'Far-seeing' lens needed for progress in India-China ties, says EAM Jaishankar
Jaishankar, who met Wang in Beijing after arriving in China to attend a meeting of foreign ministers of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), reiterated that stable bilateral ties can be built only on the basis of mutual respect, mutual interest and mutual sensitivity.
'We have made good progress in the past nine months for the normalisation of our bilateral relations. It is a result of the resolution of friction along the border and our ability to maintain peace and tranquillity there,' Jaishankar said in televised opening remarks during the meeting with Wang.
'This is the fundamental basis for mutual strategic trust and for smooth development of bilateral relations. It is now incumbent on us to address other aspects related to the border, including de-escalation...our bilateral relationship requires that we take a far-seeing approach to our ties,' he said.
In an apparent reference to Pakistan's support for cross-border terrorism, Jaishankar told Wang that India hopes 'zero tolerance for terrorism' will be upheld at the meeting of the SCO, whose main mandate is fighting terrorism and extremism.
Earlier, Jaishankar met Chinese vice president Han Zheng and told him the continued normalisation of bilateral ties can lead to mutually beneficial outcomes.
This is Jaishankar's first visit to China since ties were hit by border skirmishes in April-May 2020, though he has met Wang on the margins of multilateral events several times since the two sides reached an understanding on ending a face-off along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) last October.
While the two sides withdrew frontline forces from the two remaining 'friction points' of Demchok and Depsang along the LAC last year, the process of de-escalation and pulling back troops to peace-time positions is yet to be completed.
Jaishankar noted there were various dimensions to relations between major economies such as India and China and said that the normalising of people-to-people exchanges can foster mutually beneficial cooperation. 'It is also essential in this context that restrictive trade measures and roadblocks are avoided,' he said without giving details.
He was apparently referring to China's curbs on exports of rare earth minerals – used in everything from smartphones to electric vehicles and in many of which Beijing has a near monopoly - and fertilisers. The restrictions on rare earth exports have been officially raised through diplomatic channels by India, especially in view of the impact on manufacturers of electric vehicles.
Jaishankar said stable and constructive ties between India and China, which will benefit the two countries and the world, can be built by 'handling relations on the basis of mutual respect, mutual interest and mutual sensitivity'.
He added, 'We have also earlier agreed that differences should not become disputes, nor should competition ever become conflict. On this foundation, we can now continue to develop our ties along a positive trajectory.'
Referring to the SCO foreign ministers' meeting on Tuesday, Jaishankar pointed out that the nine-member bloc's primary mandate is to combat terrorism, separatism and extremism. 'This is a shared concern and India hopes that zero tolerance for terrorism will be strongly upheld,' he said.
Jaishankar's remarks assume significance as a recent meeting of SCO defence ministers couldn't adopt a joint communique after Pakistan objected to a reference to the Pahalgam terror attack in the document. Indian defence minister Rajnath Singh refused to endorse the communique.
Pakistan was also backed by China during four days of hostilities with India in May, triggered by Operation Sindoor that was launched by New Delhi to target terror infrastructure on territories controlled by Islamabad.
The relationship between India and China has been 'gradually moving in a positive direction' since Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping met in the Russian city of Kazan in October 2024. 'Our responsibility is to maintain that momentum,' he told Wang.
Recent meetings at international events offered opportunities for strategic communication, and Jaishankar said India expects that this process will now become regular and take place in each other's countries.
India and China are also marking the 75th year of diplomatic relations, and New Delhi appreciates the resumption of the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra after a gap of five years, Jaishankar said, thanking the Chinese side for its cooperation on the pilgrimage to a holy mountain and a lake in Tibet.
A readout from the external affairs ministry described the talks between Jaishankar and Wang as 'constructive and forward-looking' and said the two sides agreed to take 'additional practical steps', including travel to each other's country and direct flight connectivity, to facilitate people-to-people exchanges.
Jaishankar underlined the need for cooperation on trans-border rivers, including resumption of the provision of hydrological data by the Chinese side, the readout said.
Wang said that at a time when 'unilateral protectionism and bullying by powerful countries' have created severe challenges for the world, India and China should seek long-term strategies and find a way for the two sides to 'get along with...mutual respect and trust, peaceful coexistence [and] common development'.
China is willing to strengthen communication and coordination with India to 'jointly safeguard the multilateral trading system, the stability of the global production and supply chain, and the international environment of openness and cooperation', Wang said, according to a statement from China's foreign ministry.
The two sides can also work together to safeguard the common interests of the Global South and promote regional peace, stability, development and prosperity, he said.
At his meeting with vice president Han, Jaishankar said bilateral relations were 'steadily improving' since the meeting between Modi and Xi in Kazan last October. 'Continued normalisation of our ties can produce mutually beneficial outcomes,' Jaishankar said, adding that his discussions during this visit will maintain the 'positive trajectory' in the relationship.
China's state-run Xinhua news agency quoted Han as saying that China and India, as important members of the Global South, should be 'partners contributing to each other's success'. Han said both sides should steadily advance pragmatic cooperation, respect each other's concerns, and promote the sustained and stable development of bilateral relations.
India and China reached an understanding last October to end the four-year military standoff in Ladakh sector of LAC. Two days after the understanding, Modi and Xi met in Russia and agreed to revive several mechanisms to normalise bilateral ties and to address the long-standing border dispute. Since then, there have been several meetings between the foreign and defence ministers and NSAs of the two countries.
Bilateral relations dipped to their lowest point in six decades after deadly clashes in the Galwan Valley in June 2020 killed 20 Indian soldiers and an unspecified number of Chinese troops.
However, ahead of Jaishankar's visit, the spokesperson of the Chinese embassy in New Delhi said on Sunday that Tibet-related issues such as the Dalai Lama's reincarnation are a 'thorn' in bilateral ties. The spokesperson's remarks came in the wake of the Dalai Lama's announcement that only a trust set up by him can recognise his reincarnation. Beijing has insisted that the Dalai Lama's successor must be approved by the Chinese government, while New Delhi has said it doesn't take any position on matters concerning religious practices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
American Firms Flag Hit From US Export Controls Targeting China: Report
More than a third of US companies surveyed by a US-China business group reported "negative effects" from Washington's export control policies, said a report released Wednesday, while flaring tensions and tariffs are chief among concerns. The survey, conducted between March and May, came as President Donald Trump unveiled tariffs on allies and competitors alike, with especially steep rates on Chinese products. This has fueled uncertainty as companies try to adjust supply chains, such as by diversifying away from China or deepening localization. "While 82 percent of companies reported profits in 2024, fewer than half are optimistic about the future, reflecting concerns over tariffs, deflation, and policy uncertainty," said the US-China Business Council (USCBC) in its 2025 member survey. About 40 percent of firms surveyed reported "negative effects from US export control policies," the report said, noting the rise in this proportion signals export curbs are impacting firms beyond the semiconductor industry. Companies cited issues such as lost sales to international or Chinese competitors, severed customer ties and reputational damage in China "due to the intensifying perception that US firms are unreliable suppliers," the report said. The USCBC warned of Chinese tech firms' growing capabilities eroding the competitiveness of US businesses over time. But despite challenges, "the ability to operate in China's fiercely competitive market remains non-negotiable for American companies," USCBC President Sean Stein said. Nearly all firms said they cannot remain globally competitive without their China operations. Meanwhile, companies continue to report declining market share as Beijing's industrial policies boost domestic firms, the survey said. "32 percent of companies reported losing market share in China over the last three years, while nearly 70 percent are concerned about losing market share in the next five years," the council said. The USCBC represents some 270 American companies that do business with China. This year's survey involved a pool of 130 member firms.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
"Peaceful Purposes": China Sides With 'Nuclear Iran', Slams Trump-Netanyahu's 'Bullying'
/ Jul 17, 2025, 01:01AM IST China vowed full support to Iran's sovereignty and right to enrich uranium for peaceful use. At the SCO summit, Beijing blasted U.S. 'bullying' and pledged deeper military-economic ties. The move cements Iran's alignment with China post-Israel conflict and U.S. strikes.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Rethinking the reinforced one-front war concept
Indian strategists have long worried about the deepening security partnership between China and Pakistan. The bilateral relationship today extends well beyond arms sales to include diplomatic shielding, intelligence sharing, and even elements of tactical integration. Some observers, however, suggest a more diabolical possibility: the threat of a 'reinforced one-front war'— a scenario in which India would face Pakistan and China fighting together on a single front. Proponents of this view imagine a deeper military integration, with Pakistan benefiting directly from Chinese technology, intelligence, security assets, and even military personnel. When the balloon goes up, they warn, China would act as a strategic enabler on India's western front, turning Pakistan's challenge into a more formidable, integrated threat. The argument seems almost a truism at first glance. China's support for Pakistan is undoubtedly real, sustained, and strategically motivated. Even so, describing it as a 'reinforced one-front war' risks overstating the degree of operational integration in ways that misread Beijing's intentions and distort India's own strategic calculus. At the very least, it calls for a dispassionate assessment of the facts. Not one front Let us start with the undeniable. China has become Pakistan's principal arms supplier, providing everything from advanced drones to missile systems, naval vessels, and ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) platforms. China's BeiDou satellite navigation system supports Pakistani missile targeting. During moments of crisis — such as the Balakot strikes and Operation Swift Retort — Beijing has offered diplomatic cover, blocking UN sanctions and tempering the international fallout. China ensures Pakistan remains a capable military adversary, able to field modern platforms and fight on more equal terms with India, despite economic constraints. Chinese weapons lock Pakistan into a client-supplier relationship that deepens Beijing's political influence in Islamabad. Worrying as these developments are, they do not readily lend themselves to the notion of a single, integrated military front. Arms transfers — even at scale — are not the same as a shared war plan. India itself is a major buyer of Russian, Israeli, American, and French military systems. Nobody claims India is fighting America's or Russia's wars by proxy. India has even begun exporting weapons — such as BrahMos missiles to the Philippines — without any suggestion from Beijing that Manila is fighting an Indian war against China. Likewise, Azerbaijan does not accuse India of forming an integrated front with Armenia, despite significant Indian arms sales in recent years. Similarly, advanced sales — such as China's potential supply of J-35 stealth fighters to Pakistan, or India's exploration of Russia's Su-57 — do not imply joint war planning or a unified front. China may have provided direct military support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, even monitoring the performance of its weapons systems in Pakistani use, as Indian military officials recently stated. However, monitoring is standard practice for arms suppliers. The U.S., Russia, Israel, and France all routinely do this, and India itself will understandably be interested in how the BrahMos missile performs in the Philippines. Some might argue that this is a false equivalence — that the China–Pakistan strategic partnership is by no measure comparable to the relationship between India and the Philippines. This does not detract from the principal issue: monitoring and even limited intelligence sharing are typical of arms sales relationships. But they are not evidence of a single, unified war front with joint command or shared operational planning. What many alarmist narratives often gloss over is that China and Pakistan have very different strategic interests vis-à-vis India. For Pakistan, the military contest with India is existential — a constant, defining rivalry. For China, India is a regional competitor to be managed and contained, but not an existential enemy. Beijing's principal strategic focus remains the U.S. While China has much to gain from an India tied down on its western border, Beijing's preferred denouement is an India that is cautious, preoccupied, and wary of escalation. That is precisely why China might be careful about escalation itself. This caution is evident in the absence of any commitment to join Pakistan in a full-scale war with India. Indeed, no joint commands exist; no integrated operational planning has been demonstrated. China-Pakistan military exercises, while symbolically important, fall short of the combined-force planning seen in alliances such as NATO or even U.S.-South Korea. Challenges for India This is not to deny the challenge of China-Pakistan collusion altogether. Their defence partnership does complicate India's security environment, increasing the costs of military preparedness and the demand for sophisticated countermeasures from air defence to ISR and precision strike capabilities. Even so, framing the threat as a single 'reinforced one-front war' risks misunderstanding. It imagines a level of operational integration that does not exist, encouraging Indian planners to over-invest in blunt, worst-case military postures that may be unaffordable or strategically rigid. It also underplays opportunities for diplomatic management with China, further shrinking India's options. Beijing may shield Pakistan diplomatically and arm it militarily, but it also has an interest in limiting escalation that could trigger nuclear thresholds or force Chinese military intervention. That is a lever India can look to exploit. Overstating China's willingness to fight India directly on Pakistan's behalf risks creating a self-fulfilling prophecy in which all crisis management is abandoned in favour of maximalist, binary threat perceptions. However serious the China–Pakistan nexus may appear, Indian planners ought to avoid turning prudent concern into simplistic formulations. Instead of declaring the threat a single, unified front, Indian analysts must see it for what it is: a complex, asymmetric partnership in which China equips Pakistan to be a tougher local rival without assuming the costs and risks of fighting India itself. That is the harsh strategic truth. Planning for it requires clear-eyed analysis, not rhetorical overreach. Abhijit Singh is a retired naval officer and former head of maritime policy at ORF, New Delhi
