029. She claimed that will be fully funded based on current growth levels, which would obviate the need for further tax rises, particularly on working people. But this is looking increasingly unlikely and pressure is building ahead of the October budget. READ MORE Starmer has caved in to pressure from 120 rebel Labour MPs who had vowed to vote against the Welfare Reform Bill in parliament this week. The Bill had aimed to save £5 billion annually through changes to disability and sickness-related benefit payments, but the cuts will now only apply to new applicants. This means limited savings, meaning cash will have to be found elsewhere. It had been assumed that the size of the Labour party's win would give it at least two terms in government, but this is no longer a certainty. The biggest beneficiary of its woes has been Nigel Farage's Reform Party with its uncosted populist policies. A prolonged period of political instability looks likely, which will have much wider consequences, particularly for Ireland.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Nato's new defence spending commitment aims to reverse decades of military decline
In cash terms, The Hague Defence Commitment, as it's to be known, agreed last week , will add roughly $1 trillion a year to the common defence of the Nato military alliance, according to US president Donald Trump . But cash alone is never enough. As critical in military terms are the new capability targets the deal will activate, triggering increased cross-border standardisation, improved technical co-operation and more operational integration, aimed at readying the West for war with Russia within five years. On Trump's insistence, the European alliance members plus Canada agreed to increase their defence budgets from the current 2 per cent to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 – 3.5 per cent on 'hard military spending' and another 1.5 per cent on related civil costs such as infrastructure and cybersecurity. That's why, as the 32 leaders who comprise Nato's decision-making North Atlantic Council were doing their best not to fall out with Trump over the spike in cost, behind the scenes the military planners who assess risk were calculating what strategic difference the extra trillion will make. READ MORE With military efficiency, a 10-page briefing, ' Future-proofing Nato's industrial capacity: how the decisions at the summit will strengthen the allied defence industry ', was circulated in the summit's closing hours, underpinning the imperative to reverse '60 years of progressive decline' in spending. Although the alliance was set up in 1949 as a post-second World War collective security network, it's worth remembering that with the end of the cold war, however, many of the allies switched their spending away from defence to modernising their societies, in what became known as 'the peace dividend'. [ Hostile actions 'are real and accelerating': is Russia already at war with the West? Opens in new window ] Consequently, faced with rapidly diminishing activity, defence companies on both sides of the Atlantic underwent a series of mergers and acquisitions, leading to consolidation in the defence sector. The 51 significant defence manufacturers that remained at the end of the cold war merged into 'the big five' – Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, RTX and Northrop Grumman. Here, European multinationals such as Airbus and missile systems developer, MBDA, emerged. Everything changed, however, in February 2022 with Russia's 'full-scale and brutal invasion of Ukraine', which reminded the allies that 'although the Euro-Atlantic area is not at war, it is not at peace either'. The reality, maintains Germany's chief of defence, Gen Carsten Breuer, is that a full-scale attack on a Nato member is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Moscow, he says, has been producing at least 1,500 battle tanks a year, with a significant build-up of missiles, artillery shells and drones as well, not all of which are earmarked for the war in Ukraine . His assessment, shared by other military experts in the region, goes as far as to conclude that the 'most vulnerable' area for an attack would be the Suwalki Gap, a largely unpopulated corridor in northeast Poland where Poland meets Lithuania, Belarus and Russia. The military experts' briefings to their political leaders have been uncompromising. 'Individually, all of them understand the urgency of the threat that is approaching Nato', says Gen Breuer, who adds he believes Russia could attack by 2029. [ If Russia is indeed planning an attack against a Nato state, distance and neutrality will provide no defence Opens in new window ] Given that threat, Nato's new capability targets involve co-investment, co-development and co-production to make the alliance 'more lethal' as secretary general Mark Rutte put it. And that collaboration will by global – reaching far beyond its 32 member states. Nato's four Indo-Pacific partners – Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea, known as the IP4 – will be critical to that 'enhanced co-operation'. So too will its partnership with the EU, where the political and cultural links are already close and often overlapping. The aim overall is achieving a 'new coherence' in dealing with a familiar enemy. [ The Irish Times view on international politics: law of the jungle taking hold Opens in new window ]
Irish Times
15 hours ago
- Irish Times
Is it worth my while to give half my inheritance to my husband to avoid tax?
I just want to confirm my understanding of the position around deed of variation/family arrangement with wills in Ireland. I am due to inherit €30,000 from my brother-in-law and I am wondering if it is worth my while to gift my husband half, in order to avoid tax ? Ms C.L. When someone draws up a will, they generally have two things in mind. First, they want to take care of those closest and dearest to them; second, they want to minimise how much of their estate gets taken in tax. READ MORE There's an industry of lawyers and tax advisers making a very good living servicing this demand – as evidenced by last week's article about wealthy individuals in Ireland buying farmland to avail of an inheritance tax loophole while it lasts. This can be a game of cat and mouse. New reliefs are introduced, advisers notice they can be used entirely legitimately but not in the way the Government originally intended to benefit their (generally) wealthy clients and, over time, amendments are brought in to try to restore the measure to its original purpose. But what you are talking about is a much longer established structure called a deed of variation, otherwise known as a deed of family arrangement. Anyone who has been in the UK might be more familiar with it as, in that jurisdiction, it can be a very useful way of effectively rewriting someone's will – at least in relation to any inheritance you are in line to receive – to take account of changed circumstances, such as the arrival of children, grandchildren or in-laws since the will was originally drafted. It can also be used in intestacy where the absence of a will might mean, for instance, that a cohabiting partner could otherwise be left with nothing. [ Wills and spouses: Why you cannot just cut a wife out of your will Opens in new window ] In the UK, such a deed of variation must be in writing and must be signed within two years of the original benefactor dying. One of the advantages is that rather than being seen as you inheriting and then passing some of that benefit onwards, the benefit you allocate to anyone else under such a deed is considered as coming to them directly from the person who has died. So what does that mean for you? Well, while there is a lot of similarity between the law here and in the UK due to our shared heritage, there are some significant differences too, not least in relation to inheritance. For instance, while, in the UK, the tax liability is on the estate of the dead person, in Ireland, the liability rests with the individual beneficiaries depending on the amount involved and the beneficiary's relationship with the dead person. In-laws are considered as 'strangers' in terms of inheritance. As such, they come under the lowest category C tax-free threshold And there is a key difference of approach also when it comes to deeds of variation. While there is nothing stopping you exercising a deed of variation to gift your husband half of what you are inheriting from your brother-in-law, it will have no impact on your tax liability. In Ireland, as Revenue has confirmed for me, as far as liability for Capital Acquisitions Tax (CAT or inheritance tax) is concerned, you will be considered to have taken the full €30,000 inheritance from your brother-in-law with your husband being seen as taking a subsequent €15,000 gift from you. Now, in practical terms, that raises no tax bill for your husband as gifts and inheritances between spouses are exempt from inheritance. But it could have tax implications for the recipient of your largesse if you were looking to have a friend benefit, for instance. And it does mean you will face a tax bill. In-laws are considered as 'strangers' in terms of inheritance. As such, they come under the lowest category C tax-free threshold – currently €20,000. So you will face a 33 per cent tax bill on at least €10,000 of this inheritance – €3,300. It could be more if, as would not be unusual, you previously received an inheritance – or, indeed a gift of more than €3,000 in one year – from a friend, in-law, cousin or more distant relation. They all come under category C and that €20,000 tax-free limit is a lifetime one extending back to cover any inheritance or large gift received since December 5th, 1991. That leaves you with two choices: you can accept the inheritance and pay the tax due on anything over your tax-free threshold, or you can disclaim the inheritance. However, that second option is an all or nothing one. You cannot just disclaim €10,000 of the €30,000 so that you stay within your tax-free limit. You will be giving all of it up. Nor have you any right, if you disclaim, to influence where the inheritance goes. That will be determined by the wording of the will. The money would most likely go to other beneficiaries under a residuary clause – a clause governing the distribution of any assets not specifically allocated to any person or institution. The bottom line is that, if the intention is to reduce your tax bill, a deed of variation will not do it and, of course, you will have incurred legal costs in getting advice on and drawing up any such deed. Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street Dublin 2, or by email to with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice
